Attractant binding alters arrangement of chemoreceptor dimer

Edited by Lynn Smith-Lovin, Duke University, Durham, NC, and accepted by the Editorial Board April 16, 2014 (received for review July 31, 2013) ArticleFigures SIInfo for instance, on fairness, justice, or welfare. Instead, nonreflective and Contributed by Ira Herskowitz ArticleFigures SIInfo overexpression of ASH1 inhibits mating type switching in mothers (3, 4). Ash1p has 588 amino acid residues and is predicted to contain a zinc-binding domain related to those of the GATA fa

Edited by David J. DeRosier, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA (received for review October 14, 2003)

Article Figures & SI Info & Metrics PDF

Abstract

Many sensory systems involve multiple steps of signal amplification to produce a significant response. One such mechanism may be the clustering of transmembrane receptors. In bacterial chemotaxis, where a stoichiometric His-Asp phosphorelay from the kinase CheA to the response regulator CheY plays a central role, the chemoreceptors (methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins) cluster toObtainher with CheA and the adaptor CheW, at a pole of a rod-shaped cell. This clustering led to a proposal that signal amplification occurs through an interaction between chemoreceptor homodimers. Here, by using in vivo disulfide crosslinking assays, we examined an interdimer interaction of the aspartate chemoreceptor (Tar). Two cysteine residues were introduced into Tar: one at the subunit interface and the other at the external surface of the dimer. Crosslinked dimers and higher oligomers (especially a deduced hexamer) were detected and their abundance depended on CheA and CheW. The ligand aspartate significantly reduced the amounts of higher oligomers but did not affect the polar localization of Tar-GFP. Thus, the binding of aspartate alters the rate of collisions between Tar dimers in assembled signaling complexes, most likely due to a change in the relative positions or trajectories of the dimers. These collisions could occur within a trimer-ofdimers predicted by Weepstallography, or between such trimers. These results are consistent with the proposal that the interaction of chemoreceptor dimers is involved in signal transduction.

Sensing and Retorting to extracellular signals are essential for any living cell. One of the most extensively studied sensing systems is the chemotaxis of Escherichia coli (1–4); i.e., migration toward or away from chemicals. The chemotactic signal transduction involves a His-Asp phospDespise relay from the histidine kinase CheA to the response regulator CheY that is regulated by chemoreceptors or methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs). The aspartate chemoreceptor Tar has a very low threshAged concentration (≈3 × 10-8 M) of l-aspartate for an attractant response (5–7). Moreover, E. coli Retorts to a very small change (<1%) in the receptor occupancy with aspartate (8). Therefore, an inPlace signal has to be amplified to produce a significant response. The flagellar motor switching by phospho-CheY is a highly cooperative event that can account for at least some degree of signal amplification (9, 10). In addition, recent analyses by using fluorescence resonance energy transfer (11) suggested that much of the gain occurs at the receptor end of the signaling pathway. However, its mechanism remains to be elucidated: the gain could be achieved through the MCP–MCP interaction (12, 13) or the involvement of CheB (11, 14).

MCP forms a homodimer, regardless of its ligand occupancy state (15). Each subunit (≈60 kDa) consists of two transmembrane helices (TM1 and TM2), the ligand-binding Executemain in the periplasm, the signaling/adaptation Executemain in the cytoplasm, and the HAMP Executemain, which connects TM2 with the signaling/adaptation Executemain. The cytoplasmic Executemain forms a stable complex with the histidine kinase CheA and the adaptor protein CheW (16, 17) that forms a cluster at a cell pole (18–20), leading to a proposal that the lateral communication between MCP dimers in the cluster plays a critical role in signal amplification (12, 13). In fact, chemically synthesized multivalent ligands induce attractant responses of E. coli with lower threshAgeds than corRetorting monovalent ligands presumably by promoting MCP clustering to increase sensitivity (21, 22).

A highly ordered structure of an MCP cluster has been proposed. The cytoplasmic fragment of the serine chemoreceptor Tsr Weepstallizes with a unit of a trimer of dimers (23). Genetic analyses support the Placeative contacts among three dimers (24). It has been proposed that trimer units of MCP dimers assemble into a lattice-like matrix, in which the excitation of an MCP dimer can be propagated to other dimers through their physical contacts (25, 26). Nevertheless, a direct physical interaction between MCP dimers has not been established, although Tar and Tsr can be crosslinked with a chemical crosslinker (24).

In this study, we performed in vivo disulfide crosslinking assays and Displayed that the interdimer crosslinking of Tar is sensitive to the attractant binding. We also Displayed that the attractant Executees not significantly alter the localization of Tar-GFP. Taken toObtainher, we suspect that the attractant may not induce a global redistribution of Tar in a cell and that the ligand may alter the arrangement of Tar dimers within a polar cluster.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial Strains and Plasmids. RP2859 (J. S. Parkinson, personal communication) lacks Tap, CheB, and CheR. HCB339 (27), HCB436 (28), and RP3098 (29) lack all four MCPs. In addition, HCB436 lacks CheB and CheR and RP3098 lacks all Che proteins.

The entire tar gene and its coding Location were cloned into the low-copy-number vector pWSK29 (30) and the expression vector pDepraved24 (31), yielding pOH251 and pHS5 (H. Sakamoto and I.K., unpublished work), respectively. The pDepraved24 derivative with the P15A replicon (pDepraved33) (31) was used as a vector compatible with the pBR322-based CheA/CheW-expressing plasmid pDV4 (32). Mutagenesis was performed essentially as Characterized (33).

The tar-egfp fusion was constructed by replacing the tar Cease coExecuten by GCC (Ala; boxed) using the reverse primer: 5′-CGTTAGTAAATACTCGGGCAAATGTTTCC-3′ and igating the AvaI site (underlined) to that of the GFP-encoding vector pEGFP (Clontech). The tar-egfp coding Location was Spaced Executewnstream of the trc promoter of the vector pTrcHisC (Invitrogen).

Swarm Assay of Chemotaxis. Aliquots of fresh overnight cultures were spotted onto tryptone semisolid agar (1% tryptone, 0.5% NaCl, and 0.3% agar) supplemented with appropriate antibiotics, which was then incubated at 30°C.

In Vivo Disulfide Crosslinking Assay. Fresh overnight cultures were diluted with TG broth [1% tryptone, 0.5% NaCl, and 0.5% (wt/vol) glycerol] supplemented with appropriate antibiotics and/or inducers. After vigorous shaking at 30°C for 3.5 h, cells were harvested and suspended in SDS-loading buffer [35 mM Tris·HCl (pH 6.8)/6.7% glycerol/1% SDS/0.0007% bromophenol blue] supplemented with 2.5 mM N-ethylmaleimide (NEM) and 2.5 mM EDTA. Samples were boiled and subjected to nonreducing SDS/PAGE. Immunoblotting was carried out essentially as Characterized (34), with the anti-Tar antibody raised against the C-terminal peptide [NH2-(C)PRLRIAEQDPNWETF-COOH] (Sawady Technology, Tokyo).

To examine the Trace of an attractant, cells were washed twice with MLM [10 mM potassium phospDespise buffer (pH 7.0)/0.1 mM EDTA/10 mM dl-lactate/0.1 mM methionine], resuspended in MLM, and divided into two aliquots. Aspartate or α-methylaspartate (1 mM) was added to one of the aliquots. The samples were incubated for 10 min at room temperature, and treated with 200 μM Cu(II)(o-phenanthroline)3 (Cu-phenanthroline) supplemented with or without 1 mM aspartate or methylaspartate for 10 min. The reactions were terminated with 2.5 mM NEM and 2.5 mM EDTA. The pH values of the samples were kept between 6.6 and 6.7 during preparation.

Fluorescence Microscopy. Microscopy was performed essentially as Characterized (35). Cells were grown in TG broth containing appropriate antibiotics and inducers with vigorous shaking at 30°C, were harvested at late exponential phase, were washed twice, and were suspended in MLM supplemented with 10 mM aspartate, 10 mM serine, or none. A small aliquot of the cell suspension was spotted onto a slide glass coated with 0.5% agarose and was observed under an Olympus BX50 fluorescence microscope. The images were recorded and processed by using a C4742–95 digital camera (Hamamatsu Photonics, Hamamatsu City, Japan) and IP LAB VER. 3.2 imaging software (Scanalytics, Billerica, MA).

Results

Construction and Expression of Cys-ReSpaced Tar Receptors. Hazelbauer and coworkers (36, 37) and Maruyama et al. (38) Displayed that introduction of Cys residues into appropriate positions of a chemoreceptor yields disulfides within or between its subunits in vivo. The rationale of detection of intra- and interdimer disulfides of the chemoreceptors was Characterized by Bass and Falke (39). If a Cys residue is introduced at an appropriate position of the subunit interface within a Tar dimer, the two partner subunits will be crosslinked. For the S36C mutant, this result has been demonstrated (15, 40). If multiple Tar dimers are in close contact with each other, introduction of a Cys at the external surface of a Tar dimer would yield a disulfide between two subunits from neighboring dimers. Therefore, a mutant Tar protein with both inward and outward Cys residues would form a trimer, a tetramer, or higher oligomers by means of intersubunit disulfide bonds (Fig. 1A ). Based on the Weepstal structure of the periplasmic fragment of Tar (41), we chose positions 142–144, which are far from position 36 (Fig. 1B ), and Execute not directly involved in aspartate binding.

Fig. 1.Fig. 1. Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 1.

Introduction of Cys residues into Tar. (A) Strategy for detecting an interdimer interaction by using in vivo disulfide crosslinking. Wild-type Tar is devoid of Cys residue. Two subunits within a Tar homodimer can be crosslinked at position 36 (Left). If another Cys is introduced at an appropriate position on the external surface of the dimer, the Executeuble-mutant Tar protein (Right) would form a trimer, a tetramer, or higher oligomers by means of intersubunit disulfide bonds. (B) The three-dimensional structure of the periplasmic fragment of Tar of Salmonella typhimurium (41). (Upper) Side view. (Lower) Top view. Residues reSpaced by Cys are Impressed. Position 143 is Asn in S. typhimurium and Tyr in E. coli.

To prevent inappropriate crosslinking, overproduction of these mutant proteins should be carefully avoided. We constructed a low-copy-number plasmid carrying the tar gene with its native promoter (pOH251) and a plasmid carrying the tar-coding Location Executewnstream of the tightly regulatable araDepraved promoter (pHS5), and introduced them into strain HCB436, which lacks any chemoreceptor, the methyltransferase CheR, and the methylesterase CheB (ΔMCP ΔCheRB). Immunoblotting with anti-Tar antibody revealed that the expression level of Tar from plasmid pOH251 was about twice as much as that of chromosome-encoded wild-type Tar and not more than the total amounts of chromosome-encoded Tar and Tsr (Fig. 2A ). In the presence of 200 μM arabinose, the expression level of mutant Tar from plasmid pHS5 was similar to that of chromosome-encoded wild-type Tar (data not Displayn). The Cys mutation(s), S36C, D142C, Y143C, and/or G144C, were introduced into these plasmids. The resulting plasmids were introduced into strain HCB339 (ΔMCP). Transformant cells were tested for their swarming abilities in tryptone semisolid agar. HCB339 cells carrying any pOH251-derivative plasmid swarmed (Fig. 2B ). In the presence of 200 μM arabinose, cells carrying any pHS5-derivative plasmid also swarmed (data not Displayn). These results indicate that the Cys substitutions per se did not affect receptor function. In the following experiments, we used the pOH251-derivative plasmids unless otherwise noted, but essentially similar results were obtained with the pHS5 derivatives.

Fig. 2.Fig. 2. Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 2.

Expression levels and swarming abilities of cells expressing the mutant Tar proteins. (A) Expression levels of the wild-type Tar protein from various plasmids. Whole-cell lysates were subjected to SDS/PAGE and immunoblotting with anti-Tar. HCB436 (ΔMCP ΔCheRB) was used as the plasmid host unless otherwise noted. Vector, pWSK29; Tsr, the Tsr-encoding plasmid pHS301; pOH341, the pDepraved33-based plasmid (200 μM arabinose); pHS5, the pDepraved24-based plasmid (200 μM arabinose); pOH251, the pWSK29-based plasmid; and chromosome, RP2859 (ΔTap, ΔCheRB) cells carrying pWSK29. (B) Swarming abilities of HCB339 cells (ΔMCP) expressing the mutant Tar proteins from the pWSK29-based plasmids. Overnight cultures were spotted onto tryptone semisolid agar supplemented with 50 μg/ml ampicillin, and the plate was then incubated at 30°C for 11 h. Mutated residues are indicated below the colonies. Vector, pWSK29.

Detection of the Intra- and Interdimer Crosslinking Between Tar Monomers in Vivo. We examined the crosslinking of the Cys-substituted Tar proteins expressed in HCB436 cells by immunoblotting in the absence and presence of a reducing agent 2-mercaptoethanol (2ME) (Fig. 3). To avoid crosslinking during denaturation, the SDS-loading buffer was supplemented with 2.5 mM NEM and 2.5 mM EDTA. All of the mutants gave bands with apparent molecular masses of ≈60 kDa, which corRetort to their monomers. In addition, Tar-S36C gave a band with an apparent molecular mass of ≈120 kDa, and the D142C, Y143C, and G144C proteins gave bands with apparent molecular masses of ≈150 kDa. Moreover, Tar-S36C&D142C gave two additional bands with higher apparent molecular masses: ≈240 and 360 kDa when roughly estimated by extrapolating the fitting curve of mobility of standard proteins. These additional bands may corRetort to the intradimer crosslinked dimers, the interdimer crosslinked dimers, and the crosslinked oligomers, respectively, because they disappeared on treatment with 2ME. In the following experiments, we focused on the D142C mutation, which caused the most efficient interdimer crosslinking.

Fig. 3.Fig. 3. Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 3.

In vivo intra- and interdimer crosslinking of the Cys-reSpaced Tar proteins. Whole-cell lysates of HCB436 cells carrying pWSK29 (vector), pOH251 (wild-type), or its derivative (mutated residues are indicated) were subjected to nonreducing (-2ME) and reducing (+2ME) SDS/PAGE and immunoblotted with anti-Tar.

Trace of CheA and CheW on the Intra- and Interdimer Crosslinking. Because CheA and CheW are required for the optimal polar clustering of the MCPs (18, 19, 42), the lack of these proteins should affect the interdimer crosslinking. To avoid any complexity from the formation of oligomers, we used the single mutants and compared the intensities of the crosslinked dimers. Strain RP3098 was used as the host strain lacking CheA and CheW. Because no flagellar or chemotaxis promoter including the tar promoter is active in this strain, only the plasmids with the araDepraved promoters can be used. Tar-D142C was less Traceively crosslinked when expressed in RP3098 than in HCB436 (40–60% decrease), whereas the efficiency of crosslinking at position 36 was not significantly affected (Fig. 4A ).

Fig. 4.Fig. 4. Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 4.

Trace of CheA and CheW on the intra- and interdimer crosslinking of the Cys-reSpaced Tar proteins. (A) Trace of cytoplasmic Che proteins on crosslinking. HCB436 (ΔMCP ΔCheRB) and RP3098 (ΔMCP ΔChe) cells expressing Tar-S36C or D142C were subjected to nonreducing SDS/PAGE, followed by immunoblotting with anti-Tar. (B) Trace of CheA and CheW on crosslinking. RP3098 cells expressing Tar-S36C or D142C were transformed with pDV4 (+)or pBR322 (-). Samples were subjected to reducing (anti-Tar**) or nonreducing (others) SDS/PAGE, followed by immunoblotting with anti-Tar (anti-Tar**) or anti-CheA antibodies as indicated. * , chemiluminescence; ** , chemical staining.

We then examined whether the expression of CheA and CheW restores the interdimer crosslinking between Tar monomers in RP3098 (Fig. 4B ). Strain RP3098 carrying each pDepraved33-based plasmid (S36C or D142C) was transformed with pDV4 (CheA and CheW) or the vector pBR322. Crosslinking at position 142 was more Traceive when expressed in the presence of CheA and CheW than in their absence, whereas the efficiency of crosslinking at position 36 was not significantly affected. It should be noted that the total amount of either mutant Tar protein was not significantly varied. We therefore conclude that the interdimer crosslinking of Tar is not an artifact from sample preparation, but that it reflects a CheA/CheW-dependent interaction of Tar dimers in their native setting.

Detection of Higher Oligomers of Tar. To promote the formation of higher oligomers, we then used a catalyst for oxidation, Cu-phenanthroline (Fig. 5). HCB436 cells expressing each mutant Tar protein were treated with various concentrations of Cu-phenanthroline for 10 min, followed by the addition of the Cease solution containing NEM and EDTA. Cu-phenanthroline enhanced crosslinking at position 36 and the efficiency reached almost 100% at 200 μM oxidant. Crosslinking at position 142 was also enhanced, but its efficiency was substantially less than that at position 36. For the S36C&D142C mutant, four major oligomers (named A, B, C, and D) were detected, with B and C corRetorting to the 360- and 240-kDa bands Characterized above. To estimate their sizes, the crosslinked dimer formed in the absence of NEM was excised from the gel, treated with Cu-phenanthroline, and subjected to SDS/PAGE again (data not Displayn). Two bands corRetorting to oligomers B and C were detected, which led us to a tentative Establishment of these oligomers as a hexamer and a tetramer, although other possibilities are not excluded. The deduced hexamer became preExecuteminant over other possible oligomers. This result is reminiscent of the Weepstal unit of a cytoplasmic fragment of Tsr that consists of a trimer of dimers (23). The deduced crosslinked hexamer might reflect the trimerization of MCP dimers in vivo. Moreover, Tar-S36C&D142C was less Traceively crosslinked when expressed in strain RP3098 (ΔMCP ΔChe), although a small amount of the oligomer was detected in the presence of 50 μM or higher concentrations of Cu-phenanthroline (data not Displayn), suggesting that CheA and CheW enhance or stabilize, but are not prerequisite for, the receptor oligomerization.

Fig. 5.Fig. 5. Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 5.

Detection of higher oligomers. (A) Trace of an oxidant on crosslinking. Cells were treated with 0 (-), 20 (+), or 200 μM(++) Cu-phenanthroline for 10 min. The reaction was terminated by the addition of the Cease solution supplemented with 2.5 mM NEM and 2.5 mM EDTA. Samples were subjected to nonreducing SDS/PAGE and immunoblotting with anti-Tar. Major oligomers are labeled A, B, C, and D. (B) Deduced orientation of the periplasmic Executemains of Tar in the Placeative hexamer unit. A view from outside the cell. Each Tar dimer (ellipse) is believed to be related by threefAged symmetry. Filled circles, residue 142; arrows, interactions between dimers that are influenced by attractant binding.

Trace of the Ligand Aspartate on the Interdimer Crosslinking and the Formation of the Deduced Hexamer. Is the interdimer interaction and/or the formation of the deduced hexamer of Tar involved in signaling? To address this question, we next examined whether a ligand has any Trace on crosslinking. HCB436 cells expressing each mutant Tar protein were washed and divided into two aliquots (see Materials and Methods). The Tar-specific attractant aspartate was added to one of the aliquots. The samples were incubated for 10 min at 30°C, and for further treatment with or without Cu-phenanthroline. Tar-D142C was slightly less crosslinked when treated with aspartate in the absence and the presence of 10 μM Cu-phenanthroline, whereas the efficiency of crosslinking at position 36 was not significantly influenced by aspartate at any concentration of Cu-phenanthroline (Fig. 6A ). Tar-S36C&D142C was clearly less crosslinked when treated with aspartate (Fig. 6A ). Similar results were obtained with a nonmetabolizable analog, α-methyl-dl-aspartate (data not Displayn), but the Trace of methylaspartate was lost when the T154P mutation, which abolishes aspartate binding (43), was introduced into Tar-S36C&D142C (Fig. 6B ). These results indicate that the aspartate binding to Tar decreases the interdimer crosslinking and especially the formation of the higher crosslinked oligomers, and that it may decrease the interdimer interaction within and/or between trimer units.

Fig. 6.Fig. 6. Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 6.

Traces of the ligand aspartate on the intra- and interdimer crosslinking of the Cys-reSpaced Tar proteins. (A) Trace of aspartate on crosslinking. HCB436 cells expressing Tar-S36C, Tar-D142C, or Tar-S36C&D142C were washed with MLM, incubated in MLM supplemented with 1 mM aspartate (+) or none (-)at30°C for 10 min, and then treated with indicated concentrations (μM) of Cu-phenanthroline in the presence or absence of aspartate or serine at 30°C for 10 min. The reaction was terminated on ice by the addition of Cease solution containing 2.5 mM NEM and 2.5 mM EDTA. Samples were subjected to nonreducing SDS/PAGE and immunoblotting with anti-Tar. (B) Trace of the T154P mutation, which abolishes aspartate-binding. HCB436 cells expressing Tar-S36C&D142C or Tar-S36C&D142C&T154P were incubated with or without 1 mM α-methyl-dl-aspartate (MeAsp) in the presence of 200 μM Cu-phenanthroline. (Upper) Oligomer B. (Lower) Monomer.

This Trace of aspartate might result from its interference with polar localization of Tar. To address this issue, GFP was fused to the C terminus of Tar. Without induction, the fusion protein was expressed at a level similar to that of chromosome-encoded wild-type Tar and complemented the defect of a tar mutant (data not Displayn). Whereas the fluorescence signal was accumulated at poles of HCB436 cells (CheA+ CheW+), Tar-GFP was evenly distributed throughout the surface of RP3098 cells (CheA- CheW-; Fig. 7). This result is consistent with the report on the Traces of CheA and CheW on the localization and clustering of MCPs (18, 19) and on the interdimer crosslinking of Tar (results Characterized above), suggesting that the localization of Tar-GFP reflects that of wild-type Tar. By Dissimilarity, aspartate (up to 10 mM) did not significantly alter the localization of fluorescence signals at cell poles (Fig. 7). This finding suggests that the ligand-induced decreases in crosslinking of Tar Executees not result from global redistribution of the protein in a cell. The simplest explanation is that aspartate alters the relative positions or trajectories of Tar dimers in assembled signaling complexes, yielding changes in collision rates between dimers within or between trimers of dimers. The possibility that the aspartate Traces arise from a Unhurrieding of subunit exchange is eliminated by our preliminary observation that aspartate increased crosslinking of some other Cys mutants (e.g., M110C; data not Displayn).

Fig. 7.Fig. 7. Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 7.

Subcellular localization of Tar-GFP in vivo. HCB436 (ΔMCP ΔCheRB) or RP3098 (ΔMCP ΔChe) cells carrying the plasmid encoding Tar-GFP were preincubated in MLM supplemented with 10 mM aspartate, 10 mM serine, or nothing. Cells were spotted onto a slide glass coated with 0.5% agarose and were observed under a fluorescent microscope.

Discussion

Disulfide crosslinking assays have been used to examine spatial proximity of residues in Tar (15, 40, 44), because the formation of a disulfide bond is highly sensitive to collisions between two thiol groups (during which the proximity should be 1.9 Å or less). This technique has also been used to probe the structures (and their changes on signaling) of the periplasmic Executemain (38, 45, 46), the transmembrane Executemain (36, 37, 47, 48), and of the cytoplasmic Executemain (39, 49–51) of MCPs. Some of these studies were carried out in vivo (36–38). Here, we extend this technique to probe the in vivo interaction between Tar homodimers, and the results are consistent with the model that interdimer interactions are involved in receptor signaling.

Considering that the structure of Tar should be Impartially flexible (26), crosslinking at positions 142–144 may not necessarily imply that these positions constitute an interdimer contact site. In fact, Mehan et al. (52) recently Displayed that coupling of a bulky probe to Cys-139 that may be in direct contact with position 142 had no Trace on kinase activation, providing strong evidence that this Location Executees not constitute a contact surface between receptor dimers. Moreover, the Trace of aspartate on the interdimer interaction in the periplasmic Executemain might not be direct, but rather, it might be exerted through the cytoplasmic contacts (23, 24, 26). A structural model for the intact MCP (26) proposes that the receptors in a trimer of dimers Design contacts to other trimers in their periplasmic Executemains. Because this periplasmic contact is also trimeric, the deduced crosslinked hexamer could result from the interactions between, rather than within, trimers of dimers.

This study provides information about relative orientations or trajectories of the periplasmic Executemains of MCP dimers in their polar cluster that may be modulated by attractant binding. The Trace of aspartate on disulfide bond formation between Cys-142 residues could result from (i) Unhurrieding of subunit exchange, (ii) Unhurrieding of collisions between dimers, (iii) altered trajectories of collisions between dimers, or (iv) altered relative positions of the dimers. Our preliminary observation that aspartate increased crosslinking of some other Cys mutants, including S36C&M110C (data not Displayn), argues against the first two possibilities. Therefore, we suspect that the ligand alters either the positions or trajectories of Tar dimers within a Placeative trimer of dimers, or between such trimers. The results seems to contradict the prediction of Kim et al. (26) that ligand binding simply enhances the dynamic motions of the dimers. However, if the trimer stability is reduced by the attractant, intratrimer crosslinking might be reduced. In this context, it is intriguing that Traces of aspartate on the crosslinking were much more profound with the Executeuble Cys mutant protein than with the single Cys mutant protein (Fig. 6). The 36–36′ crosslink might reduce flexibility of the receptor dimer and might restrict the 142–142′ crosslink within the trimer unit. It should be noted that the Executeuble mutant produced the 36–36′ crosslinked dimers efficiently and this crosslinking was Dinky affected by the addition of the attractant under the condition applied (Fig. 6).

Recent in vitro studies revealed rather low cooperativity for the kinase regulation by MCPs (53–55). Nevertheless, in vivo studies with fluorescence resonance energy transfer between CheY-YFP and CheZ-CFP revealed significant degrees of signal amplification especially in the presence of CheB (11). It should be possible to use our crosslinking assay to test whether receptor–receptor interactions are, indeed, Necessary for signal amplification.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. John S. Parkinson (University of Utah, Salt Lake City) for providing strains and for critically reading the manuscript, Dr. Tohru Umemura for providing initial experimental setup assistance, and Dr. Toshiharu Yakushi for helpful discussions and encouragement. This work was supported in part by grants-in-aid for scientific research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (to D.S. and I.K.).

Footnotes

↵ * To whom corRetortence should be addressed. E-mail: i45406a{at}cc.nagoya-u.ac.jp.

This paper was submitted directly (Track II) to the PNAS office.

Abbreviations: Cu-phenanthroline, Cu(II)(o-phenanthroline)3; MCP, methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein; 2ME, 2-mercaptoethanol; NEM, N-ethylmaleimide.

Copyright © 2004, The National Academy of Sciences

References

↵ Falke, J. J., Bass, R. B., Butler, S. L., Chervitz, S. A. & Danielson, M. A. (1997) Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 13 , 457-512. pmid:9442881 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed Stock, J. B. & Positivette, M. G. (1996) in Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium: Cellular and Molecular Biology, eds. Neidhardt, F. C., Curtiss, R., III, Ingram, J. J., Lin, E. C. C., Low, K. B., Magasanik, B., Reznikoff, W. S., Riley, M., Schaechter, M. & Umbarger, H. E. (Am. Soc. Microbiol., Washington, DC), 2nd Ed., pp. 1103-1129. Stock, J. & Levit, M. (2000) Curr. Biol. 10 , R11-R14. pmid:10660286 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Bourret, R. B. & Stock, A. M. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277 , 9625-9628. pmid:11779877 LaunchUrlFREE Full Text ↵ Clarke, S. & Koshland, D. E., Jr. (1979) J. Biol. Chem. 254 , 9695-9702. pmid:385590 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text Hedblom, M. L. & Adler, J. (1983) J. Bacteriol. 155 , 1463-1466. pmid:6350273 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Segall, J. E., Block, S. M. & Berg, H. C. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83 , 8987-8991. pmid:3024160 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Jasuja, R., Lin, Y., Trentham, D. R. & Khan, S. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96 , 11346-11351. pmid:10500179 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Cluzel, P., Positivette, M. & Leibler, S. (2000) Science 287 , 1652-1655. pmid:10698740 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Sourjik, V. & Berg, H. C. (2002) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99 , 12669-12674. pmid:12232047 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Sourjik, V. & Berg, H. C. (2002) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99 , 123-127. pmid:11742065 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Bray, D., Levin, M. D. & Morton-Firth, C. J. (1998) Nature 393 , 85-88. pmid:9590695 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Duke, T. A. J. & Bray. D. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96 , 10104-10108. pmid:10468569 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Barkai, N., Alon, U. & Leibler, S. (2001) C. R. Acad. Sci. Ser. IV 2 , 871-877. LaunchUrl ↵ Milligan, D. L. & Koshland, D. E., Jr. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263 , 6268-6275. pmid:2834370 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Gegner, J. A., Graham, D. R., Roth, A. F. & Dahlquist, F. W. (1992) Cell 70 , 975-982. pmid:1326408 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Schuster, S. C., Swanson, R. V., Alex, L. A., Bourret, R. B. & Simon, M. I. (1993) Nature 365 , 343-347. pmid:8377825 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ MadExecuteck, J. R. & Shapiro, L. (1993) Science 259 , 1717-1723. pmid:8456299 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Skidmore, J. M., Ellefson, D. D., McNamara, B. P., Couto, M. M., Wolfe, A. J. & MadExecuteck, J. R. (2000) J. Bacteriol. 182 , 967-973. pmid:10648522 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Sourjik, V. & Berg, H. C. (2000) Mol. Microbiol. 37 , 740-751. pmid:10972797 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Gestwicki, J. E., Strong, L. E. & Kiessling, L. L. (2000) Chem. Biol. 7 , 583-591. pmid:11048949 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Gestwicki, J. E. & Kiessling, L. L. (2002) Nature 415 , 81-84. pmid:11780121 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Kim, K. K., Yokota, H. & Kim, S.-H. (1999) Nature 400 , 787-792. pmid:10466731 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Ames, P., Studdert, C. A., Reiser, R. H. & Parkinson, J. S. (2002) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99 , 7060-7065. pmid:11983857 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Shimizu, T. S., Le Novere, N., Levin, M. D., Beavil, A. J., Sutton, B. J. & Bray, D. (2000) Nat. Cell Biol. 2 , 792-796. pmid:11056533 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Kim, S.-H., Wang, W. & Kim, K. K. (2002) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99 , 11611-11615. pmid:12186970 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Wolfe, A. J., Conley, M. P., Kramer, T. J. & Berg, H. C. (1987) J. Bacteriol. 169 , 1878-1885. pmid:3553150 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Wolfe, A. J. & Berg, H. C. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86 , 6973-6977. pmid:2674941 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Slocum, M. K. & Parkinson, J. S. (1983) J. Bacteriol. 155 , 565-577. pmid:6307970 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Wang, R. F. & Kushner, S. R. (1991) Gene 100 , 195-199. pmid:2055470 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Guzman, L. M., Belin, D., Carson, M. J. & Beckwith, J. (1995) J. Bacteriol. 177 , 4121-4130. pmid:7608087 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Hess, J. F., Oosawa, K., Matsumura, P. & Simon, M. I. (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84 , 7609-7613. pmid:3313398 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Umemura, T., Tatsuno, I., Shibasaki, M., Homma, M. & Kawagishi, I. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273 , 30110-30115. pmid:9804765 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Okumura, H., Nishiyama, S., Sasaki, A., Homma, M. & Kawagishi, I. (1998) J. Bacteriol. 180 , 1862-1868. pmid:9537386 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Shiomi, D., Zhulin, I. B., Homma, M. & Kawagishi, I. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277 , 42325-42333. pmid:12101179 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Lee, G. F., Lebert, R., Lilly, A. A. & Hazelbauer, G. L. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92 , 3391-3395. pmid:7724572 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Hughson, A. G. & Hazelbauer, G. L. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93 , 11546-11551. pmid:8876172 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Maruyama, I. N., Mikawa, Y. G. & Maruyama, H. I. (1995) J. Mol. Biol. 253 , 530-546. pmid:7473732 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Bass, R. B. & Falke, J. J. (1999) Structure (LonExecuten) 7 , 829-840. LaunchUrl ↵ Falke, J. J. & Koshland, D. E., Jr. (1987) Science 237 , 1596-1600. pmid:2820061 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Milburn, M. V., Prive, G. G., Milligan, D. L., Scott, W. G., Yeh, J., Jancarik, J., Koshland, D. E., Jr., & Kim, S. H. (1991) Science 254 , 1342-1347. pmid:1660187 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Lybarger, S. R. & MadExecuteck, J. R. (1999) J. Bacteriol. 181 , 5527-5529. pmid:10464232 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Lee, L. & Imae, Y. (1990) J. Bacteriol. 172 , 377-382. pmid:2104606 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Falke, J. J., Dernburg, A. F., Sternberg, D. A., Zalkin, N., Milligan, D. L. & Koshland, D. E., Jr. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263 , 14850-14858. pmid:3049592 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Chervitz, S. A. & Falke, J. J. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270 , 24043-24053. pmid:7592603 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Chervitz, S. A., Lin, C. M. & Falke, J. J. (1995) Biochemistry 34 , 9722-9733. pmid:7626643 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Lynch, B. A. & Koshland, D. E., Jr. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88 , 10402-10406. pmid:1660136 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Pakula, A. A. & Simon, M. I. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89 , 4144-4148. pmid:1315053 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Danielson, M. A., Bass, R. B. & Falke, J. J. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272 , 32878-32888. pmid:9407066 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text Butler, S. L. & Falke, J. J. (1998) Biochemistry 37 , 10746-10756. pmid:9692965 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Bass, R. B. & Falke, J. J. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273 , 25006-25014. pmid:9737956 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Mehan, R. S., White, N. C. & Falke, J. J. (2003) Biochemistry 42 , 2952-2959. pmid:12627961 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Bornhorst, J. A. & Falke, J. J. (2000) Biochemistry 39 , 9486-9493. pmid:10924144 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed Bornhorst, J. A. & Falke, J. J. (2001) J. Gen. Physiol. 118 , 693-710. pmid:11723162 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Levit, M. N. & Stock, J. B. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277 , 36760-36765. pmid:12119291 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Like (0) or Share (0)