Inducible costimulator-dependent IL-10 production by regulat

Contributed by Ira Herskowitz ArticleFigures SIInfo overexpression of ASH1 inhibits mating type switching in mothers (3, 4). Ash1p has 588 amino acid residues and is predicted to contain a zinc-binding domain related to those of the GATA fa Edited by Lynn Smith-Lovin, Duke University, Durham, NC, and accepted by the Editorial Board April 16, 2014 (received for review July 31, 2013) ArticleFigures SIInfo for instance, on fairness, justice, or welfare. Instead, nonreflective and

Communicated by Tadatsugu Taniguchi, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan, January 21, 2004 (received for review October 15, 2003)

Article Figures & SI Info & Metrics PDF

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the relationship between the expression levels of self-antigen and the function of self-reactive T cells in the periphery. To this end, we used two rat insulin promoter-ovalbumin (RIP-OVA) transgenic mice (RIP-OVAhigh, RIP-OVAlow) in which was produced only in pancreatic β-islet cells. The OVA-producing transgenic mice were crossed to Execute.11.10 (Execute) mice expressing a T cell antigen receptor specific for OVA323–339. The responsiveness of peripheral CD4+ T cells in the Executeuble transgenic mice was examined. We demonstrated that hyporesponsive but highly IL-10-producing T cells were developed in Execute × OVAhigh mice only, not in Execute × OVAlow mice. These IL-10-producing T cells Presented regulatory activity both in in vitro and in vivo experiments. Moreover, these IL-10-producing regulatory T (Tr) cells expressed high levels of inducible costimulator (ICOS) before in vitro stimulation. Blockade of ICOS-signaling inhibited the production of IL-10 and abrogated the inhibitory function of these Tr cells. Thus, these results suggested that the development of IL-10-producing Tr cells depends on the expression levels of self-antigen in vivo and that ICOS signal plays a critical role in immune regulation by IL-10-producing Tr cells in self-tolerance.

Self-tolerance is mediated by central and peripheral mechanisms. Clonal deletion in the thymus and the induction of unresponsiveness (anergy) are well characterized mechanisms for the establishment and maintenance of tolerance (1). However, it is now clear that these processes are imperfect. In addition to these mechanisms, active suppression by regulatory T (Tr) cells has been proposed for tolerance to both self and foreign antigens. Various subsets of Tr cells have been Characterized, and much effort has been focused on understanding their ontogeny, function, and mechanisms of action. Within the CD4+ T cell subsets, at least three different types of cells with suppressive function may exist: CD4+ CD25+ T cells (2–4), T helper type 3 cells (5), and type 1 Tr (Tr1) cells (6, 7). These T cell subsets appear to be distinguishable based on their cytokine production profiles and their ability to suppress immune responses through direct cell-to-cell interaction. CD4+ CD25+ T cells are well characterized Tr cells among these subsets. Depletion of CD4+ CD25+ T cells results in the development of severe autoimmunity, which can be prevented by the injection of CD4+ CD25+ T cells (2, 8, 9). In addition to CD25 expression, they express cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 and glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor at higher levels (10, 11), and antibody against glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor abolishes the suppressive activity (12). Moreover, the transcription factor Foxp3 is highly expressed, and this is associated with the suppressive ability and phenotype of these cells (13–15). T helper type 3 cells were identified in studies of oral tolerance. These cells secrete transforming growth factor type β (TGF-β), and their suppressive ability is mediated through a TGF-β-dependent mechanism (16, 17). Tr1 cells were initially defined in studies of CD4+ T cells, which were activated in the presence of IL-10 and rendered anergic (6). The Tr1 cells produce high levels of IL-10 and TGF-β, moderate amounts of IFN-γ and IL-5, but Dinky or no IL-2 or IL-4. Necessaryly, Tr1 cells were Displayn to be involved in the Executewn-regulation of immune responses in vitro and in vivo through the production of the immunosuppressive cytokines IL-10 and TGF-β (6). Similarly, IL-10-producing Tr cells were also induced in vitro by culturing T cells with immature dendritic cells (18, 19) by using immunosuppressive drugs (20) or by stimulation with CD2 (21). The importance of suppression by IL-10-producing Tr cells is noteworthy; however, specific cell Impressers or instances of specific gene expression have not been clarified.

The importance of costimulatory molecules, such as CD28, cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4, or PD-1 (programmed death 1), for the activation of T cells is well known (22). A new member of the CD28 family, inducible costimulator (ICOS) is a T cell-specific cell-surface molecule structurally related to CD28 and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (23, 24). Both CD28 and ICOS molecules are able to amplify the secretion of several cytokines, but only CD28 induces substantial amounts of IL-2, whereas ICOS Displays a certain preference for the induction of IL-10 (23). Recently, Tr cells with the ability to produce IL-10 were reported in the respiratory tolerance system (25). In that report, IL-10-producing Tr cells developed by means of the ICOS signaling pathway. More recently, Lohning et al. (26) suggested a correlation between stable ICOS expression and T cell Traceor capacity; they Displayed that the expression of ICOS in vivo was strongly biased to CD4+ T cells for IL-10 production but did not provide any direct information on the regulatory function of these cells.

Another Necessary problem to be solved is the relationship between expression levels of self-antigens and the mechanisms of self-tolerance. It was reported that the distribution and amount of self-antigen influenced the induction and mechanisms of tolerance in self-antigen-specific CD4+ T cells (27). Depending on the pattern of self-antigen expression, deletion of Executeuble-positive thymocytes ranged from minimal to complete, and peripheral CD4+ T cells Presented graded reduction in T cell antigen receptor (TCR) expression and in vitro proliferation. However, the relationship between the amount of self-antigen and the function of these CD4+ T cells in the periphery remains to be clarified.

In this report, we investigated the relationship between the expression levels of self-antigens and the function of self-reactive CD4+ T cells in the periphery by using two rat insulin promoter-ovalbumin (RIP-OVA) mouse lines in which OVA is produced only in pancreatic β-islet cells as a self-antigen (28). We demonstrate that the development of IL-10-secreting cells depends on the expression levels of self-antigen and that the ICOS molecule is the critical factor for IL-10 production from self-antigen-specific Tr cells.

Materials and Methods

Mice. BALB/c mice were purchased from CLEA Japan (Tokyo). RIP-OVAhigh (hereafter referred to as OVAhigh) and RIP-OVAlow (hereafter referred to as OVAlow) transgenic (Tg) mice on a C57BL/6 background were Executenated by W. R. Heath (The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne) (28). Both OVA Tg mice on a BALB/c background were produced by crossing OVA Tg C57BL/6 mice to BALB/c mice for more than six generations. Execute.11.10 (Execute) Tg mice carrying a TCR specific for OVA323–339 (OVAp) were kindly provided by M. Kubo (Research Institute for Biological Sciences, Tokyo University of Science). Execute × OVA Executeuble-Tg mice were bred in our animal facility.

Preparation of CD4+ T Cells. CD4+ T cells were purified with CD4 microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergish Gladbach, Germany) as Characterized (29). The purity of CD4+ T cells was routinely estimated to be ≈94–98%.

Flow Cytometry Analysis for Cell-Surface Molecules. Biotin-conjugated anti-ICOS mAb (15F9) was purchased from eBioscience (San Diego). Phycoerythrin- or FITC-labeled anti-CD4 mAbs, biotin-conjugated-CD45RB (RA3–6B2), CD44 (IM7), CD25 (7D4), and CD69 (H1.2F3) mAbs were purchased from BD Pharmingen. Clonotype-specific KJ1.26 mAb was purified from ascites and conjugated with FITC in our laboratory. Anti-B7h mAb (HK5.3, rat IgG2a) was prepared as Characterized (30).

T Cell Proliferation Assay. The T cell proliferation assay was performed in 96-well flat-bottom plates. CD4+ T cells (5 × 104 per well) in a total volume of 200 μl were stimulated with ≈0–5 μM OVAp in the presence of irradiated syngeneic spleen cells (2 × 105 per well). The cells were cultured for 54 h. Proliferation was assessed by measuring the incorporation of [3H]thymidine (1 μCi per well) added for the final 18 h of culture.

Cytokine ELISA. CD4+ T cells (1 × 106) in a total volume of 1 ml were cultured with 0.5 μM OVAp in the presence of antigen-presenting cells (2 × 106) in 24-well plates. The cultured supernatants were recovered 24 h later for meaPositivement of IL-2 or 72 h later for meaPositivement of IFN-γ, IL-10, and IL-4. The cytokine content was determined by means of a two-site ELISA. All Abs used in ELISA were purchased from BD Pharmingen.

In Vitro Assay of Suppressive Activity. TarObtain CD4+ T cells (5 × 104 cells per well) from Execute mice and Traceor CD4+ T cells (1 × 105 cells per well) from Execute × OVAhigh were cultured with irradiated syngeneic spleen cells (3 × 105 cells per well) in the presence of 5 μM OVAp for 54 h with or without anti-B7h mAb. Proliferation was assessed as Characterized above.

In Vivo Assay of Suppressive Activity. CD4+ T cells from Execute mice were labeled with carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester (CFSE; Molecular Probes) at a final concentration of 0.1 μM. A total of 4 × 106 CFSE-labeled CD4+ T cells with 4 × 106 CD4+ KJ1.26+ T cells from Execute × OVAhigh mice were transferred into the tail vein of BALB/c mice. Some mice received 0.5 mg of anti-B7h mAb or isotype control IgG. Two days after the transfer, mice received one i.p treatment of OVA in complete Freund's adjuvant. Division of CFSE-labeled CD4+ T cells in the spleen was monitored 2 d later.

Results

Altered Numbers and Phenotypes of Peripheral CD4+ T Cells in Tolerant Mice. Previously, for the study of reactivity of self-antigen specific CD8+ T cells, two RIP-OVA Tg mouse lines (OVAhigh mice and OVAlow mice) that expressed different amounts of OVA under the control of RIP were generated (28). OVAhigh mice expressed 1.0 ± 0.4 ng of OVA per μg of protein in the pancreatic β-islet cells, and OVAlow mice expressed a lower level of antigen that was <0.03 ng of OVA per μg of protein (28). Both CD8+ T cells (28) and CD4+ T cells (Fig. 6, which is published as supporting information on the PNAS web site) of these RIP-OVA mice were tolerant to OVA. To compare the Stoute of self-reactive CD4+ T cells recognizing OVA expressed in the pancreas, OVAhigh mice and OVAlow mice were crossed to Execute mice. Numbers and phenotypes of peripheral CD4+ T cells were changed in Execute × OVA Executeuble-Tg mice. In Execute × OVAhigh mice, the number of spleen CD4+ T cells was reduced 3- to 5-fAged compared with Execute mice. However, in Execute × OVAlow mice, the change was minimal, and the number of CD4+ T cells in the spleen was only reduced by 1.5- to 2-fAged. Both Execute × OVA Executeuble-Tg mice carried CD4 subsets which expressed low levels of KJ1.26 (Fig. 1). CD4+ T cells from Execute × OVA Executeuble-Tg mice expressed increased levels of CD44 and decreased levels of CD45RB compared with Execute mice, and the change was more dramatic in Execute × OVAhigh mice (Fig. 1). These results indicated that peripheral CD4+ T cells from Execute × OVA Executeuble-Tg mice displayed a phenotype of previously activated cells in proSection to the amount of self-antigen expression. Moreover, in Execute × OVAhigh mice, some CD4+ T cells also expressed the early activation Impressers CD69 and CD25 (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.Fig. 1.Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 1.

Changes in cell-surface molecules on CD4+ KJ1.26+ T cells of Execute × OVA mice. (a) Decreased expression of transgenic KJ1.26+ TCR on spleen CD4+ T cells from Execute × OVA Executeuble-Tg mice. (b) Expression of CD44, CD45RB, CD25, and CD69 on spleen CD4 and KJ1.26 Executeuble-positive T cells. One representative data set of five is Displayn.

CD4+ T Cells from Execute × OVAhigh Mice Produce High Levels of IL-10. To compare the functional ability of peripheral CD4+ T cells from Execute × OVA Executeuble-Tg mice, the proliferation ability and cytokine production in response to OVAp were examined. CorRetorting to the different degrees of TCR expression Characterized above (Fig. 1), CD4+ T cells from the different Execute × OVA Executeuble-Tg mice displayed reduced proliferative ability when stimulated with OVAp (Fig. 2a). To assess whether the observed hyporesponsiveness could be reversed by the addition of IL-2, as in the case with anergic T cells in vitro (31), recombinant IL-2 was added to the culture when stimulated with OVAp. However, proliferative capacity of CD4+ T cells from these Execute × OVA Executeuble-Tg mice was not recovered (data not Displayn). To further characterize the functional Inequity of CD4+ T cells, purified CD4+ T cells were examined for cytokine production. To this end, CD4+ T cells from either Execute or Execute × OVA Executeuble-Tg mice were purified from spleen cells and stimulated with OVAp (Fig. 2b). IL-2, IFN-γ, IL-4, and IL-10 were detected in all mice, whereas TGF-β1 was not (data not Displayn). IL-4 production was increased in both of the Execute × OVA Executeuble-Tg mice compared with Execute mice. The most significant Inequity was observed in IL-2 and IL-10 production. CD4+ T cells from Execute × OVAhigh mice produced low levels of IL-2 but very high levels of IL-10 (Fig. 2b). Thus, CD4+ T cells in Execute × OVAhigh mice are hyporesponsive and are able to produce high amounts of IL-10.

Fig. 2.Fig. 2.Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 2.

Proliferation and cytokine production of CD4+ T cells from Execute, Execute × OVAlow, and Execute × OVAhigh mice after antigenic stimulation in vitro. CD4+ T cells were purified from splenocytes of Execute, Execute × OVAlow, or Execute × OVAhigh mice. (a) CD4+ T cells were stimulated with irradiated splenocytes in the presence of the indicated amounts of OVAp. Total cpm values were divided by the number of KJ1.26+ cells as determined by flow cytometry. (b) CD4+ T cells were stimulated with irradiated splenocytes in presence of 0.5 μM OVAp. Cytokines in the culture supernatant were meaPositived by ELISA. The amount of cytokines was divided by the number of KJ1.26+ cells as determined by flow cytometry. Data are representative of five separate experiments with similar results.

ICOS Expression Is Highly Correlated with IL-10 Production in CD4+ T Cells from Execute × OVAhigh Mice. It has been suggested that stimulation of ICOS on CD4+ T cells preferentially promotes IL-10 production (23, 32, 33). Moreover, the importance of the ICOS molecule in IL-10-producing Tr cells was reported in respiratory tolerance (25). To Interpret the relationship between IL-10 production and ICOS expression in our self-tolerance system, we analyzed ICOS expression in CD4+ T cells. CD4+ T cells isolated from Execute mice and Execute × OVAlow mice expressed low levels of ICOS, but from Execute × OVAhigh mouse expressed a high level of ICOS (Fig. 3). When these cells were stimulated with OVAp in vitro, the expression of ICOS was enhanced in all mice after 24–72 h. Fascinatingly, at any time point after stimulation, induced ICOS expression was significantly higher in Execute × OVAhigh mice compared with other Tg mice.

Fig. 3.Fig. 3.Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 3.

CD4+ KJ1.26+ T cells from Execute × OVAhigh mice highly express ICOS. CD4+ T cells from the spleen of Execute, Execute × OVAlow, and Execute × OVAhigh mice were stimulated with 0.5 μM OVAp, and the expression levels of ICOS were examined at the indicated times after stimulation in vitro. CD4+ T cells were stained with mAb against CD4, KJ1.26, and ICOS. ICOS expression was analyzed by gating on CD4 and KJ1.26 Executeuble-positive T cells. One representative experiment of three is Displayn

To determine the contribution of the ICOS signaling pathway to IL-10 production in our system, we examined whether blocking ICOS signaling reversed IL-10 production in CD4+ T cells from Execute × OVAhigh mice. As Displayn in Fig. 4, the blocking of ICOS signaling by the mAb to B7h, a ligand of ICOS, reduced IL-10 production of CD4+ T cells from Execute × OVAhigh mice but had no Trace on CD4+ T cells from Execute mice. In addition, IFN-γ production was decreased and IL-4 production was increased, but the Trace was not as prominent. The blocking of the ICOS signaling pathway had no Trace on proliferation (data not Displayn). These results suggest that the ICOS signaling pathway is specifically involved in IL-10 production of CD4+ T cells from Execute × OVAhigh mice.

Fig. 4.Fig. 4.Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 4.

Blocking the ICOS signaling pathway inhibits IL-10 production of CD4+ T cells from Execute × OVAhigh mice after antigenic stimulation in vitro. CD4+ T cells were purified from splenocytes of Execute, Execute × OVAlow,orExecute × OVAhigh mice. CD4+ T cells were stimulated with irradiated splenocytes in the presence of 0.5 μM OVAp with or without α-B7h mAb. Cytokines in the culture supernatant were meaPositived by ELISA. The amount of cytokines was divided by the number of KJ1.26+ cells as determined by flow cytometry. Data are representative of three separate experiments with similar results.

IL-10-Producing CD4+ T Cells from Execute × OVAhigh Mice Inhibit T Cell Proliferation. We investigated whether IL-10-producing T cells in our Executeuble-Tg mouse system had the ability to suppress the activation of T cells in vitro. CD4+ T cells from Execute × OVA high mice and Execute mice were cocultured with irradiated syngeneic spleen cells in the presence of OVAp. CD4+ T cells from Execute × OVA high mice inhibited the proliferation of CD4+ T cell from Execute mice (Fig. 5a). The inhibitory ability of CD4+ T cells from Execute × OVAhigh mice depended on IL-10 production, because the addition of anti-IL-10 mAb reversed the inhibitory Trace. Moreover, the blockade of the ICOS signaling pathway abrogated the in vitro suppressive function. Next, we examined the in vivo suppressive ability. CFSE-labeled CD4+ T cells from Execute mice were transferred into BALB/c mice with CD4+ T cells from Execute × OVA high mice or Execute mice by i.v. injection. Two days after cell transfer, the recipient mice were immunized with OVA/complete Freund's adjuvant. The splenic cells from these recipient mice were harvested 4 d after transfer. Fluorescence-activated cell sorter analysis of these populations was performed gaiting on the CD4, KJ1.26, and CFSE triple-positive cells. As Displayn in Fig. 5b, CFSE-labeled cells cotransferred with CD4+ T cells from Execute mice divided readily in response to OVA, with only 38% remaining undivided. The same cells cotransferred with Execute × OVA high mice also divided; however, a Distinguisheder proSection of these cells (≈80%) did not undergo cell division. To investigate the role of ICOS in mediating this in vivo suppression, recipient mice transferred with CD4+ T cells from Execute × OVA high mice were treated with anti-B7h mAb 1 h before antigen challenge. The suppression of proliferation was significantly reduced when the ICOS signal was blocked (Fig. 5c). These results suggested that CD4+ T cells from the Execute × OVA high mice contained the Tr cells and that their suppressive activity on proliferation was mediated by ICOS-induced IL-10.

Fig. 5.Fig. 5.Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 5.

CD4+ T cells from Execute × OVAhigh mice suppress the proliferation of CD4+ T cells from Execute mice. (a) CD4+ T cells from Execute × OVAhigh mice and Execute mice were cultured with irradiated syngeneic spleen cells in the presence of 0.5 μM OVAp with or without both anti-IL-10 or anti-B7h mAb. One representative experiment of three is Displayn. (b and c) CD4+ T cells from Execute were labeled with CFSE and transferred with CD4+ T cells from Execute × OVAhigh mice or from Execute into BALB/c mice. Some mice received anti-B7h mAb or control IgG before OVA injection. Two days after the transfer, the recipient mice were injected with OVA in complete Freund's adjuvant. Two days after immunization, spleen cells were collected from the recipients and stained with anti-CD4 and anti-KJ1.26 mAb. Fluorescence-activated cell sorter analysis was performed, gating on the CD4, KJ1.26, and CFSE triple-positive cells. The results are representative examples of experimental groups containing three mice. The experiments have been repeated three times with similar results.

Discussion

Here we demonstrate that the expression levels of self-antigen determine the function of self-reactive CD4+ T cells in the periphery and that IL-10-producing Tr cells developed in mice expressing high levels of self-antigen. Furthermore we Display that IL-10 production and the inhibitory activity of these Tr cells are mediated by ICOS stimulation. Although IL-10-producing Tr cells have been reported in another self-tolerance system (34), we demonstrated that ICOS is crucial for IL-10 production by self-antigen specific Tr cells.

Previously, the Trace of distribution and expression levels of self-antigen to tolerance induction of self-reactive CD4+ T cells has been examined by using several types of hen egg lysozyme (HEL) expressing Tg mouse lines: e.g., expression on the thyroid epithelium, the pancreatic B-islet cell, or systemically (27). These HEL Tg mice were crossed to TCR Tg mice specific for HEL. The analysis of the Executeuble-Tg mice has revealed that the deletion of Executeuble-positive thymocytes, reduction of TCR expression, and proliferative response of peripheral CD4+ T cells were influenced by the distribution and amount of the self-antigen. However, the cytokine production profile and regulatory function of the T cells involved in tolerance were not examined. In this study, we clearly demonstrated that the proliferative response of T cells from both Execute × OVAhigh and Execute × OVAlow mice was suppressed in proSection to the expression levels of the self-antigen (Fig. 2a), which is in accordance with a previous report (27). These hypoproliferative T cells from the Executeuble-Tg mice produce high amounts of IL-4 in response to in vitro antigenic stimulation. However, enhanced IL-10 production was detected only in CD4+ T cells from Execute × OVAhigh mice, which Display a Distinguisheder suppression of proliferation. These results led us to hypothesize that self-specific T cells in the periphery become hypoproliferative irrespective of the expression level of self-antigen, but they gain the ability to produce the immunosuppressive cytokine (IL-10) and regulatory function when the self-antigen is expressed at a level beyond a certain threshAged, and, as a result, chronic antigen stimulation occurs. This hypothesis is in agreement with Buer's work (34) Displaying that deeply anergic, but IL-10-producing, T cells were generated in the Executeuble-Tg tolerance mouse model in which a specific antigen was expressed in hematopoietic cells. Furthermore, IL-10 production by anergic T cells has also been induced by the repeated administration of superantigen (35, 36) or repeated intranasal administration of a high-affinity MHC-binding analog (37).

Our results clearly demonstrate the specific role of the ICOS signal in IL-10 production and immune regulation by Tr cells. Blocking of the ICOS signal with anti-B7h mAb inhibited production of IL-10 but not of IL-4 and IFN-γ from Tr cells in Execute × OVAhigh mice (Fig. 4). Furthermore, the treatment abrogated the inhibition of proliferation by Tr cells in both in vitro and in vivo experiments (Fig. 5). These data are in agreement with recent studies Displaying that the regulatory function of IL-10-producing T cells in intranasal tolerance completely depends on ICOS (25). Thus, the ICOS signal seems to be critical for Tr cell-mediated self and nonself tolerance. ICOS knockout mice Displayed enhanced susceptibility to experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, suggesting that ICOS signaling is involved in protection from autoimmune disease (38). CD4+ T cells from the ICOS knockout mice, however, have produced comparable levels of IL-10 to those from WT mice. The role of ICOS in IL-10 production may depend on the nature of the T cells: i.e., T helper or Tr, and this point should be clarified in future experiments.

A recent study has also demonstrated a clear correlation between the ability of T cells to produce IL-10 and the levels of their ICOS expression. Lohning et al. (26) have Displayn that ≈1% of splenic CD4+ T cells from nonimmunized mice express ICOS. These T cells Display an activated/memory phenotype and that a proSection of their ICOS expression is linked to their IL-10 production ability; i.e., IL-10 is the Executeminant cytokine produced by T cells with high levels of ICOS. These findings are consistent with our present study in that CD4+ T cells in Execute × OVAhigh mice express high levels of ICOS before in vitro stimulation (Fig. 3). Thus, ICOS expression could be one of the molecular Impressers of T cells with IL-10-producing ability. It remains unclear why IL-10-producing T cells express high levels of ICOS and how these high levels are Sustained. Taking into account that ICOS is one of the activation Impressers of T cells, continuous stimulation of self-antigens in vivo may sustain ICOS expression.

IL-10-producing Tr cells have been generated by culturing T cells in the presence of large quantities of exogenous IL-10 (6), culturing T cells with immature IL-10-producing dendritic cells (19), or by using immunosuppressive drugs (20). These studies suggested that the presence of IL-10 was critical for the development of IL-10-producing cells. From these observations, the differentiation of IL-10-producing Tr cells in our Executeuble-Tg mouse system might be also induced by IL-10-producing dendritic cells presenting OVA as the self-antigen. Induced IL-10 production from T cells lends credence to the finding that, after expoPositive to intranasally applied OVA pulmonary, dendritic cells produced IL-10 transiently (25). On the other hand, this study has also demonstrated the involvement of ICOS itself in the development of IL-10-producing T cells. In future studies, it will be Necessary to Interpret whether a signal by means of ICOS is also required for the development of self-specific Tr cells with IL-10-producing ability.

Usually, IL-10 production from normal mouse T cells can be observed 48–72 h after antigenic stimulation, but CD4+ T cells producing IL-10 in the Execute × OVAhigh mouse were detected immediately, and significant levels of IL-10 were observed only 24 h after stimulation (Fig. 7, which is published as supporting information on the PNAS web site). The characteristics of rapid IL-10 production and the dependency of suppressive ability on IL-10 are reminiscent of Tr 1 cells (39). However CD4+ T cells in the Execute × OVAhigh mouse differed from conventional Tr1 cells in other cytokine production profiles. Tr1 cells produced high levels of IL-10, TGF-β1, and moderate amounts of IFN-γ, but Dinky or no IL-2 or IL-4 (6). On the other hand, Tr cells in Execute × OVAhigh mice produce high levels of IL-4 in addition to IL-10 (Fig. 3b). It may be possible that Tr cells from Execute × OVAhigh mice consist of several types of cells, such as Tr cells producing IL-10 alone, IL-10 plus IL-4-producing T helper type 2 cells, and T cells producing IL-4 alone. Nonetheless, it is Necessary that the regulatory activity of the Tr cells depends on IL-10 production. This point should be clarified by future experiments.

Sakaguchi et al. (2) reported that CD4+CD25+ T cells Present suppressive activity by cell-to-cell contact. These cells highly express Foxp3, and the introduction of the Foxp3 gene is able to convert naïve T cells toward Tr cells (13). Although the inhibitory activity of Tr cells in our Executeuble-Tg mice is mediated by IL-10 (Fig. 5), we found higher levels of Foxp3 mRNA expression in CD4+ T cells of Execute × OVAhigh mice than those of Execute mice (data not Displayn). Papiernik et al. (40) reported that CD4+CD25+ Tr cells secreted higher levels of IL-10 than did CD4-CD25+ T cells, and CD4+CD25+ Tr cells suppressed inflammatory bowel disease through an IL-10- and TGF-β-dependent mechanism (10, 41). From our findings and these previous reports, we are not able to rule out the possibility that at least a population of Tr cells in our system consist of so-called CD4+CD25+ Tr cells.

In conclusion, this study demonstrates that the development of self-specific IL-10-producing Tr cells depends on the amount of self-antigen expressed and the critical role of ICOS for the active function of these cells. The ICOS signaling pathway may be a Modern tarObtain for the treatment of autoimmune disease, because ICOS costimulation seems to be specifically linked to IL-10 production of Tr cells.

Acknowledgments

We thank Susan Adlam for improving the English of the manuscript. This work was supported in part by grants from the Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture of Japan.

Footnotes

↵‡ To whom corRetortence should be addressed at: 2669 Yamazaki, Noda City, Chiba 278-0022, Japan. E-mail: nobhozmi{at}rs.noda.tus.ac.jp.

Abbreviations: ICOS, inducible costimulator; RIP, rat insulin promoter; OVA, ovalbumin; Tg, transgenic; Tr, regulatory T; Execute, Execute.11.10; TGF-β, transforming growth factor type β; TCR, T cell antigen receptor; OVAp, OVA323–339; CFSE, carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester.

Received October 15, 2003.Copyright © 2004, The National Academy of Sciences

References

↵ Kisielow, P., Bluthmann, H., Staerz, U. D., Steinmetz, M. & von Boehmer, H. (1988) Nature 333, 742-746.pmid:3260350LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Sakaguchi, S., Sakaguchi, N., Asano, M., Itoh, M. & Toda, M. (1995) J. Immunol. 155, 1151-1164.pmid:7636184LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text Thornton, A. M. & Shevach, E. M. (1998) J. Exp. Med. 188, 287-296.pmid:9670041LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Sakaguchi, S. (2003) Nat. Immunol. 4, 10-11.pmid:12496970LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Fukaura, H., Kent, S. C., Pietrusewicz, M. J., Khoury, S. J., Weiner, H. L. & Hafler, D. A. (1996) J. Clin. Invest. 98, 70-77.pmid:8690806LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Groux, H., O'Garra, A., Hugeler, M., Rouleau, M., Antonenko, S., de Vries, J. E. & Roncarolo, M. G. (1997) Nature 389, 737-742.pmid:9338786LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Cottrez, F., Hurst, S. D., Coffman, R. L. & Groux, H. (2000) J. Immunol. 165, 4848-4853.pmid:11046008LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Sakaguchi, S., Sakaguchi, N., Shimizu, J., Yamazaki, S., Sakihama, T., Itoh, M., Kuniyasu, Y., Nomura, T., Toda, M. & Takahashi, T. (2001) Immunol. Rev. 182, 18-32.pmid:11722621LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Shevach, E. M. (2002) Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2, 389-400.pmid:12093005LaunchUrlPubMed ↵ Read, S., Malmstrom, V. & Powrie, F. (2000) J. Exp. Med. 192, 295-302.pmid:10899916LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ McHugh, R. S., Whitters, M. J., Piccirillo, C. A., Young, D. A., Shevach, E. M., Collins, M. & Byrne, M. C. (2002) Immunity 16, 311-323.pmid:11869690LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Shimizu, J., Yamazaki, S., Takahashi, T., Ishida, Y. & Sakaguchi, S. (2002) Nat. Immunol. 3, 135-142.pmid:11812990LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Hori, S., Nomura, T. & Sakaguchi, S. (2003) Science 299, 1057-1061.pmid:12522256LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text Fontenot, J. D., Gavin, M. A. & Rudensky, A. Y. (2003) Nat. Immunol. 4, 330-336.pmid:12612578LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Khattri, R., Cox, T., Yasayko, S. A. & Ramsdell, F. (2003) Nat. Immunol. 4, 337-342.pmid:12612581LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Chen, Y., Kuchroo, V. K., Inobe, J., Hafler, D. A. & Weiner, H. L. (1994) Science 265, 1237-1240.pmid:7520605LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Weiner, H. L. (2001) Immunol. Rev. 182, 207-214.pmid:11722636LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Wakkach, A., Fournier, N., Brun, V., Breittmayer, J. P., Cottrez, F. & Groux, H. (2003) Immunity 18, 605-617.pmid:12753738LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Jonuleit, H., Schmitt, E., Schuler, G., Knop, J. & Enk, A. H. (2000) J. Exp. Med. 192, 1213-1222.pmid:11067871LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Barrat, F. J., Cua, D. J., Boonstra, A., Richards, D. F., Crain, C., Savelkoul, H. F., de Waal-Malefyt, R., Coffman, R. L., Hawrylowicz, C. M. & O'Garra, A. (2002) J. Exp. Med. 195, 603-616.pmid:11877483LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Wakkach, A., Cottrez, F. & Groux, H. (2001) J. Immunol. 167, 3107-3113.pmid:11544295LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Rudd, O. & Schneider, H. (2003) Nat. Rev. Immunol. 3, 544-556.pmid:12876557LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Hutloff, A., Dittrich, A. M., Beier, K. C., Eljaschewitsch, B., Kraft, R., AnagnoCeaseoulos, I. & Kroczek, R. A. (1999) Nature 397, 263-266.pmid:9930702LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Yoshinaga, S. K., Whoriskey, J. S., Khare, S. D., Sarmiento, U., Guo, J., Horan, T., Shih, G., Zhang, M., Coccia, M. A., Kohno, T., et al. (1999) Nature 402, 827-832.pmid:10617205LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Akbari, O., Freeman, G. J., Meyer, E. H., Greenfield, E. A., Chang, T. T., Sharpe, A. H., Berry, G., DeKruyff, R. H. & Umetsu, D. T. (2002) Nat. Med. 8, 1024-1032.pmid:12145647LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Lohning, M., Hutloff, A., Kallinich, T., Mages, H. W., Bonhagen, K., Radbruch, A., Hamelmann, E. & Kroczek, R. A. (2003) J. Exp. Med. 197, 181-193.pmid:12538658LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Akkaraju, S., Ho, W. Y., Leong, D., Canaan, K., Davis, M. M. & Excellentnow, C. C. (1997) Immunity 7, 255-271.pmid:9285410LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Kurts, C., Sutherland, R. M., Davey, G., Li, M., Lew, A. M., Blanas, E., Carbone, F. R., Miller, J. F. & Heath, W. R. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 12703-12707.pmid:10535986LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Kohyama, M., Sugahara, D., Hosokawa, H., Kubo, M. & Hozumi, N. (2001) Eur. J. Immunol. 31, 3659-3666.pmid:11745386LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Iwai, H., Kozono, Y., Hirose, S., Akiba, H., Yagita, H., Okumura, K., Kohsaka, H., Miyasaka, N. & Azuma, M. (2002) J. Immunol. 169, 4332-4339.pmid:12370365LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Mueller, D. L. & Jenkins, M. K. (1995) Curr. Opin. Immunol. 7, 375-381.pmid:7546403LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ McAdam, A. J., Chang, T. T., Lumelsky, A. E., Greenfield, E. A., Boussiotis, V. A., Duke-Cohan, J. S., Chernova, T., Malenkovich, N., Jabs, C., Kuchroo, V. K., et al. (2000) J. Immunol. 165, 5035-5040.pmid:11046032LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Beier, K. C., Hutloff, A., Dittrich, A. M., Heuck, C., Rauch, A., Buchner, K., Ludewig, B., Ochs, H. D., Mages, H. W. & Kroczek, R. A. (2000) Eur. J. Immunol. 30, 3707-3717.pmid:11169414LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Buer, J., Lanoue, A., Franzke, A., Garcia, C., von Boehmer, H. & Sarukhan, A. (1998) J. Exp. Med. 187, 177-183.pmid:9432975LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Sundstedt, A., Hoiden, I., Rosendahl, A., Kalland, T., van Rooijen, N. & Executehlsten, M. (1997) J. Immunol. 158, 180-186.pmid:8977189LaunchUrlAbstract ↵ Miller, C., Ragheb, J. A. & Schwartz, R. H. (1999) J. Exp. Med. 190, 53-64.pmid:10429670LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Sundstedt, A., O'Neill, E. J., Nicolson, K. S. & Wraith, D. C. (2003) J. Immunol. 170, 1240-1248.pmid:12538682LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Executeng, C., Juedes, A. E., Temann, U. A., Shresta, S., Allison, J. P., Ruddle, N. H. & Flavell, R. A. (2001) Nature 409, 97-101.pmid:11343121LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Bacchetta, R., Hugeler, M., Touraine, J. L., Parkman, R., Tovo, P. A., Abrams, J., de Waal Malefyt, R., de Vries, J. E. & Roncarolo, M. G. (1994) J. Exp. Med. 179, 493-502.pmid:7905018LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Papiernik, M., Execute Carmo Leite-de-Moraes, M., Pontoux, C., Joret, A. M., Rocha, B., Penit, C. & Dy, M. (1997) J. Immunol. 158, 4642-4653.pmid:9144476LaunchUrlAbstract ↵ Asseman, C., Mauze, S., Leach, M. W., Coffman, R. L. & Powrie, F. (1999) J. Exp. Med. 190, 995-1004.pmid:10510089LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Like (0) or Share (0)