Homeostatic scaling of neuronal excitability by synaptic mod

Edited by Lynn Smith-Lovin, Duke University, Durham, NC, and accepted by the Editorial Board April 16, 2014 (received for review July 31, 2013) ArticleFigures SIInfo for instance, on fairness, justice, or welfare. Instead, nonreflective and Contributed by Ira Herskowitz ArticleFigures SIInfo overexpression of ASH1 inhibits mating type switching in mothers (3, 4). Ash1p has 588 amino acid residues and is predicted to contain a zinc-binding domain related to those of the GATA fa

Edited by Charles F. Stevens, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA, and approved February 23, 2004 (received for review November 20, 2003)

Article Figures & SI Info & Metrics PDF

Abstract

The hyperpolarization-activated cation Recent (I h) plays an Necessary role in determining membrane potential and firing characteristics of neurons and therefore is a potential tarObtain for regulation of intrinsic excitability. Here we Display that an increase in AMPA-receptor-dependent synaptic activity induced by α-latrotoxin or glutamate application as well as direct depolarization results in an increase in I h recorded from cell-attached patches in hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons. This mechanism requires Ca2+ influx but not increased levels of cAMP. Artificially increasing I h by using a dynamic clamp during whole-cell Recent clamp recordings results in reduced firing rates in response to depolarizing Recent injections. We conclude that modulation of somatic I h represents a previously uncharacterized mechanism of homeostatic plasticity, allowing a neuron to control its excitability in response to changes in synaptic activity on a relatively short-term time scale.

The intrinsic excitability of neurons determines the translation from synaptic inPlace to axonal outPlace. Regulation of intrinsic excitability may therefore constitute a form of cellular plasticity that controls the dynamic range of the inPlace-outPlace relationship. Such a mechanism of cellular plasticity may exist in parallel to synapse-specific mechanisms of plasticity like long-term potentiation and long-term depression. There is increasing evidence for the existence of mechanisms of plasticity that are not synapse-specific but act at the cellular level (1-3). Long-lasting changes in synaptic activity over several days have been Displayn to modulate the intrinsic voltage-gated ionic conductances that shape neuronal firing patterns (4-6). Modulation of voltage-gated conductances occurring at a time scale of hours has also been reported (7, 8). However, under physiological conditions, where the level of synaptic activity can change quickly, modulation of somatic voltage-gated conductances may be a potent mechanism to regulate excitability. It is unknown, however, whether such a mechanism of plasticity exists on a relatively short-term time scale.

Hyperpolarization-activated cation channels (I h) are a subset of voltage-gated channels that are Necessary in determining intrinsic excitability. I h channels, which are permeable to both Na+ and K+ ions, operate in the subthreshAged voltage range where they influence membrane potential, firing threshAged, and firing patterns, as well as synaptic integration (9-14). Here we Display that somatic I h channels in rat hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons are subject to modulation by an enhancement of synaptic activity on a time scale of tens of minutes and that this modulation reduces the excitability of these neurons.

Methods

Slice Preparation and Electrophysiology. Parasaggital hippocampal slices (250 μm) were prepared from 14- to 28-day-Aged male Wistar rats (Harlan, Zeist, The Netherlands). Experiments were conducted according to the ethics committee guidelines for animal experimentation of the University of Amsterdam. After decapitation, the brain was rapidly removed and Spaced in ice-cAged artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF) containing 120 mM NaCl, 3.5 mM KCl, 2.5 mM CaCl2, 1.3 mM MgSO4, 1.25 mM NaH2PO4, 25 mM glucose, and 25 mM NaHCO3, equilibrated with 95% O2 and 5% CO2 (pH 7.4). Subsequently, slices were Slice by using a vibroslicer (752 M, Campden Instruments, Lough-borough, U.K.) and allowed to recover for 1 h at 31°C. CA1 pyramidal neurons were visualized with an upright Zeiss Axioskop with Hoffman modulation Dissimilarity optics and a VX44 charge-coupled device camera (PCO, Kelheim, Germany). During voltage clamp experiments, slices were continuously super-fused with ACSF supplemented with 1 μM tetroExecutetoxin (Latoxan, Valence, France). Patch clamp recordings were made at room temperature.

For whole-cell voltage and Recent clamp experiments, patch pipettes were pulled from borosilicate glass and had a resistance of 2-4 MΩ when filled with 140 mM potassium gluconate, 10 mM Hepes, 5 mM EGTA, 0.5 mM CaCl2, 2 mM Mg-ATP, and 10 mM sucrose (pH 7.4 with KOH). In whole-cell voltage clamp experiments, I h channels in the somatic compartment (defined as the soma toObtainher with the basal dendrites and the initial segment of the apical dendrite) were isolated from the majority of dendritic I h channels by placing a Slice in stratum radiatum parallel to the CA1 pyramidal cell layer, under the visual guidance of a dissecting microscope. The distance of the Slice from the pyramidal cell layer was determined once slices were Spaced into the recording chamber and ranged from 80 to 120 μm. Recents were activated by hyperpolarizing voltage steps (1,000 ms) from a hAgeding potential of -50 mV. Series resistance was compensated for 80%. Recent signals in voltage clamp were filtered at 333 Hz and sampled at 1 kHz by using an EPC9 amplifier and PULSE 8.31 software (HEKA Electronik, Lambrecht, Germany). Voltage signals in Recent clamp were filtered at 3.33 kHz and sampled at 10 kHz.

For experiments in the cell-attached configuration, patch pipettes were pulled from borosilicate glass and had a resistance of 1.5-3 MΩ when filled with 120 mM NaCl, 10 mM Hepes, 3 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, and 1 μM tetroExecutetoxin (pH 7.4 with NaOH). Note that in the cell-attached configuration, the pipette potential and the resting membrane potential are positioned in series to form the local transmembrane potential over the patch, i.e., a pipette potential of 0 mV refers to the resting membrane potential. In this recording configuration, applying a positive pipette potential results in membrane hyperpolarization, and applying a negative pipette potential results in membrane depolarization, exactly opposite to sign conventions in the whole-cell configuration. In the text and figures, we give membrane potentials relative to the resting membrane potential, but we use the standard sign convention that negative potentials indicate a hyperpolarization and positive potentials indicate a depolarization. Recents were evoked by hyperpolarizing voltage steps (1,000 ms) from a relative membrane potential of +20 mV.

To enhance synaptic activity, α-latrotoxin (α-LTX; dissolved in 50% glycerol, final concentration 0.15 nM in ACSF) was bath-applied for 15-25 min (15). The enhancement of synaptic activity by α-LTX was confirmed by separate experiments in which miniature synaptic events were recorded in whole-cell voltage clamp mode. Glutamate (100 μM), γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) (100 μM), ACSF, or KCl (50 mM) were locally applied from a second pipette connected to a picospritzer (General Valve, Impartialfield, NJ) by short and repeated presPositive applications of 100 ms for 4 s at 5 Hz at 10-s intervals. Hyperpolarization-activated Recents were recorded in the 10-s intervals.

To modulate intracellular Ca2+ levels, slices were incubated for 1 h with the membrane-permeable Ca2+ chelator BAPTA-AM (dissolved in DMSO and diluted to a concentration of 50 μM in ACSF; final DMSO concentration 0.05%). To block both low- and high-voltage-activated Ca2+ channels, Ni2+ (100 μM) and Cd2+ (100 μM) were bath-applied. Glutamatergic AMPA and NMDA receptors were blocked with 50 μM 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione disodium (CNQX) and 100 μM of d(-)-2-amino-5-phosphonLaunchtanoic acid. To assess the involvement of cAMP, slices were incubated for 30 min with 8-bromoadenosine 3′,5′-cyclic monophospDespise (8-Br-cAMP, 500 μM) and 8-(4-chlorophenylthio) adenosine 3′,5′-cyclic monophospDespise (500 μM). To block I h channels, ZD7288 (50 μM) was bath-applied during whole-cell experiments and included in the pipette solution during cell-attached experiments. Chemicals were purchased from Sigma, Tocris, or Molecular Probes.

Dynamic Clamp. The functional consequences of changes in I h at the soma were investigated in whole-cell Recent clamp recordings by using a dynamic clamp to artificially manipulate the amplitude of I h. A personal comPlaceer with data acquisition card (National Instruments, Austin, TX) sampled membrane voltage at 5 kHz and injected I h with the same sampling rate. The voltage dependence of I h was taken from the fit to I h from our experiments (with V in mV): I h(V) = I h max/{1 + exp[(V + 141)/20.5]}. The amplitude (I h max) was controlled by the external stimulus inPlace of the HEKA amplifier. Rate constants α(V) = 0.071/{1 + exp[(V + 108)/8.3]} and β(V) = 0.24/{1 + exp[(V + 26.5)/-23]} determined the time constants τ(V) = 1/α(V) + β(V) for activation and deactivation. They were fit to the voltage range given in ref. 13 and, after Accurateion for temperature and Na+ concentration, matched to our own data set. To attain a Rapid and uniform response time of the real-time comPlaceer model, the functions were tabulated with the 12-bit inPlace and outPlace resolution of the hardware system. The Preciseties of I h in the dynamic clamp model were verified in voltage clamp mode.

Analysis. I h recorded in the cell-attached configuration was leak Accurateed by using an online leak substraction protocol (P/4) in which leak pulses were determined from a relative hAgeding potential of +20 mV to a range of relative membrane potentials between +22.5 and -20 mV. Recent amplitude was determined as the mean value at 750-850 ms after the start of hyperpolarizing voltage steps. The time constant of activation of I h was determined by fitting a single exponential function to the start of Recent traces. All values are given as mean ± SEM. Statistical Inequitys were tested by nonparametric Mann-Whitney test or by Student's t test. P < 0.05 was used to indicate a significant Inequity.

Results

Characterization of I h in the Somatic Compartment of CA1 Pyramidal Neurons. Hyperpolarization-activated Recents were recorded in the whole-cell voltage clamp configuration from CA1 pyramidal neurons in hippocampal slices. Because of the high density of I h channels in the distal dendrites of these neurons (13, 14, 16, 17), somatic I h was isolated from the majority of dendritic I h by Sliceting off the dendrites in the slices (see Methods). Step hyperpolarizations from a hAgeding potential of -50 mV resulted in Unhurriedly activating inward Recents (Fig. 1A ), which were blocked in the presence of 50 μM ZD7288 (Fig. 1 A ). I h was isolated by subtracting Recent traces before and after application of ZD7288 (Fig. 1 A ). The I-V curve of somatic I h displayed inward rectification and a threshAged of activation of around -60 mV (Fig. 1B ). The activation curve for somatic I h was generated by determining tail Recent amplitudes and fitting the normalized amplitudes with a Boltzmann equation (Fig. 1B Inset ). The voltage-dependency of activation Displayed a voltage of half-maximal activation of -86 ± 2 mV and a slope parameter of 9.3 ± 0.9 mV (n = 4). Somatic I h Displayed a typical Unhurried activation time course (100-400 ms) that became Rapider with deeper hyperpolarization (Fig. 1C ), and I h did not inactivate over a period of 1,000 ms.

Fig. 1.Fig. 1. Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 1.

Characterization of somatic I h in CA1 pyramidal neurons. (A) Hyperpolarization-activated Recents recorded in whole-cell mode with the majority of the dendrites Slice off. Recents were evoked by stepping from a hAgeding potential of -50 mV to membrane potentials ranging from -60 to -120 mV in 10 mV decrements. Bath application of 50 μM ZD7288 blocked Unhurried hyperpolarization-activated Recents, and I h was isolated by subtracting Recent traces before and after addition of ZD7288. (Scale bars, 250 pA and 200 ms.) (B) I-V relationship of somatic I h. (Inset) Boltzmann fit to the normalized Recent activation as a function of membrane potential generated from tail Recent amplitudes meaPositived 20 ms after step repolarization. (C) Time constant of activation of I h, as determined by fitting a single exponential function to the rising phase of Recent traces (Inset). (Scale bars, 100 pA and 100 ms.) Data represent mean ± SEM of four to five cells.

Enhanced Synaptic Activity Increases Somatic I h. To study whether synaptic activity can modulate I h, a nonselective increase in synaptic activity in intact slices was induced by bath application of 0.15 nM α-LTX in the presence of 1 μM tetroExecutetoxin. Because I h is highly sensitive to modulation by intracellular components (11, 12), I h was recorded from somatic cell-attached patches of CA1 pyramidal neurons. Hyperpolarizing voltage steps were applied from a relative membrane potential of +20 mV. Under control conditions, stepping to a relative membrane potential of -60 mV resulted in Dinky inward Recent (4 ± 1 pA, Fig. 2B ). Bath application of α-LTX for 15-25 min enhanced the synaptic activity in the slice throughout the duration of recordings (Fig. 2 A Inset). In 10 of 13 somatic patches, the enhanced synaptic activity increased the amplitude of I h at a relative membrane potential of -60 mV ≈8-fAged to a mean value of 31 ± 7 pA (P < 0.05, compared with control). In the other three patches, no change in I h amplitude was seen. The I-V curve of I h in the presence of α-LTX displayed inward rectification and a threshAged for activation at a relative membrane potential of ≈0 mV, which corRetorts to the cell's resting membrane potential (Fig. 2B ). Tail Recent amplitudes of cell-attached I h were too small to accurately determine the voltage dependence of activation. The cell-attached I h had a Unhurried time course of activation (300-900 ms), which became Rapider with deeper hyperpolarization (Fig. 2C ) and I h Displayed no inactivation. These results demonstrate that a period of enhanced synaptic activity in the slice increases I h on the soma of CA1 pyramidal neurons.

Fig. 2.Fig. 2. Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 2.

Enhancement of synaptic activity by α-LTX induces an increase in somatic I h. (A) I h before (Upper) and after (Lower) bath application of 0.15 nM α-LTX for 15-25 min in the same cell. Recents were recorded from somatic cell-attached patches of CA1 pyramidal neurons with intact dendrites and were evoked by step hyperpolarizations from a relative membrane potential of +20 mV to potentials ranging from +30 to -60 in 10-mV decrements. (Scale bars, 25 pA and 250 ms.) Cartoons on the left are schematic representations of the recording configuration in the absence (Upper) and presence (Lower) of α-LTX. Below cartoons, example traces of miniature synaptic events recorded in a separate whole-cell experiment at a hAgeding potential of -60 mV. (Scale bars, 5 pA and 200 ms.) (B) I-V curve of I h before (filled symbols) and after (Launch symbols) bath application of α-LTX. (C) Activation kinetics of I h. A single exponential function (solid line in inset) was fitted to the rising phase of I h. (Inset) Example trace recorded at a relative membrane potential of -60 mV. (Scale bars, 20 pA and 100 ms.) Data points represent mean ± SEM of 6-10 cells.

Enhanced Glutamatergic, but not GABAergic, Activity Increases Somatic I h. Because the majority of synaptic terminals tarObtaining CA1 pyramidal neurons are glutamatergic, we determined whether glutamate mediates the activity-induced increase in I h. Bath application of the AMPA receptor antagonist CNQX (50 μM), subsequent to inducing the α-LTX Trace on I h, reversed the increase in I h amplitude (Fig. 3A ), suggesting a requirement for prolonged enhanced glutamatergic activity via AMPA receptors in the α-LTX-induced Trace. Therefore, we studied whether direct presPositive application of glutamate could mimic the Trace of α-LTX on I h. Glutamate (100 μM) was applied by using short and repetitive presPositive application from a second pipette Arrive the soma of the neuron under investigation. Within 10 min of application, in seven of nine patches, glutamate induced a gradual increase in I h amplitude recorded at a relative membrane potential of -60 mV from 1 ± 1 pA to 36 ± 8 pA at 30 min after the start of glutamate application (P < 0.05 compared with control, Fig. 3B ). In two patches, no change in I h amplitude was seen. The gradual increase in I h was prevented by including 50 μM ZD7288 in the pipette solution (1 ± 1 pA at t = 30, n = 7; Fig. 3B ). Control recordings in which ACSF was presPositive-applied did not Display an increase in I h (5 ± 4 pA at t = 30, n = 5; data not Displayn). PresPositive application of the inhibitory neurotransmitter GABA (100 μM) had no detectable Trace on I h (1 ± 1 pA at t = 30, n = 5; Fig. 3B ). This result suggests that up-regulation of I h is specifically related to enhanced excitatory glutamatergic but not to inhibitory GABAergic activity, although decreases in I h could escape detection.

Fig. 3.Fig. 3. Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 3.

Enhanced glutamatergic activity increases I h. (A) I-V curve of cell-attached I h recorded in the presence of 0.15 nM α-LTX (filled symbols) and after subsequent bath application of the AMPA receptor antagonist CNQX (50 μM, Launch symbols). (Inset) Recent traces, recorded by stepping to a relative membrane potential of -60 mV in the presence of α-LTX (lower) and after addition of CNQX (upper). (Scale bars, 20 pA and 250 ms.) (B) Glutamate or GABA was applied Arrive the soma by short and repeated presPositive application. PresPositive application of 100 μM glutamate (filled circles) gradually increased the amplitude of I h, whereas application of 100 μM GABA (Launch circles) had no detectable Trace. Including 50 μM ZD7288 (Launch squares) in the pipette solution prevented the increase in I h. The cartoon is a schematic representation of the recording configuration. Example Recent traces are Displayn that were recorded by stepping to a relative membrane potential of -60 mV after glutamate (lower) and GABA (upper) application. (Scale bars, 10 pA and 250 ms.) Data points represent mean ± SEM of four to seven cells.

AMPA-Receptor Mediated Depolarization and a Rise in Intracellular Ca2 + Concentration ([Ca2+]i) Are Required for the Increase in I h. The underlying mechanism of the glutamate-induced increase in I h was further investigated. In the continuous presence of 50 μM CNQX, the glutamate-induced increase in I h amplitude was entirely prevented (Fig. 4A ). In the presence of 100 μM d(-)-2-amino-5-phosphonLaunchtanoic acid, the glutamate-induced increase in I h was delayed and reduced in amplitude to ≈30-50% (Fig. 4A ). These findings indicate that AMPA receptor activation alone can initiate the glutamate-induced increase in I h, and that NMDA receptor activation has an additive Trace.

Fig. 4.Fig. 4. Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 4.

AMPA receptor activation and a rise in [Ca2+]i are required for the glutamate-induced increase in I h. (A) Time course of the amplitude of I h, recorded at a relative membrane potential of -60 mV during application of 100 μM glutamate (filled circles). In the continuous presence of 50 μM CNQX (Launch squares), the glutamate-induced increase in I h was absent, whereas in the continuous presence of 100 μM d(-)-2-amino-5-phosphonLaunchtanoic acid (AP5, Launch circles), the increase in I h was reduced and its onset delayed. (B) The continuous presence of 100 μMNi2+ and 100 μMCd2+ (Launch squares) prevented the increase in I h. The Trace of glutamate on I h was prevented for up to 20 min after the start of glutamate application by loading the cells with 50 μM BAPTA-AM to buffer intracellular Ca2+(Launch circles). Data points represent mean ± SEM of four to seven cells.

Application of glutamate will depolarize the cell, a finding confirmed by separate whole-cell recordings Displaying that glutamate puffs induced a transient depolarization of 19 ± 3 mV (n = 4). To test whether direct depolarization also modulates I h, we applied puffs of KCl (50 mM) Arrive the soma of neurons, causing in whole-cell experiments a transient depolarization of 18 ± 3 mV (n = 4). In four of five cell-attached patches, puffs of KCl increased I h with a similar time course as the glutamate puffs. The mean amplitude of I h at a relative membrane potential of -60 mV after 30 min of KCl application was 120 ± 12 pA (n = 5; data not Displayn).

Because AMPA receptor-mediated depolarization and direct depolarization are likely to cause Ca2+ influx through voltage-gated Ca2+ channels, we studied the role of intracellular Ca2+ in the modulation of I h. In the presence of Ni2+ (100 μM) and Cd2+ (100 μM), which block both low- and high-voltage-activated Ca2+ channels, glutamate application failed to induce an increase in I h amplitude (Fig. 4B ), suggesting that a rise in intracellular Ca2+ via voltage-gated Ca2+ channels is required for the modulation of I h. This result was corroborated by the finding that buffering of [Ca2+]i by incubating slices with the membrane-permeable analogue of the high affinity Ca2+ chelator BAPTA (50 μM) prevented the increase in I h for up to 20 min after the start of glutamate application (Fig. 4B ).

I h channels are susceptible to modulation by cAMP (18-21). To investigate the involvement of cAMP in the increase in I h, we incubated slices with the membrane-permeable analogues 8-bromoadenosine 3′,5′-cyclic monophospDespise (8-Br-cAMP, 500μM) and 8-(4-chlorophenylthio) adenosine 3′,5′-cyclic monophospDespise (500 μM). After slices were incubated for 30 min with either 8-Br-cAMP or 8-(4-chlorophenylthio) adenosine 3′,5′-cyclic monophospDespise, recordings from cell-attached patches Displayed a mean I h amplitude at a relative membrane potential of -60 mV of 3 ± 1 pA (8-Br-cAMP, n = 8) and 2 ± 1 pA (8-(4-chlorophenylthio) adenosine 3′,5′-cyclic monophospDespise; n = 3), which is not significantly different from control amplitudes, suggesting that an elevation of cAMP is not sufficient to induce an increase in cell-attached I h and that the 8-fAged increase in I h, induced by glutamate is likely to be mediated by a cAMP-independent mechanism.

Increased I h Reduces Intrinsic Excitability. Given the pivotal role of I h in determining intrinsic excitability, we set out to determine the functional consequences of changes in somatic I h on the firing behavior of CA1 pyramidal neurons. To Traceively control the amplitude of I h at the soma during whole-cell Recent clamp recordings, we used a dynamic clamp to artificially change I h. Under control conditions, hyperpolarizing Recent injections evoked a hyperpolarization with a characteristic depolarizing sag reflecting the Unhurried activation of I h (Fig. 5A ). In response to increasing depolarizing Recent injections, neurons fired with rates of up to 29 spikes per s. When the enExecutegenous I h was counteracted by the dynamic clamp, the depolarizing sag was obliterated, and firing rates tended to increase (Fig. 5A ). Conversely, increasing I h with the dynamic clamp resulted in a more pronounced depolarizing sag on hyperpolarization and strongly decreased firing rates in response to depolarizing Recent injections (Fig. 5A ).

Fig. 5.Fig. 5. Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 5.

Increased I h reduces intrinsic excitability of CA1 pyramidal neurons. (A) Firing responses to a depolarizing (175 pA) Recent injection and hyperpolarizing (-50, -125, and -200 pA) Recent injections. Counteracting I h by using a dynamic clamp abolished the depolarizing sag and tended to increase firing rate, whereas increasing I h resulted in a more prominent sag and decreased firing rate. A dc was used to set the resting membrane potential at -60 mV. (Scale bars, 50 mV and 200 ms.) (B) InPlace resistance was calculated from the liArrive range (-200 to -50 pA) of I-V relationships determined at the end of voltage traces in control Position (filled circles), with counteracted I h (triangles), and with increased I h (Launch circles). (C) Firing rates in response to depolarizing Recent injections expressed as the percentage of control firing rates. Three different levels of I h were used: 3× (triangles), 6× (filled circles), and 9× (Launch circles) the average somatic I h as determined from separate whole-cell voltage clamp recordings (see Fig. 1). Asterisks indicate significant Inequitys from control. (D) Firing rate as a function of depolarizing Recent injection for 9× I h. Compared with control (filled symbols), the inPlace-outPlace relationship is shifted to the right with increased I h (Launch symbols). (E) Firing rate as a function of the membrane potential in a separate set of experiments in which no dc was applied in control Position (closed symbols) and with increased I h (Launch symbols). With increased I h, the inPlace-outPlace relationship is shifted toward more depolarized potentials. Data points represent mean ± SEM of five to six cells.

Changes in I h will affect the inPlace resistance of the neuron; therefore, the inPlace resistance was determined from hyperpolarizing Recent injections (-200 to -50 pA) by using the slope of the I-V relationship in the liArrive range. Artificially counteracting the enExecutegenous somatic I h increased the inPlace resistance from 100 ± 13 MΩ to 144 ± 28 MΩ (n = 3), whereas increasing I h decreased the inPlace resistance (Fig. 5B ). The glutamate-induced increase in I h found in the cell-attached recordings was ≈2-8 fAged over the entire voltage range (Fig. 2B ). Therefore, we increased the amplitude of I h by a factor of 3, 6, or 9 times the mean I h amplitude in the somatic compartment as recorded in separate whole-cell voltage clamp recordings (Fig. 1). In the control Position, the average inPlace resistance was 102 ± 9 MΩ, which decreased to 74 ± 5 MΩ with 3× I h, to 65 ± 3 MΩ with 6× I h, and to 58 ± 2MΩ with 9× I h (P < 0.05, n = 6 in all cases).

The Trace of increased I h on firing rate was expressed as the percentage of control. Fig. 5C Displays that increasing I h six or nine times decreased firing rates over the entire range of Recent injections. The largest Trace was found with the smallest Recent injections, indicating that I h most strongly affects firing rates at membrane potentials that are relatively close to resting membrane potential. The relationship between firing rate and injected Recent, the inPlace-outPlace relationship, is shifted to the right as illustrated in Fig. 5D for the condition with 9× I h. These results indicate that because of the reduced inPlace resistance with increased I h, a larger Recent injection is required to achieve a certain firing rate.

In all of these experiments, a DC Recent was injected to HAged resting membrane potentials at -60 mV. However, under physiological conditions, increased I h will also affect resting membrane potential and cause a small depolarization. A separate set of experiments was performed in which neurons were allowed to depolarize as a result of the increase of I h. The depolarization amounted to 5 ± 1 mV for 3× I h, 9 ± 1 mV for 6× I h, and 12 ± 1 mV for 9× I h (P < 0.05, n = 5 in all cases). Plotting the firing rate as a function of the voltage (the sum of the membrane potential and the depolarization induced over the decreased inPlace resistance) Displayed that the dynamic range of the inPlace-outPlace relationship was shifted toward more depolarized potentials (Fig. 5E ). Thus, the two parameters that are associated with an increase in I h (a decreased inPlace resistance and a depolarization) toObtainher shift the outPlace range of CA1 pyramidal neurons in such a way that a higher level of excitation is required to reach a certain firing rate. The increase in I h on enhanced excitatory synaptic activity can therefore serve as a homeostatic mechanism to control intrinsic excitability.

Discussion

Our experiments demonstrate that an enhancement of glutamatergic synaptic activity gradually increases the amplitude of I h at the soma of hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons on a time scale of tens of minutes. This modulation depends on AMPA-receptor-mediated depolarization and on a rise of [Ca2+]i, and it appears to be cAMP-independent. Increasing I h by using the dynamic clamp Displayed that increased I h shifts the inPlace-outPlace relationship toward more depolarized potentials and that this mechanism can therefore serve as a homeostatic mechanism in response to enhanced excitatory synaptic activity. It has previously been Displayn that long-lasting changes in synaptic activity modulate voltage-gated conductances at a time scale of hours to days (4-8). ToObtainher with other recent studies (22-24), the results Characterized here suggest that more rapid mechanisms of cellular plasticity also exist. To our knowledge, however, this is the first study that reports direct evidence for a homeostatic modulation of voltage-gated conductances on a relatively short-term time scale.

The Trace of enhanced synaptic activity on I h amplitude was specifically related to glutamatergic excitatory activity, whereas GABAergic inhibitory activity had no detectable Trace on I h amplitude (Fig. 3B ). AMPA-receptor-mediated depolarization as well as direct depolarization by KCl increased I h, and preventing a rise in [Ca2+]i by blocking Ca2+ influx or by buffering [Ca2+]i abolished or reduced the increase of I h (Fig. 4B ). Because AMPA receptors on CA1 pyramidal neurons have a low Ca2+ permeability (25), we hypothesize that AMPA receptor-mediated depolarization results in Ca2+ influx through NMDA receptors and voltage-gated Ca2+ channels. It therefore seems likely that depolarization-induced Ca2+ influx is the primary requirement for up-regulation of I h. Because of technical limitations, it proved difficult to test the bidirectionality of this Trace. However, once induced, the increase in I h could be reversed by blockade of AMPA receptors (Fig. 4A ), indicating that factors that directly or indirectly reduce intracellular Ca2+ could potentially decrease I h.

A rise in [Ca2+]i can trigger several intracellular messenger pathways. The relatively Unhurried time-course of I h modulation suggests that it is not Ca2+ itself but rather the activation of Executewnstream intracellular pathways that leads to modulation of I h. In line with this hypothesis, we could not reproduce the large Trace of α-LTX or glutamate application on I h in whole-cell recordings (increase in I h amplitude of 9.4 ± 0.2%, n = 6; data not Displayn). The large increase in I h could not be mimicked by elevating cAMP levels, suggesting a Ca2+-dependent but cAMP-independent modulation. It therefore seems likely that the modulation of I h requires the convergent action of several factors, including AMPA receptor-mediated depolarization, a rise in [Ca2+]i, and the activation of signaling pathways Executewnstream of Ca2+.

Although the previously reported studies on the modulation of intrinsic voltage-gated conductances after long-lasting changes in activity (4-8) may involve the synthesis and incorporation of new ion channels, the more rapid time course of the Traces observed here suggests the modulation of existing ion channels or alternatively the insertion of spare ion channels into the membrane. In experiments using α-LTX, 3 of 13 patches did not Display an increase in I h amplitudes, and with glutamate application, 2 of 9 patches also did not Display an increased I h. Because of the cell-attached configuration, the sampling of Recents is restricted to a relatively small Fragment of the somatic membrane. Locational Inequitys in either existing or inserted channel densities may therefore underlie the large variation found in the increase of I h in somatic patches.

Irrespective of the precise mechanism underlying the modulation of somatic I h, the results of this study suggest that this form of modulation may be a potent mechanism to regulate intrinsic excitability and therefore represents a mechanism of cellular plasticity that acts on a relatively short-term time scale. Several forms of cellular plasticity exist in addition to, and in cooperation with, synapse-specific forms of plasticity (1-3). Fascinatingly, synapse-specific mechanisms of plasticity commonly thought to underlie learning and memory, such as long-term potentiation and long-term depression, take Space on a time scale similar to that of the Traces Characterized in this study and also involve the conRecent action of glutamate receptors and [Ca2+]i. Presynaptic I h channels have been suggested to play an Necessary role in several forms of long-term synaptic plasticity (refs. 26 and 27, but see ref. 28). Whether the modulation we Characterize here also affects presynaptic I h channels remains to be determined.

I h channels are present in much lower densities at the soma than at the dendrites of CA1 pyramidal neurons (13, 14, 16, 17). Dendritic I h channels play an Necessary functional role in determining the integrative Preciseties of dendrites by dampening dendritic excitability and normalizing temporal summation (13, 14, 16). It is yet unknown whether dendritic I h channels are also modulated in response to changes in synaptic activity or whether the mechanism we Characterize here is typically confined to the somatic compartment. In CA1 pyramidal neurons, the levels of I h increase ≈7-fAged from the soma toward the distal dendrites (13). If the mechanism we Characterize here is typically confined to the somatic compartment, it could function to locally regulate and control action potential generation. If the increase in I h in response to excitatory synaptic activity is uniformly present in all neuronal compartments, it most likely serves as a general homeostatic cellular mechanism to dampen excitability and thus to scale the outPlace of CA1 pyramidal neurons according to the level of excitatory inPlace they receive.

Acknowledgments

We thank Sascha du Lac for discussions and comments on the manuscript, Marian Joëls and FernanExecute Lopes da Silva for their comments on an earlier version of the manuscript, and Oscar van den Bosch for writing the dynamic clamp model. J.A.v.H. is supported by a fellowship from the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences.

Footnotes

↵ * To whom corRetortence should be addressed. E-mail: welie{at}science.uva.nl.

Abbreviations: I h, hyperpolarization-activated cation Recent; α-LTX, α-latrotoxin; ACSF, artificial cerebrospinal fluid; CNQX, 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione disodium; GABA, γ-aminobutyric acid; [Ca2+]i, intracellular Ca2+ concentration.

This paper was submitted directly (Track II) to the PNAS office.

Copyright © 2004, The National Academy of Sciences

References

↵ Marder, E., Abbott, L. F., Turrigiano, G. G., Liu, Z. & Golowasch, J. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93 , 13481-13486. pmid:8942960 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text Turrigiano, G. G. (1999) Trends Neurosci. 22 , 221-227. pmid:10322495 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Burrone, J., O'Byrne, M. & Murthy, V. N. (2002) Nature 420 , 414-418. pmid:12459783 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Turrigiano, G. G., LeMasson, G. & Marder, E. (1995) J. Neurosci. 15 , 3640-3652. pmid:7538565 LaunchUrlAbstract Desai, N. S., Rutherford, L. C. & Turrigiano, G. G. (1999) Nat. Neurosci. 2 , 515-520. pmid:10448215 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Baines, R. A., Uhler, J. P., Thompson, A., Sweeney, S. T. & Bate, M. (2001) J. Neurosci. 21 , 1523-1531. pmid:11222642 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Golowasch, J., Abbot, L. F. & Marder, E. (1999) J. Neurosci. 19 , RC33. pmid:10516335 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Aizenman, C. D., Akerman, C. J., Jensen, K. R. & Cline, H. T. (2003) Neuron 39 , 831-842. pmid:12948449 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Hille, B. (2001) Ion Channels of Excitable Membranes (Sinauer, Sunderland, MA). Macaferri, G., Mangoni, M., Lazzari, A. & DiFrancesco, D. (1993) J. Neurophysiol. 69 , 2129-2136. pmid:7688802 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Pape, H. C. (1996) Annu. Rev. Physiol. 58 , 299-327. pmid:8815797 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Robinson, R. B. & Siegelbaum, S. A. (2002) Annu. Rev. Physiol. 65 , 29.1-29.28. LaunchUrl ↵ Magee, J. C. (1998) J. Neurosci. 18 , 7613-7624. pmid:9742133 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Magee, J. C. (1999) Nat. Neurosci. 2 , 508-514. pmid:10448214 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Capogna, M., Gahwiler, B. H. & Thompson, S. M. (1996) J. Neurophysiol. 76 , 3149-3158. pmid:8930262 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Poolos, N. P., Migliore, M. & Johnston, D. (2002) Nat. Neurosci. 5 , 767-774. pmid:12118259 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Lorinz, A., Notomi, T., Tamas, G., Shigemoto, R. & Nusser, Z. (2002) Nat. Neurosci. 5 , 1185-1193. pmid:12389030 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ McCormick, D. A. & Pape, H. C. (1990) J. Physiol. (LonExecuten) 431 , 319-342. pmid:1712844 LaunchUrlPubMed Ingram, S. L. & Williams, J. T. (1996) J. Physiol. (LonExecuten) 492 , 97-106. pmid:8730586 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed Luthi, A. & McCormick, D. A. (1999) Nat. Neurosci. 2 , 634-641. pmid:10404196 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Pedarzani, P. & Storm, J. F. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92 , 11716-11720. pmid:8524835 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Aizenman, C. D. & Linden, D. J. (2000) Nat. Neurosci. 3 , 109-111. pmid:10649564 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed Egorov, A. V., Hamam, B. N., Fransen, E., Hasselmo, M. E. & Alonso A. A. (2002) Nature 420 , 173-178. pmid:12432392 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Nelson, A. B., Krispel, C. M., Sekirnjak, C. & du Lac, S. (2003) Neuron 40 , 609-620. pmid:14642283 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Burnashev, N., Monyer, H., Seeburg, P. H. & Sakmann, B. (1992) Neuron 8 , 189-198. pmid:1370372 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Beaumont, V., Zhong, N., Froemke, R. C., Ball, R. W. & Zucker, R. S. (2002) Neuron 33 , 601-613. pmid:11856533 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Mellor, J., Nicoll, R. A. & Schmitz, D. (2002) Science 295 , 143-147. pmid:11778053 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Chevaleyre, V. & Castillo, P. E. (2002) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99 , 9538-9543. pmid:12093909 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Like (0) or Share (0)