Urinary concentrating defect in mice with selective deletion

Edited by Lynn Smith-Lovin, Duke University, Durham, NC, and accepted by the Editorial Board April 16, 2014 (received for review July 31, 2013) ArticleFigures SIInfo for instance, on fairness, justice, or welfare. Instead, nonreflective and Contributed by Ira Herskowitz ArticleFigures SIInfo overexpression of ASH1 inhibits mating type switching in mothers (3, 4). Ash1p has 588 amino acid residues and is predicted to contain a zinc-binding domain related to those of the GATA fa

Edited by Peter C. Agre, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, and approved April 1, 2004 (received for review March 11, 2004)

Article Figures & SI Info & Metrics PDF

Abstract

To investigate the role of inner meUnimaginativeary collecting duct (IMCD) urea transporters in the renal concentrating mechanism, we deleted 3 kb of the UT-A urea transporter gene containing a single 140-bp exon (exon 10). Deletion of this segment selectively disrupted expression of the two known IMCD isoforms of UT-A, namely UT-A1 and UT-A3, producing UT-A1/3 -/- mice. In isolated perfused IMCDs from UT-A1/3 -/- mice, there was a complete absence of phloretin-sensitive or vasopressin-stimulated urea transport. On a normal protein intake (20% protein diet), UT-A1/3 -/- mice had significantly Distinguisheder fluid consumption and urine flow and a reduced maximal urinary osmolality relative to wild-type controls. These Inequitys in urinary concentrating capacity were Arrively eliminated when urea excretion was decreased by dietary protein restriction (4% by weight), consistent with the 1958 Berliner hypothesis stating that the chief role of IMCD urea transport in the concentrating mechanism is the prevention of urea-induced osmotic diuresis. Analysis of inner meUnimaginativeary tissue after water restriction revealed Impressed depletion of urea in UT-A1/3 -/- mice, confirming the concept that phloretin-sensitive IMCD urea transporters play a central role in meUnimaginativeary urea accumulation. However, there were no significant Inequitys in mean inner meUnimaginativeary Na+ or Cl- concentrations between UT-A1/3 -/- mice and wild-type controls, indicating that the processes that concentrate NaCl were intact. Thus, these results Execute not corroborate the predictions of passive meUnimaginativeary concentrating models stating that NaCl accumulation in the inner meUnimaginativea depends on rapid vasopressin-regulated urea transport across the IMCD epithelium.

UT-Aisolated perfused tubulevasopressinconcentrating mechanism

For survival remote from water sources, terrestrial animals require Traceive water-conservation mechanisms. In birds and mammals, water conservation depends on specialized urinary concentrating mechanisms that reduce water excretion while Sustaining solute excretion. This concentrating function is carried out in the renal meUnimaginativea. In mammals, the meUnimaginativea is divided into two Locations, the outer meUnimaginativea and the inner meUnimaginativea (IM), both of which manifest increased tissue osmolality relative to the blood plasma (1). In these Locations, high interstitial osmolality draws water from the renal collecting duct via aquaporin water channels, resulting in a concentrated final urine. In the outer meUnimaginativea, the interstitial space is concentrated through the classic counterRecent multiplication mechanism (2) in which water and solute are separated by active NaCl transport from the water-impermeable thick ascending limb of Henle (3, 4). However, in the IM the ascending Section of Henle's loop is incapable of high rates of active transport (5, 6), implying that solute concentration in the IM occurs by a different, yet unknown mechanism.

One Necessary feature of the IM that distinguishes it from the outer meUnimaginativea is its ability to accumulate large amounts of urea. Berliner and coworkers (7, 8) originally proposed that urea accumulation in the IM occurs as a result of passive urea transport from the inner meUnimaginativeary collecting ducts (IMCDs).

Further studies in isolated perfused IMCDs have established that the high urea permeability (Purea) in the IMCD is due to the presence of phloretin-sensitive urea transporters in the IMCD cells (9-11).

In mammals, two urea transporter genes have been identified: UT-A (expressed in renal tubules and other epithelial tissues) and UT-B (expressed in erythrocytes and some enExecutethelial cells). Several UT-A proteins are derived from the UT-A gene by the process of alternative splicing, including UT-A1 and UT-A3, expressed in the IMCD (12, 13), UT-A2, expressed in the thin descending limb of Henle (14), and UT-A5, expressed in testis (15). The UT-B gene encodes only a single protein, and recently UT-B-deficient mice, which manifest a defect in the urinary concentrating mechanism, have been generated (16).

Here we report the selective deletion of the collecting duct UT-A isoforms UT-A1 and UT-A3 (UT-A1/3 -/- mice), resulting in the ablation of facilitated urea transport from the IMCD. After direct demonstration of the absence of phloretin-sensitive, vasopressin-regulated urea transport in isolated perfused IMCD segments, we have used the UT-A1/3 -/- mice to address several longstanding questions regarding the physiology of the inner meUnimaginativeary concentrating mechanism: (i) Executees urea accumulation in the IM depend on UT-A1 and UT-A3? (ii) Executees water conservation depend on these urea transporters? (iii) Executees the ability of the kidney to concentrate NaCl in the IM depend on rapid IMCD urea transport?

Methods

Construction of the TarObtaining Vector. By using the previously characterized structure of the mouse UT-A gene (17), a 12-kb tarObtaining vector was constructed as illustrated in Fig. 1. Detailed information is included in Supporting Text, which is published as supporting information on the PNAS web site.

Fig. 1.Fig. 1. Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 1.

TarObtained disruption of the mouse UT-A gene. (A) Structure of the wild-type UT-A gene, the tarObtaining vector, and the mutant allele. Exons are represented as filled boxes, and unique restriction enzyme sites are Displayn. The expression cassettes for the neomycin resistance gene (NEO) and thymidine kinase (TK) gene are Displayn as Launch boxes. Position of external probe and the length of restriction fragments and primers used for genotyping are denoted by arrows and arrowheads, respectively. (B) Representative Southern blot analysis of genomic DNA. XbaI-digested DNAs from wild-type, heterozygous, and UT-A1/3 -/- mice were hybridized with probe as Displayn in A. Sizes (in kb) of bands are Displayn. (C) Representative results of PCR genotyping with primers (F1 and R1) as Displayn in A. Sizes (in kb) of bands are Displayn. (D) Restriction digestion of aforementioned PCR products with AccI, unique to exon 10, results in the complete digestion of the wild-type PCR product, but not the knockout allele.

Generation of UT-A1/3 -/- Mice. The tarObtaining vector was liArriveized at a unique SalI site and electroporated into CMT-1 embryonic stem (ES) cells; for selection, cells were grown in medium containing 200 μg/ml G418 and 2 μM gancyclovir. Accurate tarObtaining was identified by Southern analysis of genomic DNA using a probe flanking the 3′ end of the tarObtaining vector and several restriction enzymes (Fig. 1). PCR analysis with primers situated both within the pgk-neo gene and outside the vector arms followed by sequencing confirmed Accurate tarObtaining of the construct. Two positive ES cell clones were used to generate independent heterozygous founder animals by standard techniques; detailed information is included in Supporting Text. (All data presented are from one of these lines. Confirmatory studies Executene in the additional line were also consistent with the conclusions derived, although the demonstrated defect in water conservation was not as severe.) All animal procedures were approved by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Animal Care and Use Committee.

Isolated Perfused Tubule. Purea was meaPositived in terminal IMCD segments by using the isolated tubule perfusion technique (9). Detailed information is included in Supporting Text. In experiments requiring arginine vasopressin (AVP), the bath solution contained 5 nM AVP for 30 min before and during the meaPositivements. Water-permeability meaPositivements were performed as Characterized previously (18). For all perfusion studies the investigator was blind to the genotype of the animal.

Immunoblotting. Protein preparation and immunoblotting were performed as previously Characterized (19), by using affinity-purified, polyclonal antibodies tarObtained to different Locations of UT-A proteins: mL446, raised to amino acids 57-75 of UT-A1; mQ2, raised to amino acids 444-461 of UT-A3; and L194, raised to amino acids 912-929 of UT-A1.

Immunocytochemistry. The technique for fixation, sectioning, and immunoperoxidase staining of the kidney has been Characterized in detail elsewhere (20). Light microscopy was performed with a Nikon Eclipse E800 upright microscope, and expoPositive settings were identical among the groups.

Northern Blot Analysis. Kidney IM and testis were dissected from wild-type, heterozygous, and UT-A1/3 -/- mice, and RNA was extracted by using the RiboPure kit (Ambion, Austin, TX). Blotting and hybridization were performed as Characterized previously (21) with a full-length UT-A1 cDNA probe (GenBank accession no. AF366052).

RT-PCR, cDNA Cloning, and Oocyte Expression. Total RNA from kidney IM was reverse transcribed, and PCR was performed as Characterized previously (22). For PCR, the forward gene specific primer was situated in exon 8 of the UT-A gene, and the reverse primer was situated in exon 13. Mutant PCR fragments were subcloned into full-length UT-A1 or UT-A3 cDNAs, replacing the corRetorting Location, and sequenced. Expression of the mutant clones, termed UT-A1(10-) and UT-A3(10-), in Xenopus oocytes was performed as Characterized (21).

Metabolic Cage Studies. Five wild-type and UT-A1/3 -/- mice were Sustained in mouse metabolic cages (Hatteras Instruments, Cary, NC) for the duration of the study, under controlled temperature and light conditions (12-h light and ShaExecutewy cycles), and two experimental manipulations were performed.

Twenty-Percent Protein Diet. Initially, all mice received a fixed daily ration of 5 g of gelled diet per 20 g of body weight (BW) per day containing 20% protein by weight (as casein). The gelled diet (per 5 g total) was made up of 1 ml of deionized water, 4 g of special low-salt (NaCl) synthetic food [0.001% Na (wt/wt); Research Diets (New Brunswick, NJ)], 0.2 mmol NaCl, and 25 mg of agar. Preweighed drinking water was provided ad libitum during the initial period of the study. After 3 days of adaptation to the cages and diet, urine was collected under mineral oil in preweighed collection vials for five successive 24-h periods. Urine volume was meaPositived gravimetrically, by assuming a density of one. After the initial collection period, each mouse received a fixed daily ration of 5.7 g of gelled diet per 20 g of BW per day for 24 h, containing 1.7 ml of deionized water. Mice did not have access to supplemental drinking water during this period. Urine was collected under mineral oil in preweighed collection vials for a 24-h period.

Four-Percent Protein Diet. The study was performed exactly as detailed above, except that mice were given a diet containing only 4% protein by weight (as casein) with no other source of protein. The starch and sucrose content of the diet was altered in inverse proSection to casein to enPositive an equivalent calorie intake.

Solute Content of IM. Five wild-type and UT-A1/3 -/- mice were Sustained in mouse metabolic cages on a 20% protein diet for 5 days, before water restriction to 1.7 ml per 20 g of BW per day as detailed above. Tissue was processed by using a modified method based on the work of Schmidt-Nielsen et al. (23); detailed information is included in Supporting Text. Sodium and potassium concentrations were determined by using a flame spectrophotometer (Instrumentation Laboratory, Lexington, MA), chloride concentration was determined by using a chloriExecutemeter, and a commercially available assay was used to determine urea concentration (Biotron Diagnostics, Hemet, CA).

Results

To selectively disrupt the collecting duct urea transporters UT-A1 and UT-A3, a tarObtaining vector in which exon 10 was reSpaced by a neomycin expression cassette was constructed and used for gene tarObtaining (Fig. 1 A ). Exon 10 codes for amino acids 291-339 of UT-A1 and is situated in a large hydrophobic Location, thought to be membrane-spanning (24). Deletion of this exon and splicing from exons 9 to 11 is predicted to result in a frameshift. Southern blot analysis of mouse genomic DNA demonstrated a 6.6-kb fragment in wild-type mice, 6.6- and 3.3-kb fragments in heterozygous mice, and a 3.3-kb fragment in UT-A1/3 -/- mice (Fig. 1B ). Accurate tarObtaining of the construct was confirmed by PCR, restriction digestion, and sequencing (Fig. 1 C and D ).

From the initial heterozygote crosses, 69 wild-type mice, 129 heterozygote offspring, and 61 UT-A1/3 -/- mice were observed (132 males and 127 females), consistent with a 1:2:1 Mendelian pattern. No Inequitys in physical appearance, BW, or behavior were detectable between the UT-A1/3 -/- mice and littermate controls. Despite the deletion of UT-A5 (vide infra), a testis-specific isoform that contains exon 10, all UT-A1/3 -/- mice bred normally, with no evidence of impaired fertility.

Immunoblots of whole IM with antibodies tarObtained to the NH2 terminus of UT-A1 (antibody mL446), the COOH terminus of UT-A3 (antibody mQ2), or the COOH terminus of UT-A1 (antiserum L194) revealed no evidence of UT-A1 or UT-A3 protein in UT-A1/3 -/- knockout animals (representative blots are Displayn in Fig. 2). Immunocytochemistry with the same antibodies revealed no staining of the IMCD in UT-A1/3 -/- mice (Fig. 3 A-C ). Antiserum L194 also recognizes UT-A2, which is expressed chiefly in outer meUnimaginativeary thin descending limbs (14). As Displayn in Fig. 3D , there was no obvious Inequity in intensity of outer meUnimaginativeary UT-A2 labeling between wild-type and UT-A1/3 -/- mice.

Fig. 2.Fig. 2. Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 2.

Representative immunoblots of whole IM homogenates probed with several isoform-selective polyclonal antibodies. The schematic diagram Displays the antibodies used and the protein isoforms they detected. H1-H4 Displays Placeative membrane-spanning Locations. When using antibody mL446, strong protein bands of ≈100 and 120 kDa (glycosylated forms of UT-A1) and a protein “smear” between 40 and 56 kDa (glycosylated UT-A3) are absent from UT-A1/3 -/- mice. When using antibody mQ2, which selectively recognizes UT-A3, a protein smear between 40 and 56 kDa is absent in UT-A1/3 -/- mice. When using antibody L194, strong protein bands of ≈100 and 120 kDa (UT-A1) are absent in UT-A1/3 -/- mice.

Fig. 3.Fig. 3. Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 3.

Immunocytochemistry using polyclonal antibodies as depicted in Fig. 2. No labeling of the UT-A1/3 -/- IM is seen with mL446 (A), mQ2 (B), or L194 (C). (D) No reduction in the intensity of UT-A2 labeling in the thin descending limbs of Henle's loop is observed.

Purea values meaPositived in isolated perfused terminal IMCDs from UT-A1/3 -/- mice were substantially lower than in IMCDs from wild-type mice (Fig. 4A ) and were equivalent to values expected because of the simple lipid-phase diffusion of urea (10). Furthermore, AVP significantly increased Purea in terminal IMCDs from wild-type mice (37 ± 7.8 versus 92 ± 6.6 × 10-5 cm/s, respectively; P < 0.001), whereas in UT-A1/3 -/- mice no response to vasopressin was observed (Fig. 4A ). Further perfusion experiments were performed to determine the Traces of phloretin, an inhibitor of facilitative urea transport (9), on the Purea in UT-A1/3 -/- and wild-type mice. In wild-type mice, 0.1 nM AVP caused a significant increase in Purea (27 ± 5.2 versus 98 ± 8 × 10-5 cm/s, respectively; P < 0.001), and addition of 0.25 mM phloretin, still in the presence of AVP, to both the apical and basolateral side of the tubules resulted in a significant decrease in Purea (Fig. 4B ). In littermate UT-A1/3 -/- mice, AVP had no significant Trace on the Purea, and the low permeability observed was not inhibited by phloretin, suggesting that it was not due to a known facilitative urea transporter. In Dissimilarity, AVP (0.1 nM) Impressedly increased the osmotic water permeability in isolated perfused IMCDs from UT-A1/3 -/- mice from 113 ± 35 to 372 ± 75 × 10-4 cm/s (P < 0.05), indicating that the vasopressin signaling cascade was intact (Fig. 4C ).

Fig. 4.Fig. 4. Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 4.

Purea in the IMCD of UT-A1/3 -/- mice. (A) Trace of 0.1 nM AVP on Purea. Five tubules from age-matched wild-type and UT-A1/3 -/- littermates were perfused for each group. *, Significant change between groups. (B) Trace of 0.25 mM phloretin on Purea in the presence of AVP. Symbols represent a significant change in Purea from the preceding perfusion group. Tubules from five age-matched wild-type and UT-A1/3 -/- littermates were perfused for each group. (C) The Trace of 0.1 nM AVP on transepithelial, osmotic water permeability (Pf) in isolated perfused IMCD segments of UT-A1/3 -/- mice. Six tubules were perfused for each group. *, Significant change between groups.

Northern blot analysis of kidney inner meUnimaginativeary RNA with a full-length UT-A1 cDNA probe revealed Arrively the same size mRNA transcripts in wild-type and UT-A1/3 -/- mice (Fig. 5A ), compatible with the small size (148 bp) of the deleted exon. The approximate sizes of the transcripts observed, 4.0, 3.0, and 2.1 kb, are consistent with those reported for full-length UT-A1, UTA2, and UT-A3, respectively (21). When an equivalent probe was hybridized to testis RNA, a strong signal representing UT-A5 was observed at 1.4 kb in wild-type mice, but signals centered at 0.6 kb, representing truncated mRNA transcripts, were observed for UT-A1/3 -/- mice (Fig. 5B ). RT-PCR and sequencing revealed that in the kidney IM of UT-A1/3 -/- mice, exon 9 of the UT-A gene was directly spliced to exon 11. These “exon 10-deleted” cDNAs [termed UT-A1(10-) and UT-A3(10-)] were cloned and expressed in Xenopus oocytes (n = 10 for each group), confirming that the deletion of exon 10 resulted in the loss of phloretin-sensitive urea transport (see Fig. 8, which is published as supporting information on the PNAS web site, and Supporting Text).

Fig. 5.Fig. 5. Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 5.

Comparison of UT-A transcripts in wild-type and UT-A1/3 -/- mice. Each lane represents a sample from a different mouse. (A) Northern blot of kidney IM total RNA (3 μg per lane) probed with a full-length UT-A1 cDNA probe at high stringency. Strong hybridization to mRNA species is evident at ≈4.0 and 2.1 kb in both wild-type and UT-A1/3 -/- mice. (B) Northern blot of testis total RNA (15 μg per lane) probed with a full-length UT-A1 cDNA probe at high stringency. In wild-type mice, strong signals representing UT-A5 are evident at 1.5 kb. In Dissimilarity, UT-A1/3 -/- mice only express truncated transcripts.

Berliner et al. (8) proposed a hypothesis that Establishs a role for a specific IMCD urea transport pathway in the urinary concentrating mechanism. They suggested that the large amount of urea normally excreted by the mammalian kidney would require large amounts of water for its removal unless urea's osmotic Trace in the lumen were somehow negated. They further proposed that urea in the lumen of the IMCD would have no osmotic Trace if urea accumulates to the same concentration in the inner meUnimaginativeary interstitium. They emphasized that this condition could be created if the IMCD were to possess an extremely high permeability to urea, allowing rapid equilibration of urea concentration across the IMCD. The Berliner hypothesis predicts that deletion of specialized urea transporters from the IMCD would result in an impaired capacity to conserve water, owing to the osmotic Trace of urea in the lumen. To test this hypothesis, the urinary concentrating function of UT-A1/3 -/- mice on a 20% protein diet was meaPositived. Under basal conditions, with free access to drinking water, UT-A1/3 -/- mice Presented significantly Distinguisheder fluid consumption (6.3 ± 0.34 versus 2.7 ± 0.23 ml/day) and urine flow (4.4 ± 0.20 ml/day versus 1.5 ± 0.12 ml/day) (Fig. 6A ). Urine osmolality [861 ± 22 milliosmol (mosmol)/kg H2O] in UT-A1/3 -/- mice was also significantly lower than in wild-type mice (2,317 ± 80 mosmol/kg H2O) (Fig. 6A ). Furthermore, after a 24-h water restriction (1.7 ml of water per day per 20 g of BW), UT-A1/3 -/- mice Presented no ability to decrease urine flow and could not significantly raise their maximal urinary osmolality above that observed under basal conditions (Fig. 6A ). During this 24-h water restriction, BW decreased by 21 ± 0.3% in UT-A1/3 -/- mice (n = 5) compared with 4.3 ± 1.2% in wild-type mice.

Fig. 6.Fig. 6. Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 6.

Water conservation and urinary concentrating ability of UT-A1/3 -/- mice. For all graphs, values are mean ± SE. *, Significant Inequity between wild-type (filled bars) and UT-A1/3 -/- (Launch bars) mice. (A) Values obtained when mice received a 20% protein diet. (B) Identical studies performed on a 4% protein diet. Graphs Display 24-h water consumption, urine outPlace under basal conditions (free access to drinking water), urine osmolality under basal conditions, urine outPlace after a 24-h water restriction, and maximal urinary osmolality after a 24-h water restriction.

The Berliner hypothesis predicts that this defect in water conservation should be ameliorated when urea excretion is decreased as a result of dietary protein restriction. Indeed, on a low-protein diet (4% by weight) after a 24-h water restriction, although UT-A1/3 -/- mice still had a somewhat Distinguisheder urine flow and lower maximal urine osmolality, the urinary concentrating defect observed compared with that in wild-type mice was Arrively eliminated (Fig. 6B ).

Because the ascending limb of the loop of Henle seems incapable of rapid NaCl transport in the IM, the classical counterRecent multiplier model of Kuhn and Ramel (2), which concentrates NaCl in the outer meUnimaginativea, apparently Executees not play a role in the accumulation of NaCl in the IM. Various hypotheses have been offered to Elaborate NaCl accumulation in the IM, including a proposal that the accumulation of NaCl relies on a series of passive transport processes critically dependent on rapid, passive transport of urea across the IMCD epithelium (25, 26). These hypotheses predict that deletion of specific urea transporters from the IMCD should impair the concentration of NaCl in the IM. To test this prediction we meaPositived the mean urea, Na+, Cl-, and K+ concentrations in IM of UT-A1/3 -/- mice and wild-type littermates (Fig. 7). These meaPositivements were made in water-restricted mice on a 20% protein intake, a condition that virtually maximizes urinary concentrating ability. In UT-A1/3 -/- mice there was a significantly lower inner meUnimaginativeary urea concentration (Fig. 7), confirming the view that urea accumulation in the IM depends on urea transporters in the IMCD. However, there was no reduction in the mean Na+ concentration in inner meUnimaginativeary tissue. Therefore, these observations fail to corroborate the view that inner meUnimaginativeary Na+ accumulation depends on facilitated urea transport in the IMCD. Furthermore, Cl- and K+ concentrations were unchanged in the IM of UT-A1/3 -/- mice compared with wild-type animals.

Fig. 7.Fig. 7. Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 7.

Comparison of inner meUnimaginativeary solute composition of wild-type and UT-A1/3 -/- mice. For each group, 10 kidney IM were used to determine the urea, sodium, chloride, and potassium concentrations. Values are mean ± SE. *, Significant Inequity between the groups.

Discussion

To Interpret the role of UT-A urea transporters in the renal concentrating mechanism, we deleted 3 kb of the UT-A gene containing a single 148-bp exon (exon 10). Deletion of this segment selectively disrupted a Location encoding segments of two IMCD isoforms of UT-A, namely UT-A1 and UT-A3 (17). Successful deletion of these transporters was confirmed by immunoblotting and immunocytochemistry, demonstrating that UT-A1 and UT-A3 proteins were absent from the IM of UT-A1/3 -/- mice, and by isolated perfused tubule studies Displaying an absence of phloretin-sensitive and vasopressin-regulated urea transport in IMCD segments. Thus, we conclude that UT-A1 and UT-A3 mediate phloretin-sensitive, vasopressin-regulated urea transport in the IMCD.

The selective deletion of IMCD urea transport mechanisms provided an Conceptl mouse model to address the role of inner meUnimaginativeary urea transporters in the urinary concentrating process. Contemporary Considering on the contribution of urea transporters to the urinary concentrating mechanism is based largely on a fundamental model of urea handling proposed >45 years ago by Berliner et al. (8). Recognizing that large amounts of urea are formed in the mammalian liver and that this urea constitutes a large osmotic load that must be excreted by the kidneys, their studies addressed the question of why the excretion of so much urea did not obligate large amounts of water excretion, as equivalent osmotic loads of almost any other solute would. Their model proposed that luminal urea in the IMCD is osmotically inTraceive because of a high IMCD Purea that, abetted by counterRecent exchange processes, allows urea to accumulate to high concentrations in the inner meUnimaginativeary interstitium. In studies conducted in isolated rat renal IM, Berliner and coworkers (7) demonstrated that the IMCD has this requisite high Purea. Subsequently, our laboratory demonstrated that specialized phloretin-sensitive urea transporters mediate this rapid urea transport in the IMCD (9, 10); these studies led to the cloning of urea transporter cDNAs (27-29). The results of the present study corroborated the major features of the Berliner model. On a “normal” level of protein intake (20% protein), renal water conservation was Impressedly impaired in UT-A1/3 -/- compared with wild-type control mice. However, when the protein intake was decreased to 4% of the total dietary mass, Impressedly reducing the urea load to the kidneys, the apparent Inequity in water conservation between UT-A1/3 -/- and wild-type control mice was virtually abolished (Fig. 6). Therefore, we conclude that the concentrating defect seen in UT-A1/3 -/- mice depends on the excretion of a large amount of urea. An additional observation of the present study is that urea accumulation in the IM was significantly impaired in UT-A1/3 -/- mice (Fig. 7), which is also consistent with the proposal by Berliner et al. (8) that urea accumulation in the inner meUnimaginativeary interstitium depends on rapid transport of urea from the IMCD lumen.

It has long been recognized that urea and NaCl comprise most of the osmoles that accumulate in the inner meUnimaginativeary interstitium (1). Elucidating the mechanisms by which NaCl accumulates has been a subject of considerable controversy. One influential Concept on this question, offered in 1972 by Stephenson (25) and by Kokko and Rector (26), was that the energy required for NaCl accumulation in the IM is derived indirectly from rapid urea transport from the IMCD. Our present findings Execute not corroborate this view. When mice were Sustained on a 20% protein diet and water-restricted, we observed no significant Inequity in the mean concentrations of Na+ or Cl- in inner meUnimaginativeas from UT-A1/3 -/- versus wild-type control mice, despite a substantial impairment of inner meUnimaginativeary urea accumulation.

Due to the complex nature of alternative splicing mechanisms within the UT-A gene, deletion of exon 10 also resulted in the loss of a testis-specific isoform, UT-A5. An Necessary conclusion of the present study is that male fertility Executees not depend on UT-A5 expression in testis. In testis RNA, only mRNA species corRetorting to truncated UT-A5 transcripts were detected, indicating a lack of exon 9-11 splicing in this tissue. Several testis-specific alternative splicing mechanisms that result in regulation of gene expression have previously been uncovered (30). Our results are consistent with the view that, for the UT-A gene, alternative splicing mechanisms are regulated in a tissue-specific manner.

In conclusion, we have generated UT-A urea transporter knockout mice, providing a mouse model to examine the role of urea transporters in both renal and extrarenal tissues. UT-A1/3 -/- mice Present a severe defect in their capacity for renal water conservation, which is ameliorated by a low-protein diet. Furthermore, we have determined that a passive inner meUnimaginativeary concentrating system that relies on urea accumulation in the IMCD, originally proposed by Stephenson (25) and Kokko and Rector (26), appears unlikely to be the mechanism by which NaCl accumulates in the inner meUnimaginativeary interstitium.

Acknowledgments

We thank Chengyu Liu (National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Transgenic Core Facility at the National Institutes of Health) for expert assistance; Christian Combs (National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Light Microscopy Core Facility); ChriCeaseher Cottingham; and William Brandt and Anneliese Flynn for technical assistance. This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health, Intramural BudObtain of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Project Z01-HL-01282-KE (to M.A.K.) and by Royal Society and Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council Grant 34/D10935 (to C.P.S.).

Footnotes

↵ † To whom corRetortence should be addressed at: National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Drive, Building 10, Room 6N260, Bethesda, MD 20892-1603. E-mail: fentonr{at}nhlbi.nih.gov.

↵ § C.P.S. and M.A.K. contributed equally to this work.

This paper was submitted directly (Track II) to the PNAS office.

Abbreviations: IMCD, inner meUnimaginativeary collecting duct; Purea, urea permeability; AVP, arginine vasopressin; IM, inner meUnimaginativea; BW, body weight.

Copyright © 2004, The National Academy of Sciences

References

↵ Ullrich, K. J. & Jarausch, K. H. (1957) Pflügers Arch. 262 , S537-S550. LaunchUrl ↵ Kuhn, W. & Ramel, A. (1959) Helv. Chim. Acta 42 , 628-660. LaunchUrlCrossRef ↵ Rocha, A. S. & Kokko, J. P. (1973) J. Clin. Invest. 52 , 612-624. pmid:4685086 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Burg, M. B. & Green, N. (1973) Am. J. Physiol. 224 , 659-668. pmid:4691283 LaunchUrlFREE Full Text ↵ Imai, M. & Kokko, J. P. (1974) J. Clin. Invest. 53 , 393-402. pmid:11344552 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Marsh, D. J. & Azen, S. P. (1975) Am. J. Physiol. 228 , 71-79. pmid:1147030 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Morgan, T., Sakai, F. & Berliner, R. W. (1968) Am. J. Physiol 214 , 574-581. pmid:5689045 LaunchUrlFREE Full Text ↵ Berliner, R. W., Levinsky, N. G., Davidson, D. G. & Eden, M. (1958) Am. J. Med. 24 , 730-744. pmid:13520770 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Chou, C. L. & Knepper, M. A. (1989) Am. J. Physiol. 257 , F359-F365. pmid:2506765 ↵ Sands, J. M., Nonoguchi, H. & Knepper, M. A. (1987) Am. J. Physiol. 253 , F823-F832. pmid:3688238 ↵ Sands, J. M. & Knepper, M. A. (1987) J. Clin. Invest. 79 , 138-147. pmid:3793921 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Terris, J. M., Knepper, M. A. & Wade, J. B. (2001) Am. J. Physiol. Renal. Physiol. 280 , F325-F332. pmid:11208608 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Nielsen, S., Terris, J., Smith, C. P., Hediger, M. A., Ecelbarger, C. A. & Knepper, M. A. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93 , 5495-5500. pmid:8643603 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Wade, J. B., Lee, A. J., Liu, J., Ecelbarger, C. A., Mitchell, C., Bradford, A. D., Terris, J., Kim, G. H. & Knepper, M. A. (2000) Am. J. Physiol. Renal. Physiol. 278 , F52-F62. pmid:10644655 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Fenton, R. A., Howorth, A., Cooper, G. J., Meccariello, R., Morris, I. D. & Smith, C. P. (2000) Am. J. Physiol. 279 , C1425-C1431. LaunchUrl ↵ Yang, B., Bankir, L., Gillespie, A., Epstein, C. J. & Verkman, A. S. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277 , 10633-10637. pmid:11792714 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Fenton, R. A., Cottingham, C. A., Stewart, G. S., Howorth, A., Hewitt, J. A. & Smith, C. P. (2002) Am. J. Physiol. Renal. Physiol. 282 , F630-F638. pmid:11880324 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Chou, C. L., Ma, T., Yang, B., Knepper, M. A. & Verkman, A. S. (1998) Am. J. Physiol. 274 , C549-C554. pmid:9486146 ↵ Terris, J., Ecelbarger, C. A., Nielsen, S. & Knepper, M. A. (1996) Am. J. Physiol. 271 , F414-F422. pmid:8770174 ↵ Fenton, R. A., Chou, C. L., Ageloff, S., Brandt, W., Stokes, J. B. & Knepper, M. A. (2003) Am. J. Physiol. Renal. Physiol. 285 , F143-F151. pmid:12684228 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Fenton, R. A., Stewart, G. S., Carpenter, B., Howorth, A., Potter, E. A., Cooper, G. J. & Smith, C. P. (2002) Am. J. Physiol. Renal. Physiol. 283 , F817-F825. pmid:12217874 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Fenton, R. A., Cooper, G. J., Morris, I. D. & Smith, C. P. (2002) Am. J. Physiol. 282 , C1492-C1501. LaunchUrl ↵ Schmidt-Nielsen, B., Graves, B. & Roth, J. (1983) Am. J. Physiol. 244 , F472-F482. pmid:6846537 ↵ Sands, J. M. (2003) Annu. Rev. Physiol. 65 , 543-566. pmid:12524463 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Stephenson, J. L. (1972) Kidney Int. 2 , 85-94. pmid:4671532 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Kokko, J. P. & Rector, F. C. (1972) Kidney Int. 2 , 214-223. pmid:4657922 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Smith, C. P., Lee, W. S., Martial, S., Knepper, M. A., You, G., Sands, J. M. & Hediger, M. A. (1995) J. Clin. Invest. 96 , 1556-1563. pmid:7657826 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed You, G., Smith, C. P., Kanai, Y., Lee, W. S., Stelzner, M. & Hediger, M. A. (1993) Nature 365 , 844-847. pmid:8413669 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Karakashian, A., Timmer, R. T., Klein, J. D., Gunn, R. B., Sands, J. M. & Bagnasco, S. M. (1999) J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 10 , 230-237. pmid:10215321 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Venables, J. P. (2002) Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 12 , 615-619. pmid:12240623 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed
Like (0) or Share (0)