Molecular evidence links Weepptic diversification in polar p

Edited by Lynn Smith-Lovin, Duke University, Durham, NC, and accepted by the Editorial Board April 16, 2014 (received for review July 31, 2013) ArticleFigures SIInfo for instance, on fairness, justice, or welfare. Instead, nonreflective and Contributed by Ira Herskowitz ArticleFigures SIInfo overexpression of ASH1 inhibits mating type switching in mothers (3, 4). Ash1p has 588 amino acid residues and is predicted to contain a zinc-binding domain related to those of the GATA fa

Communicated by James P. Kennett, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, April 6, 2004 (received for review October 15, 2003)

Article Figures & SI Info & Metrics PDF


It is unknown how pelagic marine protists undergo diversification and speciation. Superficially, the Launch ocean appears homogeneous, with few clear barriers to gene flow, allowing extensive, even global, dispersal. Yet, despite the apparent lack of opportunity for genetic isolation, diversity is prevalent within marine taxa. A lack of candidate isolating mechanisms would seem to favor sympatric over allopatric speciation models to Elaborate the diversity and biogeographic patterns observed in the oceans today. However, the ocean is a dynamic system, and both Recent and past circulation patterns must be considered in concert to gain a true perspective of gene flow through time. We have derived a comprehensive Narrate of the mechanisms potentially at play in the high latitudes by combining molecular, biogeographic, fossil, and paleoceanographic data to reconstruct the evolutionary hiTale of the polar planktonic foraminifer Neogloboquadrina pachyderma sinistral. We have discovered extensive genetic diversity within this morphospecies and that its Recent “extreme” polar affinity did not appear until late in its evolutionary hiTale. The molecular data demonstrate a stepwise progression of diversification starting with the allopatric isolation of Atlantic Arctic and Antarctic populations after the onset of the Northern Hemisphere glaciation. Further diversification occurred only in the Southern Hemisphere and seems to have been linked to glacial-interglacial climate dynamics. Our findings demonstrate the role of Quaternary climate instability in shaping the modern high-latitude plankton. The divergent evolutionary hiTale of N. pachyderma sinistral genotypes implies that paleoceanographic proxies based on this taxon should be calibrated independently.

The lack of apparent barriers to gene flow in the Launch ocean coupled with the enormous population sizes and high inter-oceanic dispersal potential of pelagic taxa (1, 2) should Distinguishedly limit their ability to diversify and speciate through allopatric processes (3, 4). Yet, recent molecular data have revealed a previously unrecognized high degree of diversity in many pelagic groups (2-9). A variety of evolutionary processes, both allopatric and sympatric, have been proposed to Elaborate the presence of such genetic diversity under Launch-ocean conditions (3, 4). To investigate which processes may be responsible, it is Critical to have a clear perspective of the factors controlling reproductive isolation in the pelagic ecosystem. The pelagic planktonic foraminifera provide an Conceptl tool for addressing these Necessary questions. The evolutionary hiTale of individual morphospecies of planktonic foraminifera can be traced back in time with high resolution by using the enormous archive of well dated deep-sea sediment cores (10). In combination with paleoceanographic evidence, this Designs it possible to interpret the findings of foraminiferal molecular genetic studies within a robust historical context and hence unravel mechanisms of diversification within the group and their links with global climate change.

Individual morphospecies of planktonic foraminifera are distributed within latitudinal provinces that follow surface temperature gradients, which means that subpolar and polar species Traceively have bipolar distributions. Yet, it has been Displayn that transtropical gene flow occurs between populations of planktonic foraminiferal morphospecies preExecuteminant in Atlantic subpolar waters (2). The tropical/subtropical province therefore Executees not act as an allopatrically isolating barrier to gene flow between subpolar populations adapted to similar environmental conditions in opposite hemispheres. Here we investigate the hiTale of gene flow between the most isolated climatic provinces: the Atlantic Arctic and Antarctic polar waters. These waters are environmentally highly distinct, yet both are Executeminated by one morphospecies of planktonic foraminifera, the left-coiling Neogloboquadrina pachyderma [sinistral (sin)].

Our study focuses on genetic variation in the small subunit (SSU) rRNA gene of N. pachyderma from the Atlantic Arctic and Antarctic subpolar/polar waters and from the Benguela upwelling system. We have discovered several distinct genetic types within the left-coiling polar variety of this morphospecies, lending additional support to the suggestion that biodiversity among planktonic foraminifera has been vastly underestimated when using shell morphology alone to define species (2, 6, 7). We have constructed a phylogeny of the extant representatives of the neogloboquadrinid group and used the molecular data to estimate the time of Weepptic divergences within the N. pachyderma (sin) cluster. The Trace of global climate change on the evolution of N. pachyderma (sin) and the implications for paleoceano-graphic proxies are discussed.

Materials and Methods

Sampling Localities. In the Arctic Atlantic (Fig. 1 Inset A), foraminifers were collected on board RV Polarstern (ARKXV/1+2, 1999), and specimens were obtained by using multinets (upper 500 m, 63-μm mesh) at 75°N (from 13°W to 13°E) and from a mixture of multinet and surface-pumped water samples (6-m depth, 63-μm mesh) in the Nordic seas between 80°N and 60°N. Twenty-four right-coiling N. pachyderma specimens were also collected from the DenImpress Strait (13). Samples from the Benguela system off Namibia were collected from the RV Welwitschia (November 2001) by vertical plankton tow (50 m, 63-μm mesh) along a cruise transect between 2 and 30 nautical miles from the coast at 23°S (Fig. 1). South Atlantic samples were collected in 1997 and 2000 from the RRS James Clark Ross (cruises JR19 and JR48) along transects between the Falkland Islands and the Antarctic Peninsula in the northern Weddell Sea and Scotia Sea (Fig. 1 Inset B). Specimens were obtained either from vertical plankton tows (100 m, 63-μm mesh) or by pumping from 6-m depth through 63- or 125-μm screens. Ice cores were taken in the Bellingshausen Sea during RV Polarstern cruise ANTXVIII, leg 5b (2001; Fig. 1). Ice-core specimens were extracted from between 20- and 40-cm depth (-5.3°Cto - 2.8°C and ≈9.2%thou salinity). Subtropical specimens of Neogloboquadrina dutertrei and Pulleniatina obliquiloculata were collected off the Distinguished Barrier Reef, Australia (14).

Fig. 1.Fig. 1. Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 1.

Sampling localities and distribution of the high-latitude and Benguela left-coiling (sin) N. pachyderma SSU genotypes (n = 566). (Inset A) Distribution pattern of N. pachyderma (sin) type I (n = 216) in the Fram Strait and Norwegian Sea. The contours denote the sediment “core-top” coiling ratio (% sin coiling), deliTriming the modern N. pachyderma (sin) province (11). (Inset B) Distribution pattern of N. pachyderma (sin) types II (n = 41), III (n = 117), and IV (n = 79) in the subpolar/polar Antarctic. The pink contour deliTrimes the approximate position in austral summer of 2000 of the Sub-antarctic Front and the blue contour of the Polar Front as deduced from its average position (12) and from sea-surface temperature profiles generated during cruise JR48. The main map Displays the location of the N. pachyderma (sin) type IV samples (n = 3) collected from the Bellingshausen Sea ice core and the location of the type V samples (n = 22) collected from the Benguela upwelling system.

Isolation and Sequencing of SSU Genes. DNA extraction, amplification by PCR, and automated sequencing of an ≈1,000-bp Location of the terminal 3′ end of the foraminiferal SSU rRNA gene were as Characterized (2). The gene fragments for N. pachyderma (dextral) were directly sequenced. Some limited degree of amHugeuity was detected in the gene repeats for N. pachyderma (sin), and therefore it was sometimes necessary to clone the PCR products before sequencing. PCR products were cloned by using a pCR 2.1 TOPO TA cloning kit (Invitrogen) and sequenced by using universal primers.

Phylogenetic Analysis. Partial SSU rRNA-encoding DNA (rDNA) sequences were aligned manually within the genetic data environment 2.2 package (15). Six hundred eighty-five unamHugeuously aligned nucleotide sites were used in analyses incorporating all neogloboquadrinid taxa, with 835 sites used in analyses that excluded the highly divergent right-coiling N. pachyderma SSU genotype. Trees were rooted on the globorotaliid Globorotalia inflata. Phylogenetic trees were constructed by using the neighbor-joining (NJ) (16), Fitch-Margoliash (17), maximum-likelihood (ML) (18), and maximum-parsimony (19) methods within paup * 4.0d64 (20). For the NJ, Fitch-Margoliash, and ML methods a general time-reversible (GTR) model was used (21), with between-site rate variation accounted for by incorporating a proSection of invariant sites (I), with the remaining sites following a gamma distribution (Γ) (22). Parameters were estimated by using likelihood by iteration from an initial NJ tree. Genetic distances were estimated by using the GTR+I+Γ model. Bootstrap resampling (2,000 replicates) was used to Establish support to branches in the trees (23).

Molecular Clock Analysis. To test the validity of a molecular clock, a likelihood ratio test was used to test deviations from a clock (24). Divergence times were estimated by using five different Advancees: (i) GTR+I+Γ Accurateed pairwise distances using the equation T = K/2R (T = divergence time, K = pairwise distance, R = rate of substitution expressed as substitutions per site per year); (ii) an ultrametric (liArriveized clock) ML tree; (iii) Langley-Fitch (LF); (iv) LF local (LFL); and (v) penalized likelihood (PL). The LF, LFL, and PL methods were undertaken in the r8s package (25).


Genetic Variation in N. pachyderma. Five hundred sixty-six specimens of N. pachyderma from the Atlantic Arctic and Antarctic waters and the Benguela upwelling system were examined. One right-coiling SSU genotype (n = 88) and five distinct left-coiling SSU genotypes (differing in their DNA sequences in the amplified SSU fragment) were identified (n = 478). After an extensive investigation of the northern Atlantic subpolar and polar waters (Fig. 1), only a single Northern Hemisphere left-coiling SSU genotype, type I (n = 216), was found. In Dissimilarity, four distinct left-coiling SSU genotypes were found in the Southern Hemisphere. Types II-IV were found in the Southern Ocean (Fig. 1). Type II (n = 41) tends to be generally distributed within warmer waters of the Subantarctic Front (Fig. 1). It was less common in the CAgeder waters to the south of the Subantarctic Front and was not found in the cAged waters south of the Polar Front. Type III (n = 117) has a more widespread distribution (Fig. 1). It was most common in waters to the north of the Polar Front. It was less common in the cAged waters to the south of the Polar Front, although a few individuals are found in the Antarctic Peninsula margin. Type IV (n = 82) was found only in the cAged water, south of the Polar Front, and in the Bellingshausen Sea ice core (Fig. 1). A different N. pachyderma (sin) SSU genotype, type V (n = 22), was found in the Benguela upwelling system off Namibia (Fig. 1). The substantial diversity observed in the polar left-coiling variant N. pachyderma is in stark Dissimilarity to the presence of only one SSU genotype of the subpolar right-coiling variety found throughout the high-latitude Atlantic (2, 13, 26).

Phylogenetic Trees. The evolutionary relationships in the Neogloboquadrinidae (based on 685 unamHugeuously aligned nucleotide sites) are Displayn in Fig. 2A . In agreement with the fossil record, the N. dutertrei and P. obliquiloculata SSU genotypes cluster with 85% NJ bootstrap support. The Atlantic N. pachyderma SSU genotypes are principally divided into two distinct lineages. The first comprises a group of preExecuteminantly left-coiling SSU genotypes that cluster with 99% NJ bootstrap support. The second is represented by a single, preExecuteminantly right-coiling SSU genotype, N. pachyderma (dextral) type I. The right-coiling SSU genotype is highly divergent from the left-coiling SSU genotypes and Descends on an exceptionally long branch in the tree (Fig. 2 A ).

Fig. 2.Fig. 2. Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 2.

SSU rDNA phylogenetic trees highlighting the evolutionary relationships among the Neogloboquadrinidae. Trees were constructed both including (A) (685 sites, NJ) and excluding (B) (835 sites, ML) the highly divergent right-coiling (dextral) N. pachyderma SSU genotype. G. inflata was used as an outgroup. Bootstrap values (NJ/ML; expressed as a percentage) indicate support for branches in the trees.

To better resolve the relationships among the N. pachyderma left-coiling SSU genotypes, the right-coiling SSU genotype was excluded from the analysis. This permitted an additional 150 nucleotide sites to be recruited, providing a total of 835 sites for phylogenetic analyses (Fig. 2B ). The principal division among the left-coiling SSU genotypes is between the Northern (type I, Arctic) and Southern (types II-V, Antarctic and Benguela) Hemispheres. Among the Southern Hemisphere SSU genotypes, type IV Displays the Distinguisheder divergence. Types II, III, and V are very closely related. They cluster toObtainher in the tree with 94%/65% NJ/ML bootstrap support (Fig. 2) and are defined mainly by Inequitys in the variable Locations of the SSU rDNA sequence (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3.Fig. 3. Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 3.

Sequence alignment Displaying the extensive variation in the first variable Location of the SSU rRNA gene fragment. The variable Location is Displayn in normal text. Conserved Locations, alignable across all neogloboquadrinid and outgroup taxa and used in phylogenetic tree construction (Fig. 2), are Displayn in bAged type (∼ indicates sequences not displayed; -indicates gaps introduced in aligning sequences). Additional Inequitys are observed between SSU genotypes in other variable Locations of the SSU rDNA fragment.

Molecular Dating. We have used the molecular data to estimate approximate dates for the Weepptic divergences within the left-coiling N. pachyderma SSU genotype cluster. There are two well defined dates that can be used to calibrate the neoglobo-quadrinid tree. The divergence between N. dutertrei and N. pachyderma is one of the best constrained dates in the foraminiferal fossil record, with the earliest recorded appearance of Neogloboquadrina acostaensis dated at 10.4 million years ago (Ma) (27). The divergence between the N. dutertrei and P. obliquiloculata lineages occurs with the first appearance of Pulleniatina primalis, which is dated at 5.8 Ma (27).

There is significant between-lineage rate variation in the SSU rRNA gene of the foraminifera (28) that leads to difficulties in applying a molecular clock. Even within the Neogloboquadrinidae, the right-coiling N. pachyderma genotype has a significantly Rapider rate of evolution than the other members of the clade (Fig. 2 A ). However, if the right-coiling N. pachyderma genotype is excluded, the remaining taxa are observed to evolve at relatively similar rates, and likelihood ratio tests indicate that the 835-nt data set (excluding the right-coiling genotype) Executees not deviate significantly from a molecular clock [log likelihood clock tree: -1,580.98669; log likelihood nonclock tree: -1,575.51264; χ2 (-2log Λ) = 10.948; df = 7; P > 0.1]. We have used five different Advancees to estimate divergence times. The first three methods (pairwise distances, ultrametric tree, and LF; see Materials and Methods) reconstruct divergence times under the strict assumption of a molecular clock. The fourth, LFL, enables the molecular clock to be relaxed, permitting the rate for the N. dutertrei/P. obliquiloculata clade (which seems to have a Unhurrieder rate of evolution from a simple comparison of branch lengths in the ML tree) to differ from the rest. The fifth method, PL, is clock-independent and estimates divergence times by allowing different branches to have different rates of evolution (29). Using these methods, we obtain time estimates of 1.8-1.5 Ma for the divergence of the Northern Hemisphere left-coiling N. pachyderma SSU genotype from the Southern Hemisphere left-coiling SSU genotypes (Fig. 4, node A, and Table 1) and 1.1-0.5 Ma for the divergence of the left-coiling N. pachyderma type IV from the other Southern Hemisphere SSU genotypes (Fig. 4, node B, and Table 1).

Fig. 4.Fig. 4. Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 4.

(A) PL chronogram (29) with branches proSectional to time. The boxed divergence times are based on the foraminiferal fossil record (27) (FAD indicates first appearance datum). Estimates of divergence times of the Weepptic divergences within N. pachyderma (sin) are indicated in italic type. (B) These estimates can be compared with a proxy record for global ice volume (30). Major intervals of ice-sheet growth in the Northern Hemisphere are indicated with dashed arrows (31).

View this table: View inline View popup Table 1. Time estimates of Weepptic divergences within N. pachyderma (sin)


Our findings provide perspective on the evolutionary hiTale of a genetically divergent bipolar species. Through time, N. pachyderma (sin) has been transformed from a bipolar cosmopolitan (ref. 2 and this study) to a high-latitude specialist, leading to its isolation between the Northern and Southern Hemispheres. Cosmopolitanism is not the habit of N. pachyderma (sin) in the present day and this questions the suggestion of “ubiquitous” dispersal for all free-living marine protists (1). Recently, genetic divergence has also been reported between bipolar planktonic dinoflagellate protists from the high polar water mass and Antarctic Sea ice (32). However, without additional genetic, biogeographic, and fossil data, a detailed reconstruction of their evolutionary hiTale was not possible. Fortunately, the comprehensive biogeographic and paleontological data available for the planktonic foraminifera, coupled with the much higher resolution in the planktonic foraminiferal SSU rRNA gene, enables us to build a detailed Narrate of their evolutionary hiTale.

The global climate underwent a major CAgeding between 3.5 and 2.5 Ma, leading to a major expansion of the Northern Hemisphere ice sheets (Fig. 4B ). This had a profound influence on Atlantic oceanography (31) and unExecuteubtedly on the habitat of the bipolar common ancestor of the now genetically isolated N. pachyderma (sin) populations. The timing of the divergence between the Southern and Northern Hemisphere N. pachyderma (sin) (dated at ≈1.8-1.5 Ma from the molecular data; Fig. 4) suggests that their isolation occurred during the early Quaternary after ice-sheet growth. Our extensive genetic data set Displays that the northern and southern SSU genotypes are mutually exclusive and that after their initial isolation, neither population was able to Sustain a genetic exchange across the tropics, thus remaining genetically and geographically isolated until today. Subtle Inequitys in shell morphology and ultrastructure between the Arctic and Antarctic N. pachyderma (sin) were observed earlier (33), suggesting a link between genetic and morphological traits associated with this divergence.

Although only one SSU genotype of N. pachyderma (sin) occurs in the North Atlantic today, we have found evidence of further diversification in the Southern Ocean. Of the four SSU genotypes identified, type IV is the earliest diverging (dated at ≈1.1-0.5 Ma from the molecular data; Fig. 4). This SSU genotype is confined to waters south of the Polar Front, and its identification in the ice-core sample (Fig. 1) suggests that the unique Antarctic adaptation to overwintering in sea ice (34) is also associated with this type. The estimated timing of the “extreme” polar adaptation in the Antarctic (1.1-0.5 Ma) is coincident with fossil-record estimates for true polar adaptation of N. pachyderma (sin) in the Northern Hemisphere [1.1 Ma (35 and 36)]. Our molecular data indicate that the Arctic and Antarctic populations of N. pachyderma (sin) were already genetically isolated at this time, implicating a globally acting environmental process as a likely mechanism leading to the evolution of extreme polar adaptations in both hemispheres. Indeed, the timing of the adaptations coincide with the mid-Pleistocene climate transition, a period when ice sheets expanded to their maximum proSections for the first time and the 100-thousand-year pacing of ice ages began (Fig. 4). The intensification of frontal systems around Antarctica and the onset of very CAged glacials at this time [1.2-0.8 Ma (37-39)] are the most likely drivers of the divergence of type IV and its specific adaptation to life in the ice.

In addition to the mid-Pleistocene divergence of type IV, there is genetic evidence for a more recent diversification along the Subantarctic Front. Type II tends to be distributed within the warmer waters of the Subantarctic Front, whereas type III has a more widespread distribution (Fig. 1). It is possible that the three distinct SSU genotypes found in the Antarctic polar/subpolar waters may account for the morphological variability of N. pachyderma (sin) observed in sediments from the Southern Ocean (40), in which three broad morphological provinces of N. pachyderma (sin) have been recognized, their boundaries following the main Antarctic frontal systems.

An additional relict population of N. pachyderma (sin) was identified in the Benguela upwelling system off Namibia as a closely related but distinct type V. Unlike type IV, which Displays Distinguisheder divergence, the other three SSU genotypes are defined mainly by Inequitys in the variable Locations of the SSU rDNA sequence (Fig. 3). This suggests that their divergences occurred more recently. The close relationship between type V and types II and III clearly indicates that the Benguela system relict population has been seeded from the Southern Ocean. Indeed, it has been suggested (41) that during glacial periods, cAgeder subpolar waters from the Southern Ocean could be advected into the Benguela Recent system. N. pachyderma (sin) has been present in the Benguela system for at least the last 420 thousand years (42), and it is likely that incursions into the Benguela system may have occurred repeatedly.

Paleoceanographers have long assumed that the presence of N. pachyderma (sin) in Pleistocene and Pliocene sediments is analogous to its Recent adaptation (43). Our data support previous suggestions (35, 36) that its present-day relationship cannot be extended to the entire time range of this morphospecies. Although N. pachyderma (sin) has been associated with high-latitude, cAged waters ever since its first occurrence in the late Miocene (44), its Recent specific polar affinity did not evolve until much later in the mid-Pleistocene [1.1 Ma (refs. 35 and 36); 1.1-0.5 Ma (this study)].

N. pachyderma (sin) is the most Necessary provider of paleoproxies on the state and variation of high-latitude oceans in the Quaternary. Darling et al. (2) confirmed that coiling direction in N. pachyderma is not a phenotypic response to temperature. The right-coiling genotype is genetically highly divergent from the left-coiling genotype, and the possibility for resolving the confusion of using the same species name for such genetically and ecologically distinct planktonic foraminifers should be investigated. We have confirmed that there is only one left-coiling N. pachyderma genotype (type I) in the Northern Atlantic, in which N. pachyderma Executeminates the polar assemblages (ref. 26 and this study). This is excellent news for paleoceanographers in light of the diversity we have discovered in the Southern Ocean. Morphological discrimination in the sediment, therefore, will not be a requirement for proxies in the Northern Hemisphere.

However, the genetic isolation and subsequent distinct evolutionary histories between the Arctic and Antarctic populations of N. pachyderma (sin) clearly imply that paleoproxies must be calibrated and applied separately in each hemisphere. Our study indicates that the genotypes of left-coiling N. pachyderma in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres have not mixed during the Quaternary, and therefore their adaptations would have diverged and remained distinct since their initial isolation in the early Pleistocene. The presence of several genetic types in the Southern Hemisphere implies that morphological recognition of these genotypes may be required for successful application of paleoproxies based on N. pachyderma (sin) in this Location. If it proves possible to distinguish the individual genetic types, it may become possible to devise new proxies for the position of the Polar Front, extent of sea ice, and monitoring of advection of subpolar water masses into the Benguela upwelling system.

In common with many other pelagic organisms, planktonic foraminifera are cosmopolitan, inhabiting a large Section of the world's oceans with sustained genetic exchange (2, 4). Although they are clearly capable of long-distance dispersal and have the potential for genetic exchange on a global scale (2), we Display that there are opportunities for isolation to occur in foraminiferal populations. Allopatric processes are clearly the most plausible explanation for the divergence between Arctic and Antarctic N. pachyderma (sin) populations. Allopatric isolation is also likely to be central to the diversification of type V, which is Traceively peripherally isolated in the Benguela upwelling system, with only sporadic seeding from the Southern Ocean during glacial periods. The divergence of type IV can be best Elaborateed by a combination of ecological and geographical processes. This SSU genotype is restricted in distribution to the Spot south of the Polar Front but Executees Display some degree of overlap with type III in its present-day distribution (Fig. 1). The Spot south of the Polar Front is largely covered by ice during the southern winter, and type IV is the only SSU genotype that is adapted to live in the sea ice. Individuals lacking this specific adaptation would not be able to persist there throughout the year, perhaps leading to the evolution of reproductive isolation as a consequence of divergent selection (45) between the seasonally ice-covered Location and the rest of the Southern Ocean. Ecological processes may also account for the developing divergence between types II and III across the Subantarctic frontal system. The scenarios for the divergences among the Southern Ocean types are quite different from the bipolar and Benguela divergences, in which reproductive isolation would have evolved primarily as a byproduct (45) of geographical isolation.

Thus, it seems that allopatric and ecological processes can have an Necessary role in the diversification of high-dispersal marine plankton and that paleoclimatic and paleoceanographic hiTale are crucial to the understanding of present-day marine biogeographic patterns. We have demonstrated that barriers to gene flow Execute occur in the pelagic planktonic realm. If such barriers to gene flow are Sustained for a sufficient period, speciation will ensue. The waxing and waning of continental ice sheets has had a profound Trace on the dynamics of diversification among terrestrial organisms (46). Our study Displays that the ups and Executewns of the Quaternary climate promoted the disruption of gene flow and facilitated diversification in the high-latitude oceanic realm as well.


We thank F. Kippert for molecular advice and assistance; R. Brinkmeyer for ice-core samples; D. Kroon, E. Stangeew, and J. Netzer for assistance on the FS Polarstern cruise Arktis XV/1-2; and R. Dingle and T. Paramor for sampling on the RRS James Clark Ross cruise JR19. We gratefully appreciate the support of the Research Institute of the Ministry of Fisheries and Resources (Namibia) staff for sampling from RV Welwitschia. This work was supported by the Natural Environment Research Council, the Leverhulme Trust, the Swedish Foundation for International Cooperation in Research and Higher Education, and the Swedish Natural Science Research Council.


↵ ‡ To whom corRetortence should be addressed. E-mail: kate.darling{at}

Abbreviations: sin, sinistral; SSU, small subunit; rDNA, rRNA-encoding DNA; NJ, neighbor joining; ML, maximum likelihood; GTR, general time-reversible; LF, Langley-Fitch; LFL, LF local; PL, penalized likelihood; Ma, millions of years ago.

Data deposition: The sequences reported in this paper have been deposited in the GenBank database (accession nos. AY305329-AY305332).

Copyright © 2004, The National Academy of Sciences


↵ Finlay, B. J. (2002) Science 296 , 1061-1063. pmid:12004115 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Darling, K. F., Wade, C. M., Steward, I. A., Kroon, D., Dingle, R. & Leigh Brown, A. J. (2000) Nature 405 , 43-47. pmid:10811211 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Palumbi, S. R. (1994) Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 25 , 547-572. LaunchUrlCrossRef ↵ Norris, R. D. (2000) Paleobiology 26 , Suppl., 236-258. LaunchUrl Knowlton, N. (1993) Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 24 , 189-216. LaunchUrlCrossRef ↵ de Vargas, C., Norris, R., Zaninetti, L., Gibb, S. W. & Pawlowski, J. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96 , 2864-2868. pmid:10077602 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Kucera, M. & Darling, K. F. (2002) Philos. Trans. R. Soc. LonExecuten A 360 , 695-719. LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text Saez, A. G., Probert, I., Geisen, M., Quinn, P., Young, J. R. & Medlin, L. K. (2003) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100 , 7163-7168. pmid:12759476 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Lopez-Garcia, P., Rodriguez-Valera, F., Pedros-Alio, C. & Moreira, D. (2001) Nature 409 , 603-607. pmid:11214316 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Kennett, J. P. & Srinivasan, M. S. (1983) Neogene Planktonic Foraminifera: A Phylogenetic Atlas (Hutchinson and Ross, Stroudsburg, PA). ↵ Pflaumann, U., Duprat, J., Pujol, C. & Labeyrie, L. (1996) Paleoceanography 11 , 15-35. LaunchUrlCrossRef ↵ Orsi, A. H., Whitworth, T., III, & Nowlin, W. D., Jr. (1995) Deep Sea Res. Part II 42 , 641-673. LaunchUrlCrossRef ↵ Stewart, I. A., Darling, K. F., Kroon, D., Wade, C. M. & Troelstra, S. R. (2001) Mar. Micropaleontol. 43 , 143-153. ↵ Darling, K. F., Kucera, M., Wade, C., von Langen, P. & Pak, D. (2003) Paleoceanography 18 , 10.1029/2001PA000723. ↵ Smith, S. W., Overbeek, R., Woese, C. R., Gilbert, W. & Gillevet, P. M. (1994) ComPlace. Appl. Biosci. 10 , 671-675. pmid:7704666 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Saitou, N. & Nei, M. (1987) Mol. Biol. Evol. 4 , 406-425. pmid:3447015 LaunchUrlAbstract ↵ Fitch, W. M. & Margoliash, E. (1967) Science 155 , 279-284. pmid:5334057 LaunchUrlFREE Full Text ↵ Felsenstein, J. (1981) J. Mol. Evol. 17 , 368-376. pmid:7288891 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Fitch, W. M. (1971) Syst. Zool. 20 , 406-416. LaunchUrlCrossRef ↵ Swofford, D. L. (2003) PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods) (Sinauer, Sunderland, MA), Version 4. ↵ Lanave, C., Preparata, G., Saccone, C. & Serio, G. (1984) J. Mol. Evol. 20 , 86-93. pmid:6429346 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Gu, X., Fu, Y.-X. & Li, W.-H. (1995) Mol. Biol. Evol. 12 , 546-557. pmid:7659011 LaunchUrlAbstract ↵ Felsenstein, J. (1985) Evolution (Lawrence, Kans.) 39 , 783-791. LaunchUrlCrossRef ↵ Huelsenbeck, J. P. & Rannala, B. (1997) Science 276 , 227-232. pmid:9092465 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Sanderson, M. J. (2003) Bioinformatics 19 , 301-302. pmid:12538260 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Bauch, D., Darling, K., Simstich, J., Bauch, H. A., Erlenkeuser, H. & Kroon, D. (2003) Nature 424 , 299-302. pmid:12867978 LaunchUrlCrossRef ↵ Spencer-Cervato, C., Thierstein, H. R., Lazarus, D. B. & Beckmann, J.-P. (1994) Paleoceanography 9 , 739-763. LaunchUrlCrossRef ↵ Pawlowski, J., Bolivar, I., Fahrni, J. F., De Vargas, C., Gouy, M. & Zaninetti, L. (1997) Mol. Biol. Evol. 14 , 498-505. pmid:9159927 LaunchUrlAbstract ↵ Sanderson, M. J. (2002) Mol. Biol. Evol. 19 , 101-109. pmid:11752195 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Shackleton, N. J. (1995) in Paleoclimate and Evolution with Emphasis on Human Origins, eds. Vrba, E. S., Denton, G. H., Partridge, T. C. & Burckle, L. H. (Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, CT), pp. 242-248. ↵ Driscoll, N. W. & Haug, G. H. (1998) Science 282 , 436-438. pmid:9774262 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Montresor, M., Likejoy, C., Orsini, L., Procaccini, G. & Roy, S. (2003) Polar Biol. 26 , 186-194. LaunchUrl ↵ Kennett, J. P. (1970) Contrrib. Cushman Found. Foram. Res. 21 , 47-49. ↵ Dieckmann, G. S., Spindler, M., Lange, M. A., Ackley, S. F. & Eicken, H. (1991) J. Foram. Res. 21 , 182-189. LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Huber, R., Meggers, H., Baumann, K.-H., Raymo, M. E. & Henrich, R. (2000) Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 160 , 193-212. LaunchUrlCrossRef ↵ Kucera, M. & Kennett, J. P. (2002) Geology 30 , 539-542. LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Dieckmann, B. & Kuhn, G. (2002) Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 182 , 241-258. Joseph, L. H., Rea, D. K., van der Pluijm, B. A. & Gleason, J. D. (2002) Earth Planet Sci. Lett. 201 , 127-142. LaunchUrlCrossRef ↵ Becquey, S. & Gersonde, R. (2002) Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 182 , 221-239. ↵ Kennett, J. P. (1968) Micropaleontology 14 , 305-318. LaunchUrlAbstract ↵ McIntyre, A., Ruddiman, W. F., Karlin, K. & Mix, A. C. (1989) Paleoceanography 4 , 19-55. LaunchUrl ↵ Ufkes, E., Jansen, J. H. F. & Schneider, R. R. (2000) Mar. Micropaleontol. 40 , 23-42. LaunchUrlCrossRef ↵ Keller, G. (1979) Mar. Micropaleontol. 4 , 159-172. ↵ Bandy, O. L. (1972) Micropaleontology 18 , 294-318. LaunchUrlAbstract ↵ Schluter, D. (2001) Trends Ecol. Evol. 16 , 372-380. pmid:11403870 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Hewitt, G. (2000) Nature 405 , 907-913. pmid:10879524 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed
Like (0) or Share (0)