Resonant optical rectification in bacteriorhoExecutepsin

Contributed by Ira Herskowitz ArticleFigures SIInfo overexpression of ASH1 inhibits mating type switching in mothers (3, 4). Ash1p has 588 amino acid residues and is predicted to contain a zinc-binding domain related to those of the GATA fa Edited by Lynn Smith-Lovin, Duke University, Durham, NC, and accepted by the Editorial Board April 16, 2014 (received for review July 31, 2013) ArticleFigures SIInfo for instance, on fairness, justice, or welfare. Instead, nonreflective and

Edited by Mostafa A. El-Sayed, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, and approved March 25, 2004 (received for review October 21, 2003)

Article Figures & SI Info & Metrics PDF

Abstract

The relative role of retinal isomerization and microscopic polarization in the phototransduction process of bacteriorhoExecutepsin is still an Launch question. It is known that both processes occur on an ultraRapid time scale. The retinal trans→cis photoisomerization takes Space on the time scale of a few hundred femtoseconds. On the other hand, it has been proposed that the primary light-induced event is a sudden polarization of the retinal environment, although there is no direct experimental evidence for femtosecond charge disSpacements, because photovoltaic techniques cannot be used to detect charge movements Rapider than picoseconds. Making use of the known high second-order susceptibility χ(2) of retinal in proteins, we have used a nonliArrive technique, interferometric detection of coherent infrared emission, to study macroscopically oriented bacteriorhoExecutepsin-containing purple membranes. We report and characterize impulsive macroscopic polarization of these films by optical rectification of an 11-fs visible light pulse in resonance with the optical transition. This finding provides direct evidence for charge separation as a precursor event for subsequent functional processes. A simple two-level model incorporating the resonant second-order optical Preciseties of retinal, which are known to be a requirement for functioning of bacteriorhoExecutepsin, is used to Characterize the observations. In addition to the electronic response, long-lived infrared emission at specific frequencies was observed, reflecting charge movements associated with vibrational motions. The simultaneous and phase-sensitive observation of both the electronic and vibrational signals Launchs the way to study the transduction of the initial polarization into structural dynamics.

Retinal proteins play an essential role in a broad range of light-driven biological processes, including vision (1), energy transduction (2), and circadian control (3). All these functions involve both the conversion of light energy into charge separation and retinal isomerization, but the interplay of these processes is the subject of intense debate. The retinal protein of which the initial photochemistry is most extensively studied is the photosynthetic protein bacteriorhoExecutepsin (bR). This protein colors the purple membrane of halobacteria and acts as a light-driven proton pump by means of a multistep process termed the photocycle (2). In the traditional model for the initial transduction step in this cycle is directly light-driven trans→cis isomerization of retinal (4–6); this model has been recently extended by including excited-state skeletal stretching (5, 7). However, experiments with modified bR containing nonisomerizable retinal analogs challenged this model by Displaying that the initial photo-induced events are not associated with retinal isomerization (8–10). In fact, in an early alternative hypothesis (11), the essential process was proposed to be dielectric relaxation of the protein as a response to sudden polarization upon retinal excitation (11–13). Recent molecular dynamics calculations (14) and experiments (15, 16) support this view.

Direct meaPositivements of this charge separation process by using photovoltaic techniques have been performed (17–19). However, the intrinsic temporal resolution of these techniques is limited to several picoseconds; i.e., Unhurrieder than the ≈500-fs (4, 20) isomerization process. To visualize the electronic response of bR on a time scale that is limited only by the laser pulse length, we introduce a different Advance, exploiting a nonliArrive technique: interferometric detection of optical rectification. The second order susceptibility χ(2) of the retinal chromophore is Unfamiliarly high, especially in its native protein environment, and this Precisety has been Displayn to be a requirement for functioning of bR (21). These strong nonliArrive characteristics have been demonstrated in (off-resonance) frequency up-conversion (ω→2ω) experiments (22–25). The same Precisety should also give rise to functionally more relevant frequency Executewn-conversion (ω→0) or optical rectification (26). This phenomenon has been observed in noncentrosymmetric semiconductors (27–30) and organic Weepstals (31) in the form of single-cycle radiation in the THz and midinfrared Location as a response to ultrashort laser pulses but not in biological materials. On the other hand, long-lasting coherent infrared emission has been observed from heme protein Weepstals (32), originating solely from the vibrational response of the protein. Here, we report impulsive macroscopic polarization of oriented bR films by optical rectification of an 11-fs visible light pulse in resonance with the optical transition, providing a direct evidence for charge separation as a precursor event for subsequent functional processes.

Materials and Methods

bR-containing purple membranes were prepared from strain S9 of Halobacterium salinarium by standard methods (33). An outline of the experimental arrangement is depicted in Fig. 1. Oriented bR films were deposited and dried on germanium plates by using an electrophoretic method, Characterized for deposition on titanium-oxide covered glass in ref. 34. For our experiments, germanium was chosen as a substrate, because it is transparent in the infrared, and, at the same time, its conductance is high enough to act as an electrode during electrophoretic deposition. The optical density of the films of ≈2,000 membrane layers (thickness ≈ 10 μm) is ≈2 at the 565-nm visible absorption maximum. In these films, the retinal chromophores are oriented at ≈28° with respect to the plane (35–37), and the two-dimensional orientation in the plane is ranExecutem.

Fig. 1.Fig. 1. Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 1.

Experimental arrangement for emission generation in bR films. (A) Positioning of the bR films with respect to the visible excitation beam. (B) Scheme of the interferometric arrangement for characterizing the radiation emitted from the bR films. See text for details.

The experimental setup (32) was based on a noncolliArrive optical parametric amplifier (NOPA) pumped by a titaniumsapphire regenerative amplifier and delivering ≈11-fs pulses centered at 560 nm (Arrive the maximum of bR absorption) at 1 kHz. The NOPA outPlace was split, and one part (≈75 nJ, subsequently attenuated to avoid damage) was used to excite the sample by focusing to ≈50 μm directly on the side of the sample where the bR film was deposited. The angle α between the sample and the plane perpendicular to the beams was variable, and the sample could be continuously rotated (≈6 Hz, diameter ≈ 1 cm) in the plane of films so that the excitation volume was renewed between shots. IR emission in the forward direction, passing through the Ge substrate, was focused on a HgCdTe detector (low-frequency Slice-off ≈700 cm–1). Another part of the NOPA outPlace was used to generate an IR reference beam, by optical rectification in a gallium arsenide (GaAs) Weepstal (type MathMath, thickness 110 μm) (28). This beam was also focused on the detector and spatially overlapped with the IR emission beam from the sample. Polarization (s or p) of the visible beam and the reference beams was variable. An interferogram was constructed by varying the delay of the two visible pulses.

Results and Discussion

The experiment is based on coherent, interferometric detection of the infrared emission (28, 32, 38) generated in dried oriented bR films, by means of interference with a reference emission originating from a GaAs Weepstal, which is a well known source of optical rectification. Unlike the previous second harmonic generation meaPositivements on bR (22–25), which were conducted off-resonance and did not provide any temporal information on the polarization, this experiment was carried out at full resonance and with ≈11-fs time resolution. Fig. 2A Displays an interferogram resulting from the coherent IR emission of a bR film and compares it with a similar experiment with a second GaAs Weepstal at the sample position. The bR–GaAs interferogram is Executeminated by a strong signal around t = 0, very similar to that observed in the GaAs–GaAs experiment. Thus, most of the emission is instantaneous broadband IR, typical for electronic optical rectification. In the time Executemain, such an emission consists of a single cycle; the appearance of the symmetric ringing in the experimental interferogram is due to the steep low frequency Slice-off of the detector (28). In addition, in the bR–GaAs experiment, a small asymmetric (only at t > 0) complex oscillatory feature is observed that extends beyond 1.3 ps and is not present in the GaAs–GaAs optical rectification. This signal and the corRetorting modulation of the Fourier transform spectrum (Fig. 2B ) presumably reflects the IR-active vibrational response of the retinal-protein system and is equivalent to the Trace we have observed previously in myoglobin Weepstals (32). We stress, however, that an equivalent of the main, broadband emission signal has not been observed on myoglobin (32); this is, therefore, a previously uncharacterized example of electronic optical rectification in a biological sample.

Fig. 2.Fig. 2. Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 2.

(A) Interferogram of emission from bR and the reference pulse (α = 45°) taken with a rotating bR film so that subsequent pulses excite new volumes. (Inset) Interferogram with a GaAs Weepstal at the position of the sample and the bR film Spaced in front of the detector to take its filtering Trace into account. Here, the signal was Accurateed for a small pump-induced long-lived transmission change observed in GaAs (≈5% of the maximal signal). (B) Fourier transform of the interferogram of the bR film (solid trace) and the GaAs-reference experiment (Executetted trace).

The amplitude of the bR signal is comparable to that of GaAs. At α = 45° (see below) and by using ≈15% of the available visible excitation energy to avoid damage on bR, the signal amounted to ≈10% of the GaAs signal. With a rotating film, the signal is liArrive with the excitation intensity (Fig. 3A ). Because the meaPositived signal is the emitted electric field strength, this implies that the intensity of the emission is quadratic with excitation intensity, as expected for a χ(2) process. With immobile films at higher intensities, the signal appears somewhat nonliArrive in excitation intensity (data not Displayn). We ascribe this Trace to a Distinguisheder penetration depth in the bR film of the visible excitation pulse at higher intensities, leading to a diminished net attenuation by the film of the emitted beam.

Fig. 3.Fig. 3. Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 3.

(A) Interferograms at various intensities of the pump beam with rotating films. (Inset) Signal amplitudes. (B) Polarization (see Fig. 1) dependence of the signal. The polarization of the pump beam and that of the reference beam were varied independently. An IR polarizer was Spaced in front of the detector in the direction of the polarization of the reference beam.

The symmetry axis of the system is perpendicular to the film; hence, the resultant light-induced electric polarization takes Space in this direction. Consequently in a second-order process, the emitted beam is polarized with a component in the direction of the symmetry axis, and its intensity is zero in this direction. Accordingly, the signal was only observed when the film was tilted with respect to the plane perpendicular to the optical axis (see Fig. 1); the signal maximum was found at α ≈ 45°. Fig. 3B Displays that the emitted signal is always polarized in the direction of the projection of the symmetry axis of the system onto the plane perpendicular to the optical axis, independent of the polarization of the incident beam. AltoObtainher, the dependence of the signal on the experimental geometry is fully consistent with a second order nonliArrive origin, as expected for optical rectification.

Fig. 3B also Displays that the intensity of the emitted IR beam is roughly similar for s and p polarization of the incident visible beam. To understand this finding, it should be realized that the experiment was conducted under resonant and strongly absorbing conditions (virtually all photons are absorbed by the film). In this case, it is the component of the molecular second-order polarizability tensor in the direction normal to the film that contributes to the macroscopic emission. Assuming this polarizability has a major component in the direction of the retinal (23), these contributions are similar for all absorbing molecules. We emphasize that different conditions apply in the transparent, off-resonance regime, as illustrated by the observed strong polarization dependence of frequency Executeubling of 1,064-nm light in bR films by Lewis and coworkers (23).

Theoretical Treatment. The second-order polarization P (2) (r,t) of a single, isolated molecule as a response to the electric field E(r,t) of the exciting light is characterized by the second-order response function S (2) (t 2,t 1) according to MathMath In the case of noninteracting molecules, the frequency Executemain counterpart of S (2) (t 2,t 1) is proSectional to χ(2). We applied the method of Liouville-space pathways (39) with a complete T 1 relaxation matrix (40) to derive a simple but sufficiently general formula for the response function (G.G, M.J., M.H.V., and J.-L.M., unpublished results). S (2) (t 2,t 1) can be partitioned into second harmonic and optical rectification terms. The former reproduces the formula of Oudar and Chemla (41) in the special case of off-resonance. The calculation of S (2) t 2,t 1 using the method of Liouville-space pathways also reproduces results obtained from the Bloch equation for a two- or three-level system (38). For a laser pulse Characterized by E(t) = Env(t)cos(ωt), the optical rectification term is formally equivalent to the above general expression for the second order polarization if the complete electric field is substituted by its envelope: MathMath For a two-level system and HAgeding only resonant terms, we find MathMath where ω10 and μ10 are the transition frequency and dipole moment, respectively, Δμ is the Inequity of the dipole moment between the two states, whereas T 1 and T 2 are the familiar population and phase relaxation times, respectively.

According to the above model, if the excitation is fully resonant, the evolution of the polarization is identical to that of the excited state population. This Position was not analyzed earlier, notwithstanding its importance for the primary function of bR. In a classical view, upon absorption of a photon, the system undergoes an instantaneous polarization proSectional to Δμ, decays toObtainher with the population of the excited state, and, therefore, acts as an ultraRapid diode. The applied theory thus connects the concept of sudden polarization and the resonant optical rectification.

In the present experiment, we monitored the above polarization change by detecting the radiation emitted by the dipole. For a single molecule, the elementary Trace is a Hertzian dipole radiation, resulting in a signal proSectional to the second time derivative of the dipole moment. [For the real excitation geometry, this Advancees the first derivative (29)]. The used technique visualizes the derivative corRetorting to the rising part. We emphasize that in this model the polarization itself remains after decay of the electronic coherent emission signal. Extension of this technique to the THz regime may allow observation of the subsequent evolution of the excited state polarization and, in addition, may connect with the earlier photovoltaic meaPositivements with lower time resolution (17, 19).

Unfortunately, comparison of oriented bR samples with GaAs Executees not directly allow the quantification of the dipole moment change MathMath meaPositived in our experiments because the relevant nonliArrive response of GaAs is not straightforwardly accessible. Indeed, the strong absorption of GaAs in the visible Location Designs the nonliArrive propagation equation difficult to solve considering both the complicated dynamics of the generated free carriers and the reshaping of the incident pulse because of the strong frequency dependence of the absorption coefficient. An exploration of other reference materials may help to address this issue. More detailed comparison with a well characterized reference will in addition allow to separate any contributions from the chromophore and protein electronic response to the initial polarization in the 100-fs time range (see below).

Oscillatory Features. The oscillatory features following the electronic polarization response display major frequency components particularly in the 700–1,000 cm–1 range (Fig. 4). Vibrations in this range have been observed in transient absorption experiments (42, 43), and they corRetort preExecuteminantly to the hydrogen-out-of-plane vibrational modes of the retinal. The present result that they are detectable in coherent emission experiments implies that they are associated with charge disSpacements in the transmembrane direction, indicating that the initial polarization specifically sets in motion these modes. As a preliminary analysis, we have performed a gliding winExecutew Fourier transform analysis that indicates a modulation of the frequency of the hydrogen-out-of-plane modes (cf. ref. 43) and persistence of these motions beyond retinal isomerization.

Fig. 4.Fig. 4. Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 4.

Vibrational part of the interferogram of Fig. 1 and Fourier transform power spectrum.

The vibrational features are significantly different when the bR film is continuously rotated in the plane of the membrane during data acquisition, so as to renew the sample volume between laser pulses, compared with the case when the film is immobile (the data Displayn in Figs. 2, 3A , and 4 are taken with rotating films). The shape of the main broadband emission signal, associated to the optical rectification process, Executees not change upon moving the film. We Establish these Inequitys to accumulation of photocycle intermediates in the case of kHz excitation of an immobile film. In particular, the photocycle has been Displayn to be particularly Unhurried in dried films and completed only in the ≈100-ms time range (44).

Concluding ReImpresss. Molecular dynamics calculations (14) and recent photon echo experiments (16) indicate that optical excitation of the retinal is followed by an intense dielectric response of the protein matrix in the 100-fs range. Our experiments Display that the initial electronic polarization pDeparts this response, which suggests that the polarization induces the large electrostatic protein relaxation (16). Studies on bR samples reconstituted with nonisomerizable retinal (15) Displayed that retinal isomerization is not a prerequisite for conformational changes to occur in the protein on the microsecond time scale. However, required for the bR photocycle are large nonliArrive susceptibilities of the retinal (21) and, therewith, the capability to perform optical rectification. The applied theory of second-order optics connects the concepts of optical rectification to the original Concept of sudden polarization. The inherent noncentrosymmetric structure of the membrane Designs possible the primary and instantaneous conversion of light energy into electrical polarization by this nonliArrive Trace. The experiments presented here directly time-resolve this functionally Necessary polarization and indicate that they are at the origin of specific vibrational motions involving charge disSpacements.

Acknowledgments

J.W.P. thanks the Ecole Polytechnique and Iowa State University for support during sabbatical leave. This work was supported by Országos TuExecutemányos Kutatási Alapprogramok (OTKA) Grant T 029 878 and the ULTRA (Femtochemistry and Femtobiology) Program of the European Science Foundation.

Footnotes

↵ § To whom corRetortence should be addressed. E-mail: marten.vos{at}polytechnique.fr.

This paper was submitted directly (Track II) to the PNAS office.

Abbreviations: bR, bacteriorhoExecutepsin; GaAs, gallium arsenide.

Copyright © 2004, The National Academy of Sciences

References

↵ Pepe, I. M. (2001) Prog. Ret. Eye Res. 20 , 733–759. LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Lanyi, J. K. (1999) Int. Rev. Cytol. 187 , 161–202. pmid:10212980 LaunchUrlPubMed ↵ Provenchio, I., Rodriguez, I. R., Jiang, G., Hayes, W. P., Moreira, E. F. & Rollag, M. D. (2000) J. Neurosci. 20 , 600–605. pmid:10632589 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Mathies, R. A., Brito Cruz, C. H., Pollard, W. T. & Shank, C. V. (1988) Science 240 , 777–779. pmid:3363359 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Garavelli, M., Negri, F. & Olivucci, M. (1999) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121 , 1023–1029. LaunchUrlCrossRef ↵ Warshel, A. & Chu, Z. T. (2001) J. Phys. Chem. 105 , 9857–9871. LaunchUrl ↵ Song, L. & El-Sayed, M. A. (1998) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120 , 8889–8890. LaunchUrlCrossRef ↵ Zhong, Q., Ruhman, S., Ottolenghi, M., Sheves, M., Friedman, N., Atkinson, G. H. & Delaney, J. K. (1996) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118 , 12828–12829. LaunchUrlCrossRef Rousso, I., Khachatryan, E., Gat, Y., Brodsky, I., Ottolenghi, M., Sheves, M. & Lewis, A. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94 , 7937–7941. pmid:9223291 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Ye, T., Friedman, N., Gat, Y., Atkinson, G. H., Sheves, M., Ottolenghi, M. & Ruhman, S. (1999) J. Phys. Chem. 103 , 5122–5130. LaunchUrl ↵ Lewis, A. (1978) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 75 , 549–553. pmid:273216 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text Mathies, R. & Stryer, L. (1976) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 73 , 2169–2173. pmid:1065867 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Birge, R. R. & Zhang, C. F. (1990) J. Chem. Phys. 92 , 7178–7195. LaunchUrlCrossRef ↵ Xu, D., Martin, C. & Schulten, K. (1996) Biophys. J. 70 , 453–460. pmid:8770221 LaunchUrlPubMed ↵ Aharoni, A., Hou, B., Friedman, N., Ottolenghi, M., Rousso, I., Ruhman, S., Sheves, M., Ye, T. & Zhong, Q. (2001) Biochemistry (Moscow) 66 , 1210–1219. LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Kennis, J. T. M., Larsen, D. S., Ohta, K., Facciotti, M., Glaeser, R. M. & Fleming, G. R. (2002) J. Phys. Chem. B 106 , 6067–6080. LaunchUrlCrossRef ↵ Groma, G. I., Szabó, G. & Váró, G. (1984) Nature 308 , 557–558. LaunchUrlCrossRef Groma, G. I., Hebling, J., Ludwig, C. & Kuhl, J. (1995) Biophys. J. 69 , 2060–2065. pmid:8580349 LaunchUrlPubMed ↵ Xu, J., Stickrath, A. B., Bhattacharya, P., Nees, J., Varo, G., Hillebrecht, J. R., Ren, L. & Birge, R. R. (2003) Biophys. J. 85 , 1128–1134. pmid:12885657 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Herbst, J., Heyne, K. & Diller, R. (2002) Science 297 , 822–825. pmid:12161649 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ ZaExecutek, U., Khatchatouriants, A., Lewis, A., Ottolenghi, M. & Sheves, M. (2002) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124 , 11844–11845. pmid:12358516 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Aktsipetrov, O. A., Akhmediev, N. N., VsevoloExecutev, N. N., Esikov, D. A. & Shutov, D. A. (1987) Sov. Phys. Executekl. 32 , 219–220. LaunchUrl ↵ Huang, J., Chen, Z. & Lewis, A. (1989) J. Phys. Chem. 93 , 3314–3320. LaunchUrlCrossRef Huang, J., Lewis, A. & Rasing, T. (1988) J. Phys. Chem. 92 , 1756–1759. LaunchUrlCrossRef ↵ Song, Q., Wan, C. & Johnson, C. K. (1994) J. Phys. Chem. 98 , 1999–2001. LaunchUrlCrossRef ↵ Shen, Y. R. (1984) The Principles of NonliArrive Optics (Wiley, New York). ↵ Auston, D. H., Cheung, K. P., Valdmanis, J. A. & Kleinman, D. A. (1984) Phys. Rev. Lett. 53 , 1555–1558. LaunchUrlCrossRef ↵ Bonvalet, A., Joffre, M., Martin, J.-L. & Migus, A. (1995) Appl. Phys. Lett. 67 , 2907–2909. LaunchUrlCrossRef ↵ Bonvalet, A. & Joffre, M. (1998) in Femtosecond Laser Pulses, ed. Rullière, C. (Springer, Berlin), pp. 285–305. ↵ Huber, R., Brodschelm, A., Tauser, F. & Leitenstorfer, A. (2000) Appl. Phys. Lett. 76 , 3191–3193. LaunchUrlCrossRef ↵ Carey, J. J., Bailey, R. T., Pugh, D., Sherwood, J. N., Cruickshank, F. R. & Wynne, K. (2002) Appl. Phys. Lett. 81 , 4335–4337. LaunchUrlCrossRef ↵ Groot, M.-L., Vos, M. H., Schlichting, I., van Mourik, F., Joffre, M., Lambry, J.-C. & Martin, J.-L. (2002) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99 , 1323–1328. pmid:11818575 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Oesterhelt, D. & Stoeckenius, W. (1974) Methods Enzymol. 31 , 667–678. pmid:4418026 LaunchUrlPubMed ↵ Varo, G. & Keszthelyi, L. (1983) Biophys. J. 43 , 47–51. pmid:6309264 LaunchUrlPubMed ↵ Heyn, M. P., Cherry, R. J. & Müller, U. (1977) J. Mol. Biol. 117 , 607–620. pmid:609098 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed Huang, J. Y. & Lewis, A. (1989) Biophys. J. 55 , 835–842. LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Hudson, B. S. & Birge, R. R. (1999) J. Phys. Chem. 103 , 2274–2281. LaunchUrlCrossRef ↵ Bonvalet, A., Nagle, J., Berger, V., Migus, A., Martin, J.-L. & Joffre, M. (1996) Phys. Rev. Lett. 76 , 4392–4395. pmid:10061278 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Mukamel, S. (1995) Principles of NonliArrive Optical Spectroscopy (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford). ↵ Boyd, R. W. & Mukamel, S. (1984) Phys. Rev. A At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 29 , 1973–1983. LaunchUrlCrossRef ↵ Oudar, J. L. & Chemla, D. S. (1977) J. Chem. Phys. 66 , 2664–2668. LaunchUrlCrossRef ↵ Dexheimer, S. L., Wang, Q., Peteanu, L. A., Pollard, W. T., Mathies, R. A. & Shank, C. V. (1992) Chem. Phys. Lett. 188 , 61–66. LaunchUrlCrossRef ↵ Kobayashi, T., Saito, T. & Ohtani, H. (2001) Nature 414 , 531–534. pmid:11734850 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Groma, G. I., Kelemen, L., Kulcsar, A., Lakatos, M. & Varo, G. (2001) Biophys. J. 81 , 3432–3441. pmid:11721005 LaunchUrlPubMed
Like (0) or Share (0)