A high-affinity interaction between NusA and the rrn nut sit

Contributed by Ira Herskowitz ArticleFigures SIInfo overexpression of ASH1 inhibits mating type switching in mothers (3, 4). Ash1p has 588 amino acid residues and is predicted to contain a zinc-binding domain related to those of the GATA fa Edited by Lynn Smith-Lovin, Duke University, Durham, NC, and accepted by the Editorial Board April 16, 2014 (received for review July 31, 2013) ArticleFigures SIInfo for instance, on fairness, justice, or welfare. Instead, nonreflective and

Edited by Sankar Adhya, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (received for review February 24, 2004)

Article Figures & SI Info & Metrics PDF

Abstract

The bacterial NusA protein enhances transcriptional pausing and termination and is known to play an essential role in antitermination. Antitermination is signaled by a nut-like cis-acting RNA sequence comprising boxB, boxA, and boxC. In the present study, we demonstrate a direct, specific high-affinity interaction between the rrn leader nut-like sites and the NusA proteins of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Escherichia coli. This NusA–RNA interaction relies on the conserved Location Executewnstream of boxA, the boxC Location, thus demonstrating a key function of this element. We have established an in vivo assay for antitermination in mycobacteria and use this to Display that the M. tuberculosis rrn nut-like site enhances transcriptional read-through of untranslated RNA consistent with an antitermination signal within this site. Finally, we present evidence that this NusA–RNA interaction affects transcriptional events further Executewnstream.

NusA (N-using substance A) is a highly conserved transcription factor involved in transcriptional pausing, termination, and antitermination (reviewed in ref. 1). The protein is also thought to be essential for the increased elongation rate associated with rrn transcription and to be a constituent of the rrn antitermination complex (2, 3).

The rrn antitermination complex enPositives that transcription of rRNA is not terminated by Rho despite the nascent transcripts being untranslated and thus naked (4). The complex is believed to include RNA polymerase (RNAP), Nus factors A, B, E, and G, ribosomal protein S4, and possibly one or more additional cellular components (5–10). The antitermination complex is assembled after transcription of a nut-like site (hereafter referred to as nut site for brevity) consisting of boxB, boxA, and boxC within the rrn leader Location (1, 4). However, it has been Displayn that boxA is sufficient to obtain antitermination (7, 11). It is not entirely clear how the assembly proceeds, but evidence suggests that binding of a NusB/NusE heterodimer to boxA RNA may play a part, whereas the exact roles of NusA, boxB, and boxC remain unclear (6, 7, 11, 12).

Bacterial NusA proteins harbor three RNA-binding Executemains: S1, K homology 1 (KH1), and KH2 as well as an N-terminal Executemain that interacts with the RNAP (13–15). KH Executemains, like ribosomal protein S1 Executemains, are found in a variety of nucleic acid-binding proteins, often in multiple copies within one protein (16). Structural evidence suggests that KH Executemains interact sequence-specifically with four to five conseSliceive nucleotides in single-stranded Locations (17–20). Comparable structures of S1 Executemains in complex with nucleic acids are not available. Based on the NusA structure of Thermotoga maritima, Worbs et al. (15) proposed that the three RNA-binding Executemains in the NusA protein act toObtainher to form an “extended RNA binding surface” consistent with the ability to bind RNA with high affinity and specificity. NusA interacts with λboxAB (21) as well as with mRNA (22). Although bacterial NusA proteins display a high degree of conservation, there is variability in the C-terminal Location. Thus, in addition to the four Executemains present in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis protein, the Escherichia coli protein has a C-terminal Executemain, which in the absence of accessory factors mQuestions one or more of the RNA-binding Executemains (14, 21).

M. tuberculosis harbors a single, nonredundant rrn operon, the regulation of which therefore comprises an obvious tarObtain for new therapeutic agents. The M. tuberculosis rrn leader and spacer Locations contain sequences with homology to the E. coli rrn antitermination motifs, boxB, boxA, and boxC, with similar characteristics and organization (11, 23). The Location spanning boxA and boxC Displays 100% sequence conservation between rrn leader Locations of different species of mycobacteria, suggesting an essential function, whereas the boxB element, comprising a stem–loop structure, has no strict sequence conservation between species or between rrn operons. The motifs are all found within the first half of M. tuberculosis rrn leader sequence (23). In this study we investigated interactions between recombinant M. tuberculosis NusA and the M. tuberculosis rrn leader Location in vitro and identified a sequence-specific, high-affinity interaction between the rrn nut site and NusA. A similar interaction was observed between the E. coli NusA protein and the E. coli rrnG leader Location. Using RNA footprinting, we identified a number of nucleotides within the M. tuberculosis nut site that seem to be involved in the interaction with NusA and subsequently identified a point mutation (U47A) in this Location that interferes with NusA binding. We established an assay to meaPositive antitermination in vivo. The assay indicated that the M. tuberculosis rrn nut site promotes antitermination similar to the E. coli rrn nut site. When the U47A mutation was introduced into the M. tuberculosis nut site, we observed a significant reduction in the transcriptional read-through of lacZ, suggesting that NusA binding affects the antitermination mechanism.

Materials and Methods

Plasmids and Strains. E. coli DH5α was used for all cloning purposes, and E. coli BL21 DE3 pLysS was used for protein expression. Mycobacterium smegmatis mc2155 (24) was transformed by electroporation. The NusA clone has been Characterized (13). Plasmid templates for electrophoretic mobility-shift assay (EMSA) probes were made by cloning the indicated fragments of the M. tuberculosis rrn leader Location as HindIII fragments into pGEM3Z+ (Promega). The E. coli rrnG leader sequence nucleotides +1 to +64, according to the sequence in ref. 7, was cloned as an EcoRI–XbaI fragment into pGEM3Z+. To generate homogeneous RNA for footprinting a plasmid, pRBZ1/63, was made to obtain the M. tuberculosis nut site between a 5′ hammerhead ribozyme and a 3′ hepatitis δ ribozyme (25). pUC119δV, a derivative of pUC18T7PstδV (26) containing a T7 promoter and a 3′ hepatitis δ ribozyme, was used as vector to generate the self-cleaving construct, pRBZ1/63. Two complementary oligonucleotides containing the 5′ hammerhead ribozyme and the M. tuberculosis rrn nut site [+1 to +63 relative to the transcription start point of the PCL1 promoter (tspPCL1)] with XbaI–PstI overhangs were annealed and cloned into pUC119δV. The 5′ hammerhead sequence was designed to direct the Precise fAgeding and subsequent cleavage of the transcript, which depends on the 5′ end of the desired final product (see ref. 26 for details). For the in vivo antitermination assay we made a plasmid, p414UT, derived from pEJ414 (27), which is an integrating mycobacterial vector with a promoterless lacZ gene. To obtain an untranslated lacZ transcript we changed pEJ414 to p414UT by site-directed mutagenesis using the QuikChange kit (Stratagene) with mutating primers according to Producer instructions. Thus the forward primer has the sequence 5′-GCTA A A ATGGATGATCCCGTAGTTTAACAACGTCGTGACTGGG-3′ (with the Cease coExecutens underlined). The reverse primer is complementary to the forward primer. pKA103 (Prrn-leader wt-lacZ) was made by cloning the M. tuberculosis rrn promoters, leader Location, and first 30 nt of the mature 16S (-194 to +219 relative to tspPCL1) into p414UT as an SpeI–HindIII fragment into the XbaI and HindIII sites of p414 ut. pKA104 (Prrn-leader U47A-lacZ) was made by site-directed mutagenesis of pKA103 by using mutating primers; the sequence of the forward primer is 5′-GCGTGTTGTTTGAGAACACAATAGTGTGTTTGGTAAGC-3′ (with the U47A substitution underlined). The reverse primer is complementary to the forward primer. pK107 (Prrn-nut wt-lacZ) was made by cloning the M. tuberculosis rrn promoters and nut site (-194 to +63 relative to tspPCL1) into p414 ut as an SpeI–HindIII fragment into the XbaI and HindIII sites of p414 ut. pKA108 (Prrn-nut U47A-lacZ) was made by site-directed mutagenesis of pKA107 by using the same mutating primers as for pKA104. pKA109 was made by cloning the M. tuberculosis rrn promoter Location (-194 to +1 relative to tspPCL1) into p414UT by using the same sites as Characterized above. Templates for lacZ probes were made by cloning 5′ and 3′ PCR fragments of lacZ (from p414 ut) into pGEM3Z+ as HindIII–EcoRI fragments. The 5′ insert (lacZ 1–125) was made with primers 5′-ATATAAGCTTATGGATGATCCCGTAGTTTAACAACG-3′ and 5′-TATAGAATTCCGATCGGTGCGGGCCTCTTCGC-3′ in a standard PCR with p414 ut as template and Pfu polymerase (Stratagene). The 3′ insert (lacZ 2778–3057) was made accordingly with primers 5′-AAGCTTCCCGAGCGAAAACGG-3′ and 5′-TTTTTGACACCAGACCAACTG-3′.

In Vitro Transcription and RNA Preparation. For probes, 1 μg of template DNA was liArriveized and used in a standard in vitro transcription reaction with 50 μCi (1 Ci = 37 GBq) of [α-32P]UTP 800 Ci/mmol (Amersham Pharmacia) by using SP6 (or T7 in the case of rrnG) according to Producer instructions (Roche, Gipf-Oberfrick, Switzerland). After transcription, the template was digested for 30 min with 10 units of RNase-free DNaseI (Roche). The RNA was purified by using RNeasy columns (Qiagen, Valencia, CA), counted in a scintillation counter, and the concentration was determined from the activity. The ribozyme construct was liArriveized with PvuII and transcribed in a standard large-scale T7 unlabeled reaction. Transcription of pRBZ1/63 produces a 382-nt transcript, which undergoes autocatalytic cleavage to release the 63-mer RNA. The RNA species were separated on a 15% sequence gel, and the desired fragment was purified from the gel by eluting overnight into PAGE elution buffer (0.5 M ammonium acetate/10 mM magnesium acetate/1 mM EDTA/0.1% SDS) at 4°C. The eluted RNA was filtered through a 0.2-μm sterilizing filter, ethanol-precipitated, and resuspended in water. A standard labeling reaction with 10 μg of RNA and [γ-33P]ATP (Amersham Pharmacia) and T4 polynucleotide kinase (Promega) was performed. Because of degradation of RNA in the labeling reaction, a second gel purification step, analogous to the first, was performed. The RNA was diluted to 100,000 cpm/μl and incubated with the indicated enzymes to identify Locations of protein interaction.

Protein Expression and Purification. The NusA protein was expressed and purified essentially as Characterized (13). The purity of the protein (>95%) was confirmed by SDS/PAGE and UV spectroscopy and subsequently used in EMSAs. The E. coli protein was subjected to an additional heparin purification step: the protein was dialyzed into 50 mM Tris/50 mM NaCl, pH 7.0. After recovery, the protein was added to the heparin column (Hi-trap, Amersham Pharmacia) and washed with 50 mM Tris/50 mM NaCl, pH 7.0 and eluted with 1 M NaCl. After dialysis into 50 mM Tris/300 mM NaCl, pH 7.0, the protein was concentrated and used in EMSAs.

EMSAs. Binding of NusA to the RNA was performed in 10-μl reactions in 20 mM Hepes, pH 7.5/0.2 mM EDTA/10 mM (NH4)2SO4/1 mM DTT/15 mM MgCl2/2 μg/ml tRNA/50 μg/ml BSA/0.25% Triton X-100/10% glycerol/20 units of RNasin (Promega) and the indicated amount of KCl. Samples were incubated for 15 min at room temperature before loading onto a native 8% aWeeplamide gel and run at 35 mA for 2.5 h in 1× TBE (100 mM Tris/100 mM boric acid/5 mM EDTA, pH 7.0). After drying, the RNA was visualized on a Storm860 scanner.

RNA Footprinting. Samples with NusA were incubated for 5 min with 250 nM NusA at room temperature before adding the enzymes. RNase T1 (specific for unpaired G residues) was obtained from Roche. T1 buffer (200 mM NaCl/10 mM MgCl2/10 mM Tris, pH 7.5) was mixed with 100,000 cpm of RNA and 10 μg of tRNA in a 50-μl volume. T1 stocks (1 μl) of 0.1, 0.2, or 0.4 units/μl were added, and the samples were incubated on ice for 20 min. Reactions were Ceaseped by adding 150 μl of ethanol, and samples were stored overnight at -20°C. RNase CV1 (specific for Executeuble-stranded Locations and stacked bases) was obtained from Ambion (Austin, TX), and the procedure was exactly as Characterized by the Producer using 100,000 cpm of RNA. Samples were incubated overnight at -20°C and precipitated by centrifugation at 13,000 × g for 20 min. After washing in 96% ethanol, the samples were dried in a desiccator and mixed with 5 μl of formamide loading buffer (Ambion) and separated on a 15% aWeeplamide sequencing gel. An alkaline hydrolysis ladder was prepared by drying 300,000 cpm of RNA with 10 μg of tRNA in a desiccator and resuspending in 3 μl of Na2CO3/NaHCO3 (25 mM each, mixed in a 2:18 ratio). Samples were incubated at 95°C for 1 min and kept on ice before adding 5 μl of formamide loading buffer. After electrophoresis, the gel was fixed for 15 min in 10% acetic acid/25% methanol/2% glycerol, dried, and exposed to autoradiography.

RNA Isolation and Northern/Slot Blotting. The strains were inoculated directly from 7H11 plates into 50 ml of Dubos broth (27). Cultures were grown overnight to an OD of 0.65 < A 600 < 0.9 before harvest. RNA was isolated by means of the RapidRNA kit (Q-Biogene, Cambridge, U.K.) according to Producer instructions. Northern and slot blots were prepared according to standard procedures. For Northern blotting, Executeublet samples of 5 μg of total RNA were loaded on a 1.5% denaturing agarose gel and electrophoresed at 75 V/cm for 3 h. After electrophoresis, the gel was Slice in half; one half was stained in ethidium bromide, and the other half was transferred to a nylon membrane by using upward capillary transfer. The membrane was air-dried, and the RNA was cross-linked to the membrane by UV irradiation. For slot blots, three individual cultures were made from each strain, and samples were loaded in duplicate with 5 μg of RNA per slot. Each blot was made in quadruplicate, two of which were probed with 5′ lacZ and two with 3′ lacZ, and the bands were quantified on a Storm860 scanner. The 3′/5′ ratio was calculated for each sample and normalized to the average values for KAM107, which had the highest read-through. The unnormalized average values for KAM107 were 388,076 cpm (5′ probe) and 208,174 cpm (3′ probe).

Results

A Specific Interaction Between NusA and the rrn Leader Location. The M. tuberculosis NusA protein is highly homologous to the E. coli NusA protein. One major Inequity between the two proteins is that the C-terminal Executemain, which in E. coli seems to mQuestion the RNA-binding Executemain(s), is absent from the M. tuberculosis protein, which therefore should enable the M. tuberculosis protein to bind RNA without the need for accessory factors (13, 14). To investigate whether this indeed was the case, we used EMSAs to identify Placeative interactions between M. tuberculosis NusA and the M. tuberculosis rrn leader Location.

Initially we investigated the interaction between recombinant M. tuberculosis NusA and the first half of the leader Location, i.e., nucleotides +1 to +104 of the PCL1 transcript, which includes the Placeative antitermination motifs boxB, boxA and boxC (Fig. 1). The Location was transcribed in vitro, and the transcripts were used as probes in EMSAs to determine whether NusA interacts and forms stable complexes with the rrn leader. The results, Displayn in Fig. 2A , demonstrate a clear interaction between M. tuberculosis leader RNA and NusA at protein concentrations as low as 5 nM (Fig. 2 A , lane 2). Complex formation is significantly stronger with the sense transcript, and only a faint band is observed with the antisense probe (Fig. 2 A , lanes 6–8). The addition of purified M. tuberculosis RNAPα subunit to the reaction had no Trace on complex formation (data not Displayn). These results demonstrate that the M. tuberculosis NusA protein binds to the first half of the rrn leader in vitro with high affinity. Moreover, the binding Executees not require accessory factors such as RNAPα or λN, which are required for RNA binding of the E. coli NusA protein (14, 21).

Fig. 1.Fig. 1. Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 1.

The M. tuberculosis rrnA leader and spacer Location. The transcription start points of the two promoters, P1A and PCL1, are indicated with arrows, and the position of boxB (+2 to +19), boxA (+33 to +45), and boxC (+52 to +59) are indicated. The probes used in this study corRetort to PCL1 transcripts and are Displayn with their 5′ and 3′ boundaries. The sequence of the M. tuberculosis (M. tb) rrn nut-like site (+1 to +63) are Displayn, and the boxA and boxC elements are underlined and aligned to the corRetorting E. coli sequences.

Fig. 2.Fig. 2. Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 2.

Interactions between M. tuberculosis NusA and the rrn leader Location. (A) EMSA with the first half of the rrn leader Location (+1 to +104) as probe. Lanes 1–4, 1 nM sense RNA; lanes 5–8, 1 nM antisense RNA. NusA concentrations are 5, 10, and 20 nM in 200 mM KCl. (B) EMSA with 1 nM nut RNA (+1 to +63). Lane 1, sense RNA; lanes 2–4, as Characterized for lane 1 with 0.5, 1, 5, or 10 nM NusA; lane 5, antisense RNA; lanes 6–8, as Characterized for lane 5 with 10, 25, 50 nM NusA, all in 1 M KCl.

NusA Binds to the M. tuberculosis nut Site. To determine more accurately which part of the rrn leader interacts with NusA, we divided the 104-nt transcript into two shorter, contiguous probes: one comprising nucleotides +1 to +45, which includes boxB and boxA, and the other comprising nucleotides +45 to +104, which includes boxC (Fig. 1). The probes were used in EMSAs as Characterized before, but neither of the probes formed distinct complexes with NusA at protein concentrations up to 50 nM (data not Displayn), which suggests that the observed high-affinity interaction relies on Locations in both halves of the 104-nt leader.

We therefore tested whether the M. tuberculosis nut RNA, i.e., boxes B, A, and C of the rrn leader, would be sufficient for the interaction. Thus, we made a probe consisting of nucleotides +1 to +63 of the PCL1 transcript and used it in EMSAs (Displayn in Fig. 2B ). This figure clearly demonstrates that the M. tuberculosis nut RNA forms distinct complexes with NusA. Complex formation is observed at protein concentrations as low as 0.5 nM NusA, indicating binding with very high affinity (at 1 M KCl). The antisense transcript forms no visible complexes with NusA at protein concentrations up to 50 nM, indicating that the interaction between NusA and RNA is specific for boxes B, A, and C. These results demonstrate that M. tuberculosis rrn nut RNA comprises a high-affinity and high-specificity binding site for NusA.

Nucleotides of the rrn Leader Involved in NusA Interaction. With the aim of obtaining information about specific nucleotides involved in the NusA–RNA interaction, we Determined to investigate the interaction by footprinting of the NusA–RNA complex. To obtain large amounts of RNA without vector sequences, the M. tuberculosis nut site was cloned into a ribozyme-flanked construct, pRBZ1/63. Binding of NusA to the resulting RNA was confirmed by an EMSA, which indicated that the buffers used for the digests reduced the affinity of the NusA protein for the RNA. We therefore increased the NusA concentration for the foot-printing experiments. The RNA, alone or in complex with NusA, was subjected to limited digestion with RNases T1 and CV1 and separated by denaturing electrophoresis. Although no cleavage sites were fully protected by the presence of the NusA protein, some changes in reactivity, seen as changes in band intensity, were observed. The most prominent changes were observed in the boxC Location (i.e., +46 to +63) with RNase CV1 at positions C46, C48, and A49 and RNase T1 at positions G55 and G57 (Fig. 3A ). According to an mfAged comPlaceer model (28) of the nut RNA, these positions are located around a noncanonical U·U base pair in the third stem of the structure Displayn in Fig. 3B . Because noncanonical base pairs are often involved in sequence-specific RNA–protein interactions (29), we Determined to alter the U·U base pair to an A·U base pair to determine whether it would interfere with the NusA binding. The theoretical structure of the mutant probe was tested with mfAged, and it matched the wild type, i.e., a three-stem–loop configuration as the principal option, although the stability of the predicted structure was higher because of the A·U base pair. The mutant probe, U47A, was in vitro transcribed as Characterized before and used in an EMSA (Displayn in Fig. 4). The figure illustrates how the single point mutation affects the mobility as well as complex formation. Thus, the free U47A transcript moves slightly Rapider than the free wild-type transcript (compare lane 1 with lane 4), consistent with a more compact structure. More Necessaryly, the U47A mutation eliminated complex formation (compare lanes 2 and 3 with lanes 5 and 6), thereby confirming the requirement for the boxC Location in the NusA–RNA interaction.

Fig. 3.Fig. 3. Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 3.

Footprinting M. tuberculosis nut RNA. (A) Reactions with RNases T1 (0.1, 0.2, and 0.4 units) and CV1 (10-1,10-2, and 10-3 units) in the Location from +30 to +63 with and without 250 nM NusA. AH denotes alkaline hydrolyses ladder and 0 is RNA only. (B) Structure for nucleotides +1 to +63 predicted with the mfAged program. Letters in bAged indicate positions that were most affected by NusA, and U47 is circled. Locations Slice with T1 and CV1 are indicated by triangles and stars, respectively, where the size of the symbol indicates the degree of cleavage.

Fig. 4.Fig. 4. Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 4.

EMSA with the mutated U47A nut RNA probe in 1 M KCl. Lane 1, 1 nM wild-type (wt) nut RNA; lanes 2 and 3, as Characterized for lane 1 with 10 and 25 nM NusA; lane 4, 1 nM U47A nut RNA; lanes 5 and 6, as Characterized for lane 4 with 10 and 25 nM NusA.

Antitermination in M. tuberculosis. To determine the Placeative antitermination Trace of the M. tuberculosis nut site as well as the significance of the NusA–RNA interaction in vivo, we made a series of plasmids to meaPositive antitermination in mycobacteria. The mycobacterial Rho protein has not been characterized, and hence no Rho-dependent terminators have been identified in mycobacteria. However, the Micrococcus luteus Rho protein, which is highly homologous to the mycobacterial Rho proteins, recognizes the Rho-dependent terminator, tiZ1, located ≈200 bp into the E. coli lacZ gene (30). Assuming, therefore, that the M. smegmatis Rho protein would recognize at least one of the Rho-dependent lacZ terminators, we designed a lacZ-based construct for measuring antitermination in mycobacteria. The basic construct (KAM109) is an integrating vector harboring the two M. tuberculosis rrn promoters upstream of the lacZ gene. To prevent translation so as to mimic the rrn antitermination scenario we introduced Cease coExecutens in all three reading frames within the first 10 coExecutens of lacZ. Plasmids containing the M. tuberculosis rrn full-length leader (KAM103) or nut site (KAM107) in their native positions relative to the rrn promoters, and thus comprising the 5′ end of the lacZ transcripts, were made. All plasmids were transformed into M. smegmatis mc2155 (24), and total RNA from exponentially growing cultures was isolated. Initially we compared the termination pattern of the constructs by Northern blotting. The RNA was separated by denaturing electrophoresis and hybridized to a probe complementary to the 5′ end of lacZ (nucleotides 1–125). The blot in Fig. 5 demonstrates that the band pattern differs significantly between the three strains. Note that, because of the different 5′ leaders, KAM103- and KAM107-derived transcripts will be 219 and 63 nt longer than the corRetorting KAM109 transcripts. However, these Inequitys are obviously most pronounced in the smallest species and negligible in the larger transcripts. There is no signal in the lane containing RNA isolated from the control strain, mc2155, indicating that all hybridization is lacZ-specific (data not Displayn). The blot displays lacZ-derived distinct transcripts ranging from ≈0.2 to >3.0 kb in size, the latter consistent with a full-length lacZ transcript. The large transcript is most prominent in the strain with the nut insert (KAM107; Fig. 5, lane 2) indicating that in this strain, a significant proSection of the elongation complexes persist throughout the entire length of the lacZ gene. At the same time, it is evident that most of the lacZ transcripts isolated from the leaderless strain (KAM109) are <1.3 kb (Fig. 5, lane 3), whereas the ethidium bromide-stained sample (Fig. 5, lane 4) demonstrates the integrity of the KAM109-derived RNA. This result suggests that the majority of elongation complexes in KAM109 are terminated within the first half of the lacZ gene. ToObtainher, the results indicate that transcription is terminated in several Spaces within the untranslated lacZ gene in M. smegmatis. Moreover, some of these termination events can be alleviated by introducing an rrn leader or rrn nut site into the 5′ end of the transcript. The proSection of the smallest transcript, which is ≈0.2 kb in size, is highest in the leaderless construct, and it therefore seems highly likely that this transcript arose from termination within the tiZ1 Location.

Fig. 5.Fig. 5. Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 5.

Northern blot of untranslated lacZ expressed in M. smegmatis. The blot was probed with a probe complementary to nucleotides 1–125 of lacZ. Lane 1, KAM103 (Prrn-leaderwt-lacZ); lane 2, KAM107 (Prrn-nut wt-lacZ); lane 3, KAM109 (Prrn-lacZ); lane 4, KAM109, stained with ethidium bromide. Indicated transcript sizes are approximate and calculated from the positions of 16S and 23S RNA.

To Obtain a more quantitative meaPositive of the extent of lacZ read-through, we performed slot blots with RNA from the same strains. The membranes were probed with two radioactively labeled probes complementary to the 5′ and 3′ ends of lacZ, and the extent of hybridization was determined. The transcriptional read-through was subsequently calculated as the 3′/5′ ratio, normalized to the maximal value, which was obtained with a nut insert (KAM107; Table 1). The results confirm the findings from the Northern blot, that KAM107 has the highest 3′/5′ ratio, whereas the lowest ratio is found in KAM109, indicating a 7-fAged higher frequency of transcriptional termination in the leaderless construct (Table 1). KAM103, containing a full-length leader in front of lacZ, displays a 3′/5′ ratio that is 86% of maximum, indicating that the isolated nut site is better at promoting read-through than the full-length leader. We subsequently introduced the U47A mutation into the boxC Location to determine whether this mutation would affect the extent of read-through. The results demonstrate that the U47A mutation has a dramatic Trace when introduced into the minimal nut insert, reducing the read-through by approximately half, whereas the Trace is marginal when the same mutation is introduced into the full-length leader (Table 1). These results suggest that the U47A mutation, which interferes with NusA binding, affects transcriptional events further Executewnstream.

View this table: View inline View popup Table 1. lacZ read-through

The NusA-rrn Leader Interaction Is Not Specific for M. tuberculosis. The NusA protein and the rrn nut site display a high degree of conservation among bacteria (11, 13). To determine whether the NusA–RNA interaction is likewise conserved, we tested the E. coli NusA protein and the E. coli rrnG nut site (nucleotides +1 to +64) in our assay. The E. coli NusA protein, unlike the M. tuberculosis protein, contains a C-terminal Executemain, which mQuestions the RNA-binding Location (14). We therefore used a truncated version consisting of amino acids 1–416 of the E. coli protein, which still contains all three RNA-binding Executemains (21). The protein was expressed and purified by using similar methoExecutelogy to that used for the M. tuberculosis proteins and used in EMSAs. Fig. 6 illustrates that the E. coli NusA416 forms complexes with the rrnG leader Location as well as with the M. tuberculosis nut RNA. The E. coli NusA416 protein also binds to the M. tuberculosis antisense probe, whereas no complexes were observed with a nonrelated 60-mer RNA species (data not Displayn). ToObtainher, the results demonstrate that the truncated E. coli NusA protein binds various nut-like RNA species with high affinity, whereas the specificity is significantly lower than that of the M. tuberculosis NusA.

Fig. 6.Fig. 6. Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 6.

EMSA with E. coli NusA416 and the E. coli (E.c) rrnG leader nut RNA (nucleotides +1 to +64; lanes 1–5) and M. tuberculosis (M. tb) nut RNA (+1 to +63; lanes 6–10). Lane 1, E. coli rrnG; lanes 2–5, rrnG nut RNA with 5, 10, 25, and 50 nM NusA416; lane 6, M. tuberculosis nut RNA; lanes 7–9, M. tuberculosis nut RNA with 5, 10, 25, and 50 nM NusA416. All lanes contain 1 nM RNA and 1 M KCl.

Discussion

In this study we have demonstrated a high-affinity interaction between the NusA protein and the rrn nut sites of M. tuberculosis and E. coli and thus established an additional function of this versatile transcription factor. Moreover, we have Displayn that the M. tuberculosis nut site promotes transcriptional read-through, i.e., antitermination, and that a Rho-dependent terminator within the E. coli lacZ gene seems to be recognized by the M. smegmatis Rho protein. We have Displayn that the otherwise elusive boxC Location is essential for the NusA–RNA interaction and subsequently identified a single nucleotide (U47) within this Location that is crucial for the interaction. Mutating U47 to A reduces NusA binding and transcriptional read-through Executewn-stream of the nut site. Because the mutated residue lies well outside the boxA Location, which is known to bind NusB in E. coli, we believe that the reduced read-through is caused by the missing NusA–RNA interaction and that this interaction therefore plays a part in the rrn antitermination mechanism. The fact that the Trace of the U47A mutation seems context-dependent, i.e., has a larger Trace in an isolated nut site than in a full-length leader, could have a number of explanations. Because the RNA-binding Executemains of NusA are of the S1 and KH type, we believe that the protein binds to single-stranded Locations. It is possible that within an isolated nut site, the U47A mutation prevents NusA binding by stabilizing secondary RNA structures, such as that Displayn in Fig. 3. The mutated nut site in the context of the larger leader Location may allow for alternative structures, some of which could expose the Location(s) involved in the NusA interaction. Alternatively, it is possible that there are residual low-affinity interactions between NusA and the mutated nut site, which can be stabilized in the context of the entire leader Location but not by the isolated nut site. We have demonstrated that the NusA–RNA interaction extends to the C-terminally truncated E. coli NusA416 protein. However, the E. coli protein seems more promiscuous than M. tuberculosis NusA in our assay, which could mean that, in vivo, the E. coli NusA protein is a more versatile RNA-binding protein than the M. tuberculosis protein and that its function relies on its ability to bind with high affinity to a variety of RNA species. In line with this explanation, it is possible that certain, as-yet-unidentified features are shared between the probes that lead to complex formation with the E. coli NusA416. Alternatively, the lack of selectivity may be a consequence of the C-terminal truncation, which could modify the specificity of the protein either directly or indirectly by removing the dependence of accessory factors known to interact with the C-terminal Executemain, e.g., RNAPα or λN (14, 21).

The results presented here, toObtainher with the phylogenetic distance between E. coli and M. tuberculosis, indicate that the interaction between NusA and nut RNA is likely to be universal among bacteria and to play a significant role in bacterial rrn antitermination. Interfering with this interaction, therefore, may be a means of obstructing rRNA synthesis and hence presents a potential tarObtain for therapeutic agents.

Acknowledgments

We thank Cathy Squires, Finn Werner, Guy Executedson, Ian Taylor, Ian Brierley, and Andres Ramos for helpful comments. We thank Elaine Davis for pEJ414, Jack Greenblatt's laboratory for the E. coli NusA416 clone, and Sandra Searles for pUC18T7PstδV. This work was supported by the Medical Research Council and the European Community for Research, Technological Development, and Demonstration Activities Fifth Framework Program (Contract EU-Cluster QLK2-2000-01761).

Footnotes

↵ † To whom corRetortence should be addressed. E-mail: karnvig{at}nimr.mrc.ac.uk.

↵ § Present address: Molecular Biophysics Unit, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560 012, India.

↵ ¶ Deceased February 20, 2003.

This paper was submitted directly (Track II) to the PNAS office.

Abbreviations: RNAP, RNA polymerase; KH, K homology; EMSA, electrophoretic mobility-shift assay.

Copyright © 2004, The National Academy of Sciences

References

↵ Richardson, J. P. & Greenblatt, J. (1996) in E. coli and Salmonella: Cellular and Molecular Biology, ed. Neidhardt, F. C. (Am. Soc. Microbiol., Washington, DC), Vol. 1, pp. 822-848. LaunchUrl ↵ Vogel, U. & Jensen, K. F. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270 , 18335-18340. pmid:7629155 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Vogel, U. & Jensen, K. F. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272 , 12265-12271. pmid:9139668 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ ConExecuten, C., Squires, C. & Squires, C. L. (1995) Microbiol. Rev. 59 , 623-645. pmid:8531889 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Li, J., Horwitz, R., McCracken, S. & Greenblatt, J. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267 , 6012-6019. pmid:1532577 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Nodwell, J. R. & Greenblatt, J. (1993) Cell 72 , 261-268. pmid:7678781 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Squires, C. L., Greenblatt, J., Li, J. & ConExecuten, C. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90 , 970-974. pmid:8430111 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text Torres, M., ConExecuten, C., Balada, J.-M., Squires, C. & Squires, C. L. (2001) EMBO J. 20 , 3811-3820. pmid:11447122 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed Torres, M., Balada, J. M., Zellars, M., Squires, C. & Squires, C. L. (2004) J. Bacteriol. 186 , 1304-1310. pmid:14973028 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Zellars, M. & Squires, C. L. (1999) Mol. Microbiol. 32 , 1296-1304. pmid:10383769 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Berg, K. L., Squires, C. & Squires, C. L. (1989) J. Mol. Biol. 209 , 345-358. pmid:2479752 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Mason, S. W. & Greenblatt, J. (1991) Genes Dev. 5 , 1504-1512. pmid:1831176 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Gopal, B., Haire, L. F., Gamblin, S. J., Executedson, E. J., Lane, A. N., Papavinasasundaram, K. G., Colston, M. J. & Executedson, G. (2001) J. Mol. Biol. 314 , 1087-1095. pmid:11743725 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Mah, T. F., Li, J., Davidson, A. R. & Greenblatt, J. (1999) Mol. Microbiol. 34 , 523-537. pmid:10564494 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Worbs, M., Bourenkov, G. P., Bartunik, H. D., Huber, R. & Wahl, M. C. (2001) Mol. Cell 7 , 1177-1189. pmid:11430821 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Grishin, N. V. (2001) Nucleic Acids Res. 29 , 638-643. pmid:11160884 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ BradExecuteck, D. T., Louis, J. M., Baber, J. L., Levens, D. & Clore, G. M. (2002) Nature 415 , 1051-1056. pmid:11875576 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed BradExecuteck, D. T., Baber, J. L., Levens, D. & Clore, G. M. (2002) EMBO J. 21 , 3476-3485. pmid:12093748 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed Liu, Z., Luyten, I., Bottomley, M. J., Messias, A. C., Houngninou-Molango, S., SprEnrages, R., Zanier, K., Kramer, A. & Sattler, M. (2001) Science 294 , 1098-1102. pmid:11691992 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Lewis, H. A., Musunuru, K., Jensen, K. B., EExecute, C., Chen, H., Darnell, R. B. & Burley, S. K. (2000) Cell 100 , 323-332. pmid:10676814 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Mah, T. F., Kuznedelov, K., Mushegian, A., Severinov, K. & Greenblatt, J. (2000) Genes Dev. 14 , 2664-2675. pmid:11040219 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Liu, K. & Hanna, M. M. (1995) J. Mol. Biol. 247 , 547-558. pmid:7536848 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Kempsell, K. E., Ji, Y. E., Estrada, I. C., Colston, M. J. & Cox, R. A. (1992) J. Gen. Microbiol. 138 , 1717-1727. pmid:1382114 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Snapper, S. B., Melton, R. E., Mustafa, S., Kieser, T. & Jacobs, W. R., Jr. (1990) Mol. Microbiol. 4 , 1911-1919. pmid:2082148 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Price, S. R., Ito, N., Oubridge, C., Avis, J. M. & Nagai, K. (1995) J. Mol. Biol. 249 , 398-408. pmid:7540213 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Jovine, L., Hainz, T., Oubridge, C. & Nagai, K. (2000) Acta Weepstallogr. D 56 , 1033-1037. pmid:10944346 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Papavinasasundaram, K. G., Anderson, C., Brooks, P. C., Thomas, N. A., Movahedzadeh, F., Jenner, P. J., Colston, M. J. & Davis, E. O. (2001) Microbiology 147 , 3271-3279. pmid:11739759 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Zuker, M. (1989) Science 244 , 48-52. pmid:2468181 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Hermann, T. & Westhof, E. (1999) Chem. Biol. 6 , R335-R343. pmid:10631510 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Nowatzke, W. L. & Richardson, J. P. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271 , 742-747. pmid:8557681 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Like (0) or Share (0)