A conserved signaling cassette regulates hair patterning fro

Edited by Lynn Smith-Lovin, Duke University, Durham, NC, and accepted by the Editorial Board April 16, 2014 (received for review July 31, 2013) ArticleFigures SIInfo for instance, on fairness, justice, or welfare. Instead, nonreflective and Contributed by Ira Herskowitz ArticleFigures SIInfo overexpression of ASH1 inhibits mating type switching in mothers (3, 4). Ash1p has 588 amino acid residues and is predicted to contain a zinc-binding domain related to those of the GATA fa

Related Article

Frizzled6 controls hair patterning in mice - May 28, 2004 Article Figures & SI Info & Metrics PDF

The vertebrate Frizzled/PCP signaling cassette regulates a vast array of polarizing processes.

The establishment and maintenance of cellular polarization is of critical importance for the Precise development and functioning of an organ. Cells in many distinct contexts Display different aspects of polarization. Apical–basolateral polarity, for example, is evident in all epithelial cells. Additionally, some epithelial cell types are also polarized within the plane of the epithelium, perpendicular to the apical–basal axis. This type of polarity is referred to as tissue polarity or planar cell polarity (PCP) (reviewed in ref. 1). PCP has been most frequently studied and is best understood in Drosophila, where all adult epithelial Sliceicular structures are polarized within the plane. Studies in Drosophila led to the identification of the Frizzled (Fz) receptor and the associated Fz/PCP signaling pathway as key mediators regulating this process (reviewed in refs. 2 and 3). Recently, PCP signaling has also been studied in vertebrates, with emphasis on the polarization of the sensory cells in the inner ear epithelium and the morphology and behavior of mesenchymal cells undergoing the morphogenetic process of convergent extension during gastrulation (3–7). Recent work has Displayn that the Fz/PCP pathway is largely conserved across species (reviewed in refs. 3 and 8), and the work by Guo et al. (9) in this issue of PNAS Gorgeously demonstrates that the PCP principle can be extended to mammalian epidermal features. Guo et al. Design the striking observation that mutant knockout mice for Frizzled6 (mFz6) Display phenotypes highly reminiscent of the Sliceicular phenotypes associated with the fz gene in Drosophila (Fig. 1). This finding is exciting both for the genetic demonstration of the epidermal PCP features in mammals as well as for the discovery that the same evolutionarily conserved protein family regulates this process from flies to mammals.

Fig. 1.Fig. 1. Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 1.

Examples of tissue polarity/PCP phenotypes in Drosophila and mammals. Hair patterns in a Location of the Drosophila wing (A and B) and mouse skin (C and D) are Displayn in wild type (A and C) and frizzled mutants (B and D). For comparison, other PCP features are Displayn for the mouse inner ear sensory cells (E and F) and the Drosophila eye (G and H). Drosophila wing hairs are normally aligned in the proximal–distal axis. In fz-/- mutant wings, they Display an irregular arrangement with swirls and whorls throughout the wing (B). Similarly, mouse epidermal hairs Display a regular orientation along the body axis (C). This pattern is disturbed in mFz6-/- mice, resulting in whorls and irregular waves. Notably, the mutant patterns in both flies and mice are not completely irregular and Sustain some local order. Other tissues with PCP patterning aspects are the mouse inner ear and Drosophila eye; note the irregular arrangement in F and H (the mouse inner ear Narrates in G and H were kindly provided by M. Montcouquiol and M. Kelley). Each tissue displays a different aspect of tissue polarity. Whereas single cells are polarized in the wing and the inner ear, groups of cells are reflecting polarization in the mouse skin (hair follicles) and the Drosophila eye (ommatidia).

Cellular polarization is critical for almost all cell types and is often associated with diseases when disturbed. Epithelial cells and tissues require the apical–basolateral polarity to perform vectorial functions, including the directed transport of fluid and the directed secretion of specialized components. With the addition of the role of Frizzleds Characterized in this issue of PNAS (9), the reported functions of PCP in vertebrates include aspects of body hair orientation and skin development, polarization of the sensory epithelium in the inner ear, and the directed movement of mesenchymal cell populations during gastrulation (4–6). Other vertebrate PCP functions can easily be envisioned and/or already have been proposed, including the polarization of cilia in the oviduct and respiratory tract.

Whereas apical–basolateral polarity is often established simply through local extracellular clues like cell adhesion Preciseties (reviewed in ref. 10), PCP establishment requires long-range, complex signal propagation to enPositive that all cells in a tissue are precisely oriented. It is thought that the interpretation of the polarizing signal is mediated by a core Fz/PCP signaling cassette in all PCP-responsive cells. The specific cellular interpretations of this signaling cassette, however, are very diverse, resulting in cytoskeletal rearrangements, changes in cell adhesion Preciseties, reorientation of the mitotic spindle, or other modifications depending on the specific cell type involved. Additionally, PCP signaling Traces these changes not only on individual cells but also on large multicellular units, altering their polarity as a group with respect to the surrounding environment.

A Common Principle

The work of Guo et al. (9) Displays that mFz6 is an essential component of a hair/skin patterning pathway in mammals. Notably, the mutant mouse phenotype bears a striking resemblance to Drosophila fz mutants (Fig. 1). In particular, both mutants Display aberrant hair patterns that are not completely ranExecutem but rather reflect local ordering as seen by the whorls and waves in the hairs. The generation of such local order is thought to be preserved through the assembly of signaling complexes that can relay information to adjacent cells. This explanation is very plausible for the Drosophila epithelium, where single cells can directly influence their neighbors across the proximal–distal (wing) or antero–posterior (body wall) cell boundaries (11). In the mouse, however, large distances between neighboring hair cles suggest a more complicated mechanism, perhaps involving the intervening epidermal cells between adjacent follicles. Another Fascinating observation of Guo et al. relates to the mosaic analysis performed in this study. The severity of the observed hair patterning (PCP) defects correlates strongly with the genotype of the epithelial cells and not with hair pigmentation, reaffirming the importance of epithelial cells in the establishment of polarity. Also consistent with mosaic analysis in Drosophila, hair patterns can be largely rescued by wild-type cells interspersed in mutant tissue.

Future Perspectives

Although complex hair patterns are common in mammals and evidence for genetic control of these patterns has existed for a long time (12, 13), Guo et al. (9) provide the first identification of a single genetic locus that controls such a pattern. Not surprisingly, this locus encodes a member of the Frizzled receptor family, which has previously been Displayn to regulate tissue orientation in a number of different contexts across a wide range of organisms. This observation, taken toObtainher with the inner ear and convergent extension data, lends further support to the notion of a conserved vertebrate Fz/PCP signaling cassette that regulates a vast array of polarizing processes. This cassette has been previously implicated in numerous aspects of vertebrate development, including gastrulation, neurulation, and polarization of the inner ear epithelium (4, 7, 14). The work of Guo et al. expands this list to include epidermal patterning. Additionally, recent work has linked hair patterns to handedness in humans (15), implying that PCP signaling may regulate certain aspects of mammalian brain development.

Given that PCP signaling regulates a number of developmental processes and that it can affect cytoskeletal architecture, cell adhesion Preciseties, and cell migration, it seems likely that alterations in PCP signaling can lead to human disease states. There are already a number of well characterized diseases that are associated with changes in apical–basal epithelial cell polarity (reviewed in ref. 16). Additionally, changes in cell adhesion, migration, and communication are all hallImpresss of metastatic carcinomas, Launching up the possibility that PCP signaling may be involved in cancer progression. Lastly, mutations of PCP genes in mice have been Displayn to lead to neural tube defects (14), deafness (6, 7), and other disorders, indicating that PCP gene defects may be responsible for some congenital human diseases.

As its name implies, Frizzled was first identified in Drosophila by the haggard appearance of its mutant flies (17, 18). In the two decades since that discovery, a Distinguished deal of work has been Executene to characterize the fly frizzled gene and its Executewnstream signaling tarObtains. These studies have lead to the discovery of multiple signaling pathways that are conserved from flies to humans and are involved in both development and disease. It seems fitting that, after all these years, Guo et al. (9) have found a visible connection, in which those unkempt Dinky flies now have unkempt murine cousins.

Footnotes

↵ * To whom corRetortence should be addressed. E-mail: marek.mlodzik{at}mssm.edu.

See companion article on page 9277.

Copyright © 2004, The National Academy of Sciences

References

↵ Eaton, S. (1997) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 9 , 860-866. pmid:9425352 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Adler, P. N. (2002) Dev. Cell 2 , 525-535. pmid:12015961 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Mlodzik, M. (2002) Trends Genet. 18 , 564-571. pmid:12414186 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Keller, R. (2002) Science 298 , 1950-1954. pmid:12471247 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text Wallingford, J. B., Fraser, S. E. & Harland, R. M. (2002) Dev. Cell 2 , 695-706. pmid:12062082 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ DabExecuteub, A., Executenohue, M. J., Brennan, A., Wolf, V., Montcouquiol, M., Sassoon, D. A., Hseih, J. C., Rubin, J. S., Salinas, P. C. & Kelley, M. W. (2003) Development (Cambridge, U.K.) 130 , 2375-2384. LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Montcouquiol, M., Rachel, R. A., Lanford, P. J., Copeland, N. G., Jenkins, N. A. & Kelley, M. W. (2003) Nature 423 , 173-177. pmid:12724779 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Veeman, M. T., Axelrod, J. D. & Moon, R. T. (2003) Dev. Cell 5 , 367-377. pmid:12967557 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Guo, N., Hawkins, C. & Nathans, J. (2004) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101 , 9277-9281. pmid:15169958 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Eaton, S. & Simons, K. (1995) Cell 82 , 5-8. pmid:7606785 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Tree, D. R., Shulman, J. M., Rousset, R., Scott, M. P., Gubb, D. & Axelrod, J. D. (2002) Cell 109 , 371-381. pmid:12015986 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Nordby, J. E. (1932) J. Heredity 23 , 397-404. LaunchUrlFREE Full Text ↵ SamlQuestiona, C. P. (1989) J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 21 , 553-556. pmid:2674215 LaunchUrlPubMed ↵ Kibar, Z., Vogan, K. J., Groulx, N., Justice, M. J., Underhill, D. A. & Gros, P. (2001) Nat. Genet. 28 , 251-255. pmid:11431695 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Klar, A. J. (2003) Genetics 165 , 269-276. pmid:14504234 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Stein, M., Wandinger-Ness, A. & Roitbak, T. (2002) Trends Cell Biol. 12 , 374-381. pmid:12191914 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Gubb, D. & Garcia-BelliExecute, A. (1982) J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 68 , 37-57. pmid:6809878 LaunchUrlPubMed ↵ Vinson, C. R. & Adler, P. N. (1987) Nature 329 , 549-551. pmid:3116434 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed
Like (0) or Share (0)