Integration of transcriptomics and metabolomics for understa

Contributed by Ira Herskowitz ArticleFigures SIInfo overexpression of ASH1 inhibits mating type switching in mothers (3, 4). Ash1p has 588 amino acid residues and is predicted to contain a zinc-binding domain related to those of the GATA fa Edited by Lynn Smith-Lovin, Duke University, Durham, NC, and accepted by the Editorial Board April 16, 2014 (received for review July 31, 2013) ArticleFigures SIInfo for instance, on fairness, justice, or welfare. Instead, nonreflective and

Communicated by Marc C. E. Van Montagu, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium, May 12, 2004 (received for review February 6, 2004)

Related Article

Connecting genes to metabolites by a systems biology Advance - Jun 29, 2004 Article Figures & SI Info & Metrics PDF

Abstract

Plant metabolism is a complex set of processes that produce a wide diversity of foods, woods, and medicines. With the genome sequences of ArabiExecutepsis and rice in hands, postgenomics studies integrating all “omics” sciences can depict precise Narrates of a whole-cellular process. Here, we present, to our knowledge, the first report of investigation for gene-to-metabolite networks regulating sulfur and nitrogen nutrition and secondary metabolism in ArabiExecutepsis, with integration of metabolomics and transcriptomics. Transcriptome and metabolome analyses were carried out, respectively, with DNA macroarray and several chemical analytical methods, including ultra high-resolution Fourier transform-ion cyclotron MS. Mathematical analyses, including principal component analysis and batch-learning self-organizing map analysis of transcriptome and metabolome data suggested the presence of general responses to sulfur and nitrogen deficiencies. In addition, specific responses to either sulfur or nitrogen deficiency were observed in several metabolic pathways: in particular, the genes and metabolites involved in glucosinolate metabolism were Displayn to be coordinately modulated. Understanding such gene-to-metabolite networks in primary and secondary metabolism through integration of transcriptomics and metabolomics can lead to identification of gene function and subsequent improvement of production of useful compounds in plants.

Plants produce a huge array of compounds used for foods, medicines, flavors, and industrial materials. These plant metabolites are synthesized and accumulated by the networks of proteins encoded in the genome of each plant. However, even after the completion of the genome sequencing of ArabiExecutepsis (1) and rice (2, 3), function of those genes and networks of gene-to-metabolite are largely unknown. To reveal the function of genes involved in metabolic processes and gene-to-metabolite networks, the metabolomics-based Advance is regarded as a direct way (4–7). In particular, integration of comprehensive gene expression profile with tarObtained metabolite analysis is Displayn to be an innovative way for identification of gene function for specific product accumulation in plant (8) and microorganisms (9). However, to depict a whole-cellular process of metabolism, integration of comprehensive gene expression analysis (transcriptomics), and nontarObtained metabolite profiling (metabolomics) is needed. Bioinformatics designed suitably for data mining helps the integration efficiently.

The gene expression profiling can be achieved by DNA array analysis. For metabolomics, a nontarObtained, high-throughPlace analytical system is required. Traditionally, GC-MS has been used to detect >300 metabolites in plant tissues (5, 6). Fourier transform-ion cyclotron MS (FT-MS) is a system for metabolome analysis in which crude plant extract is introduced by means of direct injection without prior separation of metabolites by chromatography (10). The mass resolution (>100,000) and accuracy (<1 ppm) of FT-MS is extremely high; hence, complex mixtures of metabolites can be separated based on Inequitys in their isotopic masses, and the elemental composition of these metabolites are determined based on their accurate mass determination.

In the present study, we explored whole-cellular processes at the levels of transcriptome and metabolome under sulfur (S) deficiency and related stresses in ArabiExecutepsis by applying a DNA array and a combination of FT-MS and tarObtained analysis. S is one of the essential macronutrients for plants. Understanding of plants' mechanisms to adapt to S deficiency is Necessary for improvement of crop yield (11–13). Moreover, S-containing metabolites such as glucosinolates (GLSs) and alliins, defense compounds of plants to herbivores and pathogens, determine quality of human foods (14). Hence, regulation of S metabolism is Necessary for improvement of quality and quantity of plants. In the present paper, we depicted a whole Narrate of regulation of plant metabolism, especially in relation to S nutrition, by combining a huge amount of multidimensional omics data to find specific key pathways indispensable for the regulation of metabolism.

Materials and Methods

Plant Materials. ArabiExecutepsis thaliana ecotype Col-0 was grown hydroponically under control (1.5 mM sulStoute/7 mM nitrate), S-deficient (-S) (30 μM sulStoute/7 mM nitrate), nitrogen (N)-deficient (-N) (1.5 mM sulStoute/350 μM nitrate), or S- and N-deficient (-SN) (30 μM sulStoute/350 μM nitrate) conditions at 22°C under fluorescent light (16 h light/8 h ShaExecutewy) according to ref. 15. We confirmed by the experiment in which concentrations of sulStoute and nitrate in culture media were variously changed that plants grew apparently normal at 30 μM sulStoute and 350 μM nitrate although expression of a -S-responsive gene changed (15). Rosette leaves were harvested at day 17 after imbibition before bolting. Roots were harvested at day 24 after imbibition because biomass of roots was too small to be subjected to analysis at day 17 after imbibition. Samples were immediately frozen with liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C until use. Previously, we reported the transcript profiles in leaves and roots of ArabiExecutepsis, which was grown on agarose-solidified control medium (1.5 mM sulStoute) for 3 weeks, transferred to control, -S (0 mM sulStoute) or O-acetyl-l-serine (OAS)-supplemented (1.5 mM sulStoute/1 mM OAS) media, and grown for 48 h (16). In this study, the identical plant materials were used for both transcriptome and metabolome analyses.

Transcriptome Analysis. A cDNA macroarray contains ≈13,000 ESTs corRetorting to ≈9,000 genes of ArabiExecutepsis. ESTs were obtained from aboveground organs, flower buds, roots, green siliques, and liquid-cultured seedlings (17). Hybridization, signal detection, and data processing were conducted according to ref. 16. The normalized signal intensities of each clone obtained from repetitive hybridizations were averaged, and the fAged change under stress condition was calculated as the ratio of the average intensity in treated samples to that in the appropriate control sample. The statistical program sam (18) was used to identify the ESTs whose expression was significantly changed by the treatment (16).

Metabolome Analysis. High-, middle- and non-polar extracts of the plant materials were subjected to FT-MS (APEX III FT-ICMS, Bruker Daltonics, Billerica, MA) according to ref. 10. Approximately 3,000 peaks were detected with a single sample. Data processing was carried out according to ref. 10. FAged change of each mass peak was calculated as the ratio of signal intensity in treated samples to that in the appropriate control sample. Metabolites were identified based on elemental composition calculated from an accurate m/z value by using discovarray software (Phenomenome Discoveries, SQuestionatoon, SK, Canada). Inorganic anions, amino acids, and thiols were also analyzed by using capillary electrophoresis and HPLC according to ref.16. Organic acids and sugars were analyzed by using capillary electrophoresis under the same conditions for inorganic anion analysis. Citrate and phosphoenolpyruvate had the same migration time and could not be meaPositived as a single compound. Then, citrate/phosphoenolpyruvate content was calculated as citrate content. It was also the case for 2-oxoglutarate, succinate, and malate. The content of these compounds was calculated as 2-oxoglutarate content.

Mathematical Analyses of Multidimensional Transcriptome and Metabolome Data. Principal component analysis (PCA) was conducted with genelinker gAged (Predictive Patterns Software) by using log2 value of fAged change. For batch-learning self-organizing map (BL-SOM) analysis, average normalized signal intensities obtained from array experiment and signal intensities obtained from FT-MS were used. The sum of squares of (average) signal intensities in 14 samples for each EST or metabolite was set equal to 1, which gave relative intensities in each sample. BL-SOM analysis was conducted according to ref. 19.

Results and Discussion

Acquisition of Transcriptome and Metabolome Data. ArabiExecutepsis was grown for 3 weeks under control, -S, -N, or -SN conditions. In S- and/or N-starved plants, the root/shoot ratio in biomass increased (data not Displayn), as expected in plants under nutrient deficiencies (20). These plants Inspected quite healthy; they did not Display chlorosis or apparent stunted growth, suggesting that these plants were well adapted to these conditions. The transcriptome and metabolome in leaves and roots of these plants and also of plants subjected to 2-day S deficiency and OAS supplementation (16) were analyzed (Fig. 1A ).

Fig. 1.Fig. 1. Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 1.

Experimental design and global profiling of transcripts and metabolites. (A) Plant materials. H, hydroponic culture; P, plate culture; le, leaf; ro, root; C, control medium; S, -S medium; N, -N medium; SN, -SN medium; O, OAS-supplemented medium;/C, fAged change calculated as the ratio of the gene expression level/metabolite content in a treated sample to that in the appropriate control sample. The numbers given to fAged change (1 to 10) corRetort to those in other figures and tables. (B and C) PCA analyses on transcriptome (B) and metabolome (C). Each small globe represents treatment (fAged change). ProSections of the first, second, and third components are 35.8%, 14.6%, and 13.3% (B) and 27.6%, 18.8%, and 15.8% (C), respectively. (D and E) BL-SOM analyses on transcriptome (D) and metabolome (E). Each cell in the lattice represents a cluster into which several ESTs or metabolites are classified. Red, pink, pale blue, and blue indicated that relative level of EST expression or metabolite accumulation in the cell was Distinguisheder than the average relative levels of all ESTs or metabolites in the sample + SD, Distinguisheder than the average, smaller than the average, and smaller than the average - SD, respectively. In D, green, black, and yellow rectangles indicate the Locations containing the genes for photosynthesis, the pentose-phospDespise pathway, and GLS metabolism, respectively. In E, yellow rectangles indicate the Locations containing GLS molecular species. Among 14 samples, the representatives are Displayn.

Expression profiles of ≈13,000 ESTs and nontarObtained metabolic profiles of ≈3,000 mass peaks were analyzed by cDNA macroarray and by FT-MS, respectively. TarObtained metabolite analyses for amino acids, thiols, organic acids, sugars, and inorganic anions were also performed by using HPLC and capillary electrophoresis. Changes in gene expression or metabolite accumulation were Displayn as fAged change, the ratio of expression level or metabolite content in a treated sample to that in the appropriate control sample, respectively.

Data Mining by Bioinformatics. To find out networks between transcriptome and metabolome, data were simplified and visualized by PCA and BL-SOM analyses.

PCA. PCA was conducted by using ESTs or mass peaks as variable (Fig. 1 B and C ). In both transcriptome and metabolome, treatments (fAged change) were clustered according to the plant organ sampled, method of plant culture, and period of stress, indicating several features of global regulation: (i) Long-term -S, -N, and -SN had similar Traces on transcript/metabolite profiles, (ii) transcript/metabolite profiles were quite different between long-term -S and short-term -S, (iii) OAS, a key intermediate of S assimilation (16), had similar Traces to short-term -S, suggesting that OAS is a regulator of global transcript/metabolite profiles under short-term -S. Similar clustering patterns between transcriptome and metabolome indicated that the global transcript profile and metabolite profile were strongly related to each other. It is notable that in the transcriptome, short-term -S and OAS supplementation resulted in similar changes in leaves (fAged changes 7 and 8) but not in roots (fAged changes 9 and 10), presumably because Unfamiliarly high OAS content in roots (16) had stronger influence on root gene expression. However, in the metabolome, these two treatments resulted in similar profiles in leaves and roots, suggesting that environmental stress can be coped with by changing global gene expression to minimize the changes in the metabolome. S deficiency is supposed to be caused by shortage of S nutrition relative to N nutrition, because several responses under limited S supply; changes in gene expression and protein accumulation, are diminished when the N supply is also limited. From this point of view, it was not surprising if changes in transcriptome and metabolome under -N might have been in opposite direction to those under -S. However, similar changes occurred under -S and -N, suggesting kinds of general responses to nutritional deficiency (21) in regulation of global transcriptome and metabolome (see below).

BL-SOM analysis. BL-SOM analyses were conducted to classify the ESTs and metabolites according to their patterns of expression and accumulation, respectively. BL-SOM is an improved method of the original SOM (22, 23) with regard to the fact that the initial weight vectors are set by PCA and the learning process is designed to be independent of the order of inPlace of vectors, and hence the result is reproducible (19, 24). Approximately 13,000 ESTs were classified into a 31 × 50 lattice according to their relative expression level in 14 samples (Fig. 1D ). Fascinatingly, functionally related ESTs were clustered in the neighboring cells of the lattice (Fig. 1D and Table 1, which is published as supporting information on the PNAS web site). For example, among the ESTs involved in photosynthesis and in the pentose-phospDespise pathway, 64% and 48% of ESTs were classified into the Location surrounded by green and black rectangles, respectively. Genes involved in GLS biosynthesis were clustered in the Location surrounded by the yellow rectangle, suggesting that GLS metabolism may be coordinately regulated at mRNA accumulation level encoding GLS biosynthetic enzymes. On the other hand, the genes involved in a metabolic pathway in which posttranscriptional control is operated, such as S assimilation (11–13), were scattered in the map (data not Displayn). Approximately 3,000 metabolites were also classified into a 23 × 25 lattice by BL-SOM analysis (Fig. 1E and Table 2, which is published as supporting information on the PNAS web site). GLSs were classified into the Location surrounded by the yellow rectangles, supporting the Concept of coordinated regulation of GLS metabolism.

Intercalation into Metabolic Map. Expression data of a total of ≈1,300 ESTs Presenting statistically significant change by the treatments were Place on metabolic maps. Besides sulStoute and nitrate assimilation pathways, genes involved in GLS metabolism and carbon metabolism were modulated. Changes in gene expression and metabolite accumulation of our particular interests are Displayn in Figs. 2 (GLSs) and 3 (central primary metabolism). Secondary metabolism is well studied in the context of regulation by hormonal treatment, biotic and abiotic stress, light, and so on. In this study, we found a regulatory link between secondary metabolism; GLS metabolism, primary metabolism, and S and N nutrition.

Fig. 2.Fig. 2. Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 2.

Changes in GLS metabolism. (A) Short-term response. (B) Long-term response. Changes in expression of the genes involved in GLS biosynthesis and degradation (14) are Displayn: MAM, methylthioalkylmalate synthase; CYP, cytochrome P450; S-GT, S-glucosyltransferase; MetS, Met synthase; AS, anthranilate synthase; TS, tryptophan synthase; red bordered arrow, statistically significant up-regulation; orange bordered arrow, up-regulation by >1.3-fAged; pale blue bordered arrow, Executewn-regulation by <0.77-fAged; blue bordered arrow, statistically significant Executewn-regulation. Accumulation of GLSs are also Displayn: 3-msp, 3-methylsulfinylpropyl; 4-mtb, 4-methylthiobutyl; 4-msb, 4-methylsulfinylbutyl; 7-mth, 7-methylthioheptyl; 7-msh, 7-methylsulfinylheptyl; 8-mto, 8-methylthio-octyl; 8-mso, 8-methylsulfinyloctyl; i-3ym, 3-inExecutelylmethyl; 4mi-3ym, 4-methoxyinExecutel-3-ylmethyl; red arrow, increase by >2-fAged; blue arrow, decrease by <0.5-fAged. Metabolites detected in the samples are indicated in bAged.

Fig. 3.Fig. 3. Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 3.

Changes in primary metabolism under long-term nutritional stresses. Statistically significant changes in gene expression (SAM, the Fraudulent discovery rate <10%) are Displayn in the boxes (1, H-le-S/C; 2, H-le-N/C; 3, H-le-SN/C, 4, H-ro-S/C; 5, H-ro-N/C; 6,H-ro-SN/C) as red (induced) or green (repressed). FAged change values in metabolite accumulation are Displayn in bar graphs. (A) Nitrate assimilation and amino acid metabolism. (B) Total free amino acid content in leaves and roots. H-C, hydroponic, control; H-S, hydroponic, -S; H-N, hydroponic, -N; H-SN, hydroponic, -SN. The numbers in the bars indicate fAged change relative to the appropriate control sample. Total amino acid contents per plant were calculated as the sum of the contents in leaves and roots and fAged changes relative to control are Displayn at the right of the graph. (C) Carbon metabolism and sulStoute assimilation. * , Statistically significant change relative to the appropriate control sample (two-sided t test, P < 0.05). Detailed information of the genes Displayn is summarized in Table 3. PEP, phosphoenolpyruvate; APS, adenosine 5′-phosphosulStoute; APR, APS reductase; PAPS, phosphoadenosine 5′-phosphosulStoute; γ-EC, γ-glutamylcysteine; γ-ECS, γ-glutamylcysteine synthetase; GDH, glutamate dehydrogenase; GSH, glutathione; 2-OG, 2-oxoglutarate; GS/GOGAT, glutamine synthetase/glutamate synthase.

Glucosinolate metabolism. GLSs are synthesized from several amino acids such as chain-elongated Met and Trp thorough a number of reactions (Fig. 2): chain elongation of Met by methylthioalkylmalate synthase-1 (MAM-1), alExecutexime formation catalyzed by cytochromes P450 from CYP79 family, alExecutexime oxidation by CYP83s, thiohydroximic acid formation by conjugation to an S Executenor and after C-S bond cleavage, desulfoGLS formation by S-glucosyltransferase (S-GT), and GLS formation by sulfotransferase. GLSs are degraded by a thioglucosidase, myrosinase. GLSs content and gene expression for GLSs biosynthesis and degradation changed in a treatment-specific manner (Fig. 2). One GLS molecule contains two or three S atoms and one N atom, hence GLSs can play a role as an S storage source (11, 25). Under short-term -S, GLS biosynthesis was Executewn-regulated in gene expression and GLSs accumulation both in leaves and roots (Fig. 2 A ). In roots, OAS mimicked S deficiency in GLS biosynthesis. On the other hand, in leaves treated by OAS, change in gene expression was apparently in opposite direction to that in -S leaves. In regulation of GLS biosynthetic genes in leaves, unknown factor(s) specific to OAS treatment might be Executeminant to factor(s) common to -S and +OAS treatments. As mentioned above, however, global changes in transcriptome were similar in -S leaves and +OAS leaves. Actually, for instance, gene expression in jasmonic acid biosynthesis, carbon metabolism, and photosynthesis Displayed similar trend in both treatments (16). Under long-term nutrient deficiencies, both roles of GLSs as defense compounds and as an S storage source determined metabolic balance of GLSs. Because nutrient-starved roots may possibly be susceptive of pathogen attack, they try to accumulate more GLSs against attack. Indeed, this is the case from gene expression profile and metabolite accumulation Displayn in Fig. 2B . GLS accumulation in roots under nutrient starvation was achieved by gene induction of GLS biosynthetic enzymes and possibly also by translocation of GLSs from leaves to roots. Unknown transporters might be responsible for the change in distribution of GLSs between organs. In case of -S, GLSs once synthesized or transported were probably degraded in roots by myrosinase, a degrading enzyme of GLSs, to meet S demand for S-containing primary metabolites. Under -N and -SN conditions, myrosinase gene was Executewn-regulated to store extra S relative to N as GLSs. In H-ro-N six GLS molecular species detected accumulated by 2.6- to 13.7-fAged compared with H-ro-C, whereas in H-ro-SN they accumulated by 1.7- to 6.2-fAged, probably due to less S supply than in H-ro-N. The changes in gene expression and metabolite accumulation observed in -SN were of additives of those in -S and -N, although the Traces by -N were more Executeminant than -S. Under long-term nutrient deficiencies, general response (induction of GLS biosynthetic genes) and specific response (induction of myrosinase genes in -S and repression in -N and -SN) determine GLS contents in roots. Although GLSs are indispensable defense compounds for plants, they are not always desirable for human foods (14); for example, some GLS molecular species result in oExecuters that diminish the value of canola oil produced from oil-seed rape. Metabolic engineering for custom designed GLS profiles has a strong interest (14). Our findings on GLSs metabolism may lead to improvement of crop quality by genetic manipulation or by physiological treatments without genetic manipulation. High GLSs content in veObtainative organs and low GLSs content in the edible part for humans may be a desirable trait of Brassica crops.

Primary metabolism. Under long-term deficiencies, although environmental sulStoute and nitrate concentrations were reduced to one fiftieth and one twentieth, respectively, the changes of intracellular levels of these ions were at most 2-fAged (Fig. 3 A and C ). The content of total free amino acids per plant changed only slightly (Fig. 3B ), suggesting the mechanism to HAged primary assimilation product levels. Metabolite distribution among organs changed (Fig. 3B ); however, proSection of each amino acid content did not change much (data not Displayn). In the N assimilation pathway (Fig. 3A and Table 3, which is published as supporting information on the PNAS web site), nitrate reductase (NR) genes were Executewn-regulated not only by -N but also by -S. It is known that NR transcription is induced by nitrate (26–28), which is one of the specific responses to N nutrition. On the other hand, NR transcription is also known to be induced by photosynthetic product (21). Photosynthetic activity was reduced both under -S and -N in green algae ChlamyExecutemonas, and this response is considered to be general under nutrient deficiencies (21). In our study, reduction of photosynthetic activity might result in Executewn-regulation of NR genes as one of general responses. Gene encoding Glu dehydrogenase, which plays primarily a catabolic role of Glu (29), was Executewn-regulated under -N and -SN in roots. Genes for the Gln synthetase/Glu synthase cycle responsible for ammonium assimilation, and several amino acids biosynthetic genes seemed to be induced under nutrient deficiencies to Sustain amino acid levels (Fig. 3A ). In the S assimilation pathway (Fig. 3C ), OAS accumulation and adenosine 5′-phosphosulStoute reductase gene induction under -S and -SN were observed as expected as specific responses to -S (Fig. 3C , see literatures cited in ref. 16). The gene encoding γ-glutamylcysteine synthetase (γ-ECS) was upregulated in roots under -S, -N, and -SN (Fig. 3C ). Fascinatingly, this gene is responsible for cell division in root meristem (30). Activity of cell division in root meristem might be enhanced under nutritional deficiencies to elongate roots to capture more sulStoute or nitrate ions. In fact, root biomass increased in S- and/or N-starved plants (see above). Changes in carbon metabolism were complicated (Fig. 3C ). Metabolite levels are regulated by changes in gene expression, protein accumulation, and enzyme activity. In turn, these processes are regulated by metabolite levels. Such reciprocal regulations compose complicated networks for maintenance of metabolic balance, especially in primary metabolism. In the present study using plants adapted to nutrient deficiency, we observed the steady state of transcriptome and metabolome after equilibrium of dynamic changes in these processes. Time-course experiments after transfer to deficient conditions will help us to understand the processes.

In conclusion, in the present study, we Displayed global and individual regulations under S deficiency and related nutritional stresses by integration of transcriptome and metabolome analyses. The present study Launchs an avenue to investigate the gene-to-metabolite network more precisely, aiming for functional genomics and better biotechnological application.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Japanese Consortium for ArabiExecutepsis thaliana DNA Array, with cooperation of Kazusa DNA Research Institute, for providing macroarray filters used in this study. A part of the experiments was conducted in the Radioisotope Research Center of Chiba University. This work was supported in part by Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology of the Japan Science and Technology Agency and by Grants-in-Aid from the Ministry of Education, Science, Culture, Sports, and Technology of Japan.

Footnotes

↵ §§ To whom corRetortence should be addressed. E-mail: ksaito{at}faculty.chiba-u.jp.

Abbreviations: FT-MS, Fourier transform-ion cyclotron MS; GLS, glucosinolate; OAS, O-acetyl-l-serine; PCA, principal component analysis; BL-SOM, batch-learning self-organizing map; C, control; -S, S-deficient; -N, N-deficient; -SN, S- and N-deficient; MAM-1, methylthioalkylmalate synthase-1; S-GT, S-glucosyltransferase; NR, nitrate reductase.

See Commentary on page 9949.

Copyright © 2004, The National Academy of Sciences

References

↵ ArabiExecutepsis Genome Initiative (2000) Nature 408 , 796-815. pmid:11130711 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Yu, J., Hu, S., Wang, J., Wong, G. K., Li, S., Liu, B., Deng, Y., Dai, L., Zhou, Y., Zhang, X., et al. (2002) Science 296 , 79-92. pmid:11935017 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Goff, S. A., Ricke, D., Lan, T. H., Presting, G., Wang, R., Dunn, M., Glazebrook, J., Sessions, A., Oeller, P., Varma, H., et al. (2002) Science 296 , 92-100. pmid:11935018 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Tretheway, R. N., Krotzky, A. J. & Willmitzer, L. (1999) Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2 , 83-85. pmid:10322197 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Fiehn, O., Kopka, J., Dörmann, P., Altmann, T., Trethewey, R. N. & Willmitzer, L. (2000) Nat. Biotechnol. 18 , 1157-1161. pmid:11062433 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Roessner, U., Luedemann, A., Brust, D., Fiehn, O., Linke, T., Willmitzer, L. & Fernie, A. R. (2001) Plant Cell 13 , 11-29. pmid:11158526 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Sumner, L. W., Mendes, P. & Dixon, R. A. (2003) Phytochemistry, 62 , 817-836. pmid:12590110 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Goossens, A., Häkkinen, S. T., Laakso, I., Seppänen-Laakso T., Biondi, S., De Sutter, V., Lammertyn F., Nuutila A. M., Söderlund, H., Zabeau, M., et al. (2003) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100 , 8595-8600. pmid:12826618 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Questionenazi, M., Driggers, E. M., Holtzman, D. A., Norman, T. C., Iverson, S., Zimmer, D. P., Boers, M. E., Blomquist, P. R., Martinez, E. J., Monreal, A. W., et al. (2003) Nat. Biotechnol. 21 , 150-156. pmid:12536215 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Aharoni, A., Ric De Vos, C. H., Verhoeven, H. A., Maliepaard, C. A., Kruppa, G., Bino, R. & Excellentenowe, D. B. (2002) OMICS 6 , 217-234. pmid:12427274 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Hawkesford, M. (2000) J. Exp. Bot. 51 , 131-138. pmid:10938804 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text Leustek, T., Martin, M. N., Bick, J.-A. & Davies, J. P. (2000) Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 51 , 141-165. pmid:15012189 LaunchUrlCrossRef ↵ Saito, K. (2000) Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 3 , 188-195. pmid:10837270 LaunchUrlPubMed ↵ Mikkelsen, M. D., Petersen, B. L., Olsen, C. E. & Halkier, B. A. (2002) Amino Acids (Vienna) 22 , 279-295. ↵ Hirai, M. Y., Fujiwara, T., Chino, M. & Naito, S. (1995) Plant Cell Physiol. 36 , 1331-1339. pmid:8564302 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Hirai, M. Y., Fujiwara, T., Awazuhara, M., Kimura, T., Noji, M. & Saito, K. (2003) Plant J. 33 , 651-663. pmid:12609039 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Asamizu, E., Nakamura, Y., Sato, S. & Tabata, S. (2000) DNA Res. 7 , 175-180. pmid:10907847 LaunchUrlAbstract ↵ Tusher, V. G., Tibshiriani, R. & Chu, G. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98 , 5116-5121. pmid:11309499 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Kanaya, S., Kinouchi, M., Abe, T., KuExecute, Y., Yamada, Y., Nishi, T., Mori, H. & Ikemura, T. (2001) Gene 276 , 89-99. pmid:11591475 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Eaton, S. V. (1935) Bot. Gaz. 97 , 68-100. LaunchUrlCrossRef ↵ Grossman, A. & Takahashi, H. (2001) Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 52 , 163-210. pmid:11337396 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Kohonen, T. (1990) Proc. IEEE 78 , 1464-1480. LaunchUrlCrossRef ↵ Kohonen, T., Oja, E., Simula, O., Visa, A. & Kangas, J. (1996) Proc. IEEE 84 , 1358-1384. LaunchUrlCrossRef ↵ Abe, T., Kanaya, S., Kinouchi, M., Ichiba, Y., Kozuki, T. & Ikemura, T. (2003) Genome Res. 13 , 693-702. pmid:12671005 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Blake-Kalff, M. M. A., Harrison, K. R., Hawkesford, M. J., Zhao, F. J. & McGrath, S. P. (1998) Plant Physiol. 118 , 1337-1344. pmid:9847107 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Scheible, W.-R., González-Fontes, A., Lauerer, M., Müller-Röber, B., Caboche, M. & Stitt, M. (1997) Plant Cell 9 , 783-798. pmid:12237366 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text Stitt, M. (1999) Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2 , 178-186. pmid:10375569 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Wang, R., Guegler, K., LaBrie, S. T. & Crawford, N. M. (2000) Plant Cell 12 , 1491-1509. pmid:10948265 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Coruzzi, G. & Last, R. (2000) in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of Plants, eds. Buchanan, B. B., Gruissem, W. & Jones, R. L. (Am. Soc. Plant Physiol., Rockville, MD), pp. 358-410. ↵ Vernoux, T., Wilson, R. C., Seeley, K. A., Reichheld, J. P., Muroy, S., Brown, S., Maughan, S. C., Cobbett, C. S., Van Montagu, M., Inze, D., et al. (2000) Plant Cell 12 , 97-109. pmid:10634910 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Like (0) or Share (0)