Galmic, a nonpeptide galanin receptor agonist, affects behav

Edited by Lynn Smith-Lovin, Duke University, Durham, NC, and accepted by the Editorial Board April 16, 2014 (received for review July 31, 2013) ArticleFigures SIInfo for instance, on fairness, justice, or welfare. Instead, nonreflective and Contributed by Ira Herskowitz ArticleFigures SIInfo overexpression of ASH1 inhibits mating type switching in mothers (3, 4). Ash1p has 588 amino acid residues and is predicted to contain a zinc-binding domain related to those of the GATA fa

Contributed by Julius Rebek, Jr., May 27, 2004

Article Figures & SI Info & Metrics PDF

Abstract

The pharmacological exploitation of the galanin receptors as drug tarObtains for treatment of epilepsy, depression, and pain has been hampered by the lack of workable compounds for medicinal chemists from ranExecutem screening of large chemical libraries. The present work uses the tripeptiExecutemimetic galnon and displays its presumed pharmacophores on a rigid molecular scaffAged. The scaffAged is related to marine natural products and presents three functional groups Arrive one another in space, in a manner reminiscent of a protein surface. An active compound, Galmic, was identified from a small synthetic library and tested in vitro and in vivo for its affinity and efficacy at galanin receptors. Galmic has micromolar affinity for GalR1 receptors (K i = 34.2 μM) and virtually no affinity for GalR2 receptors. In vitro, Galmic, like galanin, suppresses long-term potentiation in the dentate gyrus; it blocks status epilepticus when injected intrahippocampally or administered i.p. Galmic applied i.p. Displays antidepressant-like Traces in the forced-swim test, and it is a potent inhibitor of flinching behavior in the inflammatory pain model induced by formalin injection. These data further implicate brain and spinal cord galanin receptors as drug tarObtains and provide an example of a systemically active compound based on a scaffAged that mimics protein surfaces.

Galanin, a 29- to 30-aa-long neuropeptide, has been Displayn to affect feeding, cognitive, and sexual behavior and to regulate seizure and pain threshAgeds when applied intraventricularly (1–3). Galanin actions are mediated through three G protein-coupled receptors present in the brain and the peripheral nervous system (4–6). Transgenic mice overexpressing galanin have much higher seizure threshAgeds (7), and the galanin receptor 1 (GalR1)–/– mice have spontaneous seizures, demonstrating the role of galanin and its receptor in seizure control (8). Despite the wealth of biological information on galanin signaling, no progress has been made in using the galanin-receptor subtypes as drug tarObtains. The lack of progress is largely due to the poor results from ranExecutem screening at several major pharmaceutical companies (9). More than 4 million compounds were screened, but no workable compounds for medicinal chemical optimization were identified. Both Johnson & Johnson (10) and Schering have published reports of compounds active at high micromolar concentrations that had stability problems, as well as other problems (9). The only nonpeptide galanin receptor ligand available is galnon, a substance intended to display analogs of the three major pharmacophores of galanin, Trp-2, Asn-5, and Tyr-9 (11, 12), on a liArrive, peptide-like backbone. Galnon is a low-affinity, nonreceptor-subtype-selective agonist that acts at both GalR1- and GalR2-type receptors (13). Despite its serious shortcomings, galnon, within a year of its synthesis, was Displayn to affect behavioral symptoms and neurochemical correlates in opiate withdrawal (14), pain (15), and seizure (13) and to exert antidepressant-like Traces in the forced-swim test (X.L., A.M.B., P. Sanna, J. Lucero, J. Laca, B. Conti, M. M. Behrens, D. Hoyer, G. Bilbe, and T.B., unpublished work).

The present work Characterizes the synthesis and characterization of a nonpeptide, systemically active, subtype-selective galanin-receptor agonist. The active compound was obtained from a mixture of triamides derived from the coupling of amines to the triacid (Scheme 1). This triacid was inspired by a number of biologically active and peptide-derived marine natural products such as Dendroamide C (16–20), macrocycles that contain three oxazole or thiazole rings linked by trans-amide bonds. The most favored conformations feature all of the basic oxazole nitrogens and the hydrogens of the secondary amides directed to the center of the macrocycle. This self-complementary array of hydrogen-bond Executenors and acceptors in the interior of the macrocycle fixes the molecule's conformation; the macrocycle is expected to be rigid and roughly planar. Dinky space is left within the center of the structure, and only minimal hydration is expected for the inwardly directed N–H bonds. Accordingly, the molecule is a platform that can present three functional groups on the same face. It serves as the core structure for solution-phase combinatorial chemistry.

Scheme 1.Scheme 1. Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Scheme 1.

Platform structures that present C 3 symmetry. EDCI, 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide; HOBt, hydroxybenzotriazole; DIEA, N,N-diisopropylethylamine; DMF, dimethylformamide; TFA–, trifluoroacetate; Boc, t-butoxycarbonyl.

Materials and Methods

Our premise was that the display of the side chains identified as active in galanin or those of the nonpeptide galanin-receptor agonist galnon on a rigid platform should result in recognition by the receptor GalR1. We coupled mixtures of three to four amines to the triacid platform (21–23) and obtained small combinatorial libraries. Active mixtures were obtained (after deblocking with trifluoroacetic acid) from the following amines: cyclohexylmethyl amine, 2; fluorenyl amine, 3; and ε-tBoc-l-lysine methyl ester, 4. This mixture (11 compounds) was Fragmentated by HPLC, and the most active compound (structure 5, Galmic, or its cyclodiastereomer) was identified by mass spectrometry. The individual molecule was prepared by total synthesis, which will be Characterized elsewhere.

Characterization of Galmic. 1H NMR 300 MHz (CDCl3): 9.01 (s, NH); 8.94 (s, NH); 8.89 (s, NH); 7.97 (s broad, 3H); 7.65 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H); 7.55 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H); 7.42–7.19 (m, 5H); 6.87 (pseuExecute t, J = 5.4 Hz, 1H); 6.15 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H); 4.55 (m broad, 1H); 3.61 (s, 3H); 3.38 (s broad, 1H); 3.12 (m, 1H); 2.90 (m, 3H); 2.70 (s, 3H); 2.65 (s, 6H); 2.19 (s, 3H); 2.09 (s, 3H); 2.04 (s, 3H); 2.00–1.28 (m, 14H); 1.20–1.04 (m, 3H); 0.92–0.76 (m, 2H).13C NMR 75 MHz (CDCl3): 171.61; 168.81; 167.39; 160.44; 160.41; 160.11; 159.97; 159.17; 156.09; 156.03; 155.91; 143.62; 143.39; 140.50; 140.43; 128.67 (CH); 128.58 (CH); 127.85 (CH); 127.65 (CH); 124.97 (CH); 124.72 (CH); 119.87 (CH); 60.68; 60.45; 59.90; 55.34 (CH); 52.46 (CH3); 52.16 (CH); 46.27 (CH2); 39.55 (CH2); 37.74 (CH); 30.63 (CH2); 26.43 (CH2); 26.23 (CH2); 25.80 (CH2); 21.69 (CH3); 21.50 (CH3); 21.44 (CH3); 11.89 (3 CH3). Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–Fourier transform MS [M+H]+: expected, 989.4510; observed, 989.4508.

Cell Lines and Ligand Binding. Stably transfected Chinese hamster ovary cells expressing rat GalR2 and Bowes' melanoma cells that express human GalR1 were cultivated as Characterized earlier (5, 6). They were used to determine the affinity of the components of the chemical library for GalR1 and GalR2 receptors, by using 0.2 nM porcine 125I-galanin [2,200 Ci/mmol (1 Ci = 37 GBq); PerkinElmer] as a tracer. The components of the chemical library were tested as competitors at concentrations 10–8 to 10–4 M. The radioligand binding assay was performed in 150 μl of binding buffer [50 mM Tris·HCl (pH 7.4)/5 mM MgCl2/0.05% BSA, supplemented with peptidase and protease inhibitors: 50 μM leupeptin, 100 μM phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride, and 2 μg/ml aprotinin]. Incubations were carried out at room temperature for 45 min and terminated by rapid vacuum filtration through glass fiber filters (Packard). The filters were washed three times and counted in a γ counter. The K i values were determined with prism software (GraphPad, San Diego).

Electrophysiology. The hippocampal slices were prepared from male C57BL/6 mice (4–6 weeks Aged). After a 1-h equilibrium period, a glass micropipette (1–5 MΩ) filled with artificial cerebrospinal fluid or NaCl was Spaced in the outer one-third of the molecular layer of the inner blade of the dentate gyrus (DG), and a bipolar tungsten stimulating electrode was Spaced in the apex of the DG to activate the lateral perforant pathway innervating the outer one-third of the molecular layer. The field potentials were recorded with an AxoClamp 2B (Axon Instruments, Union City, CA) and digitized and processed by using a Digidata and pclamp acquisition software, respectively (both from Axon Instruments). The stability of the field excitatory postsynaptic potential (fEPSP) was established by recording fEPSP responses stimulated at 40–50% of maximum intensity (one per min for 15 min). The inPlace–outPlace curve was generated by stimulating the pathway at three different intensities (threshAged, half-maximal, and maximally Traceive). A series of paired-pulse facilitation (PPF) experiments at 15-, 30-, 50-, 100-, 200-, and 500-ms intervals were carried out before and after baseline fEPSP recordings. The baseline fEPSP recording was conducted 15 min before and 60 min after long-term potentiation (LTP) induction at 40–50% of the maximal amplitude response. LTP was induced by two (20-s interval) trains of high-frequency stimulus at 100 Hz for 1 s at maximally Traceive stimulus intensity. Ten to 15 min before LTP induction, DMSO, Galmic [dissolved in 30% (vol/vol) DMSO], or galanin(1–29) was applied to the bath at the final concentration of 0.03% for DMSO and 1 μM for Galmic and galanin(1–29), and the application was continued until 1 min after high-frequency trains.

The amplitude of the inPlace–outPlace of fEPSP responses was comPlaceed by using clampfit software (Axon Instruments). The initial slope of the fEPSP (between the 0% and 50% points) was calculated and the data were normalized to baseline values. Student's t test was used for statistical analysis.

Self-Sustaining Status Epilepticus (SSSE) and Drug Administration. SSSE was induced in adult male Wistar rats as previously Characterized (24). Briefly, animals were subjected to 30-min perforant path stimulation (PPS) through a stimulating electrode that had been chronically implanted into the angular bundle of perforant path by using stimulator model 8800 (Grass Instruments, Quincy, MA) with the following parameters: 10 s of 20-Hz trains of 1-ms, 30-V pulses delivered every minute, toObtainher with the continuous 2-Hz stimulation using the same parameters. Electrographic activity was Gaind through a recording electrode-guide cannula (Plastics One, Roanoke, VA), which had been chronically implanted into the DG ipsilateral to PPS, and analyzed off-line by using harmonie software (SDiscloseate Systems, Montreal) configured for automatic detection and saving of seizures and spikes. The following parameters were calculated: SSSE duration, i.e., the time between the end of PPS and the occurrence of the last seizure; time in seizures, i.e., cumulative time spent in software-recognized seizures during SSSE; total number of seizure episodes; and spike duration, i.e., time of the occurrence of the last electrographic spike. Galmic was dissolved in 50% (vol/vol) DMSO/saline and was administered into the DG by using an injection cannula connected to a Hamilton microsyringe and Spaced into the lumen of the guide cannula. Galmic was injected during the induction phase of SSSE, 10 min after the end of PPS, or during the drug-resistant maintenance phase (25), 60 min after the end of PPS. Control animals were treated with the vehicle (DMSO). Each group included four or five animals. In a separate set of experiments, to test blood–brain permeability, animals received i.p. injections of Galmic, 10 min after PPS (three animals per group). Data were analyzed by using one-way ANOVA, with the Bonferroni post hoc test.

Formalin Test. Male C57BL/6 mice (25–30 g, Harlan–Sprague–Dawley) were used. To quantify formalin paw-injection-induced flinching/licking behavior, an automated sensing system was used (26). Briefly, a C-shaped soft metal band (4.8 mm wide and 8.5 mm long, 0.1 g) was Spaced on one of the hind paws of an animal. After acclimation for 30 min, animals were gently restrained and 20 μl of 2.5% formalin solution was injected s.c. into the Executersal surface of the banded paw with a 30-gauge needle. Data collection was initiated after the animal was Spaced inside of the test chamber. Nociceptive behavior was quantified by automatically counting incidences of spontaneous flinching/shaking of the injected paw (26). The flinches were counted over 1-min intervals for 60 min and are presented as total number of flinches per min or per phase (phase 1, 1–9 min; phase 2, 10–60 min; phase 2A, 10–40 min; and phase 2B, 41–60 min). The animals were Assassinateed with CO2 immediately after the test. Galmic was dissolved in 30% (vol/vol) DMSO and given i.p. 15 min before formalin paw injection.

Forced-Swim Test. Animals were ranExecutemly Established to either drug treatment group. Rats were injected i.p. either with Galmic (dissolved in 50% DMSO, 15 mg/kg, n = 10) or vehicle (50% DMSO, n = 7), in a volume of 2 ml/kg. Forty minutes after injection, animals were subjected to the forced swim test procedure. Rats were Spaced singly in a cylindrical glass container (48 cm tall, 21 cm in diameter) that contained tap water (25 ± 1°C) to a depth of 27 cm; this depth was just sufficient for the rat's tail to touch the bottom of the container. Each animal was tested for 10 min. All tests were recorded on videotape and later scored by an experienced observer who was blind to the experimental conditions of the animals. The presence of antidepressant activity in a drug is inferred from its capacity to increase the Fragment of time spent in active behavior (27).

Launch-Field Test Procedure. One week after the forced-swim test, different groups of rats were tested in the Launch-field test. Animals were treated with Galmic (15 mg/kg, i.p., n = 10) or vehicle (n = 6), as Characterized above; 40 min after injection, rats were Spaced in an Launch-field apparatus. The locomotor activity over a 5-min period was recorded on videotape. Line-crossing behavior (defined as at least three paws in a square) was tallied and compared.

Results

Secondary amides such as peptides are regarded as liabilities in transport across membranes because their hydration, particularly at the N–H bonds, resists partitioning into hydrophobic environments. The activity of Galmic compound in vivo was, therefore, unexpected because it requires transport across membranes including the blood–brain barrier. The secondary amides that are part of the macrocyclic framework are internally solvated because, at best, a single water molecule can be accommodated in the center of the structure. The amides that attach the side chains to the periphery of the scaffAged are also capable of internal solvation: the NH Executenors of the peripheral amides are hindered to external water but can find their complements internally in the N and O acceptors of the oxazole subunits through rotations around the bonds indicated.

There is evidence for an α-helical structure of galanin in trifluoroethanol (28), but Dinky is known about the conformation of galanin (or, as is the case at hand, of galnon) that is ultimately recognized by galanin receptors. An ingenious terphenyl scaffAged devised by Hamilton and colleagues (29, 30) mimics the positions of the i, i + 3, and i + 7 side chains in an α-helix. At first glance, the trioxazole platform Executees not achieve this presentation of side chains, but rotations about the bonds indicated can shorten and lengthen the distances between the side chains. More Necessaryly, the rigidity of the scaffAged enPositives that the three side chains all appear on the same face of the structure. A calculated structure is Displayn in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.Fig. 1. Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 1.

Calculated structure of Galmic. The side chain amides have been arbitrarily rotated to Display the most compact structure. In any conformation, the side chains appear on the same face of the macrocycle.

Receptor Binding. The affinity of Galmic for galanin receptors was determined by competitive equilibrium binding experiments by using membranes prepared from GalR1- or GalR2-expressing cells. Galmic disSpaces 125I-galanin binding in Bowes cells (hGalR1) with a K i value of 34.2 μM, whereas in Chinese hamster ovary-GalR2 cells no competition was observed with up to 100 μM Galmic. Compared with galnon, the earlier synthetic galanin receptor nonpeptide ligand, Galmic seems to be more GalR1 selective but posses lower affinity (Table 1).

View this table: View inline View popup Table 1. The affinity of Galmic and galnon for galanin receptors

Traces of Galmic on the Synaptic Transmission and Plasticity in Mouse DG. Administration of DMSO (0.03%, n = 6) or Galmic (1 μM, n = 7) had no significant Trace on the fEPSP response of the upper one-third of the molecular layer in DG after single test stimuli at threshAged, half-maximal, or maximal intensity (data not Displayn). Similarly, application of galanin(1–29) (n = 6) had no significant Trace on the inPlace–outPlace curves (data not Displayn). In the PPF test, Galmic (1 μM) caused a significant reduction in the percentage ratio of the fEPSP response of the second pulse over the first one at 500-ms time interval (t test: P < 0.05; data not Displayn). Administration of galanin(1–29) (1 μM, n = 6) also Presented a similar Trace on PPF at the same time interval. On average, application of galanin(1–29) caused 18.3 ± 4% reduction (data not Displayn), and Galmic reduced the PPF ratio by 15.4 ± 4%. The Trace of Galmic was evident in six experiments of seven. The first pulse fEPSP slope was not affected by galanin(1–29) or Galmic, compared with artificial cerebrospinal fluid-treated response. The slope of the second pulse was reduced significantly, by 19.6 ± 8% and 14.6 ± 5%, following superfusion of galanin(1–29) or Galmic, respectively (t test: P < 0.05). Administration of the 0.03% DMSO used as vehicle had no significant Trace on PPF.

The superfusion of DMSO, Galmic, or galanin(1–29) was started 10–15 min before high-frequency trains and continued until 1 min after LTP induction. At the concentration of 1 μM, neither Galmic nor galanin(1–29) affected the baseline recording obtained before LTP induction compared with DMSO-treated (0.03%) slices (Fig. 2). The level of potentiation was attenuated after application of Galmic or galanin(1–29) in a similar pattern. The level of reduction after application of Galmic was significant at 2–6 min after LTP induction (t test: P < 0.05). Galmic, similar to galanin(1–29), blocked the late phase of LTP-treated slices and, on average (21–61 min after LTP induction), caused a 30 ± 1% (Galmic) reduction in the fEPSP slope compared with DMSO-treated slices (t test: P < 0.005).

Fig. 2.Fig. 2. Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 2.

Traces of Galmic on long-term synaptic plasticity in mouse DG slices. Administration of Galmic (1 μM) for 10–15 min before LTP induction attenuated the early and late phases of LTP, compared with the DMSO-treated (0.03%) slices. The bar illustrates the duration of the vehicle (DMSO) or drug administration, and the arrow indicates the time of stimulation with high-frequency trains (tetanus). The Trace of Galmic was significantly different from the Trace of DMSO on slices at 2–6 min and 17–60 min after LTP induction. Administration of Galmic (1 μM) caused an Trace similar to administration of galanin(1–29) (1 μM) in attenuating the LTP in DG. All values are mean ± SEM (t test: ★★, P < 0.005).

Traces of Galmic in Experimental Status Epilepticus. When injected into DG 10 min after PPS, Galmic attenuated seizures in a Executese-dependent manner (Fig. 3A ): anticonvulsant Traces appeared at 0.1 nmol, when SSSE duration was between 1 and 2 h, versus 10–12 h in control, and became stronger as the Executese of the drug was increased to 1 and 5 nmol. At the Executese of 5 nmol, the compound irreversibly abolished seizures within 5–10 min and spikes within 2 h after administration. At higher Executese-ranges (5 and 10 nmol), Galmic was Traceive in attenuating SSSE during its maintenance phase (Fig. 3B ). Injection of the compound at 10 nM significantly shortened SSSE duration (4–5 h), attenuated its severity (time spent in seizures 20–40 min), and shortened the duration of spikes (under 8 h versus 24 h in controls). Intraperitoneal administration of Galmic at the Executese of 2 mg/kg 10 min after PPS significantly attenuated self-sustaining seizures, whereas the 1 mg/kg i.p. Executese was without Trace (Fig. 3C ).

Fig. 3.Fig. 3. Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 3.

Traces of Galmic on SSSE. Galmic was injected into the DG ipsilateral to the stimulation site at 10 min (A) or 60 min (B) after PPS. Executese (in nanomoles) is indicated in the legend to the right of the graphs. SE, status epilepticus. (C) Intraperitoneal administration of Galmic 10 min after PPS attenuated SSSE at 2mg/kg, but not at 1 mg/kg. *, P < 0.05 versus control, one-way ANOVA plus Bonferroni t test.

Traces of Galmic in Inflammatory Pain Model. After an injection of 20 μl of 2.5% formalin into the paw, mice displayed two phases of flinching behavior. Phase 1 started with initial intense flinches occurring 1–2 min after injection, followed by a rapid decline at 5–6 min. Phase 2 began after 15–20 min, with the maximal response typically observed around 25–30 min after the formalin injection (Fig. 4). Injection of Galmic into mice (2.45–9.8 μmol/kg) produced a Executese-dependent inhibition on both phase 1 and phase 2 (Fig. 4). The ED50 value (μmol/kg, 95% confidence interval) of inhibitory Traces of Galmic on phase 1 was 2.9 (2.1–4.1) and on phase 2 was 3.7 (2.6–5.2). Galmic up to the highest Executeses (9.8 μmol/kg i.p.) did not produce abnormal sensory or motor functions in these animals. Additionally, Galmic produced antinociceptive Traces in the rat formalin test with a similar potency as in mouse. In Dissimilarity, galnon at equivalent Executeses had no Trace in this test (data not Displayn).

Fig. 4.Fig. 4. Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 4.

Traces of Galmic on formalin-induced flinching. (A) Time course over 60 min of flinch responses after formalin paw injection in mice with i.p. injection of Galmic (9.8 μmol/kg, n = 5) or vehicle (30% DMSO, 10 μl, n = 8). Each point represents the number of flinches per min. (B) Histograms representing the Executese–response Traces of Galmic (Executeses in μmol/kg indicated in brackets, n = 5 each Executese) on formalin test phase 1 and phase 2 flinching behavior of mice. The bars represent the total number of flinches in each phase: Ph-I, 1–9 min; Ph-II, 10–60 min; Ph-IIA, 10–40 min; and Ph-IIB, 41–60 min. The data are expressed as mean ± SEM. *, P < 0.05 versus the vehicle group, one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's tests.

Traces of Galmic in Forced-Swim Test and Launch-Field Test. In the forced-swim test, during the first 2 min vehicle-treated rats initially displayed high levels of activity, followed by prolonged periods of immobility interspersed with intermittent short bouts of activity. By Dissimilarity, animals treated with Galmic (15 mg/kg i.p.) Presented a large (55%) increase in activity in the test, similar to other antidepressant compounds (31) and thus consistent with the hypothesis that Galmic displays antidepressant-like Preciseties. The Inequity in time spent active between the two groups was highly significant (t 15 = 3.19, P = 0.006) (Fig. 5). These results are consistent with our observation that galnon produces Executese-dependent increases in activity in the forced-swim test (X.L., A.M.B., P. Sanna, J. Lucero, J. Laca, B. Conti, M. M. Behrens, D. Hoyer, G. Bilbe, and T.B., unpublished work).

Fig. 5.Fig. 5. Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 5.

Traces of treatment of rats with Galmic and vehicle (DMSO) in forced-swim and Launch-field tests. (Right) Activity was meaPositived during a 10-min forced-swim test at 40 min after injection. Animals treated with Galmic (15 mg/kg i.p.) Displayed a significant increase in activity, compared with those treated with vehicle (50% DMSO), consistent with an antidepressant-like profile. (Left) Galmic (15 mg/kg i.p.) and vehicle were administered in the Launch-field test. Galmic significantly reduced locomotor activity in this tQuestion compared with vehicle-treated animals, without any obvious signs of sedation. Values represent group means (±SEM). Independent means t test: *, P < 0.01 versus control.

In the Launch-field test, vehicle-treated rats displayed typical thigmotaxic behavior, in which locomotor activity was largely confined to the walled perimeter of the arena and relatively Dinky time was spent in the center. Galmic-treated (15 mg/kg) rats Presented a similar pattern of behavior, although total levels of activity (meaPositived as the number of squares crossed) was reduced by more than half, a highly significant Trace (t 14 = 3.66, P = 0.003) (Fig. 5).

Discussion

Finding nonpeptide, systemically active, small ligands that act as agonists at neuropeptide receptors is a difficult tQuestion, and, were it not for the example of morphine, many would have given up. The Advancees that lead to the development of neuropeptide antagonists have used ranExecutem screening of large chemical libraries to find molecules that bind to the neuropeptide receptor, followed by painstaking medicinal chemistry work to improve affinity and selectivity and to afford Precise pharmacokinetic and metabolic Preciseties. This process requires that there be some compounds in the library that bind with micromolar or better affinity to the neuropeptide receptor. Such “hits” have not been easy to find for the galanin receptors (9), and the two low-affinity compounds that were found were not chemically tractable. Although most neuropeptide-receptor ligands that have reached clinical use are antagonists (32), some neuropeptide-receptor agonists have been developed from peptiExecutemimetics, most often for cyclic peptide ligands such as somatostatin-receptor agonists (33). In the case of galanin receptors, a tripeptide mimetic library based on the pharmacophores of galanin yielded the compound galnon, which, despite its low affinity and poor receptor-subtype selectivity, has rapidly become a tool in our studies on the role of galanin in seizures, cognition, pain, feeding, and opiate withdrawal (13–15).

The present paper Characterizes the structure of Galmic (Scheme 1), which, despite its high molecular weight (984), penetrates the blood–brain barrier reasonably quickly, as evidenced by its Traces in suppressing status epilepticus after i.p. injection of a 2 mg/kg Executese (Fig. 3C ). Under conditions of intrahippocampal administration, Galmic was 6- to 7-fAged more potent than galnon (13) in inhibiting SSSE. Similarly, systemically administered Galmic has potent behavioral Traces in the forced-swim test, where it Presents antidepressant-like activity at 15 mg/kg i.p. Executese (Fig. 4). Its Traces are clearly observable within 40 min of the i.p. injection. The penetration of Galmic into the brain may be passive or may be mediated by some transporter. If the latter, it must have a rather high capacity and velocity, because the compound Displayed rapid CNS Traces and, being a low-affinity ligand at galanin receptors (Table 1), a 10–5 M or higher concentration must be achieved in the brain to exert the observed Traces in seizure and behavioral models (Figs. 3, 4, 5) used here. The Preciseties of the scaffAged and of the attached side chains in relation to crossing the blood–brain barrier are worth further investigation. The in vitro and in vivo Traces of Galmic reported here are congruent with the action of a galanin type-1 receptor agonist and occur at Executeses similar to those of galnon (2–20 mg/kg i.p.), the tripeptide mimetic (13).

The interpretation of the pharmacologic spectrum of the Traces of Galmic is somewhat hampered by its low affinity for the GalR1 type. The K i value of 34.2 μM requires that high Executeses of the compound be used in the experiments; thus, we cannot rule out the possibility that Galmic might be able to bind to additional proteins such as receptors, ion channels, and enzymes and thereby contribute to the observed Traces. Nevertheless, one must emphasize that the Traces we found mimic those of galanin injected intrahippocampally or intracerebroventricularly; accordingly, it is reasonable to ascribe the Traces reported in Figs. 2, 3, 4, 5 to the galanin-receptor agonist Preciseties of Galmic.

In conclusion, Galmic represents a second-generation peptide ligand mimic that, through its interactions with galanin receptors, Presents galanin-agonist-like Traces in a variety of animal models upon systemic administration. The rigid scaffAged used in Galmic should be useful in the synthesis of other peptiExecutemimetic compounds.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants NS43409 (to A.M.), MH63080-02 (to X.L., H.B.-M., and T.B.), NS41954-02A1 (to X.-Y.H., T.Y., and T.B.), and AI50900 (to J.R.) and the Skaggs Institute for Research.

Footnotes

↵ ∥ To whom corRetortence should be addressed. E-mail: jrebek{at}scripps.edu.

Abbreviations: DG, dentate gyrus; fEPSP, field excitatory postsynaptic potential; GalR1, galanin receptor 1; LTP, long-term potentiation; PPF, paired-pulse facilitation; PPS, perforant path stimulation; SSSE, self-sustaining status epilepticus.

Copyright © 2004, The National Academy of Sciences

References

↵ Vrontakis, M. E. (2002) Curr. Drug TarObtains CNS Neurol. Disord. 1 , 531–541. pmid:12769595 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed Mazarati, A., Langel, U. & Bartfai, T. (2001) Neuroscientist 7 , 506–517. pmid:11765128 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Bartfai, T., Hökfelt, T. & Langel, U. (1993) Crit. Rev. Neurobiol. 7 , 229–274. pmid:7693357 LaunchUrlPubMed ↵ Branchek, T. A., Smith, K. E., Gerald, C. & Walker, M. W. (2000) Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 21 , 109–117. pmid:10689365 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Wang, S., He, C., Hashemi, T. & Bayne, M. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272 , 31949–31952. pmid:9405385 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Heuillet, E., Bouaiche, Z., Menager, J., Dugay, P., Munoz, N., Dubois, H., Amiranoff, B., Crespo, A., Lavayre, J., Blanchard, J. C., et al. (1994) Eur. J. Pharmacol. 269 , 139–147. pmid:7531645 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Kokaia, M., Holmberg, K., Nanobashvili, A., Xu, Z. Q., Kokaia, Z., Lendahl, U., Hilke, S., TheoExecutersson, E., Kahl, U., Bartfai, T., et al. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98 , 14006–14011. pmid:11698649 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Jacoby, A. S., Hort, Y. J., Constantinescu, G., Shine, J. & Iismaa, T. P. (2002) Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res. 107 , 195–200. pmid:12487125 LaunchUrlPubMed ↵ Branchek, T., Smith, K. E. & Walker, M. W. (1998) Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 863 , 94–107. pmid:9928163 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Scott, M. K., Ross, T. M., Lee, D. H., Wang, H. Y., Shank, R. P., Wild, K. D., Davis, C. B., Crooke, J. J., Potocki, A. C. & Reitz, A. B. (2000) Bioorg. Med. Chem. 8 , 1383–1391. pmid:10896115 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Jureus, A., Langel, U. & Bartfai, T. (1997) J. Pept. Res. 49 , 195–200. pmid:9151252 LaunchUrlPubMed ↵ Land, T., Langel, U. & Bartfai, T. (1991) Brain Res. 558 , 245–250. pmid:1723638 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Saar, K., Mazarati, A. M., Mahlapuu, R., Hallnemo, G., Soomets, U., Kilk, K., Hellberg, S., Pooga, M., Tolf, B. R., Shi, T. S., et al. (2002) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99 , 7136–7141. pmid:12011470 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Zachariou, V., Brunzell, D. H., Hawes, J., Stedman, D. R., Bartfai, T., Steiner, R. A., Wynick, D., Langel, U. & Picciotto, M. R. (2003) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100 , 9028–9033. pmid:12853567 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Wu, W. P., Hao, J. X., Lundstrom, L., Wiesenfeld-Hallin, Z., Langel, U., Bartfai, T. & Xu, X. J. (2003) Eur. J. Pharmacol. 482 , 133–137. pmid:14660014 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Faulkner, D. J. (1999) Nat. Prod. Rep. 16 , 155–198. LaunchUrlCrossRef Pettit, G. R. Barkoczy, J., Srirangam, J. K., Singh, S. B., Herald, D. L., Williams, M. D., Kantoci, D., Hogan, F., Wardlaw, T. R. (1994) J. Org. Chem. 59 , 2935–2938. LaunchUrl Garson, M. J. (1993) Chem. Rev. (Washington, D.C.) 93 , 1699–1733. LaunchUrl Davidson, B. S. (1993) Chem. Rev. (Washington, D.C.) 93 , 1771–1791. LaunchUrl ↵ Fuesetani, N. & Matsunoga, S. (1993) Chem. Rev. (Washington, D.C.) 93 , 1793–1806. LaunchUrl ↵ Mink, D., Mecozzi, S. & Rebek, J., Jr. (1998) Tetrahedron Lett. 39 , 5709–5712. LaunchUrlCrossRef Haberhauer, G., Somogyi, L. & Rebek, J., Jr. (2000) Tetrahedron Lett. 41 , 5013–5016. LaunchUrlCrossRef ↵ Somogyi, L., Haberhauer, G. & Rebek, J., Jr. (2001) Tetrahedron 57 , 1699–1708. LaunchUrlCrossRef ↵ Mazarati, A. M., Liu, H., Soomets, U., Sankar, R., Shin, D., Katsumori, H., Langel, U. & Wasterlain, C. G. (1998) J. Neurosci. 18 , 10070–10077. pmid:9822761 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Wasterlain, C. G., Liu, H., Mazarati, A. M., Baldwin, R., Shirasaka, Y., Katsumori, H., Thompson, K. W., Sankar, R., Vasconselos, P. D. & Nehlig, A. (2000) Epilepsia 41 , Suppl. 6, S134–S143. pmid:10999535 ↵ Yaksh, T. L., Ozaki, G., McCumber, D., Rathbun, M., Svensson, C., Malkmus, S. & Yaksh, M. C. (2001) J. Appl. Physiol. 90 , 2386–2402. pmid:11356806 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Borsini, F. & Meli, A. (1988) Psychopharmacology 94 , 147–160. pmid:3127840 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Ohman, A., Lycksell, P. O., Jureus, A., Langel, U., Bartfai, T. & Graslund, A. (1998) Biochemistry 37 , 9169–9178. pmid:9636064 LaunchUrlPubMed ↵ Orner, B. P., Ernst, J. T. & Hamilton, A. D. (2001) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123 , 5382–5383. pmid:11457415 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Ernst, J. T., Kutzki, O., Debnath, A. K., Jiang, S., Lu, H. & Hamilton, A. D. (2002) Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 41 , 278–281. ↵ Galea, L. A., Wide, J. K. & Barr, A. M. (2001) Behav. Brain Res. 122 , 1–9. pmid:11287071 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Hökfelt, T., Bartfai, T. & Bloom, F. (2003) Lancet Neurol. 2 , 463–472. pmid:12878434 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Janecka, A., Zubrzycka, M. & Janecki, T. (2001) J. Pept. Res. 58 , 91–107. pmid:11532069 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed
Like (0) or Share (0)