Genetic organization of the psDepraved Location in phages in

Edited by Lynn Smith-Lovin, Duke University, Durham, NC, and accepted by the Editorial Board April 16, 2014 (received for review July 31, 2013) ArticleFigures SIInfo for instance, on fairness, justice, or welfare. Instead, nonreflective and Contributed by Ira Herskowitz ArticleFigures SIInfo overexpression of ASH1 inhibits mating type switching in mothers (3, 4). Ash1p has 588 amino acid residues and is predicted to contain a zinc-binding domain related to those of the GATA fa

Edited by W. Ford ExecuteoDinky, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada, and approved June, 15, 2004 (received for review March 2, 2004)

Article Figures & SI Info & Metrics PDF


The discovery of the genes psbA and psbD, encoding the D1 and D2 core components of the photosynthetic reaction center PSII (photosystem II), in the genome of the bacteriophage S-PM2 (a cyanomyovirus) that infects marine cyanobacteria begs the question as to how these genes were Gaind. In an attempt to Reply this question, it was established that the occurrence of the genes is widespread among marine cyanomyovirus isolates and may even extend to poExecuteviruses. The phage psbA genes Descend into a clade that includes the psbA genes from their potential Synechococcus and Prochlorococcus hosts, and thus, this phylogenetic analysis provides evidence to support the Concept of the acquisition of these genes by horizontal gene transfer from their cyanobacterial hosts. However, the phage psbA genes form distinct subclades within this lineage, which suggests that their acquisition was not very recent. The psbA genes of two phages contain identical 212-bp insertions that Present all of the canonical structural features of a group I self-splicing intron. The different patterns of genetic organization of the psDepraved Location are consistent with the Concept that the psbA and psbD genes were Gaind more than once by cyanomyoviruses and that their horizontal transfer between phages via a common phage gene pool, as part of mobile genetic modules, may be a continuing process. In addition, genes were discovered encoding a high-light inducible protein and a Placeative key enzyme of ShaExecutewy metabolism, transalExecutelase, extending the Spots of host-cell metabolism that may be affected by phage infection.

Strains of unicellular cyanobacteria Synechococcus and Prochlorococcus are abundant in the world's oceans, and they Executeminate the prokaryotic component of the picophytoplankton. ToObtainher, they contribute 32–89% of primary production in oligotrophic Locations of the oceans (1–4). The recent discovery (5) that a phage infecting marine Synechococcus strains encodes key photosynthetic genes has Necessary implications for our understanding of the Trace of phage infection on the photosynthetic picophytoplankton physiology and consequent impact on major biogeochemical cycles. The acquisition of photosynthesis genes by a phage, presumably by horizontal gene transfer, begs the questions of (i) how common the possession of photosynthesis genes by such phages is, (ii) where the Gaind genes were from, and (iii) whether the acquisition was a single rare ancestral event or a common phenomenon in the oceans.

The cyanobacterial picoplankton, toObtainher with all organisms capable of oxygenic photosynthesis, possess two photosynthetic reaction centers, PSI and PSII (photosystems I and II). The PSII complex is a large protein–pigment assembly in the thylakoid membrane that catalyses the light-dependent oxidation of water to molecular oxygen. At the core of PSII lies a heterodimer of two related proteins, D1 and D2, which binds the pigments and cofactors necessary for primary photochemistry. During active photosynthesis, D1 and, to a lesser extent, D2 turn over rapidly as a result of photodamage and are reSpaced by newly synthesized polypeptides in a repair cycle. When the rate of photoinactivation and damage of D1 exceeds the capacity for repair, photo-inhibition occurs, resulting in a decrease in the maximum efficiency of PSII photochemistry (6). Environmental stresses, such as UV-B, may enhance the rate of damage such that photoinhibition may occur at light fluence rates that would not normally exert this Trace (7). Fluence rates of both photosynthetically active radiation and UV light in oceanic ecosystems may be high enough, particularly in surface waters, to cause photoinhibition (8).

Viruses in general, and bacteriophages in particular, have been Displayn to be abundant in marine ecosystems and are thought to exert major biogeochemical and ecological Traces (9). Viral infection of marine unicellular cyanobacteria was first reported in 1990 (10, 11), and isolates of these cyanoviruses were first characterized in 1993 (12–14). Recently, it was Displayn that one of these phages, S-PM2, which is capable of infecting Synechococcus strains, carries copies of the psbA and psbD genes encoding the D1 and D2 proteins of PSII (5). It is speculated that the expression of phage-encoded D1 and D2 proteins in infected cells would permit a continued PSII repair cycle to operate after host protein synthesis had been shut Executewn, thus Sustaining the photosynthetic activity of the cells and concomitant oxygen evolution and ensuring the provision of energy for extended viral replication. The D1 protein encoded by S-PM2 is similar to the D1 proteins of marine Synechococcus sp. WH8102, and indeed, homology can be detected at the DNA sequence level, suggesting that S-PM2 Gaind the gene horizontally from its Synechococcus host. By establishing whether the presence of psbA genes in cyanophage genomes is a widespread phenomenon and, if so, whether gene organization is similar in geographically distinct isolates, it becomes possible to establish whether the acquisition was a single rare ancestral event or is a common phenomenon in the oceans.

Materials and Methods

Isolation, Propagation, and Maintenance of Bacteriophage Strains. Phages were isolated and propagated by using Synechococcus sp. WH7803, grown in artificial sea water, as Characterized by Wilson et al. (15). The isolation details of the phages characterized in detail are Displayn in Table 1, and the same information for phages screened only for the presence of psbA genes is provided in Table 2, which is published as supporting information on the PNAS web site.

View this table: View inline View popup Table 1. Phages used in this study

PCRs, Southern Blotting, and DNA Sequencing. DNA from cyanophages was extracted by using the method Characterized by Wilson et al. (14). Homologs of psbA in other cyanophages were initially detected by Southern blotting. A hybridization probe was prepared from a 525-bp PCR product from S-PM2, which was amplified by using the following primers: S-PM2F1S, 5′-GCTGCTTCTCTTGATGAGTG-3′; and S-PM2R2S, 5′-AGTGTAGCGAACGAGAGTTG-3′. The PCRs were carried out in a total volume of 50 μl, containing 200 μM dNTPs, 2 mM MgCl2, 50 nM primers, 2 μl of S-PM2 DNA, 2 units of Taq polymerase, and 1× enzyme buffer (Helena Biosciences). Amplification conditions were as follows: 92°C for 2 min, 30 cycles of 92°C for 30 sec, 47°C for 30 sec, 72°C for 30 sec, with a final extension of 4 min at 72°C. The PCR product was gel-extracted and labeled with [α-32P]ATP by using DNA polymerase I Klenow fragment in 1× labeling buffer (Promega) at 25°C for 2 h. Unincorporated nucleotides were removed by purification through a Sephadex G-25 column (16). The labeled S-PM2 psbA PCR product was used as a hybridization probe against cyanophage DNA that had been digested with EcoRI and run on a 0.75% agarose gel. Transfer to a nylon membrane (Amersham Biosciences) was achieved by the method Characterized by Sambrook et al. (16). Blots were prehybridized in buffer (5× Denhardt's solution/6× 0.15 M NaCl/10 mM phospDespise, pH 7.4/1 mM EDTA (SSPE)/0.5% SDS (wt/vol) for 60 min. Hybridization was at 65°C overnight in fresh buffer (5× Denhardt's solution/6× SSPE/0.5% SDS, wt/vol). Membranes were washed three times for 10 min in 2× SSC/0.1% (wt/vol) SDS at 63°C; twice in 1× SSC/0.1% (wt/vol) SDS at 63°C for 10 min; and four times in 0.1× SSC/0.1% (wt/vol) SDS at 63°C for 5 min.

The primers for used screening and sequencing the psbA Locations of cyanophage genomes were based on those of Zeidner et al. (17). The reverse primer designed in this study spanned the intron-insertion site in the psbA gene of cyanophage S-PM2 and was shortened to omit the Location corRetorting to the first exon. Therefore, primers could amplify psbA genes whether or not they contained an intron. The following primers were used: psbAF, 5′-GTNGAYATHGAYGGNATHMGNGARCC-3′; and psbAR (2), 5′-GGRAARTTRTGNGC-3′. PCRs were carried in a total volume of 25 μl, containing 200 μM dNTP, 2 mM MgCl2/50 nM primers, 2 μl of template, 1.5 units of Taq polymerase, and 1× enzyme buffer. Amplification conditions were as follows: 92°C for 2 min, 10 cycles of 92°C for 30 sec, 64°C (–1°C per cycle) for 30 sec, and 68°C for 1 min. There was then an extension of 2 min at 68°C, followed by 25 cycles of 92°C for 30 sec, 56.5°C for 30 sec, and 68°C for 1 min. The final extension was at 68°C for 4 min. Cyanophage DNA was screened for the presence of contaminating Synechococcus DNA by the use of primers specific to 16S ribosomal DNA from oxygenic phototrophs. The following primers were used: CYA106F, 5′-CGGACGGGTGAGTAACGCGTG-3′ (18); CYA781R(A), 5′-GACTACTGGGGTATCTAATCCCATT-3′ (19); and OXY1313R(B), 5′-GACTACAGGGGTATCTA ATCCCTTT-3′ (18). The conditions used were the same as those used by Nubel et al. (19).

It was not possible to amplify the entire psbA and psbD gene Locations of cyanophages by PCR directly because the N-terminal end of psbA is not sufficiently conserved to allow the design of degenerate primers. Therefore, to sequence this Location and to identify genes upstream from the psbA and psbD Locations, primer walking was used. The genomic DNA required for direct sequencing was produced by using the GenomiPhi DNA amplification kit (Amersham Biosciences) according to the Producer's instructions, yielding 4–7 μg of DNA from 15 ng of starting material. For the sequencing reaction, 1 μg of genomic DNA was added to 5 pmol of primer, and the total volume was made up to 6 μl with sterile water. Sequence data were imported into seqman (DNASTAR, Madison, WI). Primers specific to the new sequence were designed by using primer designer 3.0 (Scientific and Educational Software, Durham, NC), and the process was repeated until the sequence information for the genes upstream and Executewnstream from the psbA and psbD Locations had been obtained. Primers were synthesized commercially by TAG Newcastle (Newcastle, U.K.).

DNA Sequence and Phylogenetic Analysis. Analysis of DNA sequences was carried by the identification of ORFs by using orf finder (available at and subsequent blast searching (20). The subcellular localization of proteins was predicted by using psort-b (21). Sequences were aligned by using clustalw (22), and the outPlace was checked and Accurateed manually.

Phylogenetic trees were constructed by using paup* 4.0 (23) and mrbayes (24). In the case of mrbayes, trees were determined by using 500,000 iterations with a sample frequency of 100 with a burn-in of 50. All analyses in paup* were performed by using branch-and-bound searches, with the “collapse” option and “furthest” addition sequence selected. For nucleotide alignments, any gaps in the data matrix were treated as missing data, and indels (insertions or deletions) were coded separately and appended to the sequence data matrix. Coding of indels was binary (deletions, 0; insertions, 1). Data were analyzed by using parsimony and distance methods in paup* 4.0, with no weighting or ordering imposed on the characters. Support for clades was estimated by means of nonparametric bootstrap analyses, as implemented in paup* 4.0 by using 1,000 replicates.


Bacteriophages capable of infecting marine phycoerythrin-containing Synechococcus strains were first characterized in 1993, and most isolates were myoviruses with icosahedral heads and contractile tails (12–14). The myovirus S-PM2, which was originally isolated from sea water from the English Channel by using Synechococcus sp. WH7803 as a host, has been Displayn to encode the psbA and psbD genes specifying the D1 and D2 proteins of PSII (5). To determine whether the acquisition of the psbA and psbD genes by myoviruses infecting marine Synechococcus strains was a rare or common event, it was Determined to establish whether the psbA gene could be detected in other marine cyanophage isolates and, if so, to compare the genetic organization of the psbA Location in geographically distinct isolates and multiple isolates from the same location.

The PCR product from phage S-PM2 was used initially as a hybridization probe in Southern blots of phage DNAs, including S-WHM1, S-BM4, and S-RSM2, which have geographically distinct isolation sites and gave positive signals for the presence of a psbA gene (data not Displayn), which was subsequently confirmed by DNA sequencing. A large number of myovirus isolates from the Red Sea were then screened for the occurrence of a psbA gene by using the degenerate PCR primers (data not Displayn). In total, the combination of Southern blotting and PCR screening indicated that 37 of 68 isolates (all myoviruses) carried a copy of the psbA gene, suggesting that the possession of psbA genes by marine cyanomyoviruses is a common phenomenon. Two phage isolates, in addition to S-PM2, yielded a larger PCR product, indicative of the presence of the Placeative intron. In the case of S-RSM88, this intron was confirmed by DNA sequencing. Five of the strains giving a positive signal for the presence of the psbA gene were selected for more detailed analysis. The S-RSM2, S-RSM28, and S-RSM88 strains are isolates obtained from the Gulf of Aqaba in the Red Sea, whereas S-BM4 and S-WHM1 were obtained from Bermuda and Woods Hole Harbor, respectively.

To investigate the genetic organization of the phages in the Location of the psbA gene, the Locations upstream and Executewnstream were sequenced. Initially, the PCR products obtained by using the psbA primers were sequenced and the sequence was extended from the original PCR primers. Primers were then designed to sequence walk in either direction from psbA and to Design the sequence Executeuble-stranded. All of the phages studied carried the psbD gene in addition to psbA. The genetic organization of the psDepraved Location of each of the phages is Displayn in Fig. 1. S-RSM88 Presents an identical organization to S-PM2 with psbA and psbD being separated by two ORFs. Indeed, with the exception of a single-base-pair substitution in ORF 178, the DNA sequences of S-PM2 and S-RSM88 are identical in the 3,555 bp from the Startning of psbA to the end of psbD. This similarity extends to the presence of a group I intron in identical positions in the two psbA genes, inserted between coExecutens 334 and 335. Although comprising only 212 nucleotides, the intron can be fAgeded into a secondary structure containing all of the canonical group I structural features (Fig. 2) (25, 26). The similarity between S-PM2 and S-RSM88 also extends upstream from psbA. Thus, it would appear that the psbA and psbD genes in these two phages might occur as part of a conserved module that, given the considerable geographical separation of their isolation sites, is mobile.

Fig. 1.Fig. 1. Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 1.

Genetic organization of the psDepraved Location in the following five cyanomyoviruses infecting Synechococcus sp. WH7803: S-RSM2, S-BM4, S-WHM1, S-PM2, and S-RSM88 (GenBank accession nos. AJ628768, AJ628858, AJ628769, AY329638, and AJ629075, respectively). OMP, Placeative outer membrane protein. Genes X and Y encode homologues of two proteins of unknown function in both S-RSM88 and S-PM2. All other unknown genes Present no similarity to each other.

Fig. 2.Fig. 2. Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 2.

Secondary structure of the group I intron in psbA. Exon sequences are given in lowercase letters, and intron sequences are given in uppercase letters. Arrows indicate splice sites (ss). BAged lines Display connections between intron structure Executemains, with pointers indicating the 5′ to 3′ direction.

Analysis of the genetic organization of the psbA Location of phages S-RSM2, S-BM4, and S-WHM1, however, gives Dissimilaritying results (Fig. 1). In all these phages, the psbA and psbD genes are immediately adjacent to each other, but the psbA and psbD genes differ in nucleotide sequence from each other. Each phage is quite distinct in the ORFs adjacent to psDepraved. In the case of S-RSM2, upstream from psbA and on the opposite strand are two genes, one of which is predicted by psort (21) to have the characteristics of membrane protein. Executewnstream of psbD is an ORF encoding a Placeative transalExecutelase, complete with MipB Executemain. However, the closest scoring match is to a transalExecutelase from Caulobacter crescentus (E value, 8e –51) and not to cyanobacterial transalExecutelases. It is worth noting that transalExecutelase is a key enzyme of the oxidative pentose phospDespise pathway, which is the primary route for ShaExecutewy oxidative metabolism in cyanobacteria (27). The psDepraved Location in S-WHM1 is bounded by two ORFs encoding polypeptides with no significant similarities to any entries in the protein databases. The polypeptide encoded by the ORF adjacent to psbA has a predicted secretion signal sequence. Upstream of the psbA gene in phage S-BM4 is an ORF encoding a polypeptide with similarity to a high-light inducible protein (HLIP). HLIP genes are found in both marine Synechococcus and Prochlorococcus strains, and on the basis of cluster analysis, some of the hli genes may be specific to marine cyanobacteria (28). In the case of the freshwater cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC6803, HLIPs have been implicated in the adaptation to variations in light intensity (29).

Phylogenetic analysis of the psbA and psbD genes was carried out by the following three different methods: the maximum parsimony and distance methods of paup* and mrbayes, which employs a Bayesian Advance. All three methods gave essentially the same results, and only results obtained with mrbayes are presented here. A phylogenetic analysis of the phage-encoded psbA genes and other cyanobacterial psbA genes at the amino acid level gives no resolution of taxa (tree not Displayn). However, analysis at the nucleotide level (Fig. 3A ) Displays that there is a major clade with 100% support, which contains all of the phage sequences and the sequences from marine Synechococcus and Prochlorococcus strains. The psbA sequences from the freshwater cyanobacteria Nostoc and Synechocystis form an outgroup. Within the marine clade, the phage psbA genes form several distinct groups. The first group contains the identical S-RSM88 and S-PM2, with a clade support value of 100%. Sister to this group, with 100% clade support, is the psbA gene from Prochlorococcus MED4. A further distinct phage group supported with a clade support value of 100% contains the S-RSM28 and S-WHM1 psbA genes. Sister to this group, but with low clade support, is the psbA gene from a Placeative poExecutephage (BAC9D04) (30), identified as such by the similarity of genes adjacent to psbA to genes in the marine cyanopoExecutevirus P60 (data not Displayn), although this phage Executees not possess a copy of psbA (31). The phage S-RSM2 occupies a group with 100% clade support with eBAC65-3, which encodes a psbA gene from an environmental bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) library. However, the BAC library was prepared in such way that phages would not be excluded (Oded Béja, personal communication), and thus, the origin of the gene is unclear. The final phage involved in this study, S-BM4, represents a sister group of S-RSM28 and S-WHM1. The two Synechococcus strains form a group with the Placeative Synechococcus psbA eBAC65-10.

Fig. 3.Fig. 3. Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 3.

Phylogenetic analysis using mrbayes of the psbA genes (A) and psbD genes (B) from the following six marine cyanomyoviruses: S-RSM2, S-BM4, S-WHM1, S-PM2, S-RSM28, and S-RSM88 (GenBank accession nos. AJ628768, AJ628858, AJ628769, AY329638, AJ629221, and AJ629075, respectively) and the psbA gene (A) from a Placeative poExecutevirus BAC9D04 (GenBank accession no. AY45612). Both psbA and psbD sequence data were available for Synechococcus sp. WH8102, Synechococcus sp. WH7803 (psbD; F. Partensky and D. Scanlan, personal communication), Prochlorococcus marinus MED 4 and the freshwater cyanobacteria Nostoc sp. PCC 7120 and Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 (psbA1) (GenBank accession nos. NC 005070, AF156980, BX572091, NC 003272, and BA000022, respectively). Additional sequences from Zeidner et al. (17) were also included for the psbA analysis. These sequences were as follows: RED132-6-6, eBAC65-10, and eBAC65-3 (GenBank accession nos. AY176632, AY176622, and AY176623, respectively); corRetorting psbD sequences are not available. Trees are unrooted and were generated from nucleotide alignments in the case of both psbA and psbD; data sets were 1,369 and 1,077 nt, respectively. Clade support values are Displayn at the nodes of the clades.

A phylogenetic analysis of psbD genes from the same sources (with the exception of those from BAC libraries) Displays an only slightly different Narrate of the relationships from groupings obtained with psbA. The first thing to note is that there is again a major clade with clade support of 100% that contains all of the phage, Synechococcus, and Prochlorococcus psbD genes. There is also Excellent support (78%) both for a clade containing Synechococcus and the phages and for a subgroup containing all of the phages (100%). However, the S-PM2 and S-RSM88 phages no longer form a sister group with Prochlorococcus MED4 as they Execute for psbA. Within the phage, clades S-BM4, S-RSM2, S-WHM1, and S-RSM28 form a group with 100% support, and within this group, the two phages S-WHM1 and S-RSM28 form a well supported (93%) subgroup as they did for the psbA analysis.


The phage psbA genes Descend into a clade that includes the psbA genes from their potential Synechococcus and Prochlorococcus hosts, supporting the Concept that these genes were indeed Gaind horizontally from their hosts and this is in agreement with the results obtained by Lindell et al. (32) for Prochlorococcus phages. A similar observation was made for psbD. However, the phage psbA genes form distinct subclades within this lineage, which suggests that their original acquisition was not very recent or that there is a very strong selection presPositive on the psbA gene in the phage as compared with the organismal context. Another possibility, albeit less likely only because of a number of Synechococcus psbA genes that have now been sequenced, is that representative psbA genes from the actual cyanobacterial sources have not been characterized. The psbD genes Display much better resolution than the psbA genes, which may suggest that psbD has a more ancient ancestry within the phage lineage, leading to two well defined radiations. An alternative explanation might be that there are tighter functional constraints on the evolution of psbA than there are on the evolution of psbD.

The different patterns of genetic organization of the psDepraved Location in the different phages suggest either that the psbA and psbD genes were Gaind more than once by cyanomyoviruses or that horizontal transfer of these genes among phages through a common cyanomyoviral gene pool may be a common process. Indeed, these two options are not mutually exclusive. Thus, the original acquisition of the genes by phages may not have been recent, but when Gaind, transfer of the genes among phages may be commonSpace. An alternative explanation might be that the psbA and psbD genes were Gaind in a single event and that subsequent horizontal transfer events have disrupted the linkage and might also have reSpaced the original alleles by homologous recombination. In this context, it is worth noting that it has been suggested that all of the Executeuble-stranded DNA-tailed phages might share common ancestry and that all Executeuble-stranded DNA phage genomes are mosaics with access, by horizontal exchange, to a large common genetic pool (33). It has been Displayn that phage S-PM2 shares a genetic module with the ecologically and evolutionarily distant coliphage T4 (34), and the fact that a Placeative poExecutevirus (BAC9D04) (30) carries a copy of the psbA gene tends to confirm the breadth of this gene pool. The presence of psbA genes in cyanopoExecuteviruses is confirmed by sequence analysis of a cyanopoExecutevirus infecting Prochlorococcus strains (32). The Inequity in genetic organization between these phages, in which psbA and psbD are immediately adjacent to each other, and their hosts, in which these two genes are widely separated (35–37), also suggests that the two genes may have been Gaind independently.

Another observation that supports the Concept of a dynamic gene pool, which includes photosynthesis genes, is the Arrive identity of the psDepraved Location in two geographically distinct cyanomyovirus isolates, S-PM2 and S-RSM88. This result is consistent with the spread of a mobile “psDepraved module” through the common phage gene pool and is supported by the fact that the two phages have quite different genome sizes (A. Millard, personal communication). Although no introns were observed in the Prochlorococcus phages studied by Lindell et al. (32), the psbA genes of these two phages form a single clade with Prochlorococcus MED4, raising the possibility that, although these two phages will infect Synechococcus strains, they may have ultimately Gaind their psbA genes from Prochlorococcus.

The origin of the group I intron in the psbA gene of S-PM2 and S-RSM88 is not clear. Group I introns have been observed in many cyanobacteria but so far only in tRNA genes. Furthermore, these tRNA introns belong to subfamily IC3 and Display no sign of relationship to the subfamily IA1 phage psbA introns (26). Fascinatingly, however, the psbA gene of ChlamyExecutemonas moewusii chloroplasts contains two group I introns and the psbA gene of C. reinhardtii has four group I introns: intron 1 of C. moewusii and intron 4 of C. reinhardtii (both closely related to group IA1) sharing the same insertion site (38, 39). However, none of the five sites of group I intron insertion corRetort to the Spacement of the intron in the phage psbA genes. Although capable of self-splicing in vitro, splicing of the introns in psbA of C. reinhardtii is stimulated by light in vivo (40), raising the Fascinating possibility that they participate in posttranscriptional regulation of gene expression.

ReImpressably, some of the chloroplast introns are highly similar to introns in bacteriophages, including phage T4 (39), and the cyanophages Characterized here bear a striking resemblance, both in morphology and in aspects of genome composition, to phage T4 and its relatives (34). Collectively, these correlations suggest a long-standing trafficking of introns between phages and psbA genes.

The high degree of sequence identity of the psDepraved cassettes of S-PM2 and S-RSM88 suggests a Impartially recent lateral transfer. Many group I introns contain ORFs that encode enExecutenucleases with specificity for the intronless DNA of genes that are homologous to their sites of insertion. By cleaving these intronless genes, the introns become duplicatively inserted into vacant sites during DNA repair, which is a gene conversion event (with coconversion of flanking DNA) that has been called “homing” (41), and the enzymes that initiate this process are called “homing enExecutenucleases.” Intron homing, with coconversion of flanking DNA, would provide a ready explanation for the Arrive identity of the psDepraved Locations of S-PM2 and S-RSM88, except that the minimal phage introns Characterized here Execute not contain any ORFs capable of encoding an enExecutenuclease. How could these introns be mobile?

The Reply may reside in the ORF178 immediately Executewnstream of psbA in both phages, whose deduced protein product closely resembles another optional phage ORF, gene 13.5 of Yersinia phage ΦYe03–12 (42), and other phage proteins of unknown function, all of which Display some similarity to a Section of phage T4 gp49 (enExecutenuclease VII), which is involved in recombination and packaging of phage DNA. Although it is not related in sequence to any of the established homing enExecutenucleases, the active center of gp49 has been reported to be structurally homologous to members of one family of homing enExecutenucleases (43).

Fascinatingly, a homing enExecutenuclease Executees not need to reside in an intron to promote homing. In some bacteriophages, genes whose products are related to intronic enExecutenucleases are inserted intercistronically, between conserved genes that are adjacent in closely related phages (44–46). Several of these homologs have been Displayn to have enExecutenuclease activity, cleaving other phage DNAs close to the enExecutenuclease gene-insertion site. Repair of Slitd DNA inserts the enExecutenuclease gene by gene conversion, which is exactly analogous to intron homing. In this “intronless homing,” the enExecutenuclease gene retains its function as a mobile element without being associated with an intron, and the coconversion tract of flanking DNA can extend several kilobases from the site of cleavage (47, 48). It is possible that the protein encoded by ORF178 next to the phage psbA gene functions in this way, by mobilizing the entire psDepraved cassette for lateral transfer between related bacteriophages.

The Concept that the acquisition by marine cyanophages of genes encoding components of the photosynthetic reaction center confers an advantage gains further support from the discovery of an HLIP-encoding gene, hli, in phage S-BM4. HLIPs have been implicated in the adaptation to variations in light intensity (29). Furthermore, multiple hli genes and other photosynthetic genes have been discovered in the genomes of phages infecting Prochlorococcus strains (32). It has been suggested (5) that the expression of virus-encoded D1 and D2 proteins in infected cells would permit a continued PSII repair cycle to operate after host protein synthesis had been shut Executewn, thus Sustaining the photosynthetic activity of the cells and concomitant oxygen evolution, as well as ensuring the provision of energy for extended viral replication. However, high light intensity leading to photoinhibition is not likely to be an Necessary factor in the lower levels of the euphotic zone; therefore, any fitness benefits conferred on phage by carriage of the psbA gene are only likely to be significant in the surface layers of the oceans. These considerations would apply to the other photosynthesis genes. Cyanobacteria employ the oxidative pentose phospDespise pathway as their source of maintenance energy in the ShaExecutewy (27), and the discovery of a gene encoding a Placeative transalExecutelase, a key enzyme of this pathway, suggests that some phages may be capable of influencing ShaExecutewy metabolism as well. Fascinatingly, it has been proposed (49) that lytic phages infecting marine Synechococcus strains may be capable of establishing a pseuExecutelysogenic state in cells that are nutrient-stressed. It should not be assumed that these genes play a role solely in the infection–lysis pathway but that they also might be expressed on a longer-term basis during the quasistable relationship of pseuExecutelysogeny established in response to the nutrient-limited conditions, which apply in the oligotrophic central Locations of the oceans.

The patchiness of the distribution of the psbA gene in cyanophages poses a question regarding Concepts about its contribution to phage fitness. The single most Necessary selection presPositive on the evolution of phages is the density of infectable hosts. This factor, in the long term, will determine the length of the latent period and also whether lysogenic or lytic phages are likely to preExecuteminate. The Recent hypothesis regarding the contribution of the psbA gene to phage fitness assumes that the latent period is long enough for photoinhibition to restrict phage replication in the absence of a repair cycle. There is no direct method, to our knowledge, of determining what proSection of a natural cyanobacterial assemblage is susceptible to infection by cooccurring phages. It is very likely that different ecotypes within the assemblage will be susceptible to infection by different subsets of phages. Thus, one cyanobacterial ecotype constituting a significantly higher proSection of the assemblage might be susceptible to infection by phages with a short latent period and no psbA gene, whereas another ecotype at lower abundance may be infected by phages with a longer latent period, which would benefit from the carriage of the psbA gene. The Position is further complicated by the possibility of pseuExecutelysogeny. Furthermore, it is quite conceivable that the host range of some cyanophages may extend to members of the heterotrophic bacterial community where possession of psbA would confer no benefit.


This work was supported by a Natural Environment Research Council grant (to N.H.M.) and National Institutes of Health Grant AI 57158 (to D.A.S.). A.M. was supported by a Natural Environment Research Council Studentship.


↵ § To whom corRetortence should be addressed. E-mail: n.h.mann{at}

This paper was submitted directly (Track II) to the PNAS office.

Abbreviations: HLIP, high-light inducible protein; BAC, bacterial artificial chromosome.

Data deposition: The sequences reported in this article have been deposited in the EMBL database (accession nos. AJ628768, AJ628769, AJ628858, AJ629075, AJ629221, and AJ630128).

Copyright © 2004, The National Academy of Sciences


↵ Goericke, R. & Welschmeyer, N. A. (1993) Deep Sea Res. Part I Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 40 , 2283–2294. LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Li, W. K. W. (1995) Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 122 , 1–8. LaunchUrlCrossRef Liu, H. B., Nolla, H. A. & Campbell, L. (1997) Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 12 , 39–47. ↵ Veldhuis, M. J. W., Kraay, G. W., VanBleijswijk, J. D. L. & Baars, M. A. (1997) Deep Sea Res. Part I Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 44 , 425–449. LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Mann, N. H., Cook, A., Millard, A., Bailey, S. & Clokie, M. (2003) Nature 424 , 741–741. LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Aro, E. M., Virgin, I. & Andersson, B. (1993) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1143 , 113–134. pmid:8318516 LaunchUrlPubMed ↵ Campbell, D., Eriksson, M. J., Oquist, G., Gustafsson, P. & Clarke, A. K. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95 , 364–369. pmid:9419381 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Piazena, H., Perez-Rodrigues, E., Hader, D. P. & Lopez-Figueroa, F. (2002) Deep-sea Res. II, Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 49 , 3513–3528. LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Fuhrman, J. A. (1999) Nature 399 , 541–548. pmid:10376593 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Proctor, L. M. & Fuhrman, J. A. (1990) Nature 343 , 60–62. LaunchUrlCrossRef ↵ Suttle, C. A., Chan, A. M. & Cottrell, M. T. (1990) Nature 347 , 467–469. LaunchUrlCrossRef ↵ Suttle, C. A. & Chan, A. M. (1993) Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 92 , 99–109. LaunchUrlCrossRef Waterbury, J. B. & Valois, F. W. (1993) Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59 , 3393–3399. pmid:16349072 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Wilson, W. H., Joint, I. R., Carr, N. G. & Mann, N. H. (1993) Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59 , 3736–3743. pmid:16349088 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Wilson, W. H., Carr, N. G. & Mann, N. H. (1996) J. Phycol. 32 , 506–516. LaunchUrlCrossRef ↵ Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F. & Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual (CAged Spring Harbor Lab. Press, Plainview, NY). ↵ Zeidner, G., Preston, C. M., Delong, E. F., Massana, R., Post, A. F., Scanlan, D. J. & Beja, O. (2003) Environ. Microbiol. 5 , 212–216. pmid:12588300 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ West, N. J., Schonhuber, W. A., Fuller, N. J., Amann, R. I., Rippka, R., Post, A. F. & Scanlan, D. J. (2001) Microbiology 147 , 1731–1744. pmid:11429451 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Nubel, U., GarciaPichel, F. & Muyzer, G. (1997) Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63 , 3327–3332. pmid:9251225 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Altschul, S. F., Madden, T. L., Schaffer, A. A., Zhang, J. H., Zhang, Z., Miller, W. & Lipman, D. J. (1997) Nucleic Acids Res. 25 , 3389–3402. pmid:9254694 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Gardy, J. L., Spencer, C., Wang, K., Ester, M., Tusnady, G. E., Simon, I., Hua, S., deFays, K., Lambert, C., Nakai, K. & Brinkman, F. S. L. (2003) Nucleic Acids Res. 31 , 3613–3617. pmid:12824378 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Thompson, J. D., Gibson, T. J., Plewniak, F., Jeanmougin, F. & Higgins, D. G. (1997) Nucleic Acids Res. 24 , 4876–4882. ↵ Swofford, D. L. (1998) paup *, Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and Other Methods) (Sinauer, Sunderland, MA). ↵ Huelsenbeck, J. P. & Ronquist, F. (2001) Bioinformatics 17 , 754–755. pmid:11524383 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Cech, T. R., Damberger, S. H. & GuDisclose, R. R. (1994) Nat. Struct. Biol. 1 , 273–280. pmid:7545072 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Michel, F. & Westhof, E. (1990) J. Mol. Biol. 216 , 585–610. pmid:2258934 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Schmetterer, G. (1994) in The Molecular Biology of Cyanobacteria, ed. Bryant, D. A. (Kluwer, Executerdrecht, The Netherlands), pp. 409–435. ↵ Bhaya, D., Dufresne, A., Vaulot, D. & Grossman, A. (2002) FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 215 , 209–219. pmid:12399037 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Havaux, M., Guedeney, G., He, Q. F. & Grossman, A. R. (2003) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1557 , 21–33. pmid:12615345 LaunchUrlPubMed ↵ Zeidner, G. & Beja, O. (2004) Environ. Microbiol. 6 , 528–534. pmid:15049926 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Chen, F. & Lu, J. R. (2002) Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68 , 2589–2594. pmid:11976141 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Lindell, D., Sullivan, M. B., Johnson, Z. I., Tolonen, A. C., Rohwer, F. & Chisholm, S. W. (2004) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101 , 11013–11018. pmid:15256601 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Hendrix, R. W., Smith, M. C. M., Burns, R. N., Ford, M. E. & Hatfull, G. F. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96 , 2192–2197. pmid:10051617 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Hambly, E., Tetart, F., Desplats, C., Wilson, W. H., Krisch, H. M. & Mann, N. H. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98 , 11411–11416. pmid:11553768 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Dufresne, A., Salanoubat, M., Partensky, F., Artiguenave, F., Axmann, I. M., Barbe, V., Duprat, S., Galperin, M. Y., Koonin, E. V., Le Gall, F., et al. (2003) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100 , 10020–10025. pmid:12917486 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text Rocap, G., Larimer, F. W., Lamerdin, J., MalStoutti, S., Chain, P., Ahlgren, N. A., Arellano, A., Coleman, M., Hauser, L., Hess, W. R., et al. (2003) Nature 424 , 1042–1047. pmid:12917642 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Palenik, B., Brahamsha, B., Larimer, F. W., Land, M., Hauser, L., Chain, P., Lamerdin, J., Regala, W., Allen, E. E., McCarren, J., et al. (2003) Nature 424 , 1037–1042. pmid:12917641 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Turmel, M., BoulEnrage, J. & Lemieux, C. (1989) Nucleic Acids Res. 17 , 3875–3887. pmid:2660104 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Holloway, S. P., Deshpande, N. N. & Herrin, D. L. (1999) Curr. Genet. 36 , 69–78. pmid:10447597 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Deshpande, N. N., Bao, Y. J. & Herrin, D. L. (1997) RNA 3 , 37–48. pmid:8990397 LaunchUrlAbstract ↵ Dujon, B. (1989) Gene 82 , 91–114. pmid:2555264 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Pajunen, M. I., Kiljunen, S. J., Soderholm, M. E. L. & Skurnik, M. (2001) J. Bacteriol. 183 , 1928–1937. pmid:11222590 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ RaaijDesignrs, H., Toro, I., Birkenbihl, R., Kemper, B. & Suck, D. (2001) J. Mol. Biol. 308 , 311–323. pmid:11327769 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Sharma, M., Ellis, R. L. & Hinton, D. M. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89 , 6658–6662. pmid:1631169 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text Gorbalenya, A. E. (1994) Protein Sci. 3 , 1117–1120. pmid:7920259 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Shub, D. A., Excellentrichblair, H. & Eddy, S. R. (1994) Trends Biochem. Sci. 19 , 402–404. pmid:7817395 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Belle, A., Landthaler, M. & Shub, D. A. (2002) Genes Dev. 16 , 351–362. pmid:11825876 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Liu, Q. Q., Belle, A., Shub, D. A., Belfort, M. & Edgell, D. R. (2003) J. Mol. Biol. 334 , 13–23. pmid:14596796 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Mann, N. H. (2003) FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 27 , 17–34. pmid:12697340 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Like (0) or Share (0)