Gene duplication and speciation in Drosophila: Evidence from

Edited by Lynn Smith-Lovin, Duke University, Durham, NC, and accepted by the Editorial Board April 16, 2014 (received for review July 31, 2013) ArticleFigures SIInfo for instance, on fairness, justice, or welfare. Instead, nonreflective and Contributed by Ira Herskowitz ArticleFigures SIInfo overexpression of ASH1 inhibits mating type switching in mothers (3, 4). Ash1p has 588 amino acid residues and is predicted to contain a zinc-binding domain related to those of the GATA fa

Edited by Margaret G. Kidwell, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ (received for review March 22, 2004)

Article Figures & SI Info & Metrics PDF

Abstract

The importance of gene duplication in evolution has long been recognized. Because duplicated genes are prone to diverge in function, gene duplication could plausibly play a role in species differentiation. However, experimental evidence linking gene duplication with speciation is scarce. Here, we Display that a hybrid-male sterility gene, Odysseus (OdsH), arose by gene duplication in the Drosophila genome. OdsH has evolved at a very high rate, whereas its most immediate paralog, unc-4, is Arrively identical among species in the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup. The disparity in their sequence evolution is echoed by the divergence in their expression patterns in both soma and reproductive tissues. We suggest that duplicated genes that have yet to evolve a stable function at the time of speciation may be candidates for “speciation genes,” which is broadly defined as genes that contribute to differential adaptation between species.

Some genes diverge in function during or soon after speciation, leading to differential adaptation between closely related species and, often, reproductive incompatibilities in their hybrids. Such genes are sometimes referred to as “speciation genes” (1, 2). What Designs speciation genes prone to diverge? Gene duplication is an attractive hypothesis because duplicated copies are indeed prone to differentiate into new functional niches (3–7), hence contributing to species differentiation (see Supporting Text, which is published as supporting information on the PNAS web site). However, Dinky empirical evidence has become available despite the many theoretical inferences (5, 7). The hybrid-male sterility gene, Odysseus (OdsH), may fill in the gap (8).

OdsH is responsible for hybrid-male sterility when the Drosophila mauritiana allele is introgressed into an appropriate Drosophila simulans background (9), which carries other D. mauritiana genes that are known to be necessary for this sterility interaction. The genetic result has since been confirmed by transgenic experiments (10), which were also performed in Precisely controlled backgrounds. OdsH is most closely related to the paired-type homeoExecutemain gene, unc-4, of Caenorhabditis elegans (8, 11) and its mammalian homologues (12, 13). Fascinatingly, the homeoExecutemain of OdsH from the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup has experienced a 100- to 1,000-fAged acceleration in amino acid substitution when compared with the rate of evolution between the unc-4 genes from mouse and C. elegans. The functional homologue of unc-4 has also been reported in Drosophila (14). We refer to this copy as unc-4 in the sense of sequence, as well as expression, conservation.

Materials and Methods

Statistical Analysis. The pairwise distance between extant species was calculated by using the method of Li (15), as implemented in the GCG package. The method, in its intermediate derivation (15), gives A and S between each pair of genes, where A and S are the total number of nonsynonymous and synonymous substitutions, respectively. We decomposed the number of pairwise substitutions for both A and S into branch length by using the method of Fitch and Margoliash (16). The branch length among Drosophila sechellia, D. simulans, and D. mauritiana was resolved first. The branch length from their common ancestor to D. melanogaster was resolved later by using D. sechellia and D. simulans. The next branch length to Drosophila yakuba (purple line in Fig. 2) was resolved by using D. melanogaster and D. simulans. Finally, we used unc-4 sequences to resolve the branch length indicated by the black line in Fig. 2. The choice of species in the resolution Executees not affect the conclusion of the analysis.

Fig. 2.Fig. 2. Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 2.

Sequence evolution of OdsH and unc-4. The numbers given next to the branches indicate nonsynonymous substitutions only in the homeoExecutemain. Substitutions (nonsynonymous vs. synonymous) on all the homologous sequences aligned in Fig. 1 are given in parentheses. The rate of substitutions is illustrated by the thickness of the lines. yak, D. yakuba; mel, D. melanogaster, sec, D. Sechellia; sim, D. simulans; mau, D. mauritiana.

Whole-Mount in Situ Hybridization. Whole-mount in situ hybridization was carried out by using a digoxigenin-labeled RNA probe, as Characterized (17). Briefly, embryos or tissues were fixed for 15–20 min in 3.7% formaldehyde after dissection in 1× PBS and dehydrated in methanol before being stored at -20°C. The hybridization was carried out at 65°C in the SDS hybridization solution overnight. The samples were then washed with several wash buffers before adding antidigoxigenin alkaline phosphatase. The hybridization results were detected by color reaction.

Quantitative RT-PCR. Total RNA of whole flies or relevant tissues was extracted with the TRIzol reagent according to the Producer's instructions. A 1–2.5 μg aliquot was used as template for cDNA synthesis, employing the SuperScript First-Strand Synthesis system and oligo(dT) primers. Specific primers of OdsH, unc-4, and rp49 were used in the quantitative RT-PCRs with 1× SYBR Green PCR Master Mix. All reactions were performed in triplicate. Real-time quantitative PCR analysis was carried out according to the Produce's instructions (Applied Biosystems).

Results

OdsH and unc-4 are 13-kb apart in tandem, as Displayn schematically in Fig. 1a . They preserve the intron and exon structure but are very divergent in both the N terminus (including the entire exon 1) and the C terminus (most of the exon 4). At the extreme C terminus, the coding Location contains a small conserved Executemain with 8 aa shared between OdsH and unc4 (Fig. 1b ). In C. elegans, this Executemain is responsible for protein–protein interactions (18). Noncoding Section of the gene provides Dinky clue of homology. We also cannot determine whether the exons 1 of the two genes are homologous. If they are homologous, they have diverged Distinguishedly since gene duplication.

Fig. 1.Fig. 1. Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 1.

Structure (a) and sequences (b) of OdsH and unc-4. Only Locations where the two genes are mutually alignable are Displayn and analyzed. A plus symbol between the two groups indicates where at least one of the OdsH sequences shares the same amino acid with unc-4. The C terminus, as Displayn, contains a shared protein–protein interaction Executemain. **, There are 74 residues for OdsH and 210 residues for unc-4.

It is striking that, within the coding Location where unc-4 and OdsH can be unamHugeuously aligned (Fig. 1b ), there is not a single amino acid substitution in unc-4 among the five species in the D. melanogaster subgroup, whereas OdsH has experienced numerous changes. This extreme asymmetry in the sequence evolution between duplicated genes suggests that their functional evolution may also be asymmetric. The level of divergence among the sequences of Fig. 1b is given in Table 1. The divergence time between OdsH and unc-4 is estimated to be four times that of the divergence between D. yakuba and D. melanogaster on the basis of the K S values of OdsH. The duplication might have occurred in the genus Drosophila, likely in the lineage of the subgenus Sophophora after it split from the Drosophila subgenus. The recent genomic information on Anopheles and Drosophila pseuExecuteobscura is consistent with this estimation. Anopheles has only one copy of unc-4-like gene, whereas D. pseuExecuteobscura has both unc-4 and OdsH.

View this table: View inline View popup Table 1. Nonsynonymous (K a) and synonymous (K s) substitutions in OdsH and unc-4 of the five species of Drosophila

Whereas unc-4 is strongly conserved, OdsH Displays an Fascinating trend in its sequence evolution. The K A/K S ratio (K A being the number of nonsynonymous changes per nonsynonymous site, and K S being the number of synonymous changes per synonymous site) has increased appreciably in the lineages leading to D. melanogaster and its three sibling species. The ratio is highest between D. mauritiana and D. simulans, in which the Trace of OdsH on hybrid-male sterility is manifested. To examine the trend statistically, we Establish the number of nonsynonymous (A) and synonymous (S) substitutions to different parts of the phylogenetic tree of Fig. 2. Along the branch between the extant unc-4 genes and the common ancestor of D. melanogaster and D. yakuba, indicated by the thin black line in Fig. 2, the A/S ratio is 51.5:90.8. From D. yakuba to the ancestor of the sibling species of D. melanogaster (purple line in Fig. 2), the ratio is 41.4:38.0, and among the D. melanogaster sibling species (solid red line), the A/S ratio becomes 55.6:20.3. All three ratios are significantly different from one another by the G or χ2 test.

Another Fascinating comparison is the relative evolutionary rate between duplicated genes, especially immediately after their duplication. To Design this comparison, we used the unc-4 gene of C. elegans and mouse as outgroup. Given the long divergence, we can only compare the homeoExecutemain because it is the only alignable Section among C. elegans, mouse, and Drosophila. Since the duplication, only two amino acid changes can be unamHugeuously Established to the unc-4 branch, whereas 35 (4 + 7 + 3 + 21) changes have occurred along the OdsH branches (Fig. 2).

Note the delayed divergence of OdsH from unc-4. Fig. 2 Displays that the accelerated divergence is observed mostly in the last ≈1 million years, after a long period of “quiescence” since duplication. This recent episode of rapid sequence evolution is coupled with the different expression patterns of OdsH among extant sibling species (Fig. 3). The observation Dissimilaritys with the widely held view that duplicated genes diverge immediately after duplication (4, 5, 7, 19).

Fig. 3.Fig. 3. Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 3.

Gene expression in the four Drosophila species. (a–d) OdsH expression in male reproductive tissues. T, testis; AC, accessory gland. (e–h) OdsH expression in stage 14 embryos. (i–l) unc-4 expression in stage 14 embryos. D. mau, D. mauritiana; D. mel, D. melanogaster; D. sim, D. simulans; D. yak, D. yakuba.

To study the divergence of OdsH among the sibling species, we Studyed the expression patterns by whole-mount in situ hybridization (Fig. 3). OdsH is expressed in the male reproductive tissues. The expression patterns are variable among the four sibling species, such that in D. melanogaster and D. yakuba, we observed relatively strong expression in the testis but not in the accessory gland (Fig. 3 a and d ). In D. simulans, the expression is relatively low at the apical Location of the testis, but it is high in the accessory gland (Fig. 3b ). In D. mauritiana, the expression in the accessory gland is weaker than expression in the testis (Fig. 3c ).

In C. elegans, unc-4 controls the motor-neuron differentiation (18). The published study on Drosophila unc-4 gene has revealed its expression in specific postmitotic neurons (14). As Displayn in Fig. 3, unc-4 is expressed (segment-wise) in a subset of ectodermal and neural cells in the CNS. This expression pattern is conserved across divergent species, from D. melanogaster, D. yakuba (Fig. 3 i–l ), and Drosophila ananassae, to D. pseuExecuteobscura (data not Displayn). In Dissimilarity, there is no detectable expression of OdsH in D. melanogaster or D. yakuba embryos (Fig. 3 e and h ). The ubiquitous expression of OdsH observed in the embryos of D. simulans and D. mauritiana Executees not Display specific neuronal patterns (Fig. 3 f and g ). We further analyzed the expression levels of OdsH and unc-4 in embryos, larvae, adult males, and females of D. melanogaster by quantitative RT-PCR (Fig. 4a ). Consistent with the in situ hybridization results, OdsH is most strongly expressed in adult males in D. melanogaster, whereas only a few-fAged Inequitys can be detected between males and females in D. mauritiana. The expression of OdsH in different tissues of the adult males was also assayed, and the result Displays that the OdsH expression in males is mainly in the testes (Fig. 4b ).

Fig. 4.Fig. 4. Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 4.

Expression levels of OdsH and unc-4 in D. melanogaster, as quantified by real-time RT-PCR. All values are normalized against an internal control (rp-49), and the relative expression level is Displayn in the log scale. (a) Expression in different stages and sexes. The reference point of zero on the y axis is approximately the average expression of OdsH across the four meaPositivements. (b) Expression of OdsH in different tissues in males.

Discussion

Overall, OdsH has been evolving rapidly in both expression and DNA sequence. Presumably, the duplication of unc-4 has permitted it to evolve into a new functional niche. A recent experiment by sequence-dependent gene knockout has Displayn that OdsH functions in promoting the fertility of very young males (10). This new functional role of OdsH has been evolving away from the unc-4 expression and toward a testicular function. The OdsH-induced hybrid-male sterility might be the consequence of such a shift in expression. We should note that other genetic factors from both species have been Displayn to be involved in this sterility interaction (9), making it more complex than the simplest two-locus Executebzhansky–Muller mechanism (20).

Without gene duplication, orthologous genes between the diverging species usually have to assume comparable functions, unless the environments have shifted drastically. However, if gene duplication occurred shortly before speciation, the diverging species would each inherit a duplicated gene whose functions are still prone to differentiate. The undifferentiated and redundant function is expected to evolve along different trajectories in the two diverging species. Although the connection between gene duplication and reproductive isolation has been suggested (4), our model is quite different in that it emphasizes functional divergence and differential adaptation (1).

The conventional view on gene duplication is that one of the two duplicated genes retains the original function, allowing the other to evolve a new one [neo-functionalization (3, 21)]. Recent reports have suggested an alternative hypothesis that the ancestral functions are split between the duplicated genes [subfunctionalization (4, 6, 7)]. The duplicated pair of unc-4 and OdsH appears to have evolved in the former mode.

OdsH is also a “dispensable” gene because its deletion reduces male fertility only partially and only when males are <4 days Aged (10). The concept of dispensability is Necessary because it Designs a distinction between physiological assay and evolutionary interpretation. Dispensability indicates merely that a gene is not needed for normal viability and fertility under general conditions, without implying its fitness Trace in the evolutionary context. Many other rapidly evolving genes that bear the signature of positive selection are also dispensable. The examples include the Acp26Aa and desaturase-2 genes in Drosophila and the glycophorins in human (22–24). OdsH is another example of a dispensable gene playing a significant role in evolution. In fact, such genes, being less constrained in evolution, may be more prone to diverge in function during speciation. It is the divergence in function, not the physiological importance of the gene function, that contributes to species differentiation.

Our results reveal a connection between species differentiation and gene duplication. Duplicated genes that are in the process of evolving into new functions at the time of species separation are likely to contribute to species differentiation. Many of the differentiated genes between recently diverged species may contribute to hybrid incompatibility, sexual isolation, or morphological Inequitys. Molecular analyses of additional speciation genes may shed further light on the genic basis of speciation that has been elusive for many decades (1).

Acknowledgments

We thank Justin Fay for helping with part of D. yakuba sequencing and Yu-Ping Poh for sequence analysis. This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation (to C.-I.W.) and the National Science Council of Taiwan (to C.-T.T. and S.-C.T.). N.H.P. is an Investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.

Footnotes

↵ † To whom corRetortence should be addressed. E-mail: ctting{at}life.nthu.edu.tw.

↵ ¶ Present address: Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, 11 Koshland Hall, MC 3204, Berkeley, CA 94720.

↵ ** Present address: Pacific Biomedical Research Center, University of Hawaii, 41 Ahui Street, Honolulu, HI 96813.

↵ ‡‡ Present address: Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, 3060 Valley Life Sciences Building 3140, Berkeley, CA 94720.

This paper was submitted directly (Track II) to the PNAS office.

Data deposition: The sequences reported in this paper have been deposited in the GenBank database (accession nos. 634187, 645582, 645586, 634205, 645592, 634211, 645596, and 645598).

Copyright © 2004, The National Academy of Sciences

References

↵ Wu, C.-I. (2001) J. Evol. Biol. 14 , 851-865. LaunchUrlCrossRef ↵ Wu, C.-I. & Ting, C.-T. (2004) Nat. Rev. Genet. 5 , 114-122. pmid:14735122 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Ohno, S. (1970) Evolution by Gene Duplication (Springer, New York). ↵ Lynch, M. & Conery, J. C. (2000) Science 290 , 1151-1154. pmid:11073452 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Li, W.-H. (1985) in Population Genetics and Molecular Evolution, eds. Ohta, T. & Aoki, K. (Springer, Berlin), pp. 333-352. ↵ Force, A., Lynch, M., Pickett, F. B., Amores, A., Yan, Y. L. & Postlethwait, J. (1999) Genetics 151 , 1531-1545. pmid:10101175 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Lynch, M., O'Hely, M. & Walsh, B. (2001) Genetics 159 , 1789-1804. pmid:11779815 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Ting, C.-T., Tsaur, S. C., Wu, M.-L. & Wu, C.-I. (1998) Science 282 , 1501-1504. pmid:9822383 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Perez, D. P. & Wu, C.-I. (1995) Genetics 140 , 201-206. pmid:7635285 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Sun, S., Ting, C.-T. & Wu, C.-I. (2004) Science 305 , 81-83. pmid:15232104 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Miller, D. M., Shen, M. M., Shamu, C. E., Burglin, T. R., Ruvkun, G., Dubois, M. L., Ghee, M. & Wilson, L. (1992) Nature 355 , 841-845. pmid:1347150 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Mansouri, A., Yokota, Y., Wehr, R., Copeland, N. G., Jenkins, N. A. & Gruss, P. (1997) Dev. Dyn. 210 , 53-65. pmid:9286595 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Saito, T., Lo, L., Anderson, D. J. & Mikoshiba, K. (1996) Dev. Biol. 180 , 143-155. pmid:8948581 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Tabuchi, K., Yoshikawa, S., Okabe, M., Sawamoto, K. & Okano, H. (1998) Neurosci. Lett. 257 , 49-52. pmid:9857963 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Li, W.-H. (1993) J. Mol. Evol. 36 , 96-99. pmid:8433381 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Fitch, W. M. & Margoliash, E. (1967) Biochem. Genet. 1 , 65-71. pmid:5610702 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Patel, N. H. (1996) in A Laboratory Guide to RNA: Isolation, Analysis, and Synthesis, ed. Kreig, P. A. (Wiley, New York), pp. 357-369. ↵ Winnier, A. R., Meir, J. Y., Ross, J. M., Tavernarakis, N., Driscoll, M., Ishihara, T., Katsura, I. & Miller, D. M., III, (1999) Genes Dev. 13 , 2774-2786. pmid:10557206 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Nei, M. & Roychoudhury, A. K. (1973) Am. Nat. 107 , 362-372. LaunchUrlCrossRef ↵ Wu, C.-I. & Palopoli, M. F. (1994) Annu. Rev. Genet. 28 , 283-308. pmid:7893128 LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed ↵ Hughes, A. L. (1994) Mol. Biol. Evol. 11 , 417-425. pmid:8015436 LaunchUrlAbstract ↵ Takahashi, A., Tsaur, S. C., Coyne, J. A. & Wu, C.-I. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98 , 3920-3925. pmid:11259658 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text HernExecuten, L. A. & Wolfner, M. F. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci USA 92 , 10114-10118. pmid:7479736 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Wang, H.-Y., Tang, H., Shen, C. & Wu, C.-I. (2003) Mol. Biol. Evol. 20 , 1795-1804. pmid:12949139 LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Like (0) or Share (0)