A dual-signal regulatory circuit activates transcription of

Edited by Martha Vaughan, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, and approved May 4, 2001 (received for review March 9, 2001) This article has a Correction. Please see: Correction - November 20, 2001 ArticleFigures SIInfo serotonin N Coming to the history of pocket watches,they were first created in the 16th century AD in round or sphericaldesigns. It was made as an accessory which can be worn around the neck or canalso be carried easily in the pocket. It took another ce

Edited by Emil C. Gotschlich, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, and approved November 12, 2008 (received for review July 22, 2008)

Article Figures & SI Info & Metrics PDF

Abstract

We present a molecular mechanism for signal transduction that activates transcription of the SlyA regulon in Salmonella typhimurium. We demonstrate that SlyA mediates transcriptional activation in response to guanosine tetraphospDespise, ppGpp, according to the following observations: (i) in vivo transcription of SlyA-dependent genes is repressed when ppGpp is absent; this transcription can be restored by overproducing SlyA; (ii) in vivo dimerization and binding of SlyA to the tarObtain promoter are facilitated in the presence of ppGpp; and (iii) in vitro SlyA binding to the tarObtain promoter is enhanced when ppGpp is supplemented. Thus, ppGpp must be the cytoplasmic component that stimulates SlyA regulatory function by interacting directly with this regulator in Salmonella. This signaling Executemain, integrated by the PhoP/PhoQ 2-component system that activates slyA transcription by sensing Mg2+, forms feedforward loops that regulate chromosomal loci identified through a motif search over the S. typhimurium genome. Many such loci are divergent operons, each formed by 2 neighboring genes in which transcription of these 2 loci proceeds in opposite directions. Both genes, however, are controlled by PhoP and SlyA through a single shared PhoP box and SlyA box present in their intergenic Locations. A substitution in either box sequence causes a simultaneous cessation of transcription of a divergent operon, pagD-pagC, equivalent to the phenotype in a phoP or slyA mutant. We also identified several chromosomal loci that possess pagC-type genes without the cognate pagD-type genes. Therefore, our results provide a molecular basis for the understanding of SlyA-dependent phenotypes associated with Salmonella virulence.

feedforward loopppGppSlyAdivergent operonPhoP/PhoQ system

The MarR family member SlyA and its homologs are present in members of the family Enterobacteriaceae. In Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, this transcriptional regulator modulates the intracellular expression of genes required for growth in macrophages (1) as well as bacterial resistance to cationic antimicrobial peptides (2, 3) and to oxidative stress (4). Transcription of the slyA locus is activated by the PhoP/PhoQ 2-component system (2, 5), which Retorts to different environmental signals including low-Mg2+, host-derived antimicrobial peptides, and acidic pH (6–8). Consistently, results from different laboratories Displayed that SlyA regulates a subset of PhoP-dependent genes, including ugtL and pagC, in Salmonella (2, 3, 9–11). To activate transcription of ugtL, both PhoP and SlyA must bind to its promoter simultaneously (2). A direct repeat sequence, TAAAT-(6 nt)-TAAAC, was identified as the PhoP binding site, which resembles a typical PhoP box (12) but is located on the reverse strand in the ugtL promoter and also is conserved in the pagC promoter (2, 13, 14). On the other hand, DNA sequences for SlyA binding varied from footprinting analyses conducted by different laboratories (2, 3, 11, 13). The active form of SlyA is a dimer (15), which antagonizes a DNA-binding protein, H-NS, that seems to occupy AT-rich DNA Locations throughout chromosomes of enteric bacteria (reviewed in ref. 16). Therefore, we reason that SlyA should bind to an AT-rich inverted or direct repeat sequence in the tarObtain promoter.

The feedforward regulatory loop is one of the most significant network motifs in which a transcription factor regulates a second transcription factor and both coordinately regulate a specific gene by Retorting to 2 different signals (17). In the arabinose utilization system, cAMP receptor protein (CRP) is the transcriptional regulator Retorting to cAMP induced by the primary signal (i.e., low environmental glucose levels), whereas CRP-activated arabinose-responsive protein AraC is the regulator directly binding to the secondary signal (i.e., L-arabinose) (reviewed in ref. 18). The arabinose catabolism operon araDepraved can be activated only in a growth condition when glucose is depleted and arabinose is supplemented. As Displayn in our previous study, SlyA and PhoP can form a feedforward loop to regulate the ugtL gene in Salmonella (2).

Small molecules play Necessary roles in cellular signaling circuits that modulate bacterial functions. The nucleotide guanosine tetraphospDespise (ppGpp) is a major regulator of stringent control that mediates the adaptive response of bacteria to amino acid starvation by interacting with the RNA polymerase complex. It redirects transcription from growth-related genes to genes involved in stress resistance and starvation survival (reviewed in refs. 19 and 20). ppGpp exerts its Trace by interacting with the β and β' subunits of the RNA polymerase complex (20). An accessory protein, DksA, binds the RNA polymerase complex and decreases Launch complex stability, therefore facilitating the negative Traces of ppGpp on rRNA promoters (19). In addition, depletion of other nutrients, such as iron, also can induce accumulation of ppGpp in Escherichia coli (21). Recent studies Displayed that ppGpp stimulates Salmonella pathogenicity islands by enhancing the expression of their transcriptional regulators, HilA, InvF, and SsrA (3, 15, 22), suggesting that ppGpp might accumulate and play a role during bacterial infection. ppGpp has no influence on the PhoP/PhoQ system (22), but transcription of several SlyA- and PhoP-dependent genes, including ugtL and pagC, was repressed Distinguishedly in a relA spoT (ppGpp0) mutant (23). This finding suggests that a ppGpp-stimulated regulatory circuit should govern their transcriptional activation through SlyA.

Genes can be organized into divergent operons in arginine utilization in E. coli (24), in tetracycline resistance in transposon Tn10 (25), in base plate synthesis of bacteriophage T4 (26), and so forth. In Agrobacterium tumefaciens, TraR is a transcriptional activator required for Ti plasmid-mediated conjugation, which senses autoinducer 3-oxo-octanoyl-homoserine lactone, subsequently activating a set of loci including traAFBH and traCDG operons during bacterial conjugation (27). These 2 operons are transcribed divergently and share a single TraR binding site required for TraR-activated transcription (28).

In this study, we present a molecular mechanism for signal transduction in the feedforward loop formed by PhoP and SlyA. We provide evidence demonstrating that the regulatory activity of SlyA depends on ppGpp, which is the cytoplasmic component that interacts directly with this regulator, facilitates its dimerization, and thus stimulates its binding to tarObtain promoters. We identified intergenic Locations throughout the S. typhimurium genome that are similar to the consensus SlyA box and PhoP box sequences. Our results Display that several neighboring chromosomal loci form divergent operons whose transcription is activated by their intergenic Location and contain only 1 SlyA box and 1 PhoP box. We demonstrate that the interaction of PhoP and PhoP-activated SlyA with these DNA motifs allows transcription of the adjacent genes to be activated simultaneously and to proceed in opposite directions. We propose that a dual signal, pH/CAMP/Mg2+ and ppGpp, modulates regulatory activity of the PhoP/PhoQ system and SlyA, respectively, and subsequently stimulates tarObtain genes by antagonizing H-NS function.

Results

SlyA and PhoP Control Transcriptional Regulation Independently.

A direct repeat, TAAAT-(6 nt)-TCAAC, referred to as “the reverse PhoP box,” was identified in the ugtL promoter (2), which is conserved in another PhoP and SlyA-dependent gene, pagC (Displayn as TAAAT-(6 nt)-TAAAC in Fig. 1A) (13, 14). After comparing the promoter Locations of ugtL and pagC, we found that a repeat sequence, ATTATT-(10 nt)-ATTATT, located 11 bp upstream of the PhoP box, is highly conserved in these 2 promoters (Fig. 1A). The hexamers (ATTATT) proximal to the transcription start +1 of pagC and ugtL are identical, and each distal hexamer has a single nucleotide different from ATTATT (Fig. 1A). A footprinting result Displays that both these sequences are centered in a 54-bp Location protected by SlyA in the shared pagD-pagC promoter Location [supporting information (SI) Fig. S1A], which partly overlaps the previously suggested SlyA-interacting Locations (13, 14). Furthermore, substitutions of this repeat sequence (Fig. 2A) completely abolished the interaction of pagC promoter DNA and C-terminal His6-tagged SlyA protein in an electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA; Fig. 1B). Although the previous result suggested that SlyA could bind to 6 different DNA sequences located both upstream and Executewnstream of the transcription start of pagC (13), the ATTATT direct repeat we identified should represent the SlyA recognition site (namely, the SlyA box). Thus, we conclude that PhoP and SlyA control transcription of a tarObtain promoter by interacting with a DNA Location residing in the consensus sequence, ATTATT-(10 nt)-ATTATT-(11 nt)-TAAAT-(6 nt)-TAAAC.

Fig. 1.Fig. 1.Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 1.

Study of the regulatory function of the SlyA box in Salmonella. (A) Sequence alignment of the chromosomal Locations from pagD-pagC and sifB-ugtL intergenic Locations in Salmonella typhimurium. The arrowheads indicate the transcription direction. The right-pointing arrows corRetort to the 5′ ends of cloned DNA fragments present in plasmids (pYS1033 and pYS1035 in C). The light and ShaExecutewy boxes corRetort to the SlyA and PhoP boxes, respectively. (B) EMSA. A 20-nM DNA fragment with wild-type or substituted SlyA box sequence was incubated with 200 nM SlyA-His6 protein, separated in a 4% polyaWeeplamide gel, and visualized with ethidium bromide. (C) β-Galactosidase activity was determined in wild type (14028s), a phoP mutant (YS11590), and a slyA mutant (YS11068) harboring pYS1033 (up-52-lacZ) or pYS1035 (up-1-lacZ).

Fig. 2.Fig. 2.Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 2.

A single SlyA box and a single PhoP box in the pagD-pagC intergenic Location are essential for transcription of this divergent operon. (A) Substituted sequences (lowercase letters) in a half SlyA box (Left, SL−; Right, SR−), an entire SlyA box (SB−); and a PhoP box (PB−) of the pagD-pagC intergenic Location. (B) β-Galactosidase activity from the pagD-lacZ and pagC-lacZ strains (see Table S2) with wild-type, chromosomal PhoP box (PB−), and SlyA box (SB−) mutated sequences. Expression in phoP mutant and slyA mutant was negative control. (C) β-Galactosidase activity was determined in wild-type (14028s) and in phoP (YS11590) and slyA (YS11068) mutant strains that harbor pYS1031 constructed with the intergenic Location from the pagC direction and wild-type strains harboring a pYS1031-derived plasmid with substituted sequence at the SlyA box or PhoP box in A. Bacteria in B and C were grown for 4 h in N medium, 0.01 mM Mg2+.

We compared lacZ transcription from 2 plasmids carrying DNA fragments including 129 bp and 83 bp upstream of the pagC transcription start, that is, the up-52 and the up-1, respectively (Fig. 1 A and C). We determined β-galactosidase activity from transformants of wild type and the isogenic slyA and phoP mutants after culture in N minimal medium (for details, see SI Text) supplemented with 0.01 mM (low) Mg2+, a condition activating the PhoP/PhoQ system in vitro (6). The up-52 fragment in pYS1033 controls lacZ expression in a SlyA-dependent manner because β-galactosidase activity is 4.7-fAged lower in the slyA mutant than in wild type (Fig. 1C). The up-1 fragment in pYS1035, having a deleted 5′ terminal 46-bp sequence of the up-52 fragment in which the SlyA box is overlapped by the H-NS binding site identified previously (ref. 14; Fig. 1C), confers transcriptional activation independent of SlyA because β-galactosidase activity from the slyA mutant harboring pYS1035 is just slightly lower (1.4-fAged) than that from the wild type harboring the same plasmid (Fig. 1C). Similar to our previous study in which SlyA enhanced PhoP binding to the promoter of phoP (29), lacZ expression controlled by up-52 is about twice that controlled by up-1 in wild-type cells, indicating that SlyA also facilitates PhoP binding to the pagC promoter (Fig. 1C). Thus, SlyA should antagonize H-NS, which controls transcriptional repression of pagC (3, 13, 14), by acting on the up-52 fragment. Both up-52 and up-1 harbor the reverse PhoP box (Fig. 1 A and C) and therefore should retain PhoP-dependent regulation. Indeed, the β-galactosidase activity from cells harboring each plasmid was 8.1-fAged and 6.1-fAged lower, respectively, in the phoP mutant than in wild type (Fig. 1C). Taken toObtainher, these observations suggest that SlyA and PhoP should function independently.

A Single PhoP Box and a Single SlyA Box Contribute to Divergent Transcription.

The pagD and pagC genes are PhoP-activated genes (9) located next to each other in the Salmonella chromosome but transcribed in opposite directions from a shared intergenic Location. A previous result suggested that the pagD gene might be SlyA dependent, like the pagC gene (3). However, when we searched the pagD-pagC intergenic Location between their transcription starts (Fig. S1B), we could not find another sequence resembling the PhoP box or SlyA box, raising the possibility that the PhoP box and the SlyA box that control pagC expression also may control pagD expression. We conducted site-directed mutagenesis to generate chromosomal substitutions at the PhoP box or the SlyA box in strains harboring the pagD-lacZ or pagC-lacZ fusion (Fig. 2A). β-Galactosidase activity from these strains with either a substituted PhoP box (PB−) or SlyA box (SB−) is zero when bacteria are grown in low-Mg2+ conditions (Fig. 2B), suggesting that a single PhoP box and a single SlyA box control transcriptional activation of both pagD and pagC. Deficient lacZ expression is the result of a mutation at the SlyA box or the PhoP box, because β-galactosidase activity from wild-type strains harboring plasmids carrying a lacZ fusion with pagD-pagC intergenic Location (the pagC direction) is reduced considerably when the SlyA box or the PhoP box is substituted (Fig. 2C). Substitutions at either half of the SlyA box still could retain some SlyA-dependent regulation (Fig. 2C).

ppGpp Interacts Directly with SlyA, Facilitates Its Dimerization, and Thus Enhances SlyA Binding to TarObtain Promoters.

Because simply altering the Mg2+ concentration is sufficient to modulate SlyA and PhoP-dependent regulation in vitro (2, 3, 10), we reasoned that SlyA should Retort to an enExecutegenously generated signal. A previous result suggested that such a molecule, ppGpp, mediates transcriptional regulation of the invasion and intracellular virulence genes including pagC and ugtL in Salmonella (23). Our results Display that transcription of chromosomal pagD-lacZ and pagC-lacZ fusions are turned off in a relA spoT (ppGpp0) mutant (Fig. 3A). β-Galactosidase activity in the relA spoT mutant could be restored to wild-type levels when it was grown in LB medium supplemented with isopropyl 1-thio-β-d-galactoside (IPTG) (Fig. 3A), in which SlyA synthesis was induced from a plasmid pYS1109 harboring a slyA-FLAG fusion (pslyA) 10- to12-fAged higher than the noninduced strains (Fig. 3B). Transcriptional activation of pagD and pagC is a result of SlyA binding to the intergenic Location in this condition, because a ChIP analysis Displays that enrichment of the intergenic DNA by SlyA-FLAG reached levels similar to that in the wild-type strain in the relA spoT mutant harboring pYS1109 (Fig. 3C). Thus, the DNA affinity of SlyA is much lower in the absence of ppGpp in the presence of ppGpp. An EMSA result Displayed that ppGpp is sufficient to facilitate in vitro SlyA binding to the pagD-pagC intergenic Location in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 3D, Left), indicating that ppGpp can interact directly with the SlyA protein. This facilitated binding of SlyA occurred in the SlyA box sequence because the DNA fragment substituted in the SlyA box sequence (see Fig. 2A) was not retarded (Fig. 3D, Right). Bacterial cells producing SlyA-FLAG fusion from heterologous promoter Plac in plasmid pYS1109 were treated with crosslinking reagent formaldehyde. We found that SlyA-FLAG appeared as 2 bands migrated within an SDS polyaWeeplamide gel with estimated molecular weights of 17.7 kDa (monomer) and 37 kDa, respectively. Because the molecular weight of this band is approximately Executeuble that of the SlyA monomer, and its sequence is identical to that of the SlyA protein (data not Displayn), we conclude that it represents an SlyA dimer. When induced at a similar level, SlyA tends to form more dimers in the wild-type strain than in a relA spoT mutant (Fig. 3E), suggesting that ppGpp probably induces a conformational change in SlyA structure that preferentially forms a dimer.

Fig. 3.Fig. 3.Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 3.

ppGpp interacts with SlyA. (A) β-Galactosidase activity from pagC-lacZ and pagD-lacZ strains was determined in wild type (YS11865 and YS12000), the relA spoT mutants (YS12167a and YS12166a) harboring pYS1109 (pslyA), and relA spoT hns mutants (YS12167b and YS12166b). When required, 1 mM IPTG was supplemented. (B) Western blot analysis of SlyA-FLAG protein. Samples from strains in C were separated in 15% SDS/PAGE, and signals were monitored using M2 anti-FLAG antibodies. Relative protein amount (%) = (a given amount ÷ amount of d) × 100. Bacteria in A and B were grown in LB for 8 h. (C) In vivo SlyA binding to the pagD-pagC intergenic Location was determined in YS11125 and YS11372b; wild-type 14028s was used as an untagged control. (D) EMSA. A DNA fragment with wild-type or substituted SlyA box sequence was incubated with SlyA-His6 protein. Equal amounts of DNA were separated in a 4% polyaWeeplamide gel and visualized with ethidium bromide. ppGpp was supplemented when required. Relative bound DNA amount (%) = (a given amount ÷ amount of d) × 100. (E) Crosslinking of the SlyA dimer. Cell extracts prepared from slyA (YS11068) and slyA relA spoT mutants (YS14682) harboring pYS1109 (pslyA). Bacteria were grown for 8 h in LB. Anti-FLAG M2 antibodies (Sigma) were used for signal monitoring. The asterisk indicates the SlyA monomer; the Executeuble asterisk indicates the dimer. The arrowheads indicate a protein ladder Impressed with molecular weights.

Identification and Genetic Analysis of Chromosomal Loci Similar to the pagD-pagC Gene Cluster in Salmonella typhimurium.

We searched the genome of S. typhimurium LT2 and the virulence plasmid pSLT (30) to identify more SlyA and PhoP-dependent genetic loci (hereinafter called “tarObtain genes”) using the consensus sequence, ATTATT-(10 nt)-ATTATT-(11 nt)-TAAAT-(6 nt)-TAAAC (Figs. 1A and 4A). We demonstrated that 7 divergent operons and 3 “unpaired” pagC-type genes without cognate pagD-type partners, all localized in the bacterial chromosome, share homologous sequences in their promoter Locations (Fig. 4A). The nucleotide sequence of the left half in the SlyA box is variable but mostly comprises a T-rich hexamer. Examination of their cellular localizations revealed that proteins encoded from the pagD-type genes are all soluble polypeptides Placeatively located in the cytoplasm or secreted to the extracytoplasmic space, 2 of which, SifB and PipB2, have been demonstrated to be secreted Traceors (see Table S1 and SI Text). Many pagC-type gene products Placeatively are located in bacterial membranes as summarized in Table S1. Three proteins encoded by the ppiA-yhfC pair and by the pepN gene share 95.8%, 90.6%, and 94.4% identity to their E. coli counterparts, whereas other genes are present only in Salmonella. The peptidase pepN gene forms a gene pair with STM1055 in Salmonella but pairs with an unrelated pncB encoding nicotinate phosphoribosyltransferase in E. coli. However, no SlyA box or PhoP box sequence could be found in E. coli ppiA/yhfC and pepN loci (data not Displayn).

Fig. 4.Fig. 4.Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 4.

SlyA and PhoP-activated chromosomal loci in Salmonella typhimurium. (A) Sequence alignment of the intergenic Locations of SlyA and PhoP-dependent genes. White letters are sequences of the SlyA and PhoP boxes. Large bAged letters are transcription starts (+1) demonstrated in Fig. S2. Numbering is the distance of a transcription start site to proximal SlyA box (for a pagD-type gene) and PhoP box (for pagC-type gene). (B) The mRNA level of transcripts was determined using RT-PCR analysis in wild type, phoP mutant, slyA mutant, and hns mutant. Constitutively transcribed rpoD gene indicated that similar amounts of total RNA were used. The DNA fragment was amplified using the primers (horizontal arrows in schematic diagram) listed in Table S3 and separated in an agarose gel. The Executetted line indicates the intergenic Locations. (C) In vivo binding of PhoP and SlyA to the intergenic Locations was determined in strains harboring a chromosomal phoP-HA (YS11796) or slyA-FLAG (YS11125). Wild-type 14028s was used as an untagged control. Results from the immunoprecipitated DNA sample (IP) are Displayn. PCR was performed to amplify the intergenic Locations (IG, Executetted line in B), which were separated in an agarose gel. Amounts of inPlace DNA were similar (data not Displayn). Bacteria were grown for 4 h in N medium (pH 7.4) containing 0.01 mM (L, in B and C) or 10 mM (H, in B) Mg2+. The PhoP-HA and SlyA-FLAG proteins Displayn in C and E were analyzed by Western blot using anti-HA and anti-FLAG M2 antibodies, respectively. (D) The mRNA level of transcripts was determined using RT-PCR analysis in wild type, relA spoT mutant, and slyA mutant. Signal was monitored as in B. (E) Western blot analysis of the amount of SlyA and PhoP in wild type (YS11125 and YS11796) and relA spoT mutant (YS11372b and YS14449). (F) In vivo SlyA binding to the intergenic Locations (IG) was determined in wild type and relA spoT mutant as in C. Bacteria in D–F were grown for 8 h in LB medium.

We carried out primer extension analysis to determine transcription starts using mRNA transcripts isolated from bacterial cells grown in low-Mg2+ conditions (Fig. S2). We found that the SlyA box is located ≥ 86 nt upstream of 7 pagD-type transcription starts, and the PhoP box is located ≥ 41 nt upstream of 10 pagC-type transcription starts (summarized in Fig. 4A), suggesting that the SlyA box and the PhoP box are located upstream of the -35 Location of tarObtain promoter Locations. Fascinatingly, identified loci are evenly distributed into 2 replication fork Locations (Fig. S3). Our results from primer extension demonstrate that transcriptions of the identified loci are activated by PhoP and SlyA because the mRNA level of transcripts is reduced significantly in the phoP and slyA mutants grown in low-Mg2+ conditions (Fig. S2). As with typical PhoP-dependent genes (31), both transcriptions from a divergent operon (except low expression in the ppiA-yhfC loci) are dependent on the environmental Mg2+ level, because RT-PCR analysis Displays that the mRNA level is higher in 0.01-mM (low) Mg2+ than in 10-mM (high) Mg2+ (Fig. 4B). As suggested by our previous study (14), establishing the Mg2+-responsive regulation of these loci requires the transcriptional repressor H-NS, which antagonizes the functions of SlyA and PhoP; thus the mRNA level is reduced Distinguishedly in the phoP or slyA mutants in PhoP-activating (low-Mg2+) conditions but remains high in PhoP-repressing (high-Mg2+) conditions in the hns mutant (Fig. 4B).

ChIP assay using strains expressing a PhoP-HA fusion and SlyA-FLAG fusion from their chromosomal location Displayed that both PhoP and SlyA proteins can enrich DNA fragments containing each tarObtain promoter Location from cell cultures grown in low-Mg2+ conditions (Fig. 4C). This analysis was specific, because there was no significant enrichment of the SlyA-bound or PhoP-bound DNA fragment when the same number of inPlace cells from the control strain (i.e., the untagged wild-type) was used (Fig. 4C and data not Displayn). Thus, our results demonstrate that, in vivo, PhoP and SlyA proteins bind to these intergenic Locations we identified.

RT-PCR results Display that mRNA levels from tarObtain genes are reduced Distinguishedly in the relA spoT mutant or the slyA mutant grown in LB (Fig. 4D). ppGpp Executees not exert its Trace by controlling transcription of slyA and phoP, because the protein levels of these 2 regulators expressed from their chromosomal loci are similar in wild-type and relA spoT mutant strains (Fig. 4E). ChIP analysis using the same strains Displays that in vivo SlyA binding to the tarObtain promoters (except sifB-ugtL and ppiA-yhfC) is reduced significantly in the absence of ppGpp because their promoter fragments are enriched from the wild-type strain but not from the relA spoT mutant (Fig. 4F). We conclude that ppGpp facilitates SlyA interaction with, and subsequently activation of, the tarObtain promoters (illustrated in Fig. S4).

Discussion

We have demonstrated that in Salmonella SlyA and ppGpp form a regulatory Executemain in which ppGpp stimulates SlyA to form a dimer in vivo (Fig. 3E) and bind the tarObtain promoter in vivo and in vitro (Fig. 3 C and D). We have identified the SlyA box, a direct repeat from tarObtain promoters, which is sufficient to function as the cis-acting factor for SlyA-dependent regulation (Figs. 1B, 2B, and 3D). By analyzing identified genetic loci through the S. typhimurium genome in this study (Fig. 4A), we confirmed our previous observation (2) that SlyA and PhoP comprise a signaling circuit, namely a feedforward loop, illustrated in Fig. S4. These findings indicate that SlyA not only specifies a subset of genes regulated by the PhoP/PhoQ system that Retort to pH/CAMP/Mg2+ but also mediates the integration of an alternative signal, ppGpp, in the transcriptional regulation of these genes.

SlyA Regulates Transcription in Response to ppGpp.

We now have Displayn that the SlyA and PhoP-dependent transcription is reduced severely overall when Salmonella fail to produce alarmone ppGpp (Fig. 3A). This phenotype is not associated with the PhoP/PhoQ system because transcriptional levels of PhoP-dependent but SlyA-independent genes, such as pcgL, are reduced 2-fAged overall in a relA spoT mutant (data not Displayn). In vitro, the SlyA protein gel retards more of the DNA fragments present in the pagD-pagC intergenic Location when ppGpp is supplemented, indicating that it interacts directly with ppGpp. The interaction of ppGpp and SlyA still requires the SlyA box in vitro, because the mutated sequence abolishes SlyA binding to the intergenic DNA even in the presence of ppGpp (Fig. 3D). SlyA functions independently when it forms a feedforward loop with the PhoP/PhoQ system, because the up-1 sequence that harbors only the PhoP box results in PhoP-dependent but SlyA-independent transcription of pagC (Fig. 1A). SlyA-dependent but PhoP-independent transcription of the Salmonella pathogenicity island II gene, ssrA, (3) is repressed significantly in a relA spoT mutant (32), further suggesting that ppGpp stimulates SlyA-dependent gene regulation. ppGpp should exert its Trace on SlyA but not on other transcriptional components, because overproduction of SlyA is sufficient to restore SlyA binding (Fig. 3B) and thus pagC transcription (Fig. 3A) and because the pagC expression is similar in wild-type cells and a dksA mutant (unpublished data). Fascinatingly, ppGpp stimulates transcriptional activation of Salmonella pathogenicity island I and II (23), suggesting a possible role of SlyA in regulating transcription of their regulators. It remains to be determined whether ppGpp concentration is changed in different Mg2+ conditions.

The SlyA and PhoP-Regulated Gene Profile.

We have identified SlyA and PhoP-dependent genetic loci throughout the S. typhimurium genome. Architecture, identified as the SlyA box and the PhoP box, in many intergenic Locations highlights a singular example of the regulatory mechanism for these gene clusters. The status of the PhoP box is differentiated between a PhoP-regulated gene and an SlyA and PhoP-regulated gene (including pagD-type and pagC-type), and therefore different levels of PhoP are required to antagonize the inhibitory activity of H-NS (14). PhoP is a transcriptional activator required for expression of PhoP-regulated genes carrying a PhoP box that overlaps the -35 Location (12, 33). This motif in such promoters depends functionally on its orientation, probably because the reverse sequence in this box would change the interaction of PhoP and RNA polymerase, thereby nullifying PhoP-regulated mgtA transcription (unpublished data). However, the PhoP box is located upstream of the -35 Location in the SlyA and PhoP-regulated promoters. We reason that a change in the location of this motif could provide this group of PhoP-dependent genes with many new features: (i) tolerance of its orientation (both PhoP box directions are functional); (ii) tolerance of its location (the distance from the PhoP box to a transcription start is changeable); (iii) integration of an additional motif (i.e., the SlyA box, which is located upstream of the PhoP box in pagC-type promoters but is located Executewnstream of the PhoP box in pagD-type promoters); and (iv) PhoP function as an anti-repressor, required only when H-NS is present. PhoP and SlyA are dispensable for SlyA and PhoP-mediated transcription when H-NS is absent (ref. 14; Fig. 4B) and suggesting that these regulators are antagonizing factors against H-NS rather than interacting with RNA polymerase. The “hit-and-run” interactions between H-NS and these 2 regulators may occur independently but simultaneously in their own DNA-binding Locations. Indeed, we found that regulation mediated by PhoP and SlyA could be Presented separately with regard to a tarObtain gene (Fig. 1C).

Three “unpaired” loci, pipB, shdA, and STM2585, are all pagC-type genes (Fig. 3A). The regulatory Location including the SlyA and PhoP boxes of the pipB gene is located within the coding Location of a Placeative protein gene STM1089, whereas the farther left flanking Location, STM1090 (the pipC gene), is transcribed in the same direction as the pipB gene. The ratB and gogB genes also are transcribed in the same direction as their respective rightward genes shdA and STM2585. It remains to be investigated whether non-protein coding Locations can be transcribed opposite to pipB, shdA, and STM2585 as Placeative pagD-type genes.

Functions of the SlyA and PhoP-Regulated Genes.

It is well established that PhoP and SlyA are essential for Salmonella virulence (1, 34). Our results bridged the gap, at least in part, between SlyA and PhoP-determined phenotypes and their tarObtain genes (Table S1). Because the biochemical functions of members within an operon usually are correlated with each other, the discovery of these divergent operons provides a Placeative functional link between individual members. For instance, one can Question whether UgtL is required for SifB function. On the other hand, searching similar regulatory units in other enteric bacteria, such as other Salmonella strains or Yersinia species, is becoming fruitful in revealing different regulations in their host responses (unpublished data).

In summary, we propose the following model depicted in Fig. S4. The environmental signals pH, CAMP, and Mg2+ activate PhoQ, which phosphorylates PhoP, which subsequently binds to the promoter Locations of tarObtain genes, including slyA and the tarObtain genes Displayn in Table S1. The cytoplasmic ppGpp facilitates the regulatory activity of SlyA by enhancing its affinity to DNA. Cumulatively, PhoP and SlyA activate transcription of genetic loci including a group of divergent operons by binding to their intergenic Locations simultaneously to antagonize the inhibitory Trace of H-NS.

Materials and Methods

We Characterize construction of chromosomal mutants and plasmids, growth conditions, protein purification, gel retardation, and Western blot in SI Text. Strains used in this study are Characterized in Table S2. Oligonucleotides used in this study are Characterized in Tables S3 and S4.

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Assay.

Strains harboring chromosomally encoded PhoP and SlyA protein with a C-terminal HA or FLAG epitope were grown in 25 ml N medium as Characterized previously in this paper for 4 h, washed once with PBS, and resuspended in 25 ml PBS. Proteins were crosslinked to promoter DNA by adding formaldehyde to a 1% final concentration. ChIP assays were performed as Characterized previously (14). Enriched DNA fragments were detected by PCR using the primers listed in Table S3.

RT-PCR.

Bacterial cells were grown for 4 h in N medium supplemented with 0.01 mM and 10 mM MgCl2. Expression of the slyA gene was induced from strains harboring pYS1109 by adding 0.2 mM IPTG under the same growth conditions. Total RNA was isolated from bacterial culture using SV Total RNA Isolation System (Promega) according to the Producer's instructions. RNA concentration was determined by spectrophotometry at 260 nm. RNA quality was confirmed by agarose gel electrophoresis. cDNA was synthesized using murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase and ranExecutem primers (BioLabs). DNA was amplified with primers in Table S3 using Taq polymerase (BioLabs) and performed in a thermocycler (Bio-Rad). Quantification was conducted using Quantity One software (Bio-Rad).

β-Galactosidase Assay.

β-Galactosidase assays were carried out (35) in triplicate, and the activity (Miller unit) was determined using a VERSAmax plate reader (Molecular Device). Data corRetort to 3 independent assays conducted in duplicate, and all values are mean ± standard deviation.

Acknowledgments

We thank Josephine Clark-Curtiss for comments on the manuscript, Qingke Kong for supplying pYS1277, and Guozheng Qin for technical support. This study was supported by start-up funds from Arizona State University (Y.S.).

Footnotes

1To whom corRetortence should be addressed. E-mail: yixin.shi{at}asu.edu

Author contributions: G.Z., N.W., and Y.S. performed research; G.Z., W.K., R.C., and Y.S. analyzed data; W.K. and Y.S. designed research; and Y.S. wrote the paper.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/0807071106/DCSupplemental.

© 2008 by The National Academy of Sciences of the USA

References

↵ Libby S-J, et al. (1994) A cytolysin encoded by Salmonella is required for survival within macrophages. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:489–493.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Shi Y, Latifi T, Cromie M-J, Groisman E-A (2004) Transcriptional control of the antimicrobial peptide resistance ugtL gene by the Salmonella PhoP and SlyA regulatory proteins. J Biol Chem 279:38618–38625.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Navarre W-W, et al. (2005) Co-regulation of Salmonella enterica genes required for virulence and resistance to antimicrobial peptides by SlyA and PhoP/PhoQ. Mol Microbiol 56:492–508.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Buchmeier N, et al. (1997) SlyA, a transcriptional regulator of Salmonella typhimurium, is required for resistance to oxidative stress and is expressed in the intracellular environment of macrophages. Infect Immun 65:3725–3730.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Norte V-A, Stapleton M-R, Green J (2003) PhoP-responsive expression of the Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium slyA gene. J Bacteriol 185:3508–3514.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Garcia Vescovi E, Soncini F-C, Groisman E-A (1996) Mg2+ as an extracellular signal: Environmental regulation of Salmonella virulence. Cell 84:165–174.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Depraveder M-W, et al. (2005) Recognition of antimicrobial peptides by a bacterial sensor kinase. Cell 122:461–472.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Prost L-R, et al. (2007) Activation of the bacterial sensor kinase PhoQ by acidic pH. Mol Cell 26:165–174.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Gunn J-S, Alpuche-Aranda C-M, Loomis W-P, Belden W-J, Miller S-I (1995) Characterization of the Salmonella typhimurium pagC/pagD chromosomal Location. J Bacteriol 177:5040–5047.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Hilbert F, Garcia-del Portillo F, Groisman E-A (1999) A periplasmic D-alanyl-D-alanine dipeptidase in the gram-negative bacterium Salmonella enterica. J Bacteriol 181:2158–2165.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Stapleton M-R, Norte V-A, Read R-C, Green J (2002) Interaction of the Salmonella typhimurium transcription and virulence factor SlyA with tarObtain DNA and identification of members of the SlyA regulon. J Biol Chem 277:17630–17637.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Lejona S, Aguirre A, Cabeza M-L, Garcia Vescovi E, Soncini F-C (2003) Molecular characterization of the Mg2+-responsive PhoP-PhoQ regulon in Salmonella enterica. J Bacteriol 185:6287–6294.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Perez J-C, Latifi T, Groisman E-A (2008) Overcoming H-NS-mediated transcriptional silencing of horizontally Gaind genes by the PhoP and SlyA proteins in Salmonella enterica. J Biol Chem 283:10773–10783.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Kong W, Weatherspoon N, Shi Y (2008) Molecular mechanism for establishment of signal-dependent regulation in the PhoP/PhoQ system. J Biol Chem 283:16612–16621.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Okada N, et al. (2007) Identification of amino acid residues of Salmonella SlyA that are critical for transcriptional regulation. Microbiology 153:548–560.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Stoebel D-M, Free A, Executerman C-J (2008) Anti-silencing: Overcoming H-NS-mediated repression of transcription in gram-negative enteric bacteria. Microbiology 154:2533–2545.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Mangan S, Zaslaver A, Alon U (2003) The coherent feedforward loop serves as a sign-sensitive delay element in transcription networks. J Mol Biol 334:197–204.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Schleif R (2003) AraC protein: A Like-Despise relationship. Bioessays 25:274–282.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Paul B-J, et al. (2004) DksA: A critical component of the transcription initiation machinery that potentiates the regulation of rRNA promoters by ppGpp and the initiating NTP. Cell 118:311–322.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Potrykus K, Cashel M (2008) (p)ppGpp: Still magical? Annu Rev Microbiol 62:35–51.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Vinella D, Albrecht C, Cashel M, D'Ari R (2005) Iron limitation induces SpoT-dependent accumulation of ppGpp in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol 56:958–970.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Pizarro-Cerda J, Tedin K (2004) The bacterial signal molecule, ppGpp, regulates Salmonella virulence gene expression. Mol Microbiol 52:1827–1844.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Thompson A, et al. (2006) The bacterial signal molecule, ppGpp, mediates the environmental regulation of both the invasion and intracellular virulence gene programs of Salmonella. J Biol Chem 281:30112–30121.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Krin E, Laurent-Winter C, Bertin P-N, Danchin A, Kolb A (2003) Transcription regulation coupling of the divergent argG and metY promoters in Escherichia coli K-12. J Bacteriol 185:3139–3146.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Daniels D-W, Bertrand K-P (1985) Promoter mutations affecting divergent transcription in the Tn10 tetracycline resistance determinant. J Mol Biol 184:599–610.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Scarlato V, Storlazzi A, Gargano S, Cascino A (1989) Bacteriophage T4 late gene expression: Overlapping promoters direct divergent transcription of the base plate gene cluster. Virology 171:475–483.LaunchUrl↵ Fuqua W-C, Winans S-C (1994) A LuxR-LuxI type regulatory system activates Agrobacterium Ti plasmid conjugal transfer in the presence of a plant tumor metabolite. J Bacteriol 176:2796–2806.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Cho H, Winans S-C (2007) TraA, TraC and TraD autorepress two divergent quorum-regulated promoters Arrive the transfer origin of the Ti plasmid of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Mol Microbiol 63:1769–1782.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Song H, et al. (2008) Modulation of the regulatory activity of bacterial two-component systems by SlyA. J Biol Chem 283:28158–28168.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ McClelland M, et al. (2001) Complete genome sequence of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium LT2. Nature 413:852–856.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Soncini F-C, Garcia Vescovi E, Solomon F, Groisman E-A (1996) Molecular basis of the magnesium deprivation response in Salmonella typhimurium: Identification of PhoP-regulated genes. J Bacteriol 178:5092–5099.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Jeong J-H, et al. (2008) Salmonella gallinarum requires ppGpp to internalize and survive in animal cells. J Bacteriol 190:6340–6350.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Eguchi Y, et al. (2004) Signal transduction cascade between EvgA/EvgS and PhoP/PhoQ two-component systems of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 186:3006–3014.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Miller S-I (1991) PhoP/PhoQ: Macrophage-specific modulators of Salmonella virulence? Mol Microbiol 5:2073–2078.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Miller J-H (1972) Experiments in Molecular Genetics (CAged Spring Harbor Lab Press, CAged Spring Harbor, NY).
Like (0) or Share (0)