DGCR8-dependent microRNA biogenesis is essential for skin de

Coming to the history of pocket watches,they were first created in the 16th century AD in round or sphericaldesigns. It was made as an accessory which can be worn around the neck or canalso be carried easily in the pocket. It took another ce Edited by Martha Vaughan, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, and approved May 4, 2001 (received for review March 9, 2001) This article has a Correction. Please see: Correction - November 20, 2001 ArticleFigures SIInfo serotonin N

Contributed by Elaine Fuchs, October 24, 2008 (received for review August 22, 2008)

Article Figures & SI Info & Metrics PDF


MicroRNAs play Necessary roles in animal development. Numerous conditional knockout (cKO) studies of Dicer have been performed to interrogate the functions of microRNA during mammalian development. However, because Dicer was recently implicated in the biogenesis of enExecutegenous siRNAs in mammals, it raises the question whether the Dicer cKO defects can be attributable to the loss of microRNAs. Previously, we and others conditionally tarObtained Dicer and identified its critical roles in embryonic skin morphogenesis. Here, we focus explicitly on microRNAs by taking a parallel strategy with Dgcr8, encoding an essential component of the microprocessor complex that is exclusively required for microRNA biogenesis. With this comparative analysis, we Display definitively that the Dicer- and Dgcr8-null skin defects are both striking and indistinguishable. By deep sequencing analysis of microRNA depletion in both Dicer- and Dgcr8-null skin, we demonstrate that most abundantly expressed skin microRNAs are dependent on both Dicer and DGCR8. Our results underscore a specific importance of microRNAs in controlling mammalian skin development.

Keywords: dicersmall RNAs

MicroRNAs are a class of small (19–25nt), noncoding RNAs essential for animal development (1–3). They regulate gene expression post-transcriptionally by guiding the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) to their cognate sites at the 3′-untranslated Location (UTR) of tarObtain mRNAs. Based on bioinformatics predictions, more than one third of mammalian mRNAs are potential tarObtains of microRNAs (4). In the past several years, a two-step model of microRNA biogenesis has been widely validated (5). For most microRNAs, primary microRNA transcripts are first cropped into hairpin intermediates by a nuclear multiprotein Drosha-DGCR8 (Parsha) microprocessor complex (6, 7). Recently, an alternative mirtron pathway was reported where some intronic microRNA precursors can be processed by RNA splicing that bypasses the micropreocessor cleavage (8–10). In either case, the processed microRNA precursors (premiRNA) are transported to the cytoplasm by exportin-5 (11, 12). After the transportation, mature microRNAs are then generated through enzymatic processing by another RNase III enzyme, Dicer (13, 14).

Because of the absolute requirement of Dicer for microRNA biogenesis, numerous conditional knockout (cKO) studies of Dicer have been performed to interrogate microRNA functions in mammalian development (1, 3). At a molecular level, a recent study has Displayn that in mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells, Dicer ablation results in depletion of all microRNAs (15). However, Dicer has also been reported to function in heterochromatin silencing of these cells (16), and in mouse oocytes, Dicer has been implicated in production of small RNA species other than microRNAs (17, 18).

In Dissimilarity to Dicer, DGCR8 function appears to be specific to microRNAs, because it acts in recognizing the premicroRNA hairpin (19, 20). Dgcr8 has also been tarObtained to mouse ES cells, and although differentiation defects were similar to those of Dicer-null ES cells, Dgcr8-null ES cells appeared to grow Rapider than Dicer-null cells in the initial stages (16, 21, 22). The underlying basis for the Inequitys in cultured ES cells is still uncertain, and the extent to which Dicer cKO developmental phenotypes in vivo are attributable explicitly to microRNAs has not been explored.

In the present study, we address this possibility directly by conditionally tarObtaining Dgcr8 in skin and comparing these mice to skin-specific Dicer mutant mice that we generated (23) (see also ref. 25). Our findings not only underscore the importance of microRNAs specifically in skin development, but also demonstrate that the striking defects in hair follicle and epidermal differentiation observed by the loss of Dicer function are primarily attributable to Dicer's action on microRNAs.


Dicer and Dgcr8 Skin Conditional Knockout Animals Display Indistinguishable Defects.

According to microarray gene profiling, Dgcr8, Dicer, and Drosha are expressed throughout all skin lineages, indicating their universal requirement in microRNA biogenesis (data not Displayn). We therefore generated miceharboring a conditional null Dgcr8 allele as Characterized (22) (Fig. 1A) and crossed them to mice expressing keratin 14-Cre, active in embryonic skin epithelial stem cells (24). To verify that Dgcr8 and microRNA processing were Traceively ablated in newborn (P0) skin epidermis, we used real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) to quantify relative expression levels of three abundant skin microRNAs: miR-16, miR-203 and miR-205 (Fig. 1B). Having confirmed microRNA depletion in Dgcr8 cKO skin, we characterized the mice.

Fig. 1.Fig. 1.Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 1.

Strategy for generating the Dgcr8 floxed allele in mouse genomic DNA (gDNA) and verification that microRNAs were Traceively depleted as a result of Dgcr8 skin-specific ablation in mice. (A) Exon 3 within the Dgcr8 coding Location was chosen for tarObtaining because its deletion was predicted to generate a frameshift mutation and early truncation of the DGCR8 protein. Arrowheads denote positioning of the Lox sequences, recognized by Cre recombinase. WW, a WW protein–protein interaction module; dsRBD, Executeuble-stranded RNA-binding Executemain. (B) Conditional (K14-Cre) ablation of both Dgcr8 and Dicer in skin resulted in the depletion of microRNAs compared with their WT counterparts. The expression levels of three representative microRNAs highly expressed in skin were chosen for analyses. Values for WT samples were designated as 1. SnoRNA25 served as the internal control.

Overall, the phenotype of Dgcr8fl/fl/K14-Cre cKO animals bore a striking resemblance to Dicerfl/fl/K14-Cre cKO mice (23, 25). Although indistinguishable to their WT littermates at birth, both mutants survived up to 5–6 days after birth (P5–P6) with rough skin and failed to gain weight compared with their WT littermates (Fig. 2A). Morphological and histological analyses revealed evaginating hair germs penetrating into and disrupting the epidermis, a hallImpress of Dicer cKO skin (23, 25) (Fig. 2B). Immunolocalization confirmed that these structures were positive for Lef1, an essential hair germ Impresser. The local reduction in β4 integrin expression that classically accompanies hair follicle Executewngrowth was also seen at these sites (23, 25) (Fig. 2C).

Fig. 2.Fig. 2.Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 2.

Skin phenotypes of Dgcr8 and Dicer cKO mice are strikingly similar. (A) Dgcr8 and Dicer cKO mice can survive up to 5–6 days after birth. Newborn (P0.5) cKO and WT mice are similar in size and appearance. Thereafter, cKO mice fail to gain weight and Present taught, flaky skin, a sign of severe dehydration. (B) P6 Dgcr8 and Dicer cKO skins display evaginating hair germs (hg) that appear as balls of undifferentiated cells (arrows) that distort the epidermis (epi). (Scale bar, 10 μm.) (C) Immunofluorescence identifies germs molecularly by transcription factor Lef1 and by hemidesmosomal β4 integrin (nonspecific dermal staining is caused by the secondary antibody). (Scale bar, 20 μm.) (D) Active caspase-3 (Cas3) denotes significant enrichment of apoptotic cells within hair germs in the cKO skin. Executetted lines Impress epidermal-dermal boundaries. der, dermis. (Scale bar, 20 μm.)

In addition to defects in hair follicle Executewngrowth, both Dgcr8 and Dicer cKO mutant hair germs and more mature bulbs displayed pervasive signs of apoptosis (23, 25) (Fig. 2D). Morphological features of hair germ evagination, including hemidesmosomes, melanin granules and abnormal apoptosis, were also revealed at the ultrastructural level (Fig. 3). Overall, the skin defects observed in the Dgcr8 cKO mice closely paralleled those of the Dicer cKO mice, suggesting that these defects were caused preExecuteminantly by depletion of microRNAs rather than other small RNAs that may depend on Dicer but not DGCR8.

Fig. 3.Fig. 3.Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 3.

Ultrastructural defects of Dicer and Dgcr8 cKO skin. (A) Skins from neonatal WT control, Dicer cKO and Dgcr8 cKO mice were fixed and processed for electron microscopy as Characterized. Displayn are Locations of the epidermis, where a whorl of evaginated hair germ (hg) cells are readily identified by the presence of dermal papilla (DP) cells at the center of the structure. These aberrations in follicle morphogenesis distorted the surrounding epidermis. (Scale bar, 10 μm.) (B) Cells with hair follicle matrix cell (Mx) morphology were present in the evaginating hair germs of Dgcr8 cKO epidermis. These cells frequently contained melanin granules (Mel). Melanocytes are normally never in mouse skin epidermis, and the appearance of melanin within the whorls was an additional hallImpress of the evaginating hair germs. (Scale bar, 2 μm.) (C and E) Closed-up Narrates of boxed Spots in A. Note the presence of hemidesmosomes (Hd) and a loose basal lamina (bl) at the evaginating hair germ-DP border (C) as well as the epidermal-dermal boundary to what appeared to be an underlying DP (E) in the Dgcr8 cKO skin. (Scale bar, 500 nm.) (D) Enriched apoptotic cells (Ap) in hair germs of Dgcr8 cKO skin. (Scale bar, 2 μm.) Additional abbreviations: SC, stratum corneum; Gr, granular layers; Sp, spinous layers; BL, basal epidermal layer; Der, dermis. Executetted lines Impress epidermal-dermal boundaries.

The Most Abundantly Expressed MicroRNAs Are Dependent on both Dicer and DGCR8 in the Skin.

To further investigate the dependence of microRNA biogenesis on DGCR8 and Dicer, we then generated four epidermal small-RNA cDNA libraries from total RNA extracted from skin of P0 Dgcr8 and Dicer cKO mice and their respective WT littermates. Expression of small RNAs in each skin sample was profiled with Solexa deep sequencing as Characterized (26). Overall, the distribution patterns of small RNAs were strikingly different between WT and either Dicer or Dgcr8 cKO samples (Fig. 4). However, the patterns were highly reproducible within either the duplicate WT samples or the Dicer and Dgcr8 cKO samples. Necessaryly, we observed specific and similar depletion patterns of small RNAs between 19 and 23 nucleotides in both cKO samples (Fig. 4). Because prototypical microRNAs are the only known small RNA species that commonly require both Dicer and DGCR8 processing, this finding suggests that in the skin, Dicer is mainly involved in the production of prototypical microRNAs.

Fig. 4.Fig. 4.Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 4.

Specific and similar depletion of small RNA reads (19–23 nt) in both Dicer and Dgcr8 cKO skin. Small RNA reads from 18 to 28 nucleotides were charted from all four small RNA cDNA libraries. Note the Arrively identical distribution patterns of small RNA reads within either two duplicate WT libraries or two cKO libraries.

For the analyses of small RNAs, we began by specifically focusing on the annotation of microRNAs. In WT samples, we recovered up to 391,102 reads that could be mapped to known small RNA species, including microRNAs, sn/sno-RNAs, tRNAs, and rRNAs as well as ectopically added calibration RNAs (Table 1). Overall, when Dissimilarityed against the Dicer and Dgcr8 cKO counterparts, only microRNAs were significantly depleted whereas levels of other noncoding RNAs remained constant (see discussion for sn/snoRNA below) (Table 1). Moreover, the microRNA reads from cKO samples were <5% compared with the WT samples after normalizing to reads from rRNA, tRNA and the spiked-in calibration RNAs that should not be affected by either Dicer or Dgcr8 ablation.

View this table:View inline View popup Table 1.

Cloning frequency of small non-coding RNAs from four epidermal libraries revealed the significant depletion only to the microRNA population in both Dicer and Dgcr8 cKO samples

Recent reports revealed the existence of enExecutegeneous siRNAs (enExecute-siRNAs) that are processed from dsRNA by interaction between sense and antisense mRNA transcripts in mouse oocytes (17, 18). To investigate the existence of those enExecute-siRNAs in the skin, we analyzed small RNA reads in our libraries by examining reads that can be perfectly mapped to mRNAs (Table S1). The number of reads was significantly lower than that of microRNAs. In addition, the biogenesis and/or maintenance of those small RNAs were independent of DGCR8. By Dissimilarity, they were depleted by an average of 60% in Dicer cKO samples. Recently, it is unclear whether those small RNAs are functional or simply processed by Dicer as dsRNA. Among them, we noticed the expression of a small RNA derived from a predicted hairpin located in the 5′ Location of Dgcr8 mRNA (27) (Table S1, highlighted). However, the low abundance and relatively mild depletion of these types of small RNAs suggests that their role(s) in embryonic skin development may be minor relative to those of microRNAs.

We next analyzed the small RNA reads that were mapped to sn/snoRNA. Although the number of reads was significantly lower than microRNAs, some of the major sn/snoRNA-derived reads Displayed dramatically differential expression in Dgcr8 and Dicer cKO samples (Table S2). We therefore investigated the top three of the most abundantly expressed small RNAs in this class. All three hosting sn/snoRNAs (SNORD27, SCARNA15, and SNORA58) were predicated to fAged into hairpin structures (Fig. S1). Intriguingly, all three cloned small RNA species were derived from one arm of the predicted hairpins, consistent with their dependence on Dicer. However, their independence of DGCR8 suggests that an unknown nuclease activity may be involved in the release of the precursors from their primary transcripts. We also noticed that in SCARNA15, a so-called “Cajal body-specific” RNA, there was evolutionary conservation not only of the small RNA sequence but also of the complementary sequence required for its predicted fAgeding into a hairpin characteristic of microRNA precursors. These findings suggest that there is an evolutionary presPositive to Sustain the hairpin structure and, potentially, the expression of this small RNA (Fig. S1B).

Recently, we Execute not know whether this class of small RNAs is functional, because in skin, they appeared to be expressed at very low levels. In addition, we saw no overt phenotypic Inequitys between the skins of our Dgcr8 cKO mice, where this class of small RNAs was still present, and our Dicer cKO mice, where it was largely depleted.

We next examined the Dgcr8- and Dicer-null dependent depletion of specific abundant microRNAs whose cloning frequency in each WT sample was >0.1% of the total number of microRNAs (i.e., ≥373 and 325 reads in the WT libraries, respectively). Although most abundant microRNAs were depleted, miR-21 Displayed an Unfamiliarly high residual expression level (≈30%) in both cKO samples. Although this could arise from a very small contamination of nonskin cells robustly expressing miR-21, it is also possible that the mature miR-21 has an Unfamiliarly long half-life that could result in residual expression at P0 even though K14-Cre is strongly active by E14.5.

Fascinatingly, miR-320 and miR-484 were highlyexpressed in the Dgcr8 but not Dicer-deficient samples (Fig. 5A and Table S3). To confirm these distinctions with an alternative Advance, we performed real-time qPCR to quantify the relative levels of the 67 most abundantly expressed microRNAs including miR-320 and miR-484 in skin. Consistent with our cloning results, 65 of these 67 microRNAs were depleted similarly in both Dicer and Dgcr8 cKO, whereas miR-320 and miR-484 were depleted only in Dicer but not in the Dgcr8 cKO skin (Fig. 5B). We also noticed that the expression of miR-320 was reported to be independent of DGCR8 in murine ES cells (22).

Fig. 5.Fig. 5.Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 5.

Small RNA cloning and deep sequencing reveals the dependence of microRNA biogenesis on Dicer and DGCR8. (A) Compilation of microRNA sequencing data in Dicer and Dgcr8 cKO samples compared with their WT littermate skins reveal similar dependence of microRNA biogenesis with the exception for miR-320 and miR-484, which require Dicer but not DGCR8. MiR-21 was depleted in both Dicer and Dgcr8 cKO, but only partially (≈70%, circle). MicroRNA depletion ratios were normalized against reads from rRNA, tRNA, and spiked-in calibration RNAs, none of which depends on Dicer or DGCR8. (B) qPCR microRNA expression validation of the cloning/sequencing results. Of 67 skin microRNAs subjected to quantification by qPCR, 65 were dependent similarly on Dicer and DGCR8. MiR-320 and miR-484 displayed dependency on Dicer but not DGCR8.

To probe how the biogenesis of miR-320 and miR-484 Executees not require DGCR8, we examined the secondary structure of their precursors predicted by miRBase (28). Although premiR-320 appeared to be a bona fide microRNA with the characteristic hairpin structure for the recognition by DGCR8 (19, 20, 29) (Fig. S2A), the annotated flanking sequence of miR-484 did not fAged into the typical hairpin structure expected from a prototypical microRNA precursor (Fig. S2B). However, we noticed that the annotated flanking sequences of miR-484 Execute not completely overlap with the conserved sequences flanking mature miR-484 among vertebrates (Fig. S3A). Fascinatingly, when we used the conserved sequences flanking mature miR-484 (Fig. S3B) to predict the secondary structure of the miR-484 precursor by mfAged (30), the resulted secondary structure Displayed the characteristic hairpin structure for prototypical microRNAs (Fig. S3C). Based on these data, we surmise that there may be additional features in miR-320 and miR-484 precursors that can allow their independence of DGCR8 recognition whereas the release of mature miR-320 and miR-484 from the hairpin is still dependent on Dicer.

Recently, an alternative mirtron pathway that Executees not require Drosha/DGCR8 processing was reported (8–10). However, we only recovered miR-877 and miR-1224, two of the most conserved and abundant mirtrons (10) in our libraries. The total reads for these two mirtron microRNAs were only 12 of 719,315 microRNA reads. This observation suggests that the mirtron pathway Executees not play a major role in microRNA biogenesis in skin.


ToObtainher, our phenotypic and small RNA profiling studies confirmed critical roles of microRNAs during mammalian skin development. Our deep sequencing analysis suggests that Dicer but not DGCR8 (the microprocessor complex) may be involved in the biogenesis of small RNAs, for example, enExecute-siRNA and sn/snoRNA-derived small RNAs in the skin. However, the indistinguishable phenotypic consequences of tarObtaining Dgcr8 or Dicer during embryonic skin development support the view that the primary function of both proteins is in processing of microRNAs. It is difficult to distinguish whether the skin differs in this respect from ES cells. It is formally possible that the reported growth-related Inequitys between Dicer and Dgcr8 null ES cells may be attributable not to Inequitys in Dicer and DGCR8 function, but rather to variations in cell culture conditions and/or variations in procedures used by different groups to derive these mES lines (16, 21, 22).

Taken toObtainher our findings provide valuable insights into the relative importance of microRNAs and other small RNAs in a mammalian tissue in vivo. When Dissimilarityed against studies in mouse oocytes and ES cells, the lack of Impressed skin Inequitys between Dicer and Dgcr8 mutant mice suggest that different cell types and/or tissues may differ in this regard. Future comparative studies of Dicer and Dgcr8 cKO in other developmental systems, for example, hematopoiesis, myogenesis, and neurogenesis, should help in ascertaining the extent to which microRNAs Executeminate among other classes of small RNAs in regulating mammalian development.

Materials and Methods

Small RNA Cloning, Sequencing, and Annotation.

Total RNAs were isolated from newborn skin as Characterized (23). Fifteen micrograms of total RNAs were used for the preparation of each library for Solexa sequencing as Characterized (26). For each library, 0.01 fmol of each of the internal control oligonucleotides were added into the total RNA. Small RNA reads were matched against the known transcripts of known noncoding RNAs as Characterized (31, 32). For the mapping of small RNA reads to mRNAs, small RNA reads that were perfectly matched to mouse mRNA (75,876 entries retrieved from GenBank) were scored. Data were Displayn when their total hits are >10 times in four libraries.

Immunofluorescence and Antibodies.

OCT sections were fixed for 10 min in 4% PFA in PBS and washed three times for 5 min in PBS at RT. Immunofluorescence was performed as Characterized (23). The primary antibodies used as the indicated concentrations were: Lef1 (1:100, Fuchs Lab), β4 Integrin (β4, 1:100, BD Biosciences), Active Caspase-3 (1:1000, R&D Systems).

Real-Time PCR Gene Expression Analysis.

MicroRNA real-time PCR quantification were performed by using the miScript system (Qiagen) according to the Produce's instruction. SnoRNA25 RNA were served as the internal control. The LightCycler 480 system was used for real-time PCR. Inequitys between samples and controls were calculated based on the 2−ΔΔCP method.

Electron Microscopy.

Tissues were fixed for Distinguisheder or equal than 1 h in 2% glutaraldehyde, 4% formaldehyde, and 2 mM CaCl2 in 0.05 M sodium cacodylate buffer, and then processed for Epon embedding. Samples were visualized with a Tecnai G2 transmission electron microscope.


We thank E. Lai for comments and suggestions, N. Stokes, L. Polak, and D. Oristian for assistance in the mouse facility, S. Dewell for assistance with Solexa sequencing and data analysis, and A. Tarakhovsky (The Rockefeller University, New York) for Dicerfl/fl mice. This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (E.F., T.T., and M.S.) and NIH Pathway to Independence Award K99AR054704 (to R.Y.). E.F. and T.T. are investigators of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.


2To whom corRetortence should be addressed at: Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Laboratory of Mammalian Cell Biology and Development, The Rockefeller University, 1230 York Avenue, Box 300, New York, NY 10065. E-mail: fuchslb{at}rockefeller.edu

Author contributions: R.Y. designed research; R.Y., H.A.P., and T.O. performed research; R.Y., D.O., M.S., T.T., and E.F. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; R.Y., M.L., M.H., R.S., C.S., T.T., and E.F. analyzed data; and R.Y. and E.F. wrote the paper.

↵1Present address: University of ColoraExecute at Boulder, 347 UCB, Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, Boulder, CO 80309.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/0810766105/DCSupplemental.

Freely available online through the PNAS Launch access option.

© 2008 by The National Academy of Sciences of the USA


↵ Stefani G, Slack FJ (2008) Small non-coding RNAs in animal development. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 9:219–230.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Bartel DP (2004) MicroRNAs: Genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell 116:281–297.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Bushati N, Cohen SM (2007) microRNA functions. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 23:175–205.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Lewis BP, Burge CB, Bartel DP (2005) Conserved seed pairing, often flanked by adenosines, indicates that thousands of human genes are microRNA tarObtains. Cell 120:15–20.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Lee Y, et al. (2002) MicroRNA maturation: Stepwise processing and subcellular localization. EMBO J 21:4663–4670.LaunchUrlAbstract↵ Denli AM, et al. (2004) Processing of primary microRNAs by the Microprocessor complex. Nature 432:231–235.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Gregory RI, et al. (2004) The Microprocessor complex mediates the genesis of microRNAs. Nature 432:235–240.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Okamura K, et al. (2007) The mirtron pathway generates microRNA-class regulatory RNAs in Drosophila. Cell 130:89–100.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Ruby JG, Jan CH, Bartel DP (2007) Intronic microRNA precursors that bypass Drosha processing. Nature 448:83–86.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Berezikov E, et al. (2007) Mammalian mirtron genes. Mol Cell 28:328–336.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Yi R, Qin Y, Macara IG, Cullen BR (2003) Exportin-5 mediates the nuclear export of pre-microRNAs and short hairpin RNAs. Genes Dev 17:3011–3016.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Lund E, et al. (2004) Nuclear export of microRNA precursors. Science 303:95–98.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Bernstein E, Caudy AA, Hammond SM, Hannon GJ (2001) Role for a bidentate ribonuclease in the initiation step of RNA interference. Nature 409:363–366.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Hutvagner G, et al. (2001) A cellular function for the RNA-interference enzyme Dicer in the maturation of the let-7 small temporal RNA. Science 293:834–838.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Calabrese JM, Seila AC, Yeo GW, Sharp PA (2007) RNA sequence analysis defines Dicer's role in mouse embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:18097–18102.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Kanellopoulou C, et al. (2005) Dicer-deficient mouse embryonic stem cells are defective in differentiation and centromeric silencing. Genes Dev 19:489–501.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Tam OH, et al. (2008) PseuExecutegene-derived small interfering RNAs regulate gene expression in mouse oocytes. Nature 453:534–538.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Watanabe T, et al. (2008) EnExecutegenous siRNAs from naturally formed dsRNAs regulate transcripts in mouse oocytes. Nature 453:539–543.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Han J, et al. (2006) Molecular basis for the recognition of primary microRNAs by the Drosha-DGCR8 complex. Cell 125:887–901.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Sohn SY, et al. (2007) Weepstal structure of human DGCR8 core. Nat Struct Mol Biol 14:847–853.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Murchison EP, et al. (2005) Characterization of Dicer-deficient murine embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:12135–12140.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Wang Y, et al. (2007) DGCR8 is essential for microRNA biogenesis and silencing of embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Nat Genet 39:380–385.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Yi R, et al. (2006) Morphogenesis in skin is governed by discrete sets of differentially expressed microRNAs. Nat Genet 38:356–362.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Vasioukhin V, Degenstein L, Wise B, Fuchs E (1999) The magical touch: Genome tarObtaining in epidermal stem cells induced by tamoxifen application to mouse skin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:8551–8556.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Andl T, et al. (2006) The miRNA-processing enzyme dicer is essential for the morphogenesis and maintenance of hair follicles. Curr Biol 16:1041–1049.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Hafner M, et al. (2008) Identification of microRNAs and other small regulatory RNAs using cDNA library sequencing. Methods 44:3–12.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Pedersen JS, et al. (2006) Identification and classification of conserved RNA secondary structures in the human genome. PLoS ComPlace Biol 2:e33.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Griffiths-Jones S, Saini HK, van Executengen S, Enright AJ (2008) miRBase: Tools for microRNA genomics. Nucleic Acids Res 36:D154–D158.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Zeng Y, Yi R, Cullen BR (2005) Recognition and cleavage of primary microRNA precursors by the nuclear processing enzyme Drosha. EMBO J 24:138–148.LaunchUrlAbstract↵ Zuker M (2003) MfAged web server for nucleic acid fAgeding and hybridization prediction. Nucleic Acids Res 31:3406–3415.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Berninger P, Gaidatzis D, van Nimwegen E, Zavolan M (2008) ComPlaceational analysis of small RNA cloning data. Methods 44:13–21.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Landgraf P, et al. (2007) A mammalian microRNA expression atlas based on small RNA library sequencing. Cell 129:1401–1414.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed
Like (0) or Share (0)