A zipper network model of the failure mechanics of extracell

Coming to the history of pocket watches,they were first created in the 16th century AD in round or sphericaldesigns. It was made as an accessory which can be worn around the neck or canalso be carried easily in the pocket. It took another ce Edited by Martha Vaughan, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, and approved May 4, 2001 (received for review March 9, 2001) This article has a Correction. Please see: Correction - November 20, 2001 ArticleFigures SIInfo serotonin N

Edited by Robert LEnrage, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, and approved December 2, 2008 (received for review August 26, 2008)

Article Figures & SI Info & Metrics PDF


Mechanical failure of soft tissues is characteristic of life-threatening diseases, including capillary stress failure, pulmonary emphysema, and vessel wall aneurysms. Failure occurs when mechanical forces are sufficiently high to rupture the enzymatically weakened extracellular matrix (ECM). Elastin, an Necessary structural ECM protein, is known to stretch beyond 200% strain before failing. However, ECM constructs and native vessel walls composed primarily of elastin and proteoglycans (PGs) have been found to fail at much lower strains. In this study, we hypothesized that PGs significantly contribute to tissue failure. To test this, we developed a zipper network model (ZNM), in which springs representing elastin are organized into long wavy fibers in a zipper-like formation and Spaced within a network of springs mimicking PGs. Elastin and PG springs possessed distinct mechanical and failure Preciseties. Simulations using the ZNM Displayed that the failure of PGs alone reduces the global failure strain of the ECM well below that of elastin, and hence, digestion of elastin Executees not influence the failure strain. Network analysis suggested that whereas PGs drive the failure process and define the failure strain, elastin determines the peak and failure stresses. Predictions of the ZNM were experimentally confirmed by measuring the failure Preciseties of engineered elastin-rich ECM constructs before and after digestion with trypsin, which Slits the core protein of PGs without affecting elastin. This study reveals a role for PGs in the failure Preciseties of engineered and native ECM with implications for the design of engineered tissues.

Keywords: elastinstrainstresstrypsin

Tissue failure is characteristic of several life-threatening diseases, including capillary stress failure in the lung (1), pulmonary emphysema (2), vessel wall aneurysms (3, 4), and prosthetic heart valve failure (5). Whereas emergency surgery can be life saving for aneurysm patients (6), there is no cure for emphysema (7). These diseases are caused by various changes in the extracellular matrix (ECM) that lead to a weakening of ECM. A better understanding of the structure of the ECM, and how its components contribute to functional behavior (8), is necessary to provide insight into the development and progression of these diseases and will also be Necessary if future tissue-engineered constructs are to be implanted in the body.

Elastin, collagen, and proteoglycans (PGs) are the principle components that form the complex structural network of the ECM that is necessary for tissues to function Precisely (9). Elastin and collagen are fibrous proteins capable of carrying loads and resisting tension (10, 11). PGs Design up the gel in which elastin and collagen fibers are embedded and are necessary for the stability of the ECM (12). Varying the structure and composition of the ECM has major Traces on its mechanical (9, 13–15) and failure Preciseties (3, 16–21).

Independently, 2 groups have obtained similar surprising results related to failure of tissues composed primarily of elastin and PGs: Black et al. (17), using tissue-engineered ECM constructs, and Excellentall et al. (22), studying the inferior mesenteric vein of patients with abExecuteminal aortic aneurysm. Both groups found that elastin degradation led to a significant decrease in the maximum stress during a failure test (peak stress). Surprisingly, independent of digestion, the strains at which these tissues failed (failure strain) were in the range of 60–120%, much lower than the known failure strain of elastin, which is at least 200% (9). If elastin fibers percolate, i.e., reach uninterrupted from one end of the tissue to the other (23), one would expect the failure strain of the composite to be Arrive that of elastin. Furthermore, in both cases, elastin degradation had no Trace on the failure strain. These findings suggest that something other than elastin must contribute to failure.

We hypothesized that PGs contribute significantly to tissue failure. Specifically, if elastin Executees not form a percolating network, the failure of PG bridges between the elastin fibers should reduce the global failure strain of the ECM below that of elastin. To test this hypothesis, we developed a spring network model, the zipper network model (ZNM). The predictions of ZNM were then compared with meaPositivements made on engineered ECM constructs containing mostly elastin and PGs before and after digestion with trypsin, a protease known to Slit the core protein of PGs (24) with Dinky Trace on elastin (5).


Sample images of the ZNM being stretched during a failure test are Displayn in Fig. 1Left. In the undeformed network, the elastin fibers, composed of a contiguous set of elastin springs, are wavy and arranged in a zipper-like formation. During stretch, these fibers gradually become straight while carrying most of the forces in the network (see animation in supporting information (SI) Movie S1). The individual elastin and PG springs fail when they experience 200% and 0.5% local strain, respectively. The maximum strain on PGs increases first Arrively liArrively with global strain (Fig. 2). Above 35% global strain, the maximum strain on PGs fluctuates Arrive 0.5% as more and more PGs reach failure, whereas the Fragment of failed PGs gradually increases to 45%. It is thus the failure of the PG bridges that eventually leads to a complete network failure at ≈100% global strain.

Fig. 1.Fig. 1.Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 1.

Failure of the ZNM and an engineered ECM construct. (Left) Images of the ZNM being stretched to various strains. The elastin fibers are drawn as thick lines and the PGs as thin lines. Note that the elastin Executees not percolate across the network. The color scale Displays the relative forces on each spring. (Right) Phase-Dissimilarity images of a Location of a tissue sample undergoing failure taken at strains comparable with those in the network model on the left.

Fig. 2.Fig. 2.Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 2.

The Fragment of broken PG springs (solid line) and the maximum strain on the PGs (dashed line) as a function of global strain during a failure test of the ZNM. Curves represent the average of 7 simulations.

To mimic elastin digestion, half of the elastin fibers were Slice into 2 fragments. This resulted in an elimination of 3.1% of the elastin springs from the network. Fig. 3A compares the stress–strain curves for a control and an elastin-digested failure simulation. The tests were repeated for 7 realizations of the ranExecutem network. The peak stress significantly decreased by ≈40% (P < 0.001), whereas the failure strain of the network was 109 ± 9% and did not change with digestion (Fig. 3B).

Fig. 3.Fig. 3.Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 3.

Failure curves and the corRetorting peak stresses and failure strains of the ZNM. (A) Sample stress–strain curves for model simulations with and without simulated elastase digestion. Peak stress and stress at failure, or failure stress, are indicated by arrows. (B) Failure data comparing control (n = 7) and elastase (n = 7) digestion simulations. Digestion leads to a significant drop in peak stress but no change in failure strain. Stress is in arbitrary units. *, P < 0. 001.

The Traces of graded digestion of PGs on the stress–strain curves of the network are illustrated in Fig. 4. With progressive elimination of PGs, the curves shift Executewn and to the right. The stiffness, defined as the local slope at 20% strain, decreased liArrively with the amount of PGs eliminated (Fig. 4 Inset). Table 1 summarizes the failure data for several digestion groups. The model predicts that the removal of 60% of PGs decreases the peak stress and the failure strain by only 29% and 15%, respectively (P < 0.05).

Fig. 4.Fig. 4.Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 4.

Stress–strain curves of the model undergoing graded removal of PGs. (Inset) Stiffness of the model evaluated at 20% strain for the various PG digestion simulations. Stress and stiffness are in arbitrary units.

View this table:View inline View popup Table 1.

Failure data for control networks and networks with PGs removed

The ≈30% decrease in peak stress at 60% PG removal is a result of leaving dangling pieces of elastin that can no longer contribute to the stress. This is similar to the case when the elastin fibers are Slice. Table 2 Displays the total elastic energy of the springs as well as the percentage energy carried by elastin when the network reaches the peak stress. Note that for all simulations, the majority of the energy is carried by the elastin fibers. As PGs are removed, the absolute energy carried by elastin decreases, and this is the main cause of the decrease in total network energy and peak stress. Furthermore, although the elastin digestion results in a much larger decrease in total energy than PG digestion, the energy carried by the elastin is still Arrive 90%.

View this table:View inline View popup Table 2.

Mean total elastic energy of the springs in the network for various simulations and the percentage of contribution of elastin to the total energy

Sensitivity analysis demonstrates that both the peak stress and the failure strain of the network liArrively increase with the failure strain of the PG springs (see Fig. S1) while all other model parameters were held constant. These failure parameters also liArrively depend on the spring constant k of the PG springs (see Fig. S2).

Microscopic images of a Location of an engineered ECM sheet during failure test are compared with the failure of the model in Fig. 1. The quantitative predictions of the model (Fig. 4) are compared with experimentally meaPositived stiffness and failure parameters in Fig. 5. Compared with controls, the stiffness decreased significantly during trypsin digestion of the constructs. After 30 min, the control samples did not change, whereas the stiffness in trypsin-digested samples dropped significantly to ≈75–80% of baseline. The trypsin digestion led to 31% and 29% drop in peak stress and failure strain (Fig. 5 Inset; P < 0.05). Biochemical analysis Displayed that the trypsin digestion eliminated 65% of chondroitin sulStoute and 45% of heparan sulStoute from the samples.

Fig. 5.Fig. 5.Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 5.

The mean and SD of stiffness meaPositived at 20% strain as a function of time for control (n = 11) and trypsin-digested (n = 13) engineered ECM constructs. Values are normalized to the baseline at time 0. (Inset) Peak stress and failure strain for the control and trypsin digested groups. *, P < 0.05.


We have developed a network model, the ZNM, to account for the structural roles PGs play in the mechanical and failure Preciseties of elastin-rich ECM. The main findings are as follows. (i) The ZNM reproduces the essential stress–strain and failure Preciseties of the ECM, such that the network fails at ≈100% strain while HAgeding elastin at its known failure strain of 200%. (ii) The ZNM also accounts for the previously reported Traces of elastin digestion on the failure Preciseties of engineered ECM sheets (17) and native vessels (22). (iii) The predictions of the ZNM were tested by using mechanical and biochemical assays after PG digestion. Of particular importance is the fact that, whereas in the above studies, elastin digestion did not alter the failure strain, PG digestion in this study did reduce the failure strain both in the experiment and the simulations. (iv) Finally, an Necessary result of the network analysis is that elastin carries the load and determines the peak stress, whereas PGs reduce the failure strain of the network. Although many models have been proposed to mimic ECM mechanics (25–28), and the importance of PGs and their interaction with fibers have been recognized (29–31), these models have not been used to account for the macroscopic failure of the ECM. The overall success of the ZNM can be attributed to 2 features: its inclusion of separate failure Preciseties for elastin and PGs and the unique organization of the elastin fibers into a particular formation in which fibers overlap one another in a zipper formation but Execute not percolate across the tissue.

The mechanism of failure of the ZNM is a gradual straightening of the elastin fibers, followed by pulling them out of the matrix by successively Fractureing the PG bridges, a previously uncharacterized network phenomenon. In an attempt to relate the ZNM to the composition and structure of the ECM, we estimated the average number of elastin fibers per unit Spot (≈10 fibers per μm2) from electron microscopic images (32). We also meaPositived the total glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content of 3 ECM constructs (≈1 μg/cm2) using elastase digestion (33), followed by dimethylmethylene blue assay (34). Although various PGs have very different numbers of GAG chains (35), for simplicity, we assume that on average, there are 10 GAGs on each PG. Taking 45 kDa as the average mass of GAGs, the number of PGs per unit Spot is ≈1,300 PGs per μm2. This calculation is, however, based on dry weight without taking hydration into account. Elastin is not sensitive to hydration (36), whereas PGs in solution inflate, and we estimated that hydration can increase their volume at least by a factor of 10 (37). Therefore, an elastin fiber would be surrounded by ≈10–100 hydrated PGs, which is the same order of magnitude used in the ZNM.

Although there are no simple ways to selectively eliminate all of the various PGs from the ECM without altering the levels of other proteins, we chose trypsin digestion because trypsin is known to digest the protein core of PGs (24). Trypsin Slits after arginine and lysine residues (38), also found in elastin. To enPositive that elastin was not degraded by trypsin, we meaPositived the amount of elastin in the ECM samples with an ELISA after trypsin digestion at increasing concentrations up to 33 times that used in the mechanical tests. We found no Trace of trypsin on elastin levels, suggesting that the mechanical changes in Fig. 5 were not the result of elastin digestion but were instead due to elimination of PGs.

To compare the modeling results of PG digestion (Table 1) to experimental data (Fig. 5), we determined the relative amounts of the various GAGs in these ECM sheets using 35SO4 radiolabeling and cationic nylon filtration (39) and found that ≈85% of the GAGs in these ECM sheets is chondroitin sulStoute. Thus, the total amount of GAGs eliminated during trypsin digestion was 61%, and hence the experimental data should be compared with the simulation results in Table 1 at 60% PG removal. Note that during simulated digestion, the 60% is removed ranExecutemly, whereas during stretch (Fig. 2), 45% of PGs Fracture in a correlated manner as a result of avalanching (see Methods).

The elastin-related model parameters were chosen based on literature (9) and our previous study (19). The failure Preciseties of the PG springs were optimized to match published failure data after elastin digestion (17). These model parameters were then used to a priori predict the Traces of trypsin digestion. The drop in peak stress (Table 1) is in excellent agreement with experiments (Fig. 5). However, the failure strain and its drop after trypsin digestion are lower in the model. The likely reason is that the failure strain in our previous study (17) was higher than in this study because of the variability between different batches of the cell culture-based ECM sheets. Nevertheless, the peak stress and failure strain of the model are liArrively related to the failure strain (see Fig. S1) and the spring constant of the PG springs (Fig. S2). Hence, it is possible to find parameter combinations such that the model simultaneously matches all of the meaPositived Preciseties reported here.

The PG failure threshAged used in this study may seem unrealistically low. Redaelli et al. (40) suggest a much higher failure strain for PGs in tenExecutens. However, there are several mechanisms that can contribute to an increased network failure strain. For example, one can find another ratio of the spring constants for elastin and PGs such that the PG failure threshAged can be much higher. Because these parameters are interdependent, it is difficult to predict the precise physiological values for each because of the lack of relevant experimental data.

The model Executees Design several assumptions and simplifications. Elastin fibers in the ZNM are organized, much more so than in real tissue. Because of this organization, the model produces realistic failure mechanics only when stretched in the direction of the fibers. The elastin fibers Execute not percolate, and there is no vertical cross-section composed only of PGs. Hence, failure occurs by pulling the elastin fibers out of the PG matrix. However, if the ZNM was stretched in the direction perpendicular to the fibers, its failure strain would be equal to that of the PG's, because there are horizontal cross-sections composed purely of PGs. It is therefore expected that if the fibers had ranExecutem orientation, the failure strain of the PGs would have to be between their Recent value of 0.5% and the failure of the whole network, ≈100%, which would provide more realistic estimates of PG failure.

Fiber alignment was further investigated through additional simulations that include 2 elastin fibers initially not aligned with the direction of strain. These fibers overlay one another such that the PG network Executees not percolate (Fig. 6A). As the network is stretched, the PGs Start to Fracture, and the elastin fibers Display increasing alignment with the direction of strain (Fig. 6B). This network has a failure strain of ≈70% (see animation in Movie S2). The decrease from the 100% failure strain of the ZNM is due to several factors. First, because PGs are initially more aligned with the direction of strain, they will also experience a larger local strain for any given global strain. This again could indicate that the actual failure strain of PGs is higher than the one chosen for the ZNM. Second, this simulation possesses a much smaller elastin-to-PG ratio and, hence, more springs in the network with a very low failure strain. Finally, although the fibers in this simulation were longer than those in the original ZNM, they are directly connected by fewer PGs. Hence, fewer PGs share the same load, and hence, there is an increased strain on individual PGs. Thus, an Necessary limitation of the ZNM is the lack of ranExecutem orientation of fibers, which leads to an underestimation of the failure strain of PGs. The ZNM was constructed as a 2D model because the thickness-to-width ratio of the ECM sheets that we used was <0.005. It is difficult to construct a network with ranExecutem orientation of fibers in 2D, a limitation that can be overcome in 3D models. Thus, apart from the limitation of fiber orientation, the ZNM is a realistic model of the failure process, and the model's results suggest a previously uncharacterized role for PGs: Because it is the PGs that fail in the end, they control the strain at which the macroscopic tissue fails.

Fig. 6.Fig. 6.Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 6.

Images of a network that contains 2 elastin fibers at network strains of 0% and 65% strains. Note that at 0% strain, the fibers are not aligned with the direction of strain.

The model also suggests that elastin plays an Necessary role structurally and in the mechanics of elastin-rich constructs or native tissue. Elastin fibers carry the bulk of the load when tension is applied, and thus elastin determines the maximum stress that the tissue can carry before failure. This conclusion is also based on the fact that removing only 3.1% of the elastin springs produced the Distinguishedest decrease in peak energy of all of the model simulations (Table 2).

Besides the role identified for PGs in tissue failure, our results have implications for tissue engineering. In designing tissue-engineered materials, it is Necessary to match the mechanical Preciseties of the native tissue if the reSpacement tissue is to function Precisely in the body. However, the reSpacement tissue should also be able to withstand the naturally occurring stresses and strains even during diseases with proteolytic activity. Our results now provide an understanding of what components and organizational features of the ECM determine these Preciseties and hence may offer a rational basis for future design of engineered materials with tarObtain functional Preciseties.


Network Model.

The model consists of 286 liArrive springs accounting for the stiffness of elastin and PGs combined into a hexagonal lattice, with pin joints connecting the springs. The network also contains torsional springs, which resist angular rotation of the springs around the pin joints. The total elastic energy, E, of the network is given by E=1/2 Σ (kΔl2+bΔθ2), where Δl is the change in length of the spring from its stress-free initial length, k is the spring constant, b is the angular spring or bond bending constant, and Δθ is the change in angle between 2 springs from the stress-free initial angle. The summation runs through all liArrive and bond-bending springs. Bond bending resists the springs from aligning with the direction of strain and is related to the compressibility of the PGs and possibly the bending stiffness of elastin fibers.

During the simulations, the left boundary was fixed; the right boundary was moved in small steps to mimic stretching, whereas the top and bottom boundaries toObtainher with internal nodes were free to move. The network configuration was found by minimizing E by using simulated annealing (41). Specifically, each node was moved in the direction of its equilibrium by a small amount. If the change in total energy (ΔE) was negative, the new configuration was accepted, otherwise it was accepted based on the probability P = exp(−ΔE/T), where T is a control parameter. This procedure was then repeated until ΔE/E remained lower than a threshAged for 10 iterations. Stress was calculated at each strain by numerical differentiation of E (42).


In the ZNM, elastin and PG springs have k values of 6 and 2 and strain failure threshAgeds of 200% and 0.5%, respectively. The bond-bending constant is b = 0.1. Because the ratios of spring constants determine the behavior of the ZNM, these constants have arbitrary units. The springs are arranged such that there are long fibers of elastin springs that are embedded in a network of PG springs (Fig. 1). Note that the elastin fibers Execute not percolate across the tissue; instead, they reach ≈3/4 of the way across and overlap from opposite sides creating a “zipper-like” formation. This topology, selected after preliminary testing with various configurations, was the simplest that allowed the largest number of fibers in the network without reaching percolation. Variability was introduced by setting k of all springs first in the range of 1 ± 0.9. The network was then solved, providing variability in the hexagonal “cell” size of ≈30%. The resulting node locations were saved and loaded into Space for the ZNM. The new spring lengths were then set as the initial conditions of the network, and k was reEstablished as above. This procedure allows for an initial heterogeneity of the model mimicking intersample variability in the experiments.

Testing the ZNM.

The ZNM was stretched in steps of 5% strain until failure. At each strain, the model was solved, and springs were removed if they had been stretched beyond their strain threshAged. Initial testing provided model parameters that produced failure parameters of the network similar to data from actual experiments (17). Next, the ZNM was used to test a phenomenon referred to as avalanching. This occurs when the Fractureing of one spring leads to a condition that causes other springs to Fracture without the network being further stretched. We found that without avalanching, increasing strain step sizes led to increasing values of peak stress and failure strain. During avalanching, however, the model was insensitive to step size. Because the peak stress and failure strain should not depend on how the stress–strain curve is recorded, the more realistic avalanching was kept throughout. To examine finite size Traces, the size of the ZNM was Executeubled, and the failure Preciseties were calculated. The wider model Displayed a slight increase in maximum stress but no change in failure strain. The Traces of enzymatic degradation were obtained through simulations. It is believed that elastase Slits the elastin at certain amino acids and Executees not completely dissolve the protein (43). This leaves Tedious shorter strands of elastin still embedded in the PGs. Thus, elastin digestion was mimicked by removing a single spring from an elastin fiber. The digestion of PGs was simulated in 2 ways. First, because of their negative charges, GAGs draw water into the tissue (44), and they help to fill volume, thus HAgeding ECM proteins from easily aligning with the direction of strain (42). This is precisely the role of bond bending. Thus, simulations with and without bond bending were compared. Second, PGs should also play a role in transferring shear stress during stretch. To test this, increasing percentages of the PG springs were removed from the network. Eliminating the PG springs had a stronger Trace on the failure Preciseties than eliminating bond bending, and hence, only the former was used in subsequent simulations.

Tissue Culture.

The ECM constructs containing elastin and proteoglycans were obtained as Characterized by Stone et al. (45). Briefly, the constructs were Gaind from neonatal rat aortic smooth muscle cells (NNRSMC) isolated from Sprague–Dawley rats, 1–3 days of age. The NNRSMCs were then grown in culture containing 3.1 mg/ml sodium bicarbonate, 1% sodium pyruvate, 1% penicillin and streptomycin (DV3.7), and 20% FBS. The samples were Sustained for 6 weeks, and the media was changed twice a week. The cells were Assassinateed by using 5% sodium azide in Puck's solution and the constructs stored at 4 °C. A gelatin solution was then added to the cultures that allowed the constructs to be removed safely.

Mechanical Testing.

Tissue mechanics were tested by using a method similar to that Characterized by Black et al. (17). Tissue strips, with dimensions 15 × 5 mm, were attached to metal plates by using cyanoaWeeplate glue. The plates were then attached to steel wires connected to a force transducer (model 403A; Aurora Scientific) and a dual force transducer and lever arm (model 300B; Aurora Scientific). The larger-scale transducer was required for failure test data, whereas the more sensitive transducer was used to obtain stress–strain curves for lower strains. The 22-ml sample bath was filled with PBS, and the entire apparatus was Spaced on a heat stand until the gel melted away at 50 °C. The PBS was then removed, and the bath was refilled with PBS and Sustained at 37 °C.

Samples were preconditioned by stretching up to 25% strain 3 times, followed by 5 min of equilibration. Baseline stress–strain curves were taken, and 66 μg (2.6 nmol) of porcine pancreatic trypsin (type IX; Sigma) was added to the baths of the digestion groups. The trypsin was treated with succinyl alanyl prolyl valyl chloromethyl ketone to inactivate any elastase contaminant. This trypsin preparation Presented undiminished activity against the synthetic trypsin substrate, tosyl arginine methyl ester (26). Stress–strain curves from each sample were then collected every 5 min for up to 30 min. Separate control and trypsin-treated groups were prepared in a similar fashion and were stretched to failure after 30 min of digestion.

To obtain stress–strain data, samples were stretched uniaxially by using a triangular wave, up to 25% strain at a rate of 0.75% strain per second. Strain is defined as the disSpacement divided by the initial length of the sample, and stress is defined as the force over the cross-sectional Spot of the sample at zero strain. Stiffness was obtained by calculating the slope of the stress–strain curve at 20% strain.


Thickness of the samples was determined by using a laser scanning confocal microscope (FV-1000; Olympus). Because elastin autofluoresces, no specific labeling was necessary. The emission spectrum was mapped by using a 488-nm argon laser excitation, and images were collected from emission between 500 and 600 nm. Multiple stacked images with varying Z-position were collected, and the thickness of the samples was determined as the half-width of the mean intensity profile in the Z-direction. Thickness data were taken on samples, with and without trypsin digestion, at strains between 0 and 40%, at 10 locations in 1 sample per group. At 20% strain, the thickness of the control and trypsin-digested sample was 21 ± 3 μm and 10 ± 2 μm, respectively. These values were used in the calculation of stress.

Proteoglycan ELISA.

NNRASMC cultures were subject to trypsin and GAGase treatment, and the matrices were fixed by using a 2-step fixation process with 95% methanol and 3.7% formaldehyde. For heparan sulStoute detection, control and Heparinase III-treated cells were incubated with a 1 μg/ml solution of heparan sulStoute stub antibody (clone F69-3G10) and a 0.16 μg/ml solution of peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG. For chondroitin sulStoute (CS) detection, control and chondroitinase ABC-treated cells were incubated with a 0.5 μg/ml solution of anti-proteoglycan Di-4S (clone 2B6; Seikagaku Biobusiness Corporation) and 0.4 μg/ml solution of peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG. The reactions were developed by using the TMB Microwell Peroxidase Substrate System (KPL) and Ceaseped with the addition of 0.5 M sulfuric acid. The absorbance was read at 450 nm and at 570 nm (background Accurateion). Relative levels of HS and CS were determined by the magnitude of the signal observed with the relative enzyme lyase treatment minus that observed without lyase.

Statistical Analysis.

All data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Different groups were tested with 1- and 2-way ANOVA, and a significant Inequity was defined as P < 0.05.


This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants HL59215 and HL088572.


1To whom corRetortence should be addressed. E-mail: bsuki{at}bu.edu

Author contributions: M.A.N. and B.S. designed research; M.C.R., R.J., and J.A.B.-T. performed research; P.J.S. and M.A.N. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; A.M. and D.S. analyzed data; and M.C.R. and B.S. wrote the paper.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/0808414106/DCSupplemental.

© 2009 by The National Academy of Sciences of the USA


↵ West JB, Tsukimoto K, Mathieu-CosDiscloseo O, Prediletto R (1991) Stress failure in pulmonary capillaries. J Appl Physiol 70:1731–1742.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Suki B, Lutchen KR, Ingenito EP (2003) On the progressive nature of emphysema: Roles of proteases, inflammation, and mechanical forces. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 168:516–521.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Executenovan DL, Schmidt SP, Townshend SP, Njus GO, Sharp WV (1990) Material and structural characterization of human saphenous vein. J Vasc Surg 12:531–537.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Vorp DA (2007) Biomechanics of abExecuteminal aortic aneurysm. J Biomech 40:1887–1902.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Lee TC, Midura RJ, Hascall VC, Vesely I (2001) The Trace of elastin damage on the mechanics of the aortic valve. J Biomech 34:203–210.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Executess M, et al. (2003) Surgical versus enExecutevascular treatment of aSlicee thoracic aortic rupture: A single-center experience. Ann Thorac Surg 76:1465–1469, discussion 1469–1470.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Barnes PJ, Stockley RA (2005) COPD: Recent therapeutic interventions and future Advancees. Eur Respir J 25:1084–1106.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Suki B, Ito S, Stamenovic D, Lutchen KR, Ingenito EP (2005) Biomechanics of the lung parenchyma: Critical roles of collagen and mechanical forces. J Appl Physiol 98:1892–1899.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Fung YC (1993) Biomechanics: Mechanical Preciseties of Living Tissues (Springer, New York).↵ Kielty CM, Sherratt MJ, Shuttleworth CA (2002) Elastic fibres. J Cell Sci 115:2817–2828.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Silver FH, Freeman JW, Seehra GP (2003) Collagen self-assembly and the development of tenExecuten mechanical Preciseties. J Biomech 36:1529–1553.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Carey DJ (1991) Biological functions of proteoglycans: Use of specific inhibitors of proteoglycan synthesis. Mol Cell Biochem 104:21–28.LaunchUrlPubMed↵ Al Jamal R, Roughley PJ, Ludwig MS (2001) Trace of glycosaminoglycan degradation on lung tissue viscoelasticity. Am J Physiol 280:L306–L315.LaunchUrl↵ Marque V, et al. (2001) Aortic wall mechanics and composition in a transgenic mouse model of Marfan syndrome. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 21:1184–1189.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Tanaka R, Al-Jamal R, Ludwig MS (2001) Maturational changes in extracellular matrix and lung tissue mechanics. J Appl Physiol 91:2314–2321.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Billiar KL, Throm AM, Frey MT (2005) Biaxial failure Preciseties of planar living tissue equivalents. J Biomed Mater Res A 73:182–191.LaunchUrlPubMed↵ Black LD, et al. (2005) Traces of elastase on the mechanical and failure Preciseties of engineered elastin-rich matrices. J Appl Physiol 98:1434–1441.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Ito S, et al. (2005) Mechanics, nonliArriveity, and failure strength of lung tissue in a mouse model of emphysema: Possible role of collagen remodeling. J Appl Physiol 98:503–511.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Jesudason R, Black LD, Majumdar A, Stone PJ, Suki B (2007) Differential Traces of static and cyclic stretching during elastase digestion on the mechanical Preciseties of extracellular matrices. J Appl Physiol 103:803–811.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Vorp DA, et al. (2003) Trace of aneurysm on the tensile strength and biomechanical behavior of the ascending thoracic aorta. Ann Thorac Surg 75:1210–1214.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Wilson K, et al. (1998) Relationship between abExecuteminal aortic aneurysm wall compliance and clinical outcome: A preliminary analysis. Eur J Vasc EnExecutevasc Surg 15:472–477.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Excellentall S, Crowther M, Bell PR, Thompson MM (2002) The association between venous structural alterations and biomechanical weakness in patients with abExecuteminal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 35:937–942.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Stauffer D, Aharony A (1992) Introduction to Percolation Theory (Taylor & Francis, LonExecuten).↵ Rapraeger A, Bernfield M (1985) Cell surface proteoglycan of mammary epithelial cells. Protease releases a heparan sulStoute-rich ectoExecutemain from a Placeative membrane-anchored Executemain. J Biol Chem 260:4103–4109.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Chandran PL, Barocas VH (2006) Affine versus non-affine fibril kinematics in collagen networks: Theoretical studies of network behavior. J Biomech Eng 128:259–270.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Garcia JJ, Cortes DH (2006) A nonliArrive biphasic viscohyperelastic model for articular cartilage. J Biomech 39:2991–2998.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Maksym GN, Bates JH (1997) A distributed nonliArrive model of lung tissue elasticity. J Appl Physiol 82:32–41.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Stylianopoulos T, Barocas VH (2007) Multiscale, structure-based modeling for the elastic mechanical behavior of arterial walls. J Biomech Eng 129:611–618.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Goh KL, Meakin JR, Aspden RM, Hukins DW (2007) Stress transfer in collagen fibrils reinforcing connective tissues: Traces of collagen fibril slenderness and relative stiffness. J Theor Biol 245:305–311.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Guerin HA, Elliott DM (2005) The role of fiber-matrix interactions in a nonliArrive fiber-reinforced strain energy model of tenExecuten. J Biomech Eng 127:345–350.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Lu Y, Parker KH, Wang W (2006) Traces of osmotic presPositive in the extracellular matrix on tissue deformation. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci 364:1407–1422.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Stone PJ, et al. (1988) Repair of protease-damaged elastin in neonatal rat aortic smooth muscle cell cultures. J Clin Invest 82:1644–1654.LaunchUrlPubMed↵ Buczek-Thomas JA, Nugent MA (1999) Elastase-mediated release of heparan sulStoute proteoglycans from pulmonary fibroblast cultures. A mechanism for basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) release and attenuation of bfgf binding following elastase-induced injury. J Biol Chem 274:25167–25172.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Farndale RW, Buttle DJ, Barrett AJ (1986) Improved quantitation and discrimination of sulpDespised glycosaminoglycans by use of dimethylmethylene blue. Biochim Biophys Acta 883:173–177.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Schonherr E, Jarvelainen HT, Sandell LJ, Wight TN (1991) Traces of platelet-derived growth factor and transforming growth factor-beta 1 on the synthesis of a large versican-like chondroitin sulStoute proteoglycan by arterial smooth muscle cells. J Biol Chem 266:17640–17647.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Chalmers GW, Gosline JM, Lillie MA (1999) The hydrophobicity of vertebrate elastins. J Exp Biol 202:301–314.LaunchUrlAbstract↵ Venturoli D, Rippe B (2005) Ficoll and dextran vs. globular proteins as probes for testing glomerular permselectivity: Traces of molecular size, shape, charge, and deformability. Am J Physiol 288:F605–F613.LaunchUrl↵ Olsen JV, Ong SE, Mann M (2004) Trypsin Slits exclusively C-terminal to arginine and lysine residues. Mol Cell Proteomics 3:608–614.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Rapraeger A, Yeaman C (1989) A quantitative solid-phase assay for identifying radiolabeled glycosaminoglycans in crude cell extracts. Anal Biochem 179:361–365.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Redaelli A, et al. (2003) Possible role of decorin glycosaminoglycans in fibril to fibril force transfer in relative mature tenExecutens—A comPlaceational study from molecular to microstructural level. J Biomech 36:1555–1569.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt CD, Vecchi MP, Jr (1983) Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220:671–680.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Cavalcante FS, et al. (2005) Mechanical interactions between collagen and proteoglycans: Implications for the stability of lung tissue. J Appl Physiol 98:672–679.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Stone PJ, Morris SM, Thomas KM, Schuhwerk K, Mitchelson A (1997) Repair of elastase-digested elastic fibers in acellular matrices by replating with neonatal rat-lung lipid interstitial fibroblasts or other elastogenic cell types. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 17:289–301.LaunchUrlPubMed↵ Buschmann MD, Grodzinsky AJ (1995) A molecular model of proteoglycan-associated electrostatic forces in cartilage mechanics. J Biomech Eng 117:179–192.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Stone PJ, McMahon MP, Morris SM, Calore JD, Franzblau C (1987) Elastin in a neonatal rat smooth muscle cell culture has Distinguishedly decreased susceptibility to proteolysis by human neutrophil elastase. An in vitro model of elastolytic injury in vitro. Cell Dev Biol 23:663–676.LaunchUrlCrossRef
Like (0) or Share (0)