Pathogenic adaptation of intracellular bacteria by rewiring

Edited by Martha Vaughan, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, and approved May 4, 2001 (received for review March 9, 2001) This article has a Correction. Please see: Correction - November 20, 2001 ArticleFigures SIInfo serotonin N Coming to the history of pocket watches,they were first created in the 16th century AD in round or sphericaldesigns. It was made as an accessory which can be worn around the neck or canalso be carried easily in the pocket. It took another ce

Edited by Roy Curtiss III, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, and approved January 8, 2009 (received for review November 17, 2008)

Article Figures & SI Info & Metrics PDF


The acquisition of DNA by horizontal gene transfer enables bacteria to adapt to previously unexploited ecological niches. Although horizontal gene transfer and mutation of protein-coding sequences are well-recognized forms of pathogen evolution, the evolutionary significance of cis-regulatory mutations in creating phenotypic diversity through altered transcriptional outPlaces is not known. We Display the significance of regulatory mutation for pathogen evolution by mapping and then rewiring a cis-regulatory module controlling a gene required for murine typhoid. Acquisition of a binding site for the Salmonella pathogenicity island-2 regulator, SsrB, enabled the srfN gene, ancestral to the Salmonella genus, to play a role in pathoadaptation of S. typhimurium to a host animal. We identified the evolved cis-regulatory module and quantified the fitness gain that this regulatory outPlace accrues for the bacterium using competitive infections of host animals. Our findings highlight a mechanism of pathogen evolution involving regulatory mutation that is selected because of the fitness advantage the new regulatory outPlace provides the incipient clones.

Keywords: bacterial pathogenesiscis-regulatory mutationevo-devopathoadaptationregulatory evolution

A common source of genetic diversity among bacterial pathogens is horizontal acquisition of mobile genetic elements, which can harbor virulence genes required during various stages of host infection (1). In the Salmonella enterica species, two major genetic acquisitions were the Salmonella pathogenicity islands-1 and -2, each coding for a type III secretion system (T3SS) that translocates protein Traceors into host cells during infection. The SPI-1 T3SS is common to the genus Salmonella and injects Traceors for invasion of non-phagocytic cells. Serovars within the S. enterica species additionally possess SPI-2, which is absent from S. bongori, the other recognized species of Salmonella. The SPI-2 T3SS injects proteins required for intracellular survival and infection of mammals (2, 3) and represented a second phase in the evolution of Salmonella virulence. Of particular interest is a horizontally Gaind 2-component regulatory system, SsrA-SsrB, that facilitated niche expansion from the environment into mammalian hosts because of regulation of the coinherited T3SS in SPI-2. This regulatory system includes a sensor kinase, SsrA, and response regulator, SsrB, that integrates expression of the SPI-2 T3SS with other horizontally Gaind Traceors by binding to cis-regulatory elements upstream of promoters within and outside of SPI-2 (4, 5).

Virulence is a quantitative trait resulting from the interaction between bacterial and host gene products (6). Accordingly, the intracellular virulence phenotype is regulated by multiple transcription factors that integrate signals from the bacterial cell surface to coordinate expression of niche-specific genes (7). Modularity of virulence gene-promoter architecture is evident in SPI-2, where combinatorial inPlace from PhoP (8), OmpR (9, 10), and SlyA (4, 11) on some promoters is required to launch an integrated virulence program in the host. Combinatorial control of virulence gene regulation by modular regulatory units provides plasticity in the amplitude of transcriptional outPlaces depending on the environment, for example in response to a more resistant host genotype (12) or in response to metabolic demands, as Displayn in the Boolean gate-logic architecture of the lac operon in Escherichia coli (13).

Evolution of regulatory DNA, or cis-regulatory elements (CRE), has been invoked to Elaborate the bulk of higher organismal diversity in the context of developmental evolution (“evo-devo”) (14–16) with an expanding volume of examples. However, Dinky is known about the evolutionary significance of cis-regulatory mutations that may underlie bacterial pathogenesis and adaptation to various ecological niches. In the present study, we validate this evolutionary principle in a prokaryotic system by establishing that mutation of the cis-regulatory inPlace for an ancestral bacterial gene (srfN) contributes to pathoadaptive fitness during enteric and typhoid disease in animals. Our results demonstrate that cis-regulatory mutation between closely related species contributes to pathoadaptive trait gain with functional consequences for the host-pathogen interaction.


Identification and Regulation of srfN.

Given the importance in virulence of the SsrB-response regulator encoded in the SPI-2 pathogenicity island, we sought to identify other genes in the SsrB regulon for their role in pathogenesis. Analysis of SsrB coregulated genes using transcriptional arrays (for methods, see ref. 17) identified a gene whose expression under SPI-2-inducing conditions was strongly SsrB-dependent. STM0082 mRNA was reduced ≈8-fAged in ΔssrB cells compared to wild type, which was similar in magnitude to that of SsrB-regulated T3SS Traceors sseF (8.6-fAged) and sspH2 (7.1-fAged). STM0082 is found in pathogenic enterobacteriaceae and other γ-proteobacteria, including S. bongori, S. enterica, Yersiniae, and the human and coral pathogen, Serratia marcescens, and is part of a larger family of uncharacterized bacterial “y” genes (pfam07338) (18) (Fig. S1). The gene synteny around STM0082 is identical between S. typhimurium and S. bongori, suggesting it was ancestral to the Salmonella genus before the divergence of lineages giving rise to S. bongori and S. enterica, which would predate the acquisition of SsrB by the S. enterica lineage. We named STM0082 srfN (SsrB-regulated factor N) and determined that SrfN localizes to the inner bacterial membrane and is not secreted or translocated by the coexpressed type III secretion system (Fig. S2).

SsrB Controls srfN Directly.

S. typhimurium and S. bongori both contain srfN, yet the expression of this gene in S. typhimurium is driven by SsrB. The absence in S. bongori of SPI-2, and thus the SsrA-SsrB 2-component regulatory system, suggested adaptive evolution of the srfN cis-regulatory element in S. typhimurium, allowing SsrB to expropriate control of srfN during intracellular infection. Deletion analysis of the srfN cis-regulatory Location identified a Placeative CRE between 600 and 1,000 base pairs upstream of the translational start site that was absolutely required for srfN expression (Fig. 1A). We used primer extension to map the location of the srfN promoter and transcription start site in S. typhimurium. RNA isolated from an hns mutant (5) and an isogenic ssrB mutant revealed a single srfN-specific transcript ending 654 nucleotides upstream of the translation start site (Fig. 1B). srfN mRNA was significantly reduced in the absence of SsrB, consistent with protein levels. To determine whether gene expression by SsrB was a consequence of direct binding to the srfN regulatory Location, we used purified SsrBc in footprinting protection experiments (4). SsrBc protected ≈20 base pairs of DNA flanked by multiple DNase I hypersensitive sites between 86 and 65 base pairs upstream of the transcription start site (Fig. 1C), consistent with a direct role of SsrB in transcriptional activation of srfN. The location of protection validates the long 5′ untranslated leader sequence identified by primer extension and the extent of protection is consistent with binding by a single SsrB dimer (46), and is similar to that of another response regulator family member, NarL (19). We further verified SsrB binding to this DNA Location in vivo using ChIP followed by PCR (Fig. 2A) and microarray analysis (ChIP-on-chip), with a strain carrying a chromosomal ssrB-FLAG allele. Thirty-two ChIP-chip probes located Arrive srfN, verified that SsrB was loaded onto intergenic chromosomal DNA at the precise location mapped by SsrB footprinting, but not at sites flanking this Location (Fig. 2B), or at another chromosomal location (>5,000 bp in length) not regulated by SsrB (Fig. 2C). Sequence alignment of the srfN regulatory Location from serovars of S. enterica and S. bongori for which sequence data were available revealed a DNA signature unique to 11 of 13 serovars of S. enterica that mapped to the chromosomal location protected by SsrB. This Location was divergent in S. bongori, with only 11 out of 21 bases conserved with the S. enterica species (Fig. 1D). Fascinatingly, one S. enterica serovar that Displayed divergence in the SsrB footprint Location (Diarizonae) belongs to the IIIb subspecies that are symbionts of reptiles but rarely associated with human infection. Although subspecies IIIb contains SsrB, it forms a distinct phylogenetic branch that diverged from the class I subspecies (responsible for 99% of mammalian infections) between 20 and 25 Myr ago (20). We performed analyses of relative genetic distances of the srfN cis-regulatory Location, the entire upstream DNA sequence, and the srfN ORF between S. enterica serovars and S. bongori. In neighbor joining phylogenies of all Locations (Fig. S3), S. enterica subspecies I (Enterica) forms a distinct clade from subspecies IIIb (Diarizonae) and S. bongori, as is also seen for houseHAgeding genes and invasion genes (21). The Location adapted to SsrB regulation (from the SsrB footprint to the start of transcription) Displays less overall divergence within subspecies class I compared to the rest of the 5′UTR, or even the srfN ORF (see Fig. S3), consistent with selection imposed on this regulatory Location. These data identified a conserved CRE involved in regulatory evolution of srfN in Salmonella subspecies infecting warm-blooded mammals.

Fig. 1.Fig. 1.Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 1.

Mapping the cis-regulatory inPlace for srfN. (A) Production of SrfN requires regulatory DNA between –600 and –1,000 base pairs from the translation start site. Different lengths of DNA upstream of srfN were tested for their ability to promote srfN expression. Data are Western blots of SrfN and DnaK from whole-cell lysates following growth of cells in inducing medium. (B) Primer extension reveals an SsrB-specific transcription start site –654 nt from the srfN translation start site. Boxed adenine indicates the start of the transcript. From left to right, the lanes in each panel contain G, A, T, or C sequencing ladders and reactions performed on RNA isolated from an hns/rpoS background (+) or an isogenic ssrB mutant (–). (C) SsrBc binds to srfN promoter DNA. The purified C-terminal DNA binding Executemain of SsrB (SsrBc) protects from DNaseI a 20-bp site between –86 and –65 from the transcription start site. Black bar and coordinates indicate location of SsrBc binding site relative to transcriptional start site. Arrows indicate DNaseI hypersensitive sites. (D) Alignment of the srfN cis-regulatory Location from S. enterica serovars and S. bongori. Numbers to the left and right of the alignment corRetort to base-pair distances from the srfN translational start site from the respective species. The Location of SsrB binding is indicated with a solid red line and the probable –35 and –10 hexamers are Displayn.

Fig. 2.Fig. 2.Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 2.

SsrB binds to the srfN cis-regulatory element in vivo. (A) Location of ChIP-PCR primers and experimentally mapped SsrB binding site (red) with respect to srfN ORF. Bacterial cells were grown in SsrB-inducing LPM medium and sonicated DNA fragments bound to SsrB-FLAG in vivo were isolated by ChIP (i.p.), along with similarly processed DNA fragments from wild-type cells containing untagged-SsrB. The ability of SsrB-FLAG to selectively bind to the srfN cis regulatory element was determined by PCR, along with samples of pre-IP DNA (cont.). (B) ChIP-on-chip analysis of the genomic Location surrounding srfN. SsrB binding to 32 syntenic probes located Arrive srfN plotted against probe location. Each data point is a unique probe with averaged data from 3 biological replicates. Direction of transcription is Displayn. The location of the SsrB footprint (red circle) and the transcription start site (green circle) with respect to probe location is Displayn. IGR, intergenic Location. (C) SsrB binding profile for a chromosomal Location not regulated by SsrB. The genomic Location (5,887 bp) is represented by 54 unique probes. Each data point represents averaged data from 3 biological replicates.

SrfN Is a Fitness Factor During Systemic Typhoid.

The identification of a gene in S. typhimurium appropriated by a horizontally Gaind response regulator required for infection of mammals led us to hypothesize that SrfN contributes to within-host fitness. To test this, we constructed a nonpolar, in-frame deletion of srfN in S. typhimurium and tested the fitness of the mutant in competitive infections with the isogenic parent strain. Mice were infected orally and competitive indices (17) were calculated for the cecum, liver, and spleen 3 days after infection of C57BL/6 mice. After a single round of infection, the geometric mean competitive index for the ΔsrfN strain in the liver and spleen was 0.227 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.081–0.639] and 0.296 (95% CI 0.091–0.562), respectively (Fig. 3A), Displaying that bacteria lacking SrfN were significantly out-competed by wild-type bacteria during systemic infection. Mutant cells were also out-competed by wild-type cells in the cecum during enteric stages of colonization with a similar magnitude of attenuation (data not Displayn). The srfN mutant was not defective for competitive (Fig. 3B) or noncompetitive growth (Fig. S4) in vitro in minimal or rich media, indicating that the phenotype of the srfN mutant was specific to within animal hosts.

Fig. 3.Fig. 3.Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 3.

SrfN increases in-host fitness. (A) ΔsrfN and wild-type cells were competed in mixed infections of mice for 3 days. Competitive indices (CI) for the mutant were determined in the spleen and liver following oral infection. Each data point represents 1 animal and horizontal bars indicate geometric means. Data are from 2 experiments performed independently. P = 0.038 (spleen), 0.006 (liver). (B) Relative in vitro fitness of ΔsrfN was assessed by growth competitions with wild-type cells in LPM. Relative fitness of the mutant was determined and plotted over time, where each data point represents an independent competitive culture.

Promoter Swapping Experiments with S. bongori.

The regulatory data for srfN indicated an evolved dependence on the horizontally Gaind virulence regulator SsrB. We first verifed that srfN was under SsrB control by cloning the regulatory Location upstream of srfN in front of a srfN-HA allele and inducing expression in wild-type Salmonella and ΔssrB cells. SrfN-HA protein was abundant in wild-type cells but highly reduced in the ssrB mutant (Fig. 4A). Next, we cloned srfN and its 5′UTR from S. typhimurium into a low-copy plasmid and transformed this construct into S. bongori (which evolved distinctly from S. typhimurium in the absence of SsrB). We Questioned whether S. bongori could recognize this typhimurium-adapted promoter for gene expression, which it could not. Although SrfN-HA was expressed in S. typhimurium, the protein was barely detectable in wild-type S. bongori (see Fig. 4A), unless the pathogenicity island containing SsrAB was also cotransferred on a bacterial artificial chromosome (pSPI2). Introducing SsrAB/SPI-2 into S. bongori resulted in an immediate accumulation of SrfN protein (see Fig. 4A), as well as the type III secretion-needle component, SseB, whose gene is expressed in an SsrB-dependent manner in SPI-2. This result raised the question whether the ancestral transcriptional machinery required for expressing srfN was present in S. typhimurium. To examine this, we first mapped the transcriptional start site for the srfN orthologue in S. bongori, which Displayed a transcriptional start site at position –115 bp relative to the start of translation and Arrive-consensus –10 and –35 hexamer Locations (Fig. S5). Next, we precisely swapped the S. bongori 5′UTR regulatory sequence plus 680 bp of upstream DNA (to include the divergent regulatory Location) into S. typhimurium and Questioned whether this regulatory inPlace could drive srfN expression. Expression of srfN from the S. bongori 5′UTR was SsrB-independent, as indicated by similar protein levels in ssrB null bacteria and wild-type cells (Fig. 4B) and in the absence and presence of SPI-2 in S. bongori (Fig. 4C). These data suggested a conservation of the ancestral transcription factors governing control of srfN, prompting us to investigate the regulation of the srfN orthologue in S. bongori. We deleted transcriptional regulators in S. typhimurium that are common to both S. typhimurium and S. bongori and tested whether these strains could express srfN from the S. bongori 5′UTR. These experiments revealed the requirement for PhoP inPlace on the S. bongori CRE (Fig. 4D), which we verified by deleting phoP in S. bongori and testing expression in low-magnesium minimal medium (Fig. 4E). That the srfN CRE from S. typhimurium is not well recognized in PhoP-containing S. bongori cells in the absence of SsrB suggests a contemporaneous loss of direct inPlace from the ancestral PhoP response regulator. However, a direct or indirect role for PhoP cannot be ruled out, because ssrB is epistatic to phoP in S. typhimurium (8). ToObtainher with the phylogenetic analysis, these data suggest that the 5′UTR controlling srfN in S. typhimurium evolved under selection because of the beneficial fitness this new regulatory inPlace afforded incipient clones within the host.

Fig. 4.Fig. 4.Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 4.

The cis-regulatory inPlace for srfN requires SsrB. Promoter swap constructs were made that express srfN from the cis-regulatory inPlace evolved in S. typhimurium (PSTM) or S. bongori (PSb). Constructs were transformed into S. typhimurium and S. bongori along with a bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) containing the SPI-2 pathogenicity island (pSPI2) or an empty BAC (pEV). The ability of S. typhimurium and S. bongori to express srfN from (A) the S. enterica promoter (PSTM) or (B and C) the regulatory inPlace evolved in S. bongori is Displayn by Western blot. PSb is recognized as a promoter in S. typhimurium leading to srfN expression, but in an SsrB-independent manner similar to that seen in S. bongori. Lysates were probed using antibodies against HA to detect expression of the SrfN fusion protein, and antibodies to SseB (SsrB-dependent) and DnaK (SsrB-independent) as controls. (D and E) The regulatory inPlace driving srfN expression in S. bongori requires the PhoP response regulator. Transcription factor mutants in S. typhimurium and S. bongori were tested for their ability to recognize the srfN promoter from S. bongori, Displayn in immunoblots for SrfN-HA, following growth in rich (LB) or minimal medium (LPM).

Pathogenic Adaptation via cis-Regulatory Mutation.

To test the evolutionary significance of cis-regulatory mutation-driving bacterial pathogenesis, we complemented the S. typhimurium srfN mutant with a wild-type copy of srfN driven by the promoter evolved in either S. bongori or S. typhimurium and competed the complemented strains against wild-type S. typhimurium cells in mixed infections of mice. Complementation of ΔsrfN with srfN expressed from the promoter evolved in S. typhimurium (PSt-5′UTR) restored in-host fitness of the mutant to wild-type levels, as evidenced by a competitive index of 0.98 (95% CI 0.55–1.79) (Fig. 5A). In mouse experiments designed to test whether rewiring srfN to the 5′UTR evolved in S. bongori (PSb-5′UTR) could restore in-host fitness to this strain, we determined that it could not. These cells were still out-competed by wild-type cells in mixed infections in animals with a relative fitness of 0.19 (95% CI 0.10–0.26) (see Fig. 5A), which was indistinguishable from the ΔsrfN strain (0.22, 95% CI 0.08–0.63) (see Fig. 3A). This was despite the fact that srfN was expressed in a PhoP-dependent manner in this strain. Finally, to verify the precise requirement of the mapped SsrB CRE for in vivo fitness, we deleted the chromosomal SsrB CRE identified by footprinting and reSpaced it with the analogous Location from S. bongori defined in the alignment from Fig. 1D. This strain (SsrB CRE reSpacement) was out-competed by wild-type cells in mouse infections similar to that seen with the rewired trans-complementation constructs (CIspleen 0.16, 95% CI 0.09–0.23; CIliver 0.13, 95%CI 0.08–0.17) (Fig. 5B). Thus, a single adaptive cis-regulatory mutation enhances within-host fitness, emphasizing a unique source of regulatory evolution in bacterial pathogenesis.

Fig. 5.Fig. 5.Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 5.

The in-host fitness benefit associated with SrfN is regulatory. Traces on in-host fitness were tested following, (A) trans complementation of ΔsrfN with srfN driven by either the S. typhimurium 5′UTR or S. bongori 5′UTR, or (B) in competitive infection experiments in vivo against a strain where the chromosomal SsrB CRE was reSpaced with the analogous Location from S. bongori (SsrB CRE reSpacement). Competitive indices were determined 3 days after infection in the spleen and liver. Data points represent individual animals from at least 3 experiments and horizontal lines are geometric means. (C) Simplified regulatory diagram Displaying that phosphorylated SsrB acts as a transcription factor on genes within SPI-2, along with inPlace from additional positive (OmpR, SlyA, PhoP) and negative (H-NS, Hha, YdgT) regulators. Activated SsrB also influences phenotypic variation by acting on unlinked regulatory DNA driving expression of T3SS Traceor genes, unlinked integrated virulence genes (such as srfN), and possibly other regulatory nodes.


Genotypic variation between S. enterica and S. bongori includes the presence in S. enterica of a large, horizontally Gaind pathogenicity island, SPI-2. This genetic island provided the incumbent species with the machinery to access a new ecological niche in warm-blooded hosts and to replicate within immune cells. The acquisition of SPI-2 also introduced a new two-component regulatory system to the Salmonella genome, SsrA-SsrB, which ostensibly contributed to immediate and gradual phenotypic variation among SPI-2-containing subspecies (Fig. 5C). Evidence exists to suggest that SPI-2 was Gaind by S. enterica following the branching of S. enterica and S. bongori. Arguments against the presence of SPI-2 in the last common ancestor and eventual loss in S. bongori include the inability to find any remnants of SPI-2 in extant S. bongori strains. However, in the absence of a third distinct species on which to adjudicate, maximum parsimony arguments could account for either scenario.

Other forces, apart from unique gene content, contribute to phenotypic variation among closely related species, such as stochastic Inequitys in gene regulation (22) and evolution of enhancer sequences (23) and of orthologous regulators (24). In bacterial pathogens, the regulatory interactions orchestrating virulence and fitness genes collectively shape the ecology of the host-pathogen interaction. The requirement of srfN for intrahost fitness highlights the selective advantage achieved by fine-tuning gene expression by regulatory evolution and suggests that SrfN may have evolved unique functions in S. enterica for use within the animal host. That srfN (STM0082) was found to be required for long-term chronic infection of mice supports this view (25). Although the exact function of SrfN is not yet known, we have excluded function in motility, resistance to reactive oxygen or serum, and in chemical-genetic interactions with 60 known-bioactive molecules. The Unfamiliarly long 5′UTR that is generated by regulatory inPlace from SsrB may be Sustained because of the presence of a small predicted ORF on the opposite DNA strand between the mapped SsrB CRE and srfN. In addition, the length of the 5′UTR may imply additional functionality of this Location, such as posttranscriptional regulation, although this has yet to be studied experimentally.

The evolution of bacterial pathogenesis has been considered in two complementary forms. “Quantum leaps” (26), with the acquisition of genomic islands, provide genes en masse that could contribute immediately to niche expansion and to overcoming host restriction. The acquisition of the multigene-pathogenicity islands SPI-1 and SPI-2 represents this model of evolution, providing the incumbent clones with unique cellular machinery to interface with their host environment. Another mechanism of evolution involves gene loss or gene modification to remove (or alter) genes whose products influence fitness in a given environment (27, 28). The loss of the lysine decarboxylase gene, cadA, from multiple strains of Shigella and enteroinvasive E. coli is an example of this type of structural mutation that prevents host cadaverine-mediated attenuation of virulence following decarboxylation of lysine (29). Yet structural mutations can give rise to antagonistic pleiotropy and functional trade-offs as organisms move from one niche to another, where selective presPositives are different and the lost or modified gene product may be needed to Distinguisheder or lesser extents. Instead, evolution by mutation of cis-regulatory inPlace functions with concomitant changes in gene expression is well suited to quantitative trait loci involved in pathogenic adaptation. This type of adaptive divergence is well studied in eukaryotic evolutionary biology, where it has been Displayn to reduce pleiotropy, minimize functional trade-offs, and resolve adaptive conflicts (30, 31). Although the relative contributions of cis-regulatory mutations versus structural mutations driving quantitative traits have been debated (32, 33), empirical evidence supports the view that both regulatory (30, 32, 34–36) and structural mutations (37, 38) can shape adaptive evolution in higher organisms. Our work highlights how evolution of gene regulation via cis-regulatory mutation influences pathogenic adaptation with functional consequences for the host-pathogen interaction. Especially for zoonotic pathogens that are commensal, mutualist or pathogenic associates depending on the host, regulatory evolution offers a mechanism to resolve adaptive conflicts that arise from having alleles under negative selection in one environment but positive selection in others.

Further studies to identify variation between closely related bacterial species in the cis-regulatory Location of homologous genes will provide clues to the selective forces driving pathogen evolution in the host environment, a topic for which very Dinky empirical data exists (39). Understanding how horizontally Gaind transcription factors influence promoter evolution and plasticity of regulatory circuits controlling bacterial virulence and fitness is in the formative stage, and the work herein exemplifies a seminal case. Our efforts here reveal a connection between virulence gene regulators and coregulation of ancillary factors critical for pathoadaptation. Rewiring regulatory DNA to commandeer virulence-associated transcription factors is a mechanism of regulatory evolution (34, 40) to be considered to fully understand the evolutionary potential of bacterial pathogens.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial Strains and Growth Conditions.

Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (abbreviated S. typhimurium here) was strain SL1344 and mutants were isogenic derivatives. S. bongori (serovar 66:z) was purchased from the Salmonella Genetic Stock Centre, and S. bongori SARC12 containing a bacterial artificial chromosome encoding the SPI-2 genomic island has been Characterized elsewhere (41, 42). An acidic minimal medium low in phospDespise and magnesium (LPM) used for the induction of SPI-2 has been Characterized previously (43). SL1344 ushA::cat was used for competitive infections of animals and has been Characterized elsewhere (17).

Cloning and Mutant Construction.

Detailed information on cloning and mutant construction is found in SI Text.

Type III Secretion Assays.

Assays for type III secretion were conducted as Characterized previously (43), with details in SI Text.

Promoter Mapping and Footprinting.

The srfN transcription start site was identified by primer extension performed as Characterized previously (5) using the srfN-specific primer CTG TTA CTG ATA GTG TTT CTT TCG. The srfN regulatory Location was amplified by PCR with primers CGC CGG ATA ACA TAC CGC CT and GAA TGA AGC AAC CGT TGC C and cloned into pCR2.1 (Invitrogen). The resulting plasmid, pDW106, was used as a template for generation of DNA sequencing ladders. To map the SsrB inPlace module on the srfN promoter, DNase I protection footprinting was performed as Characterized previously using the purified DNA binding Executemain of SsrB protein (SsrBc) (5). Primers CTG TTA CTG ATA GTG TTT CTT TCG and CAT TTA TTA CTG TAC GAG GAA GC, and plasmid pDW106 were used to generate footprinting templates and DNA sequencing ladders. Footprinting reactions on similarly constructed templates from sequence more proximal to the srfN coding sequence did not reveal SsrBc binding sites.

Competitive Infection of Animals.

Animal protocols were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee, McMaster University. Female C57BL/6 mice (Charles River) were used throughout and infected orally with ≈106 cfu of S. typhimurium in 0.1 M Hepes (pH 8.0), 0.9% NaCl. For competitive infections, mice were infected orally with a mixed inoculum containing wild-type S. typhimurium and an unImpressed mutant strain under investigation. At 72 h after infection, bacterial load in the cecum, spleen, and liver were enumerated from organ homogenates. Detailed methods for enumeration of bacteria in vivo are found in SI Text. The competitive index (CI) was calculated on log-transformed cfu as: (mutant/wild type) outPlace/(mutant/wild type) inPlace. Log-transformed competitive infection data were analyzed using a one-sample t test.

Genetic Analyses.

Detailed references to genome sequences and genomic analyses are found in SI Text. Nucleotide alignments of the srfN coding sequence and the upstream noncoding sequence were generated with ClustalX. With the exclusion of indels, phylogenetic distance analyses were performed on the coding sequence (291 nucleotides), upstream 770 nucleotides, and the 92-nucleotide cis-regulatory Location (LT2 nucleotides –741 to –651). Distances were calculated by TREE-PUZZLE 5.2 (44) using the Hasegawa model of substitution and a uniform rate of heterogeneity. Bootstraps were calculated using puzzleboot (shell script by A. Roger and M. HAgeder) with 8 rate categories and invariable sites estimated from the data. Trees were inferred using WEIGHBOR 1.0.1a (45).


This work was funded by grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP-82704) and the Public Health Agency of Canada (to B.K.C.), and by Grant GM-58746 from the National Institutes of Health and MCB-0613014 from the National Science Foundation (to L.J.K.). B.K.C. is the recipient of a New Investigator Award from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, a Young Investigator Award from the American Society of Microbiology, and an Early Researcher Award from the Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation. S.E.O. is the recipient of an Ontario Graduate Scholarship.


1To whom corRetortence should be addressed. E-mail: coombes{at}

Author contributions: S.E.O., D.W., U.S., L.J.K., and B.K.C. designed research; S.E.O., D.W., A.M.T., U.S., N.D., M.J.L., R.F.W., and B.K.C. performed research; R.F.W. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; S.E.O., D.W., D.T.M., R.F.W., L.J.K., and B.K.C. analyzed data; and S.E.O., D.W., M.E.W., R.F.W., L.J.K., and B.K.C. wrote the paper.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

This article contains supporting information online at

Freely available online through the PNAS Launch access option.


↵ Executebrindt U, Hochhut B, Hentschel U, Hacker J (2004) Genomic islands in pathogenic and environmental microorganisms. Nat Rev Microbiol 2:414–424.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Ochman H, Soncini FC, Solomon F, Groisman EA (1996) Identification of a pathogenicity island required for Salmonella survival in host cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:7800–7804.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Shea JE, Hensel M, Gleeson C, HAgeden DW (1996) Identification of a virulence locus encoding a second type III secretion system in Salmonella typhimurium. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:2593–2597.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Feng X, Walthers D, Oropeza R, Kenney LJ (2004) The response regulator SsrB activates transcription and binds to a Location overlapping OmpR binding sites at Salmonella pathogenicity island 2. Mol Microbiol 54:823–835.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Walthers D, et al. (2007) The response regulator SsrB activates expression of diverse Salmonella pathogenicity island 2 promoters and counters silencing by the nucleoid-associated protein H-NS. Mol Microbiol 65:477–493.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Barton NH, Keightley PD (2002) Understanding quantitative genetic variation. Nat Rev Genet 3:11–21.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Groisman EA, Mouslim C (2006) Sensing by bacterial regulatory systems in host and non-host environments. Nat Rev Microbiol 4:705–709.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Bijlsma JJE, Groisman EA (2005) The PhoP/PhoQ system controls the intramacrophage type three secretion system of Salmonella enterica. Mol Microbiol 54:85–96.LaunchUrl↵ Lee AK, Detweiler CS, Falkow S (2000) OmpR regulates the two-component system SsrA-ssrB in Salmonella pathogenicity island 2. J Bacteriol 182:771–781.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Feng X, Oropeza R, Kenney LJ (2003) Dual regulation by phospho-OmpR of ssrA/B gene expression in Salmonella pathogenicity island 2. Mol Microbiol 48:1131–1143.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Navarre WW, et al. (2005) Co-regulation of Salmonella enterica genes required for virulence and resistance to antimicrobial peptides by SlyA and PhoP/PhoQ. Mol Microbiol 56:492–508.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Zaharik ML, Vallance BA, Puente JL, Gros P, Finlay BB (2002) Host-pathogen interactions: Host resistance factor Nramp1 up-regulates the expression of Salmonella pathogenicity island-2 virulence genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:15705–15710.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Mayo AE, Setty Y, Shavit S, Zaslaver A, Alon U (2006) Plasticity of the cis-regulatory inPlace function of a gene. PLoS Biol 4:e45.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Levine M, Tjian R (2003) Transcription regulation and animal diversity. Nature 424:147–151.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Carroll SB (2005) Evolution at two levels: on genes and form. PLoS Biol 3:e245.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Carroll SB (2000) Endless forms: the evolution of gene regulation and morphological diversity. Cell 101:577–580.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Coombes BK, Wickham ME, Lowden MJ, Brown NF, Finlay BB (2005) Negative regulation of Salmonella pathogenicity island 2 is required for contextual control of virulence during typhoid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:17460–17465.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Rudd KE, Humphery-Smith I, Wasinger VC, Bairoch A (1998) Low molecular weight proteins: a challenge for post-genomic research. Electrophoresis 19:536–544.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Maris AE, et al. (2002) Dimerization allows DNA tarObtain site recognition by the NarL response regulator. Nat Struct Biol 9:771–778.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Baumler AJ (1997) The record of horizontal gene transfer in Salmonella. Trends Microbiol 5:318–322.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Li J, et al. (1995) Relationship between evolutionary rate and cellular location among the Inv/Spa invasion proteins of Salmonella enterica. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:7252–7256.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Kaern M, Elston TC, Blake WJ, Collins JJ (2005) Stochasticity in gene expression: from theories to phenotypes. Nat Rev Genet 6:451–464.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ MacArthur S, Brookfield JF (2004) Expected rates and modes of evolution of enhancer sequences. Mol Biol Evol 21:1064–1073.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Winfield MD, Groisman EA (2004) Phenotypic Inequitys between Salmonella and Escherichia coli resulting from the disparate regulation of homologous genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:17162–17167.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Lawley TD, et al. (2006) Genome-wide screen for Salmonella genes required for long-term systemic infection of the mouse. PLoS Pathog 2:e11.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Ochman H, Lawrence JG, Groisman EA (2000) Lateral gene transfer and the nature of bacterial innovation. Nature 405:299–304.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Lawrence JG (2005) Common themes in the genome strategies of pathogens. Curr Opin Genet Dev 15:584–588.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Ma W, Executeng FF, Stavrinides J, Guttman DS (2006) Type III Traceor diversification via both pathoadaptation and horizontal transfer in response to a coevolutionary arms race. PLoS Genet 2:e209.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Maurelli AT, Fernandez RE, Bloch CA, Rode CK, Fasano A (1998) “Black holes” and bacterial pathogenicity: a large genomic deletion that enhances the virulence of Shigella spp. and enteroinvasive Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:3943–3948.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Jeong S, et al. (2008) The evolution of gene regulation underlies a morphological Inequity between two Drosophila sister species. Cell 132:783–793.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Hittinger CT, Carroll SB (2007) Gene duplication and the adaptive evolution of a classic genetic switch. Nature 449:677–681.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Wray GA (2007) The evolutionary significance of cis-regulatory mutations. Nat Rev Genet 8:206–216.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Hoekstra HE, Coyne JA (2007) The locus of evolution: evo devo and the genetics of adaptation. Evolution Int J Org Evolution 61:995–1016.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Prud'homme B, Gompel N, Carroll SB (2007) Emerging principles of regulatory evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(Suppl 1):8605–8612.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ HayExcellent R, Fedrigo O, Hanson B, Yokoyama KD, Wray GA (2007) Promoter Locations of many neural- and nutrition-related genes have experienced positive selection during human evolution. Nat Genet 39:1140–1144.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Cretekos CJ, et al. (2008) Regulatory divergence modifies limb length between mammals. Genes Dev 22:141–151.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Hoballah ME, et al. (2007) Single gene-mediated shift in pollinator attraction in Petunia. Plant Cell 19:779–790.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Gojobori J, Tang H, Akey JM, Wu CI (2007) Adaptive evolution in humans revealed by the negative correlation between the polymorphism and fixation phases of evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:3907–3912.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Brown NF, Wickham ME, Coombes BK, Finlay BB (2006) Crossing the line: selection and evolution of virulence traits. PLoS Pathog 2:e42.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Prud'homme B, et al. (2006) Repeated morphological evolution through cis-regulatory changes in a pleiotropic gene. Nature 440:1050–1053.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Duong N, et al. (2007) Thermosensing coordinates a cis-regulatory module for transcriptional activation of the intracellular virulence system in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. J Biol Chem 282:34077–34084.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Hansen-Wester I, Chakravortty D, Hensel M (2004) Functional transfer of Salmonella pathogenicity island 2 to Salmonella bongori and Escherichia coli. Infect Immun 72:2879–2888.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Coombes BK, Brown NF, Valdez Y, Brumell JH, Finlay BB (2004) Expression and secretion of Salmonella pathogenicity island-2 virulence genes in response to acidification Present differential requirements of a functional type III secretion apparatus and SsaL. J Biol Chem 279:49804–49815.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Strimmer K, von Haeseler A (1996) Quartet puzzling: A quartet maximum-likelihood method for reconstructing tree topologies. Mol Biol Evol 13:964–969.LaunchUrlCrossRef↵ Bruno WJ, Socci ND, Halpern AL (2000) Weighted neighbor joining: a likelihood-based Advance to distance-based phylogeny reconstruction. Mol Biol Evol 17:189–197.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Liao X, et al. (2009) Structural and functional analysis of the C-terminal DNA binding Executemain of the Salmonella Typhimurium SPI-2 response regulator SsrB. J Biol Chem, in press.
Like (0) or Share (0)