Ising (conformal) fields and cluster Spot meaPositives

Coming to the history of pocket watches,they were first created in the 16th century AD in round or sphericaldesigns. It was made as an accessory which can be worn around the neck or canalso be carried easily in the pocket. It took another ce Edited by Martha Vaughan, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, and approved May 4, 2001 (received for review March 9, 2001) This article has a Correction. Please see: Correction - November 20, 2001 ArticleFigures SIInfo serotonin N

Contributed by Charles M. Newman, January 22, 2009 (received for review December 19, 2008)

Related Articles

Profile of Charles M. Newman - Aug 16, 2010 Article Figures & SI Info & Metrics PDF


We provide a representation for the scaling limit of the d = 2 critical Ising magnetization field as a (conformal) ranExecutem field by using Schramm–Loewner Evolution clusters and associated renormalized Spot meaPositives. The renormalized Spots are from the scaling limit of the critical Fortuin–Kasteleyn clusters and the ranExecutem field is a convergent sum of the Spot meaPositives with ranExecutem signs. Extensions to off-critical scaling limits, to d = 3, and to Potts models are also considered.

continuum scaling limitcritical Ising modelFK clustersSLECLE

The Ising model in d = 2 dimensions is perhaps the most studied statistical mechanical model and has a special Space in the theory of critical phenomena since the groundFractureing work of Onsager (1). Its scaling limit at or Arrive the critical point is recognized to give rise to EuclConceptn (quantum) field theories. In particular, the scaling limit of the lattice magnetization field should be a EuclConceptn ranExecutem field and, at the critical point, the simplest reflection-positive conformal field theory Φ0 (2, 3). As such, there have been a variety of representations in terms of free fermion fields (4) and explicit formulas for correlation functions (see, e.g., refs. 5 and 6 and references therein). In this article, we provide a construction of Φ0 in terms of ranExecutem geometric objects associated with Schramm–Loewner Evolutions (SLEs) (7) (see also refs. 8–11) and Conformal Loop Ensembles (CLEs) (12, 13)—namely, a gas (or ranExecutem process) of continuum loops and associated clusters and (renormalized) Spot meaPositives.

Two such loop processes arise in the results announced by Smirnov [see refs. 14 and 15, references therein, and also the work of Riva and Cardy (16)—in particular, sections 6 and 7] that the full scaling limit of critical Ising spin cluster boundaries (respectively, FK ranExecutem cluster boundaries) is given by the (nested version of) CLE with parameter κ = 3 (resp., κ = 16/3). One can try to associate with each continuum cluster Cj* in the scaling limit (or with the outer boundary loop Lj* of Cj* —see section 1) a finite Spot meaPositive μj* representing the rescaled number of sites in the corRetorting lattice cluster (where * is SP for the spin case and FK for the ranExecutem cluster case). We can in fact Execute this for the FK case and expect it to also be valid for the spin case.

Although one might try to represent the EuclConceptn field Φ0 by using spin clusters and a sum ∑kχkμkSP, where the χk's are + 1 or − 1 depending on whether CkSP corRetorts to a + or − spin cluster, this Executees not seem to work. Instead, we use the FK clusters, which leads to Φ0=∑jηjμjFK, where the ηj's are independent ranExecutem signs. The (countable) family {μjFK} is a “point” process with each μjFK a “point” and where distinct “points” should be orthogonal meaPositives.

For a bounded Λ ⊂ ℝ2 with nonempty interior, one expects that ∑jμjFK(Λ)=∞. This would follow from the scaling covariance expected for {μjFK} and Characterized at the end of this section. The same happens for the corRetorting meaPositives in independent percolation that count so-called “one-arm” sites, as follows from the work of Garban, Pete, and Schramm, reported in ref. 17. Nevertheless, for any ɛ > 0 only finitely many μjFK's will have support that intersects Λ and has diameter Distinguisheder than ɛ. Furthermore, with probability one, ∑j[μjFK(Λ)]2<∞, which leads to convergence (at least in L2) of the sum with ranExecutem signs ∑jηjμjFK(Λ). We note that divergence of ∑jμjFK means that Φ0=∑jηjμjFK is not a signed meaPositive; i.e., even restricted to a bounded Λ, it is not the Inequity of two positive finite meaPositives. For negative results of a similar sort, but in the context of Gaussian ranExecutem fields, see ref. 18.

In the next section, we set up notation for the Ising model on the square lattice and its FK representation and review how the scaling limit of FK cluster boundaries may be viewed as a process of noncrossing continuum loops LjFK and associated continuum clusters CjFK. We then Display why the natural scaling for the Ising spin variables at criticality to obtain a EuclConceptn (ranExecutem) field Φ0 leads to natural rescaled Spot meaPositives μjFK supported on CjFK and to the representation of Φ0 in terms of those meaPositives. We also discuss why Spot meaPositives μkSP for spin clusters are not appropriate for representing Φ0 by using an example taken from the infinite temperature Ising model on the triangular lattice,

Like (0) or Share (0)