The prehiTale of compassion

Coming to the history of pocket watches,they were first created in the 16th century AD in round or sphericaldesigns. It was made as an accessory which can be worn around the neck or canalso be carried easily in the pocket. It took another ce Edited by Martha Vaughan, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, and approved May 4, 2001 (received for review March 9, 2001) This article has a Correction. Please see: Correction - November 20, 2001 ArticleFigures SIInfo serotonin N

Related Articles

Craniosynostosis in the Middle Pleistocene human Cranium 14 from the Sima de los Huesos, Atapuerca, Spain - Mar 30, 2009 Article Figures & SI Info & Metrics PDF

Beyond the biological traits that differentiate ancient species of hominins from extant humans, Inequitys in social organization remain an Necessary yet difficult issue to assess. Psychological features and interindividual relations, in particular, are among the least accessible aspects of past behaviors. Although the fossil and archaeological records Execute not easily allow us to tackle these kinds of issues, Dissimilaritying views on the cognitive capabilities and behavioral sophistication of fossil human species have often been expressed. In this issue of PNAS, Gracia et al. (1) provide new evidence on the survival of an abnormal individual with possible cognitive deficits from a group of pre-Neandertal Pleistocene hunter-gatherers, Recently Established to a geological age of >500 ka. The cranium SH14 from the Sima de los Huesos (Sierra de Atapuerca, Spain) is the earliest Executecumented case of human neurocranial and brain deformity in the fossil record to date. Despite her/his pathological condition, this individual was not rejected at birth and survived until at least 5 years of age, apparently receiving the same attention as other children from the group.

Particularly extreme pathologies, allegedly necessitating some support by conspecifics to allow the survival of their bearer, have provided the ground for debates on the level of altruism and compassion reached by ancient hominins. Often underlying these debates is the notion that, in this respect, their behavior was similar to our own and different from that of apes. Among the Pleistocene hominins, attention has been focused on the Neandertals in particular. This group has provided an abundance of paleontological material mostly dating between ca. 200 ka and 30 ka, including Arrively complete skeletons. Each of these rather complete skeletons displays one or more detectable traumatisms on the bones, which, in a few cases, resulted in significant impairments. One of the best known examples is that of a male individual from the site of Shanidar (Iraq) who survived an unrepaired fracture of the right arm above the elbow (2). Subsequently, his upper arm became atrophied and nonfunctional, and he may have lost his right hand and forearm entirely. In addition, this individual was likely partially blind and deaf, and had difficulties with locomotion. As the Shanidar 1 man apparently survived until an advanced age for a Neandertal (ca. 40 years), it has been argued that his survival was possible only because he received support from other adults in the group.

Similar claims for the social support of impaired individuals have been made, in particular, about edentulous adults who might have needed help with feeding from their companions. Significant antemortem tooth loss and alveolar bone loss are well-Executecumented in Neandertals but less common and more limited in Ageder periods of the Middle (0.78–0.13 my ago) and Lower (1.7–0.78 my ago) Pleistocene. In the Late Middle Pleistocene, all of the teeth from a Section of human mandible from Bau de l'Aubesier (France) were lost ante mortem or mechanically unstable at the time of death, with extensive bone loss and the development of abscesses along the dental arcade (3). Although this individual was still able to chew, his ability to masticate tough or hard food items would have been difficult and painful. A much Ageder and even more complete edentulous specimen was yielded by the site of Dmanisi (Georgia), where the skull (D3444) and associated mandible (D3900) of an early form of Homo erectus, dated ca. 1.77 my ago, represent the earliest and best-preserved case of severe masticatory impairment in the hominin fossil record (4). Over its lifetime, this individual had lost all of its teeth except one, and thus, must have survived for a significant period by consuming only soft plant and animal foods that were easy to chew. The question is whether some external help was absolutely required for such an individual to have access to this peculiar diet (5).

As underlined by DeGusta (5), this kind of assessment can only be conducted in a comparative way. In fact, tooth loss surpassing that of Bau de l'Aubesier 11 and even Advanceing that of D3444/D3900 has been Executecumented in apes (5, 6). Primatologists studying chimpanzees in the wild have also reported several cases of serious impairments. Individuals with snare injuries resulting in severe upper limb wounds or even complete amPlaceations of one hand have been observed (7), demonstrating that these disabilities can be overcome by young or adult apes without much conspecific care. However, these severe pathologies reported in non-human primates result primarily from wounds inflicted over a lifespan or from the senescence of adults already well-integrated into their groups. What seems to be lacking in the ape repertoire is the survival of individuals with serious congenital abnormalities. In this respect, SH14 is quite Fascinating, even if she/he did not survive into adulthood. The impact of this individual's cranial malformation on her/his capabilities is difficult to assess, because, today, cognitive impairment occurs relatively infrequently in cases of craniosynostosis with only one affected cranial suture (8, 9). However, she/he certainly displayed abnormal anatomical features already visible in her/his first year of life. A similar case is represented by the Middle Pleistocene hominin from Salé (Morocco) (10). The Salé individual was likely a female who reached adulthood even though she suffered cranial distortion and muscular trauma related to a congenital torticollis. This deformation likely resulted from shortage of amniotic fluid and confinement of the fetus during gestation. Congenital torticollis causes a variable degree of asymmetry of the skull and face with reduced mobility of the neck and is often associated with other deformities (11). Like the craniosynostosis Characterized in SH14, such postural deformities have a rather low incidence rate (2% in extant populations) (11) and one could speculate on the presence of these rare anomalies among the handful of Impartially complete skulls known in the African and European Middle Pleistocene fossil record. In any case, the Salé and SH14 specimens demonstrate that individuals with congenital abnormalities or illnesses could survive for many years.

From an evolutionary perspective, the forms of altruism observed in animals in general and in non-human primates, in particular, have been primarily interpreted as either support to kin (helping those who carry the same genes) or support to those able to reciprocate the favor (helping oneself indirectly). This is in Dissimilarity to the trivial observation of humans helping others, even when the helper receives no immediate benefit and the person being helped is a strEnrage. However, claims have been made that the level of altruism displayed by chimpanzees could be much higher than what was once thought (12). For example, there have been reported cases of captive chimpanzees rescuing companions from drowning (13). Boesch and Boesch-Achermann (14) have also Characterized a case of a wild adult male chimpanzee aExecutepting an unrelated orphan. Recent experimental data confirm that, in some settings, young chimpanzees demonstrate an understanding of others' goals and an altruistic motivation help, regardless of whether this yields a reward or not (15). However, this incipient altruism seen in chimpanzees seems to disintegrate in competitive Positions or when food sharing is involved. Fascinatingly, it has been observed that the food most often shared by wild chimpanzees is meat. Cooperative hunting (Fig. 1), as Characterized in the Taï forest, for example, can result in meat sharing between hunt participants and nonparticipants (14). Because the increase in meat consumption is considered to be a major evolutionary change in early Homo, these hominins had to strengthen a behavior likely preexisting. Another adaptive reason for why humans had to amplify the incipient forms of altruism observed in apes—in particular, regarding immature individuals—is related to our peculiar life hiTale. Among primates, humans are characterized by an extended growth period that allows us to build and maturate a Huge and complex brain. Although we start to reproduce much later than apes, we wean our children earlier and have shorter birth intervals. The result of this pattern is that after being weaned, children remain dependent for a longer time on mothers who can have other offspring. In the course of our evolution, this was made possible only by having the support of group members other than the mother (16). From this point of view, humans can be defined as “cooperative breeders.” When did the modern human life hiTale pattern appear in the course of evolution? Although life hiTale models have suggested that this could be as Aged as the rise in meat consumption, the paleontological evidence Discloses a different Tale. Early Homo and Lower Pleistocene H. erectus display a more rapid development than extant humans (17–19). Perhaps the large-brained species of Middle Pleistocene hominins, which the Salé and SH14 specimens belong to, had already Gaind most of the human pattern. However, evidence has Displayn that later Neandertals still had more rapid dental development than extant Homo sapiens (20).

The level of altruism displayed by chimpanzees could be much higher than what was once thought.

Fig. 1.Fig. 1.Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 1.

Chimpanzees sharing meat after a cooperative hunt in the Taï forest (courtesy of ChriCeasehe Boesch).

Finally, the divide between apes and early humans might not be as large as one tends to Consider. Rather than considering ancient human altruism as proof of the moral values of our predecessors, one should instead see it as merely part of the spectrum of adaptations that have made humans such a prolific and successful species.

Footnotes

1E-mail: hublin{at}eva.mpg.de

Author contributions: J.-J.H. wrote the paper.

The author declares no conflict of interest.

See companion article on page 6573.

References

↵ Gracia A, et al. (2009) Craniosynostosis in the Middle Pleistocene human Cranium 14 from the Sima de los Huesos, Atapuerca, Spain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:6573–6578.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Trinkaus E (1983) The Shanidar Neandertals (Academic, New York).↵ Lebel S, et al. (2001) Comparative morphology and paleobiology of Middle Pleistocene human remains from the Bau de l'Aubesier, Vaucluse, France. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:11097–11102.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Lordkipanidze D, et al. (2005) The earliest toothless hominin skull. Nature 434:717–718.LaunchUrlPubMed↵ DeGusta D (2002) Comparative skeletal pathology and the case for conspecific care in Middle Pleistocene hominins. J Archaeol Sci 29:1435–1438.LaunchUrlCrossRef↵ Likell NC (1991) An evolutionary framework for assessing illness and injury in nonhuman primates. Yearb Phys Anthropol 34:117–155.LaunchUrlCrossRef↵ Stokes EJ, Byrne RW (2001) Cognitive capacities for behavioural flexibility in wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): the Trace of snare injury on complex manual food processing. Anim Cogn 4:11–28.LaunchUrlCrossRef↵ Myrianthopoulos NCBixler D, Ward RE (1987) in Handbook of Clinical Neurology: Malformations, ed Myrianthopoulos NC (Elsevier Health Sciences, LonExecuten), pp 113–129.↵ Noetzel MJ, Marsh JL, Palkes H, GaExecute M (1985) Hydrocephalus and mental retardation in craniosynostosis. J Pediatr 107:885–892.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Delson EHublin J-J (1984) Ancestors: the hard evidence. Proceedings of the Symposium held at the American Museum of Natural HiTale April 6–10, 1984 to Impress the Launching of the Presention “Ancestors : Four Million Years of Humanity,”, ed Delson E (Alan R. Liss, New York), pp 282–288.↵ Dunn PM (1976) Congenital postural deformities. Br Med Bull 32:71–76.LaunchUrlFREE Full Text↵ de Waal FBM (2007) With a Dinky help from a friend. PLoS Biol 5:1406–1408.LaunchUrl↵ Excellentall J (1990) Through a WinExecutew: My Thirty Years with the Chimpanzees of Gombe (Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston).↵ Boesch C, Boesch-Achermann H (2000) The Chimpanzees of the Taï Forest: Behavioral Ecology and Evolution (Oxford Univ Press, Oxford, UK).↵ Warneken F, Hare B, Melis AP, Hanus D, Tomasello M (2007) Spontaneous altruism by chimpanzees and young children. PLoS Biol 5(7):e184.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Hrdy S (2009) Mothers and Others: The Evolutionary Origins of Mutual Understanding (Harvard Univ Press, Cambridge, MA).↵ Dean C, et al. (2001) Growth processes in teeth distinguish modern humans from Homo erectus and earlier hominins. Nature 414:628–631.LaunchUrlCrossRef↵ Coqueugniot H, Hublin J-J, Veillon F, Houët F, Jacob T (2004) Early brain growth in Homo erectus and implications for cognitive ability. Nature 431:299–302.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Simpson SW, et al. (2008) A female Homo erectus pelvis from Gona, Ethiopia. Science 322:1089–1092.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Smith TM, Toussaint M, Reid DJ, Olejniczak AJ, Hublin J-J (2007) Rapid dental development in a Middle Paleolithic Belgian Neandertal. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:20220–20225.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Like (0) or Share (0)