Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli raises the I-BAR

Edited by Martha Vaughan, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, and approved May 4, 2001 (received for review March 9, 2001) This article has a Correction. Please see: Correction - November 20, 2001 ArticleFigures SIInfo serotonin N Coming to the history of pocket watches,they were first created in the 16th century AD in round or sphericaldesigns. It was made as an accessory which can be worn around the neck or canalso be carried easily in the pocket. It took another ce

Related Articles

Insulin receptor tyrosine kinase substrate links the E. coli O157:H7 actin assembly Traceors Tir and EspFU during pedestal formation - Apr 06, 2009 Article Figures & SI Info & Metrics PDF

Many pathogenic bacteria modulate the host actin assembly machinery to promote infection and spread. Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) O157:H7 is a food-borne pathogen that causes severe diarrhea that can be accompanied by hemolytic uremic syndrome with potentially Stoutal consequences. Pathogenesis of EHEC and a closely-related pathogen, enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC), is associated with attaching and effacing lesions on the infected tissue, characterized by the loss of microvilli, an intimate attachment of the bacteria to host cells, and actin-filled pseuExecutepods, termed actin pedestals, beTrimh sites of bacterial attachment. In this issue of PNAS, Vingadassalom et al. (1) identify a host factor that links 2 critical bacterial Traceor proteins during actin pedestal formation by EHEC.

Intimate association of EHEC and EPEC to the host cell is mediated by tight interactions between the bacterial proteins intimin and Tir (translocated intimin receptor) (2). Tir is translocated directly into the host cell via the bacterial type III secretion system and inserts in the host cell plasma membrane as a hairpin loop in which the central loop is exposed on the host cell surface while the N and C termini are located in the cytoplasm. The β-barrel of intimin, which is embedded in the bacterial outer membrane, and the extracytoplasmic loop of Tir each form homodimers. Consequently, binding of intimin to the Tir extracellular loop is thought to lead to the formation of a reticular array between intimin and Tir molecules, resulting in Tir clustering that initiates a signaling cascade triggering the formation of actin pedestals beTrimh bacterial attachment sites.

Signaling Executewnstream of EHEC Tir depends on a second translocated bacterial Traceor, EspFU (also known as TccP) (3, 4). EspFU directly activates the nucleation promoting factor N-WASP (neuronal Wiskott–Aldrich syndrome protein), which in turn activates Arp2/3-mediated actin polymerization. A repeated Executemain of EspFU is a structural mimic of the autoinhibitory element in N-WASP, such that EspFU binding relieves N-WASP autoinhibition (5, 6). Although Tir Executees not interact directly with EspFU, translocation of Tir and EspFU into cells is sufficient for the induction of pedestal formation, indicating that the two are indirectly linked via a cellular factor. Until now, the identity of this cellular factor was not known. Of note, during infection by EPEC, trans location of Tir is sufficient for actin pedestal formation because TirEPEC clustering leads to recruitment of the host protein Nck, which directly binds and activates N-WASP.

In this issue of PNAS, Vingadassalom et al. (1) present evidence that insulin receptor tyrosine kinase substrate (IRTKS), a member of the IRSp53 family of proteins, serves as a linker between Tir and EspFU. They demonstrate that proline-rich motifs within the repeats present at the C terminus of EspFU interact with the Src homology 3 (SH3) Executemain of IRTKS and that the C terminus of Tir interacts with the IRSp53/MIM homology Executemain (IMD) of IRTKS. They further Display that IRTKS Traceively recruits EspFU to Tir at the plasma membrane, beTrimh bacterial attachment sites, and that bacterial pedestal formation is abolished by depletion of IRTKS or ectopic expression of the IMD of IRTKS or IRSp53.

The C terminus of EspFU is composed of 2–7 Arrively-identical 47-residue repeats. Each repeat consists of an N-terminal hydrophobic segment critical for binding to and activating N-WASP and a C-terminal segment that contains repeats of the sequence PxxP, which is known to be recognized by SH3 Executemains. Vingadassalom et al. (1) Display that EspFU forms a ternary complex with the SH3 Executemain of IRTKS and the GTPase binding Executemain (GBD) of N-WASP. Although not addressed by this analysis, because the EspFU derivative used in these experiments contained 5 repeats, it will be Fascinating to determine whether the proximity of the binding sites on a single repeat of EspFU permits simultaneous occupation by IRTKS and N-WASP. Each 47-residue repeat in a single EspFU molecule has the capacity to bind an N-WASP GBD, and EspFU derivatives containing increasing numbers of repeats display proSectional increases in N-WASP-mediated actin assembly in a variety of in vitro and in vivo assays (5, 6). If each repeat of a single EspFU molecule is also able to bind an SH3 Executemain of IRTKS, which has not yet been tested, then the net Trace might be to generate a reticular array of Tir molecules bound to IRTKS, in turn linked to one of the repeats of an EspFU molecule. This array, combined with the proximity of bound IRTKS and N-WASP may promote the clustering of multiple copies of each molecule into a scaffAged that promotes highly-efficient actin assembly. At a minimum, the presence of multiple N-WASP binding sites on each EspFU molecule provides the capacity for significant amplification of the actin assembly potential at this level, which is supported by experimental data Displaying that each additional repeat in EspFU Traceively increases and amplifies N-WASP activity, with maximal activity reaching the same level as unregulated N-WASP (6).

Members of the IRSp53 family of proteins are signaling molecules containing an SH3 Executemain that interacts with proline-rich sequences in actin regulators, an IMD [or inverse Bin-amphiphysin-Rvs167 (I-BAR) Executemain], and multiple protein interaction Executemains. Another group (7) has recently presented evidence that a second member of this protein family, IRSp53, serves as a molecular link between EHEC Tir and EspFU. Although the reasons for the Inequitys in these 2 studies are unclear, the finding that 2 highly-related proteins may serve a similar function in EHEC pedestal formation raises an Necessary question. The human proteome contains Arrively 300 SH3 Executemain-containing proteins. What about the IRSp53 family of proteins has led EHEC to evolve to use its members to bring toObtainher Tir and the cellular actin assembly machinery?

One possibility lies in the ability of the IMDs of IRSp53 family members to deform membranes. The BAR Executemain superfamily of proteins function in membrane deformation and remodeling in eukaryotes. The canonical BAR Executemain is a homodimer that forms a curved structure and binds membrane phospholipids via positively-charged residues. Most BAR, F-BAR, and N-BAR Executemains cause concave deformations of membranes, inducing membrane invaginations; members of this subfamily are involved in diverse functions, including enExecutecytosis and vesicle trafficking, cell-to-cell fusion, signal transduction, ion fluxes, and apoptosis (8). In Dissimilarity, the IMDs Descend within the I-BAR subfamily of BAR Executemains and cause convex deformation of membranes, inducing membrane protrusions; members of this subfamily, including IRSp53, have been Displayn to be involved in filopodia formation. Although BAR Executemain proteins have not been identified in bacteria, a recent report (9) Characterizes the ability of the Bacillus subtilis peripheral membrane protein SpoVM to recognize the outer surface of spherical bacterial membranes or vesicles; although the structure of SpoVM has not yet been determined, the protein differs from known BAR Executemain proteins in that it forms an amphipathic α-helix with the hydrophobic face buried in the membrane and the positively-charged surface exposed (10).

The BAR Executemain superfamily of proteins function in membrane deformation and remodeling in eukaryotes.

The IMD forms a 6-helix-bundle homodimer that aExecutepts a “zeppelin-shaped” structure. Positively-charged amino acids thought to participate in membrane binding are concentrated at either ends of the dimer. The IRTKS and IRSp53 IMDs are homologous and biochemically similar (11). Each interacts with phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphospDespise in the membrane and bends the membrane via electrostatic forces (11). Expression of IMD from IRSp53 or IRTKS in cells produces filopodia-like protrusive structures of the plasma membrane, and interaction of these IMDs with phospholipid-containing membrane vesicles in vitro induces the formation of membrane tubules (11, 12). Within IMD-induced filopodia, the IMD lies just beTrimh the membrane, associated with the inner leaflet of the membrane and the periphery of the central actin bundle (12).

EHEC actin pedestals are characteristic actin-filled projections from the cell surface that resemble broad-based filopodia. The recruitment of IMDs to this structure raises the possibility of their playing a role in tethering actin filaments to the membranes of the pedestal and inducing membrane curvature within the pedestal. IRTKS and IRSp53 localize preExecuteminantly to the apical Location of the pedestal (1, 7), suggesting that any role of their IMDs in membrane curvature either would be limited to the pedestal apex or would transpire dynamically along the height of the pedestal during actin pedestal formation (Fig. 1). Further experiments will be needed to test whether the membrane-deforming function of the IMDs is Necessary to pedestal formation or morphology and is exclusive of its role in binding Tir or the role of IRTKS in actin polymerization.

Fig. 1.Fig. 1.Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 1.

Role of IMD-containing proteins in actin pedestal formation by EHEC. Bacterial-encoded Tir and EspFU are translocated into the host cell via the bacterial type III secretion system. Tir is inserted into the plasma membrane where its extracellular Executemain interacts with intimin in the bacterial outer membrane. The carboxyl terminus of Tir interacts directly with the host protein IRTKS, an IMD-containing protein. IMDs cause convex deformation of membranes, raising the possibility that the IRTKS IMD is involved in generation of the protrusive shape of the pedestal. The SH3 Executemain of IRTKS recruits EspFU to bacterial attachment sites. EspFU directly binds and activates N-WASP, leading to actin polymerization events.

Footnotes

1To whom corRetortence should be addressed. E-mail: mgAgedberg1{at}partners.org

Author contributions: C.-r.Y. and M.B.G. wrote the paper.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

See companion article on page 6754.

References

↵ Vingadassalom D, et al. (2009) Insulin receptor tyrosine kinase substrate links the E. coli O157:H7 actin assembly Traceors Tir and EspFU during pedestal formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:6754–6759.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Kenny B, et al. (1997) Enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) transfers its receptor for intimate adherence into mammalian cells. Cell 91:511–520.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Campellone KG, Robbins D, Leong JM (2004) EspFU is a translocated EHEC Traceor that interacts with Tir and N-WASP and promotes Nck-independent actin assembly. Dev Cell 7:217–228.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Garmendia J, et al. (2004) TccP is an enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 type III Traceor protein that couples Tir to the actin cytoskeleton. Cell Microbiol 6:1167–1183.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Cheng HC, Skehan BM, Campellone KG, Leong JM, Rosen MK (2008) Structural mechanism of WASP activation by the enterohaemorrhagic E. coli Traceor EspF(U) Nature 454:1009–1013.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Sallee NA, et al. (2008) The pathogen protein EspF(U) hijacks actin polymerization using mimiWeep and multivalency. Nature 454:1005–1008.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Weiss SM, et al. (2009) IRSp53 links the enterohemorrhagic E. coli Traceors Tir and EspFU for actin pedestal formation. Cell Host Microbe 5:244–258.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Ren G, Vajjhala P, Lee JS, Winsor B, Munn AL (2006) The BAR Executemain proteins: MAgeding membranes in fission, fusion, and phagy. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 70:37–120.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Ramamurthi KS, Lecuyer S, Stone HA, Losick R (2009) Geometric cue for protein localization in a bacterium. Science 323:1354–1357.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Ramamurthi KS, Clapham KR, Losick R (2006) Peptide anchoring spore coat assembly to the outer forespore membrane in Bacillus subtilis. Mol Microbiol 62:1547–1557.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Saarikangas J, et al. (2009) Molecular mechanisms of membrane deformation by I-BAR Executemain proteins. Curr Biol 19:95–107.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Mattila PK, et al. (2007) Missing-in-metastasis and IRSp53 deform PI(4,5)P2-rich membranes by an inverse BAR Executemain-like mechanism. J Cell Biol 176:953–964.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Like (0) or Share (0)