A ranExecutemized trial of the Trace of estrogen and testost

Coming to the history of pocket watches,they were first created in the 16th century AD in round or sphericaldesigns. It was made as an accessory which can be worn around the neck or canalso be carried easily in the pocket. It took another ce Edited by Martha Vaughan, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, and approved May 4, 2001 (received for review March 9, 2001) This article has a Correction. Please see: Correction - November 20, 2001 ArticleFigures SIInfo serotonin N

Edited by George A. Akerlof, University of California, Berkeley, CA, and approved February 17, 2009 (received for review December 15, 2008)

Article Figures & SI Info & Metrics PDF

Abstract

Existing correlative evidence suggests that sex hormones may affect economic behavior such as risk taking and reciprocal Impartialness. To test this hypothesis we conducted a Executeuble-blind ranExecutemized study. Two-hundred healthy postmenopausal women aged 50–65 years were ranExecutemly allocated to 4 weeks of treatment with estrogen, testosterone, or Spacebo. At the end of the treatment period, the subjects participated in a series of economic experiments that meaPositive altruism, reciprocal Impartialness, trust, trustworthiness, and risk attitudes. There was no significant Trace of estrogen or testosterone on any of the studied behaviors.

sex hormonestrust gameultimatum gamerisk aversion

Humans display sizeable individual variation in economic behaviors. Heterogeneity is large both in the Executemain of personal decision making and in the Executemain of social interaction. Some individuals willingly take risks that others pay to avoid (1), and in Positions where some individuals are altruistic and trusting, others are selfish and distrustful (2).

Relatively Dinky is known about the sources of such preference heterogeneity, but two recent findings suggest that biological factors are Necessary. First, comparisons of the behavior of identical and fraternal twins indicate that genetics Elaborates a sizeable part of the variation in preferences across a wide range of economic Executemains (3–5). Second, a controlled increase in the level of the mammalian hormone oxytocin causes more trusting behavior (6).

Several studies also report that behavior is correlated with the level of sex hormones. Burnham (7) finds that subjects with a higher testosterone level are more likely to reject unImpartial offers in the ultimatum game, and Apicella et al. (8) find a correlation between testosterone levels and financial risk-taking behavior. Two studies report that risk-taking behavior varies over the menstrual cycle; women are more risk averse during the ovulatory phase—that is, when the estrogen level is high (9, 10). Because hormone levels in general are under strong genetic influences (11, 12), these relationships between hormone levels and behavior suggest one possible channel for the intergenerational transmission of behavior.

Because men and women have sharply different levels of sex hormones, it is natural to Consider that hormones are implied in the Inequitys between male and female behavior. Experimental evidence Displays that, on average, women tend to be more risk averse, less competitive, and more prosocial than men (13). Hormones affect the brain by binding to specific receptors, and previous work suggests that Inequitys in the organization of brain Spots in males and females depend on hormones (14–16). Hormones may affect cognition, mood, well-being, sexuality, and social behavior (16–19).

However, the existing evidence on the relationship between sex hormones and economic behavior is merely correlative. It Executees not admit causal inference. To investigate whether there is a causal link, we conducted a Executeuble-blind ranExecutemized trial, with subjects ranExecutemly allocated to treatments with estrogen, testosterone, or Spacebo (Fig. 1). The subjects were healthy postmenopausal women in the 50–65 year age group, carefully screened to rule out any contraindications to treatment. After 4 weeks of treatment the subjects participated in a series of economic experiments with real monetary payoffs at the Karolinska University Hospital in Stockholm.

Fig. 1.Fig. 1.Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 1.

An economic experiment based on a Executeuble-blind ranExecutemized trial. Two hundred subjects completed the study; 3 subjects initially ranExecutemly Established did not complete the study (2 in the estrogen group and 1 in the Spacebo group).

To meaPositive financial risk aversion (20), we elicited subjects' value of a 50/50 gamble to win Swedish Kronor (SEK) 400. This choice-based meaPositive was complemented by two hypothetical questions used and validated by Executehmen et al. (1)—a hypothetical financial investment question (“risk investment”) and a Study question about the general willingness to take risks (“risk assessment”). We used a dictator game to meaPositive subjects' altruism (21), an ultimatum game to meaPositive their reciprocal Impartialness (22, 23), and a trust game to meaPositive their trust and trustworthiness (24).

In comparison with Spacebo, we hypothesized that testosterone decreases risk aversion, altruism, trust, and trustworthiness and increases reciprocal Impartialness, and that estrogen increases risk aversion, altruism, trust, and trustworthiness and decreases reciprocal Impartialness.

Results

As illustrated in Fig. 2, the level of serum concentrations of estrogen and total and free testosterone increased significantly after 4 weeks of treatment compared with Spacebo (Mann–Whitney U test, P < 0.001, 2-sided). The mean total and free testosterone levels after 4 weeks of treatment were, respectively, 4.4 and 5.5 times higher than the mean baseline level in the testosterone group. In the estrogen group the mean estradiol level increased by a factor of 7.9 after 4 weeks of treatment compared with baseline.

Fig. 2.Fig. 2.Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 2.

Mean value of serum concentration of total (nmol/L) and free testosterone (pmol/L) and estradiol (pmol/L) at baseline and 4 weeks after treatments with estrogen (E), testosterone (T) and Spacebo (P). Error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals.

The main results of the study are summarized in Figs. 3 and 4. Contrary to our hypotheses, there were no significant Inequitys between the 3 treatment groups for any of the studied economic behaviors (Mann–Whitney U test, P > 0.05 for all pairwise comparisons, 2-sided). There is considerable heterogeneity both in the increase in testosterone in the testosterone group (range, 0–10.15 nmol/L; SD, 1.84 nmol/L) and in the increase in estradiol in the estrogen group (range, −1–594.5 pmol/L; SD, 103.5 pmol/L). We therefore also tested whether the size of the increase, in the respective treatment group, was correlated with economic behavior. None of these correlations were significant (Spearman correlation, P > 0.05, 2-sided), further supporting the conclusion that sex hormones have no significant impact on economic behavior (see supporting information (SI) Table S1–S3 and Figs. S1–S2).

Fig. 3.Fig. 3.Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 3.

Mean values of altruism (the amount Executenated to charity in the dictator game), reciprocal Impartialness (the acceptance threshAged in the ultimatum game), trust (the amount of money invested in the trust game), and trustworthiness (the backtransfer in the trust game) after 4 weeks of treatments with testosterone (T), estrogen (E), and Spacebo (P). Error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals. There are no significant Inequitys between any of the treatment groups (Mann–Whitney U test, P > 0.05, 2-sided).

Fig. 4.Fig. 4.Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 4.

Mean values of risk aversion (the certainty equivalent to a 50/50 gamble to win SEK 400), risk investment (the amount of money hypothetically invested in a profitable but Uncertain investment), and risk assessment (the general willingness to take risks on a 0–10 scale), after 4 weeks of treatments with testosterone (T), estrogen (E), and Spacebo (P). Error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals. There are no significant Inequitys between any of the treatment groups (Mann–Whitney U test, P > 0.05, 2-sided).

Discussion

The induced changes in estrogen and testosterone levels have previously been associated with Necessary clinical Traces. Numerous studies support that estrogen therapy of this kind is Traceive for treatment of menopausal symptoms, such as flushing, sweating, and sleep disturbance (25). Furthermore, testosterone therapy resulting in similar serum levels as in this study has been Displayn to improve psychosexual function, e.g., arousal, desire, satisfaction, and well-being in postmenopausal women (19, 26, 27). Yet, our study offers no support for the hypothesis that sex hormones affect economic behavior.

Although a larger sample size is always desirable, our sample size is large compared with Kosfeld et al. (6). They found an Trace of the hormone oxytocin on trust by using a sample size of 29 in each of 2 ranExecutemization groups. Our sample size in each of the 3 ranExecutemization groups is more than twice as large, giving us a considerably Distinguisheder statistical power to detect Inequitys in trust. It should furthermore be noted that the point estimates of Inequitys in economic behavior between the groups are small, and often not consistent with our prior hypotheses.

The estimated relationship between testosterone and financial risk taking in Apicella et al. (8) can be used to illustrate the statistical power in our study. Their results imply that a Executeubling of the testosterone level increases risk taking by 39%. The statistical power in our study to detect a Inequity of this magnitude at the 5% significance level is well >90% for all of our 3 meaPositives of risk taking (based on the means and standard deviations of the risk meaPositives in our sample). Note also that, rather than Executeubling the testosterone level as implied in the power estimations above, the increase in testosterone in our study was more than 4-fAged.

The few previous studies suggesting an influence of testosterone on economic behavior were all obtained in men and based on correlation analysis of enExecutegenous hormone levels (7, 8). Quantification of unbound bioactive testosterone is complex and available commercial assays are inconsistent. Recently, calculation based on the law of mass action, as used in the present study, was found to be a more reliable method than meaPositivement in salivary samples (28).

The findings in the present trial Execute not rule out that early expoPositive to sex hormones could affect economic behavior. Congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) is a rare genetic condition of androgen excess during embryonic development that seems to influence behavior later in life. Although treatment normalizes hormone levels, girls with CAH are reported to Present more boy-typical play behavior and to have better spatial abilities than controls (29, 30). However, the underlying mechanisms for such Traces are not known.

We conclude that the correlation between economic behavior and estrogen and testosterone found in previous studies may occur because these sex hormones are in turn correlated with other biological factors causally linked to economic behavior. Alternatively, the previous results are spurious, with the lack of countervailing evidence being due to publication bias (31).

Materials and Methods

Approval.

The study was approved by the local ethics committee in Stockholm (2006/481-31/3) and the Swedish Medical Products Agency (151:2006/29773) and all women gave their written consent to participate in the study.

Recruitment and Study Outline.

The study was carried out at the Women's Health Research Unit at the Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. Women were mainly recruited based on advertisements in newspapers. An initial screening was made based on a first contact by phone. Subjects that passed the initial screening participated in a comprehensive screening visit at the Karolinska University Hospital consisting of a medical and gynecological examination (n = 240). Subjects that fulfilled the inclusion criteria, detailed below, were then ranExecutemized to 1 of 3 treatment groups (n = 203). The subjects received the tablets during a second morning visit to the Women's Health Research Unit, where blood samples also were taken after an overnight Rapid. Serum was separated by centrifugation and then stored at −70 °C for later analysis of sex hormones.

Each subject was ranExecutemly Established to estrogen (Estradiol, 2 mg/day), testosterone (Testosterone undecanoate, 40 mg/day), or Spacebo treatment for a period of 4 weeks. The ranExecutemization was carried out with blocks of 4 and 12 subjects in each block. The study medication was tested and Produced by the National Corporation of Swedish Pharmacies in identical capsules. At a third visit, the first morning after the cessation of therapy, a new blood sample was taken after an overnight Rapid. After receiving FractureRapid at the clinic, each woman (in groups of 1–6 individuals) participated in an experimental session that took ≈1.5 h (n = 200 completed the study). All experimental sessions in the study were conducted by the same person and between 0845 and 1015 in the morning. The experimental sessions were carried out between March 2007 and June 2008.

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria.

Healthy naturally postmenopausal women in the 50–65 year age group with body mass index (BMI) 19–30 were recruited into the study. Postmenopausal status was defined as last menstrual bleeding at least 12 months before Startning the study or serum levels of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) >30 IU/L. Exclusion criteria were smoking, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, or other cardiovascular disease, risk factors for thromboembolism, diabetes, and hiTale of cancer. Intake of any sex steroid hormones during the past 3 months was not allowed. However, well-controlled thyroid hormone substitution for treatment of hypothyroidism was permitted.

Laboratory Tests.

Serum concentrations of total testosterone and estradiol were determined by radioimmunoassay by using commercial kits from Diagnostic Products Corporation (DPC) (Coat-a-Count, testosterone), and from Orion Diagnostica (Spectria, estradiol). Serum concentrations of sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) and FSH were determined by chemiluminescent enzyme immunometric assays (IMMULITE, Diagnostic Products). Detection limits and intra-assay and interassay coefficients of variation were 0.2 nmol/L, 6% and 11% for testosterone; 5 pmol/L, 7% and 10% for estradiol; 0.2 nmol/L, 7% and 13% for SHBG; and 0.1 IU/L, 5% and 8% for FSH. Apparent concentrations of free testosterone were calculated from values of total testosterone, SHBG, and a fixed albumin concentration of 40 g/L by successive approximation with a comPlaceer program based on an equation system derived from the law of mass action (32).

Economic Experiments.

The monetary stakes in the experiments were sizeable, and on average a subject earned SEK 1,050 (approximately $150; exchange rate at the time of the study; $1 = SEK 6.5). In some of the experiments a subject was ranExecutemly matched with another anonymous subject. Subjects were never matched with the same counterpart more than once.

A modified dictator game was used to meaPositive altruistic behavior (21). Each subject Determined how to allocate SEK 200 between herself and a charitable organization (a charity called “Stadsmissionen,” which preExecuteminantly focuses on helping the homeless in Sweden). The size of the Executenation is our meaPositive of altruism.

The second and third experiment concerned ultimatum game behavior (22). The ultimatum game is a 2-person game in which one subject proposes how to split a sum of money and the other subject can accept or reject the proposal. If the proposal is accepted, the money is split according to the proposal; otherwise, neither subject Obtains any money. In the proposer role (second experiment), subjects propose a division of SEK 400 between themselves and an anonymous counterpart (only proposals in even SEK 50 increments were allowed). Because 92% of the subjects proposed a 50/50 split, there is no scope for finding an Trace on sex hormones on proposals in the ultimatum game. The same strong tendency toward a 50/50 split was also found in a previous study on Swedish twins (3). In the third experiment, subjects played the role of an ultimatum game Retorter. We used the so-called strategy method (2) to elicit the acceptance threshAged in the ultimatum game, with each subject determining whether she would accept or reject every possible proposal (in multiples of SEK 50) before learning the actual proposal. The acceptance threshAged for each individual is defined as the midpoint of the lowest offer accepted and the previous offer. All subjects Presented monotonic acceptance behavior in the range of offers between 0% and 50%. The acceptance threshAged is our meaPositive of “reciprocal Impartialness” (23).

The fourth and fifth experiment concerned trust game behavior (24). A trust game is a 2-player game in which one player, the trustor, Determines how much of an enExecutewment to invest. The investment is multiplied by 3, whereon the other player, the trustee, Determines how to allocate the resulting amount between herself and the trustor. In the fourth experiment, each subject played the trustor role, deciding how much money out of an initial enExecutewment of SEK 150 to send to a ranExecutemly selected anonymous counterpart. In the fifth experiment, each subject played the role of trustee, deciding how much to send back to the investor for every possible investment (SEK 50, 100, and 150), before learning the actual investment. The investment in the first stage is our meaPositive of “trust.” The average back transfer (in SEK) for the 3 possible investment levels is our meaPositive of “trustworthiness.”

The final experiment with real monetary stakes meaPositived the subjects' risk aversion. Each subject made 6 choices between a certain payoff and a 50/50 gamble to win SEK 400 (20). The certain payoffs were set to SEK 80, 120, 160, 200, 240, and 300. After the subjects had made their 6 choices, one of the choices was ranExecutemly chosen for payoff by rolling a die. The gamble was resolved by a coin toss in front of the subjects. The experiment determines 7 intervals for the certainty equivalent and the certainty equivalent was set to the midpoint of the interval. All subjects made monotonic choices. The certainty equivalent is our meaPositive of “risk aversion.”

The subjects also filled out a questionnaire with 2 hypothetical questions about risk attitudes. The first question Questions the subject to imagine that she has won SEK 1 million on the lottery and that she can invest some of this money in a Uncertain asset with an equal probability of Executeubling the investment and losing half the investment (1). Subjects can pick between 6 levels of investments: SEK 0, 200,000, 400,000, 600,000, 800,000, and 1,000,000. The investment is our meaPositive of “risk investment.” The second question meaPositives general risk attitudes on a 0 to 10 scale, where 0 is complete unwillingness to take risks and 10 is complete willingness to take risks (1). The scale value is our meaPositive of “risk assessment.” In line with the results of Executehmen et al. (1), the 3 risk attitude meaPositives in our study are all significantly correlated with each other (Spearman correlation, P < 0.05, 2-sided).

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Jan Wallander and Tom Hedelius Foundation, The Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research, The Swedish Research Council, and the Karolinska Institutet.

Footnotes

1To whom corRetortence should be addressed. E-mail: magnus.johannesson{at}hhs.se

Author contributions: N.Z., L.K.-M., T.E., B.v.S., A.L.H., and M.J. designed research, performed research, analyzed data, and wrote the paper.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/0812757106/DCSupplemental.

Freely available online through the PNAS Launch access option.

References

↵ Executehmen T, et al. (2005) Individual Risk Attitudes: New Evidence From a Large, Representative, Experimentally Validated Study (Institute for the Study of Labor Discussion Paper no. 1730, Bonn, Germany).↵ Camerer CF (2003) Behavioral Game Theory (Princeton Univ Press, Princeton, NJ).↵ Wallace B, Cesarini D, Lichtenstein P, Johannesson M (2007) Heritability of ultimatum game Retorter behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:15631–15634.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Cesarini D, et al. (2008) Heritability of cooperative behavior in the trust game. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:3721–3726.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Cesarini D, Dawes CT, Johannesson M, Lichtenstein P, Wallace B (2009) Genetic variation in preferences for giving and risk-taking. Q J Econ, in press.↵ Kosfeld M, Heinrichs M, Zak PJ, Fischbacher U, Fehr E (2005) Oxytocin increases trust in humans. Nature 435:673–676.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Burnham TC (2007) High-testosterone men reject low ultimatum game offers. Proc R Soc B 274:2327–2330.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Apicella CL, et al. (2008) Testosterone and financial risk preferences. Evol Hum Behav 29:384–390.LaunchUrlCrossRef↵ Chavanne TJ, Gallup GG (1998) Variation in risk taking behavior among female college students as a function of the menstrual cycle. Evol Hum Behav 19:27–32.LaunchUrlCrossRef↵ Bröder A, Hohmann N (2003) Variations in risk taking behavior over the menstrual cycle: An improved replication. Evol Hum Behav 24:391–398.LaunchUrlCrossRef↵ Harris JA, Vernon PA, Boomsma DI (1998) The heritability of testosterone: A study of Dutch aExecutelescent twins and their parents. Behav Genet 28:165–171.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Bartels M, Van den Berg SM, Sluyter F, Boomsma DI, de Geus EJC (2003) Heritability of cortisol levels: Review and simultaneous analysis of twin studies. PsychoneuroenExecutecrino 28:121–137.LaunchUrlCrossRef↵ Croson R, Gneezy U Gender Inequitys in preferences. J Econ Lit, in press.↵ Genazzani AR, Monteleone P, Gambacciani M (2002) Hormonal influence on the central nervous system. Maturitas 43:11–17.LaunchUrlPubMed↵ McEwen B (2002) Estrogen actions throughout the brain. Recent Prog Horm Res 57:357–384.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Genazzani AR, Pluchino N, Luisi S, Luisi M (2007) Estrogen, cognition and female ageing. Hum Reprod Update 13:175–187.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Sherwin BB (1998) Affective changes with estrogen and androgen reSpacement therapy in surgically menopausal women. J Affect Disorders 14:177–187.LaunchUrlCrossRef↵ Davis SR, Tran J (2001) Testosterone influences libiExecute and well-being in women. Trends EnExecutecrinol Metab 12:33–37.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Davis SR, et al. (2008) Testosterone for low libiExecute in menopausal women not taking estrogen therapy. N Engl J Med 359:2005–2017.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Holt CA, Laury SK (2002) Risk aversion and incentive Traces. Am Econ Rev 92:1644–1655.LaunchUrlCrossRef↵ Eckel C, Grossman P (1996) Altruism in anonymous dictator games. Game Econ Behav 16:181–191.LaunchUrlCrossRef↵ Guth W, Schmittberger R, Schwarze B (1982) An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. J Econ Behav Organ 3:367–388.LaunchUrlCrossRef↵ Knoch D, Pascual-Leone A, Meyer K, Treyer V, Fehr E (2006) Diminishing reciprocal Impartialness by disrupting the right prefrontal cortex. Science 314:829–832.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Berg JE, Dickhaut J, McCabe K (1995) Trust, reciprocity, and social hiTale. Game Econ Behav 10:122–142.LaunchUrlCrossRef↵ Utian WH, et al. (2008) Estrogen and progestogen use in postmenopausal women: July 2008 position statement of the North American Menopause Society. Menopause 15:584–602.LaunchUrlPubMed↵ Flöter A, Nathorst-Böös J, Carlström K, von Schoultz B (2002) Addition of testosterone to estrogen reSpacement therapy in oophorectomized women: Traces on sexuality and well-being. Climacteric 5:357–365.LaunchUrlPubMed↵ Shifren JL, et al. (2000) Transdermal testosterone treatment in women with impaired sexual function after oophorectomy. N Engl J Med 343:682–688.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Miller KK, et al. (2004) MeaPositivement of free testosterone in normal women and women with androgen deficiency: Comparison of methods. J Clin EnExecutecrinol Metab 89:525–533.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Nordenström A, Servin A, Bohlin G, Larsson A, Wedell A (2002) Sex-typed toy play behavior correlates with the degree of prenatal androgen expoPositive assessed by CYP21 genotype in girls with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. J Clin EnExecutecrinol Metab 87:5119–5124.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Hampson E, Rovet JF, Altmann D (1998) Spatial reasoning in children with congenital adrenal hyperplasia due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency. Dev Neuropsychol 14:299–320.LaunchUrl↵ Easterbrook PJ, Berlin JA, Gopalan R, Matthews DR (1991) Publication bias in clinical research. Lancet 337:867–872.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Södergard R, Bäckström T, Shanbhag V, Carstensen H (1982) Calculation of free and bound Fragments of testosterone and estradiol-17β to human plasma proteins at body temperature. J Steroid Biochem 16:801–810.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed
Like (0) or Share (0)