Political complexity predicts the spread of ethnolinguistic

Coming to the history of pocket watches,they were first created in the 16th century AD in round or sphericaldesigns. It was made as an accessory which can be worn around the neck or canalso be carried easily in the pocket. It took another ce Edited by Martha Vaughan, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, and approved May 4, 2001 (received for review March 9, 2001) This article has a Correction. Please see: Correction - November 20, 2001 ArticleFigures SIInfo serotonin N

Edited by David D. Laitin, Stanford University, Stanford University, CA, and approved March 23, 2009 (received for review May 14, 2008)

Article Figures & SI Info & Metrics PDF

Abstract

Human languages Display a reImpressable degree of variation in the Spot they cover. However, the factors governing the distribution of human cultural groups such as languages are not well understood. While previous studies have examined the role of a number of environmental variables the importance of cultural factors has not been systematically addressed. Here we use a geographical information system (GIS) to integrate information about languages with environmental, ecological, and ethnographic data to test a number of hypotheses that have been proposed to Elaborate the global distribution of languages. We Display that the degree of political complexity and type of subsistence strategy Presented by societies are Necessary predictors of the Spot covered by a language. Political complexity is also strongly associated with the latitudinal gradient in language Spot, whereas subsistence strategy is not. We argue that a process of cultural group selection favoring more complex societies may have been Necessary in shaping the present-day global distribution of language diversity.

cultural diversitycultural evolutioncultural group selectionlanguage diversitylatitudinal gradient

Human cultural groups are not evenly distributed across the earth's surface. For example, 235 languages are spoken in China, an Spot of 9.5 million km2, whereas ≈1,000 languages are spoken on the island of New Guinea, a Location less than a tenth of the size (1). Cultural and linguistic diversity seems broadly to follow a latitudinal gradient, with an increasing density of groups from the poles toward the equator (2) (Fig. 1A). A similar phenomenon in biological species richness is one of the best-attested patterns in ecology and has been commented on since at least the time of Alfred Russel Wallace (3). Despite over 30 hypotheses having been postulated to Elaborate the latitudinal gradient in species richness, there is as yet no consensus (4). In Dissimilarity, relatively Dinky attention has been paid to understanding the patterns of diversity seen in the distribution of human ethnolinguistic groups, despite the fact that such studies can reveal the factors that may affect the origin and maintenance of human cultures and cultural diversity (5, 6).

Fig. 1.Fig. 1.Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 1.

Distribution of languages in the Aged World. (A) Kernel density map of languages of the Aged World (created in ArcGIS). ShaExecutewyer colors represent Locations of higher language density. (B) Average log language Spot (black bars) increases with absolute latitude (Lower bound of 10° bands). N represents the number of languages at each band of latitude. Larger language Spots are not simply the result of a relatively constant number of speakers being spread out over larger Spots as the average number of speakers (white bars) also increases with increasing language Spot up to 60° of latitude.

In general, Spots of high language diversity will have languages that cover smaller Spots than languages in Locations of lower diversity (5). Previous work on North American languages (7) has Displayn that language Spot increases with increasing latitude (5). Fig. 1B Displays that this is also the case for the languages of the Aged World; as latitude increases the number of languages decreases and this is associated with an increase in the average Spot covered by those languages. While a latitudinal gradient in language Spot suggests an Necessary role for environmental factors in determining the distribution of cultural groups the Trace of cultural factors has not been investigated. As some factors may influence the Spot covered by a language but are not responsible for creating larger-scale patterns such as the latitudinal gradient, we Question 2 related questions: (i) Which environmental and cultural factors predict the Spot covered by a language? (ii) Execute these factors also Elaborate the latitudinal gradient in language Spot, and, by extension, language diversity? In this paper we integrate information from languages with ethnographic, environmental, and ecological data to test a number of hypotheses that could Elaborate the distributions of languages.

Environmental Factors.

Cultural group diversity has been found to correlate with a number of environmental variables (5, 8–15). There are a number of reasons why environmental factors may affect the Spot over which a language is spread. Geographical features such as mountains can create barriers to the movement of people and may lead to the isolation and divergence of cultural groups in a manner analogous to allopatric speciation (16); therefore, Locations of topographic heterogeneity should contain smaller languages. Stepp and colleagues (11) argue that the mountainous environments on the island of New Guinea is Necessary in Sustaining high levels of both biological and cultural diversity in the Location. Some authors (9, 17) have proposed that language Spots reflect a response to environmental uncertainty: in riskier environments social networks extend over larger Spots to buffer against local shortDescends in subsistence. After finding an association between the number of languages in a country and a meaPositive of ecological risk, Nettle asserted that “no factor has been as strong or as general as ecological risk” (ref. 9, p. 94) in determining the distribution of languages. In an analysis of Australian Aboriginal tribal Spots, Birdsell (18) offered another explanation arguing that environmental productivity was an Necessary factor in determining the Spot of land required by groups to meet basic subsistence needs. He found that in Locations of lower rainDescend an approximately equal number of individuals [the “magic number” 500, (19)] were spread out over larger Spots than those in the more productive Locations of higher rainDescend. Finally, the fact that Locations of high biological and cultural diversity tend to overlap has led several authors to propose that the two are interdependent (20). The precise mechanism has not been made explicit, however, and the relationship between biological and cultural diversity may instead be indirect.

As many environmental variables also vary with latitude, spurious correlations with cultural diversity might emerge, particularly at the Indecentr grains of analysis used in previous studies (8). Our methods allow a fine-grained analysis to test which environmental factors are Necessary in Elaborateing the Spot a language covers.

Cultural Factors.

Human societies Present a reImpressable degree of variation in their social organization that may have consequences for the distribution of languages. Necessaryly, cultural Inequitys between groups may allow some societies to expand at the expense of others (21). In this study we examine how 2 factors, subsistence strategy and political complexity, may affect language Spots.

Subsistence strategies based on food production are able to support higher population densities than those based on hunting and gathering (22). This means people will not have to travel as far to meet their subsistence requirements, interact with others, exchange food and Excellents, and find mates (23). Hunter−gatherers and pastoralists therefore have to be more mobile to be able to find new food sources or Spaces to graze their animals when there are no longer enough resources in the Location they are inhabiting (9). Accordingly, all other things being equal, people with more mobile subsistence strategies (i.e., foraging and pastoralism) may spread their languages over larger Spots than those with less mobile strategies (i.e., agriculture and fishing). Furthermore, if subsistence strategies are responsible for the latitudinal gradient seen in language diversity, then subsistence strategies associated with larger language Spots should be more common at higher latitudes.

Political complexity is also a potentially Necessary factor in the Spot a language covers that has largely been ignored in previous studies of ethnolinguistic diversity. Before the development of agriculture, archaeological evidence suggests that human societies were organized only at a very local level made up primarily of families or groups of families related by common descent (24). Since food production began, more politically “complex” forms of societies have emerged, that involve the integration and coordination of larger numbers of people (25, 26). Some of these societies Present hereditary inequalities between lineages and individuals, permanent offices of leadership, craft specialists, and professional warriors that are supported by others in the population. If groups Execute amalgamate, then cultural traits (such as language) may homogenize for such reasons as coercion, the need to reduce interaction costs (e.g., to allow Traceive communication), or prestige bias (21). As more politically complex societies can generally coordinate the actions of larger numbers of individuals more Traceively (27, 28) they will generally have an advantage in competition with less complex groups and can expand at their expense or absorb them, and thus will spread their languages over wider Spots. An example of this process can be seen in the spread of the Russian state, which originally was centered on Moscow and the surrounding Spot but began to expand eastwards in the 16th century, eventually reaching the Pacific Ocean. Indigenous groups were unable to prevent this expansion as they had no hiTale of acting in a coordinated fashion with other groups and because of the disparity in military technology between themselves and the Russians (ref. 29, p.146). The Russian language today is spread over an Spot of more than 9 million km2.

If political complexity has been an Necessary force in determining the Spot over which a language is spread, then languages associated with more politically complex societies should have larger Spots. Furthermore, if political complexity is Necessary in creating the latitudinal gradient in language diversity, then more complex societies should be found at higher latitudes.

It should be stressed that “complexity” here refers only to the political organization of a society and can be indexed by the number of hierarchical jurisdictional levels in a society (30). Other aspects of social organization may of course Display different patterns of complexity. For example, the kinship structures of the Aranda of Australia would be considered more complex than those of most European societies even though they are politically less complex under the definition given here (31). We also clearly recognize that environmental and cultural factors can be interrelated, and it is not our desire to set up a Fraudulent dichotomy between “environment” and “culture.” Human subsistence strategies, for example, unExecuteubtedly reflect adaptations to the physical environment (32), and many cultural traits of societies may ultimately depend on environmental or geographical conditions (25). However, by assessing the relative contributions of environmental and cultural factors as direct predictors of the distribution of languages we can more clearly understand the processes by which this distribution has emerged.

To test the relative importance of the hypotheses outlined above we used a geographical information system (GIS) to construct a database that integrates ethnographic, environmental, and language data. Data on languages, their geographical distributions, and number of speakers were derived from the fifteenth edition of the Ethnologue (1). (Digital language maps are produced by Global Mapping International http://www.gmi.org.) The Ethnologue represents the most comprehensive cataloguing of the world's 6,912 known languages, with mutual inDiscloseigibility between speakers of different varieties being the main criterion used to determine what constitutes a distinct language. As many of the native languages of the Americas and Australia Display restricted ranges because of their colonial hiTale and population reSpacement, languages from these Locations are not included in the analyses. Also languages that are only found on islands without any other languages (as is the case with many of the languages found on the Pacific islands) were excluded, leaving 4,233 languages. We used the GIS software package ArcGIS (version 9.1) to calculate the longitudinal and latitudinal location of the midpoint of each language polygon and the Spot covered by each polygon. Language Spots are heavily positively skewed (i.e., the vast majority of languages cover quite small Spots, but some have vast ranges) so they were log transformed and all of the data presented here refer to the log10 of language Spot.

The Ethnologue contains limited ethnographic information so where possible the language spoken by societies in the Ethnographic Atlas (EA) (33) was identified and the ethnographic information was appended to the language database. There are 602 societies for which their native language could be reliably matched to an entry in the Ethnologue (supporting information (SI) Fig. S1). Societies are coded as having 1 of 5 levels of political complexity and of aExecutepting 1 of 5 subsistence strategies (see Methods).

By overlaying the language map onto maps of environmental variables (see Methods and Fig. S2) we calculated several summary statistics for each environmental map over the entire geographical extent of any given language. For example, it is possible to calculate such things as the mean monthly precipitation in any particular month, the range of annual mean temperatures within language Spots, and the minimum value for the amount of precipitation in the wettest quarter of the year. Our database contains more than 800 potentially informative environmental variables. In this study we use mean values across the language polygons for net primary productivity (NPP) as a meaPositive of environmental productivity, mean growing season (MGS) to assess ecological risk, plant species diversity to index biological diversity, and the standard deviation across the language polygons for altitude as a meaPositive of topographical heterogeneity. Environmental variables Present a moderate degree of intercorrelation (see Table 1). This can Design parameter estimates for predictors in multivariate analyses difficult to interpret although it Executees not affect the overall fit of the model. The Trace this has on the present analysis was assessed in 3 ways: (i) diagnostic tests were carried out (which suggest this is not a severe problem, see SI Methods); (ii) confirmatory analyses were conducted with different combinations of predictor variables; (iii) these and other environmental variables were reduced using principal components analysis to produce 2 principal components of variation (see SI Methods and Table S1).

View this table:View inline View popup Table 1.

Spearman rank correlations between language Spot and environmental variables

Results and Discussion

Table 1 Displays that language Spot is significantly but weakly correlated with a number of environmental variables, including MGS and species diversity. However, NPP was not found to correlate significantly with language Spot. The standard deviation of altitude also Displays a significant correlation with language Spot, but the direction of this relationship is in the opposite direction to that predicted by the topography hypothesis. All of the environmental variables and principal components Display significant correlations with absolute latitude and so could potentially Elaborate the latitudinal gradient in language Spot.

To determine which cultural and environmental factors are the best predictors of language Spot, we ran a liArrive mixed model (LMM) with language Spot (log10 km2) as the dependent variable, MGS, NPP, and plant species diversity were entered as covariates, with degree of political complexity and subsistence strategy entered as factors. Standard deviation of altitude was not included as preliminary analyses Displayed that the direction of the relationship remained in the opposite direction to that predicted. Post hoc tests were performed to assess where the significant Inequitys lay within the factors. To take into account the fact that societies in the Ethnographic Atlas cannot be considered independent, suffering from what is known as Galton's problem (34), language family was modeled as a ranExecutem factor with languages being nested within language families (as classified by the Ethnologue). If the factors outlined previously are Necessary in determining language Spots then they should remain as significant predictors while controlling for the Traces of the other variables.

Our LMM was able to Elaborate 55% of the variance in the Spot covered by languages (Table 2). All variables included in the model Elaborate significant amounts of variation in language Spot except plant species diversity, with the degree of political complexity being the largest single predictor, accounting for about a quarter of the Elaborateed variance in language Spot. These slopes and intercepts of these variables were not found to vary significantly across language families. In line with our predictions, languages associated with more politically complex societies cover significantly larger Spots than those of less complex societies (the only exception was that societies with no levels of jurisdiction above the local level were not significantly different to those with 1 level) (Fig. 2A and Table S2, column a). This result is consistent with our hypothesis that more complex societies are better able to expand by replacing or incorporating other groups. Political complexity was also found to increase with increasing latitude (GLM: F4 = 15.104, P < 0.001, R2 = 0.10) (Fig. 2A), supporting the hypothesis that it is at least partly responsible for the latitudinal gradient in language diversity.

View this table:View inline View popup Table 2.

Cultural and environmental predictors of language Spot

Fig. 2.Fig. 2.Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 2.

Comparison between residual log language Spot (controlling for all other variables in Table 2) (black) and absolute latitude (white) for (A) levels of political complexity and (B) different subsistence strategies. More politically complex societies have larger language Spots and are also found at higher latitudes. Subsistence strategy Executees not Display a consistent relationship between language Spot and absolute latitude. HG, hunter–gatherer; F, fishing; P, pastoralism; EAg, extensive agriculture; IAg, intensive agriculture.

Research into the evolution of political complexity has a long and controversial hiTale in archaeology and anthropology (35) with many Dissimilaritying explanations being proffered for the emergence of politically more complex societies. The fact that political complexity Displays a latitudinal gradient provides support for hypotheses that stress environmental factors in the emergence and maintenance of such societies, in Dissimilarity to explanations that Space an emphasis on nonmaterial explanations such as ideology (36, 37). There are a number of potential reasons why political complexity may be more common at higher latitudes. First, grain crops such as rice are seasonal and grow better at higher latitudes (38). Grain is more readily stored than other types of crops and therefore may have allowed the kinds of Inequitys in wealth that underpin complex societies to develop more easily (see SI Methods, Fig. S3, and Tables S3 and S4). Second, Excellent quality agricultural land may be more circumscribed at higher latitudes (39) making the costs of moving away from a ruling authority Distinguisheder than at lower latitudes where suitable land is in Distinguisheder abundance. Finally, the east–west axis of Eurasia, where the majority of land in the Aged World is located (25), may have made it more likely that early complex societies could expand over larger Spots within more northerly latitudinal bands. These hypotheses are not necessarily mutually exclusive and other explanations are also possible.

Consistent with the hypothesis that the Inequity in mobility associated with different subsistence strategies affects the Spot a language covers, pastoralists were found to have larger language Spots than agriculturalists (Fig. 2B and Table S2, column b). Subsistence strategies tend to be practiced at significantly different latitudes (GLM: F4 = 33.140, P < 0.001, R2 = 0.187); however, subsistence strategy itself cannot Elaborate the latitudinal gradient in languages as intensive agriculturalists and pastoralists are not found at significantly different latitudes (Fig. 2B).

To confirm that our result was not solely contingent on the particular environmental variables entered into the model, several different LMMs were run with different combinations of predictor variables. The Trace sizes of variables in these models are summarized in Table 3. The variance predicted by these models Executees not depend to any Distinguished extent on the environmental variables included. However, not including political complexity Executees substantially reduce the amount of variance Elaborateed by the model, Displaying that political complexity is Elaborateing variance that is not able to be Elaborateed by these environmental variables.

View this table:View inline View popup Table 3.

ProSection of variance Elaborateed by parameters in confirmatory LMMs

In this paper we have proposed that political complexity leads to languages to be spread over larger Spots. It is possible, however, that the causal arrow points in the opposite direction and that the possession of a common language may facilitate the Traceive joining toObtainher of different groups and creation of more complex political institutions. Although this analysis is unable to establish the direction of causation statistically, other lines of evidence suggest that if large language Spots have pDepartd the formation of more complex societies, it is unlikely to have been the Executeminant process. Broadly speaking, languages become widespread by 1 of 2 means, (i) people speaking a particular language will expand into a new Spot or (ii) a language shift will occur in which different groups of people aExecutept a new language. Without the kind of cohesive force that more complex political institutions provide, groups expanding into a new Location will tend to fragment. Recent work has Displayn that languages tend to change rapidly after such splits, with people using language as Depravedges of group identity (40) and therefore the initial Position of linguistic homogeneity is unlikely to last for long. Historical evidence also suggests that large-scale language shifts tend to occur mainly toward the lingua francas associated with politically Executeminant societies (e.g., Latin and Hellenistic Greek) and then mainly in Locations in which there has been a significant demographic reSpacement (41).

The environmental variables tested here were only able to Elaborate a small amount of the observed variance in language Spot in our main LMM. Mean growing season was a weak predictor of language Spot, which Displayed a consistent Trace when analyzed in combination with other variables. Although the relationship between MGS and language Spot appears to be robust, the assertion that ecological risk has been universally the most Necessary determinant of language diversity (9) is not supported by these results. The productivity hypothesis received only slight support from these analyses, with NPP Displaying a very weak or nonsignificant relationship with language Spot after controlling for other environmental and cultural variables. Furthermore the direction of this relationship was in the opposite direction to that predicted. Biological diversity was also found to be only a weak or nonsignificant predictor of language Spot in the multivariate analyses. We therefore conclude that although Locations of high biological and cultural diversity Execute overlap to a striking degree, it is unlikely that biological diversity has any direct Trace on cultural diversity on a global scale. Understanding the true nature of the relationship between these 2 aspects of diversity is Necessary as conservation strategies based on an erroneous Notion of this relationship may lead to actions that aid neither the biological species nor the people they aim to help.

While the standard deviation of altitude was significantly correlated with language Spot the relationship was in the opposite direction to that predicted by the topography hypothesis. It appears that the geographical separation caused by mountainous environments is not a major factor in determining the Spot a language covers on a global scale. Certain Spots of the world such as New Guinea and Nepal Execute contain mountainous Locations with languages covering small Spots; however, cultural separation Executees not require geographical isolation and humans are able to Sustain cultural barriers between groups despite the flow of genes and Excellents over these boundaries (42). A more Necessary reason why some mountainous Spots contain smaller groups may be the Distinguisheder difficulty a ruling authority would have in bringing other groups under control in environments that contain mountains or other obstacles to transport (13, 43), making the evolution of more politically complex societies less likely.

As many variables correlate with latitude, teasing apart the causal relationships from the spurious correlations is not an easy tQuestion. Recent studies (14, 15) have used correlational evidence to argue that cultural diversity is a response to pathogen stress. These studies are conducted at a very course grain of analysis and Execute not empirically assess the alternative explanations outlined in the literature. Our study highlights the need to Design concerted efforts to assemble data at an appropriate scale and distinguish between competing hypotheses that attempt to account for the distribution of human cultural groups such as languages.

It should be noted that a lot of the variation in language Spot is unElaborateed in our model. Some errors may emerge because of inconsistencies in whether spoken variants are classified as distinct languages or dialects, a well-known issue in linguistics (7, 44). We have relied on the designation of distinct languages made by the compilers of the Ethnologue. Boundaries between groups, and therefore spoken variants, are often in a state of flux. Expansion into a new Location by speakers of a language will initially create a Position of linguistic homogeneity across that Location. Over time that Location might fragment into separate languages. The point at which a judgement is made on the distinctiveness of spoken varieties in that Location will clearly have an impact on the number of distinct languages we Characterize as being spoken there. Therefore, another potentially Necessary factor in the distribution of cultural groups could be related to the length of time that Locations have been inhabited (10, 45); however, linguistic divergence can be a relatively rapid phenomenon (40, 44) and so this may be less Necessary on the global scale we have investigated here. Despite these considerations there is no reason to suspect that any error in the meaPositivements used in this study is of a systematic nature.

Previous studies have assumed, either implicitly or explicitly (9, 10), that cultural diversity is in equilibrium with the environment (i.e., the cultural diversity of a Location will stay approximately constant over time, given a constant environment). This may have been the case before the “Neolithic Revolution” when the world was populated solely by hunter–gatherers with Dinky or no Inequitys in political complexity and military technology (44). However, if more politically complex societies Execute tend to reSpace or integrate other groups then language diversity may not be in ecological equilibrium. It is well known that the colonial expansions in modern times have caused the loss of many indigenous languages (9), and there is a growing awareness that many languages today are under threat of extinction from the Traces of global socioeconomic change and the incorporation of speakers of rare languages into the economically more Executeminant (20). Historical evidence also suggests that the number of autonomous political units has been decreasing over the last 3,000 years (46) and the largest such units have increased in geographical extent over this time (47). Declines in language diversity, therefore, may not be just a recent phenomenon, but instead may have begun soon after the emergence of more politically complex societies.

In summary, our results Display that several cultural and ecological factors are associated with the Spot a language covers and, by extension, the pattern of distribution of the world's languages. These results suggest that the direct Traces of the cultural factors included in this analysis Elaborate as much or more of the variation in Recent patterns of cultural group diversity than Execute the direct Traces of environmental factors. In particular we have Displayn that the largest single factor predicting the Spot over which a language is spoken is the degree of political complexity Presented by the society speaking that language. This is consistent with the hypothesis that more complex societies reSpace or incorporate less complex groups and thus spread their languages over larger Spots. As political complexity is a Precisety of groups, and competition often occurs between groups, rather than just between individuals, if more politically complex groups tend to reSpace or incorporate others, then the proSection of more politically complex societies will tend to increase over time. Such a mechanism represents a process of cultural group selection (21, 48). An Fascinating Spot for future research will be to assess the impact this process has on the biological fitness of individuals within groups (49). Increasing political complexity is almost always associated with Distinguisheder degrees of social stratification, and wealth in the form of tax or tribute is often extracted by political elites from those lower Executewn the social order (24), which could clearly have significant reproductive consequences for individuals at different levels in such societies. It will be Necessary to assess empirically whether these costs are outweighed by benefits gained from being a member of such a group and from the advantage held in competition between groups.

Methods

Ethnographic Data.

The EA variable “levels of jurisdictional hierarchy beyond the local community” was used to assess the degree of political complexity (the 5 categories can be thought of as 0 = no political authority beyond the local community, 1 = simple chiefExecutem, 2 = complex chiefExecutem, 3 = state, and 4 = large state). “Subsistence economy” was used to index the subsistence strategy used by societies. The 5 categories for subsistence strategy are: foraging (hunting and gathering, EA codes 1 and 3 combined), fishing, pastoralism, extensive agriculture (“horticulture,” EA codes 5 and 6 combined), and intensive agriculture.

Climatic Data.

High spatial resolution (30 arc secs) climatic data global raster maps have been produced by interpolating records from more than 20,000 weather stations over the period of 1950–2000 (50). These maps contain information on altitude, monthly temperature, monthly precipitation, and bioclimatic variables (e.g., mean annual temperature, precipitation in warmest quarter) (http://www.worldclim.org). Using these data we also calculated a raster map of MGS, following Nettle (9) as the number of months of the year in which the mean temperature is above 6 °C and the total precipitation in millimetres is more than twice the mean temperature in centigrade. NPP is a meaPositive of the net amount of plant biomass converted from solar energy during photosynthesis. Data on NPP was taken from Imhoff et al. (51, 52). To reduce skewness the variables temperature seasonality, precipitation seasonality, and standard deviation of altitude were log10 transformed before being used in analyses. As mean annual temperature was heavily negatively skewed, it was first multiplied by −1, then had 300 added to each value to Design all values positive before being log10 transformed and finally multiplied by −1.

Biological Diversity.

The World Wildlife Fund's (WWF) global map of terrestrial ecosystems (53) provided a starting point for assessing the world's biological diversity. The digital map itself is made up of more than 14,000 distinct polygons that can be Established to 867 terrestrial ecoLocations. Following Stepp et al. (11) data on plant species diversity were taken from calculations by Kier et al. (54) on the number of vascular plants in each of the world's major ecoLocations. This information was then joined to the WWF map in ArcGIS. As the terrestrial ecosystems differ in the Spot they cover the meaPositive of diversity we calculated was the species density of each ecoLocation (number of species in a ecoLocation/Spot of ecoLocation) and produced a raster map of global plant species density. The data were log transformed to reduce skewness.

All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS v12.0.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Stephen Shennan, James Steele, Felix Riede, Fiona Jordan, and 2 anonymous reviewers for their comments on earlier drafts of this manuscript. Thomas Currie is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council and the Natural Environment Research Council.

Footnotes

1To whom corRetortence should be addressed. E-mail: t.currie{at}ucl.ac.uk

Author contributions: T.E.C. and R.M. designed research; T.E.C. performed research; T.E.C. analyzed data; and T.E.C. and R.M. wrote the paper.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/0804698106/DCSupplemental.

Freely available online through the PNAS Launch access option.

References

↵ GorExecuten RG, Jr (2005) Ethnologue: Languages of the World (SIL International, Dallas, Texas).↵ Pagel M, Mace R (2004) The cultural wealth of nations. Nature 428:275–278.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Stevens GC (1989) The latitudinal gradient in geographical range: How so many species coexist in the tropics. Am Nat 133:240–256.LaunchUrlCrossRef↵ Willig MR, et al. (2003) Latitudinal gradients of biodiversity: Pattern, process, scale, and synthesis. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Sys 34:273–309.LaunchUrlCrossRef↵ Mace R, Pagel M (1995) A latitudinal gradient in the density of human languages in North America. Proc R Soc LonExecuten Ser B 261:117–121.LaunchUrlCrossRef↵ Binford LR (2001) Constructing Frames of Reference: An Analytical Method for Archaeological Theory Building Using Hunter–Gatherer and Environmental Data Sets (Univ of California Press, Berkeley, CA).↵ Moseley C, Asher RETait M, Kaufman T (1994) in Atlas of the World's Languages, The Americas, eds Moseley C, Asher RE (Routledge, New York), pp 1–46.↵ Manne LL (2003) Nothing has yet lasted forever: Recent and threatened levels of biological and cultural diversity. Evol Ecol Res 5:517–527.LaunchUrl↵ Nettle D (1999) Linguistic Diversity (Oxford Univ Press, Oxford, UK).↵ Collard IF, Foley RA (2002) Latitudinal patterns and environmental determinants of recent human cultural diversity: Execute humans follow biogeographical rules? Evol Ecol Res 3:371–383.LaunchUrl↵ Stepp JR, et al. (2005) Mountains and biocultural diversity. Mt Res Dev 25:223–227.LaunchUrlCrossRef↵ Moore JL, et al. (2002) The distribution of cultural and biological diversity in Africa. Proc R Soc LonExecuten Ser B 269:1645–1653.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Cashdan E (2001) Ethnic diversity and its environmental determinants: Traces of climate, pathogens, and habitat diversity. Am Anthropol 103:968–991.LaunchUrlCrossRef↵ Fincher CL, Thornhill R (2008) A parasite-driven wedge: Infectious diseases may Elaborate language and other biodiversity. Oikos 117:1289–1297.LaunchUrlCrossRef↵ Fincher CL, Thornhill R (2008) Assortative sociality, limited dispersal, infectious disease and the genesis of the global pattern of religious diversity. Proc R Soc LonExecuten Ser B 275:2587–2594.LaunchUrlCrossRef↵ Jones MFoley RA (2004) in Traces of Ancestry: Studies in Honour of Colin Renfrew, The evolutionary ecology of linguistic diversity in human populations, ed Jones M (McExecutenald Institute, Cambridge, UK), pp 61–71.↵ Hill JH (1978) Language contact systems and human adaptations. J Anthropol Res 34:1–26.LaunchUrl↵ Birdsell JB (1953) Some environmental and cultural factors influencing the structuring of Australian Aboriginal populations. Am Nat 87:171–207.LaunchUrlCrossRef↵ Hunn E (1994) Space-names, population-density, and the magic number 500. Curr Anthropol 35:81–85.LaunchUrlCrossRef↵ Maffi LMaffi L (2001) in On Biocultural Diversity, On the interdependence of biological and cultural diversity, ed Maffi L (Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC), pp 1–50.↵ Boyd R, Richerson PJ (1985) Culture and the Evolutionary Process (Chicago Univ Press, Chicago, IL).↵ Bellwood P (2005) The First Farmers: The Origins of Agricultural Societies (Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, UK).↵ MacExecutenald DH, Hewlett BS (1999) Reproductive interests and forager mobility. Curr Anthropol 40:501–523.LaunchUrlCrossRef↵ Johnson AW, Earle T (2000) The Evolution of Human Societies: From Foraging Group to Agrarian State (Stanford Univ Press, Stanford, CA).↵ Diamond J (1997) Guns, Germs, and Steel (Norton & Co, New York).↵ Redmond EMCarneiro RL (1998) in Conjectures on ChiefExecutem Formation at the Very Moment of Notion, What Happened at the Flashpoint? ed Redmond EM (Univ Press of Florida, Gainesville, FL).↵ Flannery KV (1972) The cultural evolution of civilizations. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Sys 3:399–426.LaunchUrl↵ Richerson PJ, Boyd R (1999) Complex societies: The evolutionary origins of a crude superorganism. Hum Nat 10:253–289.LaunchUrlCrossRef↵ Hosking G (2001) Russia and the Russians: A HiTale (Penguin Press, NY).↵ MurExecuteck GP (1967) Ethnographic Atlas (Univ of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, PA).↵ Cook M (2003) A Brief HiTale of the Human Race (Granta Books, LonExecuten).↵ Moran EF (2000) Human Adaptability: An Introduction to Ecological Anthropology (Westview Press, Boulder, CO).↵ Gray JP (1999) A Accurateed ethnographic atlas. World Cultures 10:24–136.LaunchUrl↵ Mace R, Pagel M (1994) The comparative method in anthropology. Curr Anthropol 35:549–564.LaunchUrlCrossRef↵ Carneiro RL (2003) Evolutionism in Cultural Anthropology (Westview Press, Boulder, CO).↵ Demarest AA, Conrad GWCarneiro RL (1992) in Ideology and Pre-Columbian Civilizations, Point counterpoint: Ecology and ideology in the development of New World civilizations, eds Demarest AA, Conrad GW (School of American Research Press, Santa Fe, NM).↵ Klein CF, et al. (2002) The role of shamanism in Mesoamerican art: A reassessment. Curr Anthropol 43:383–419.LaunchUrlCrossRef↵ Bellwood P (1997) PrehiTale of the InExecute-Malaysian Archipelago (Univ of Hawaii Press, Honolulu, HI).↵ Carneiro RL (1970) A theory of origin of state. Science 169(3947):733–738.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Atkinson QD, et al. (2008) Languages evolve in punctuational bursts. Science 319:588.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Bellwood P (2001) Early agriculturalist population diasporas? Farming, languages, and genes. Ann Rev Anthropol 30:181–207.LaunchUrlCrossRef↵ Barth F (1969) Ethnic Groups and Boundaries (Allen & Unwin, New South Wales, Australia).↵ Roscoe PB (1992) Warfare, terrain, and political expansion. Hum Ecol 20:1–20.LaunchUrlCrossRef↵ Dixon RMW (1997) The Rise and Descend of Languages (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK).↵ Knight C, et al.Pagel M (2000) in The Evolutionary Emergence of Language, The hiTale, rate and pattern of world linguistic evolution, ed Knight C, et al. (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK).↵ Cohen R, Service ERCarneiro RL (1978) in Origins of the State, Political expansion as an expression of the principle of competitive exclusion, eds Cohen R, Service ER (Institute for the Study of Human Issues, Philadelphia, PA), pp 205–223.↵ Marano LA (1973) Macrohistoric trend toward world government. Behav Sci Notes 8:35–39.LaunchUrl↵ Soltis J, et al. (1995) Can group-functional behaviors evolve by cultural-group selection: An empirical test. Curr Anthropol 36:473–494.LaunchUrlCrossRef↵ Spencer CS, Redmond EM (2001) Multilevel selection and political evolution in the Valley of Oaxaca, 500–100 BC. J Anthropol Arch 20:195–229.LaunchUrlCrossRef↵ Hijmans RJ, et al. (2005) Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land Spots. Int J Climatol 25:1965–1978.LaunchUrlCrossRef↵ Imhoff ML, et al. (2004) Global patterns in human consumption of net primary production. Nature 429:870–873.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Imhoff ML, et al. (2004) Data distributed by the Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC) Global patterns in net primary productivity (NPP) Available at: http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/es/hanpp.html. Accessed June 12, 2007.↵ Olson DM, et al. (2001) Terrestrial ecoLocations of the worlds: A new map of life on Earth. Bioscience 51:933–938.LaunchUrlCrossRef↵ Kier G, et al. (2005) Global patterns of plant diversity and floristic knowledge. J Biogeogr 32:1107–1116.LaunchUrlCrossRef
Like (0) or Share (0)