mTOR supports long-term self-renewal and suppresses mesoderm

Edited by Martha Vaughan, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, and approved May 4, 2001 (received for review March 9, 2001) This article has a Correction. Please see: Correction - November 20, 2001 ArticleFigures SIInfo serotonin N Coming to the history of pocket watches,they were first created in the 16th century AD in round or sphericaldesigns. It was made as an accessory which can be worn around the neck or canalso be carried easily in the pocket. It took another ce

Edited by R. Michael Roberts, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, and approved March 24, 2009 (received for review February 20, 2009)

Article Figures & SI Info & Metrics PDF

Abstract

Despite the recent identification of the transcriptional regulatory circuitry involving SOX2, NANOG, and OCT-4, the intracellular signaling networks that control pluripotency of human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) remain largely undefined. Here, we demonstrate an essential role for the serine/threonine protein kinase mammalian tarObtain of rapamycin (mTOR) in regulating hESC long-term undifferentiated growth. Inhibition of mTOR impairs pluripotency, prevents cell proliferation, and enhances mesoderm and enExecutederm activities in hESCs. At the molecular level, mTOR integrates signals from extrinsic pluripotency-supporting factors and represses the transcriptional activities of a subset of developmental and growth-inhibitory genes, as revealed by genome-wide microarray analyses. Repression of the developmental genes by mTOR is necessary for the maintenance of hESC pluripotency. These results uncover a Modern signaling mechanism by which mTOR controls Stoute decisions in hESCs. Our findings may contribute to Traceive strategies for tissue repair and regeneration.

differentiationpluripotencyOCT-4long-term undifferentiated growth

Human embryonic stem cells (ESCs) from blastocyst-stage early human embryos have 2 reImpressable characteristics: long-term self-renewal and the potential to develop into multiple cell types (known as “pluripotency”) (1, 2). They represent a theoretically inexhaustible source of precursor cells to treat diseases and injuries and an invaluable research tool (3, 4). Before these potentials can be realized, obstacles such as the control of cell-Stoute decisions and cell cultivation must be overcome. This requires an improved understanding of signaling pathways that govern hESC long-term undifferentiated growth and directed differentiation.

hESC long-term self-renewal suggests cell proliferation with continuing repressed differentiation. Several factors that control this complex process are known. Extrinsic factors from the feeder cells, such as mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) or their conditioned medium (CM), are necessary for long-term undifferentiated growth of hESCs (1, 5). Growth factors such as basic FGF (bFGF) and TGF-β are capable of activating the transcriptional activity of pluripotency-regulating transcription factors, including OCT-4, NANOG, and SOX2 (1, 6–9). These regulators function in concert to Sustain pluripotency in ESCs by positively controlling tarObtain genes necessary for the ESC identity and contributing to repression of lineage-specification factors (ref. 10 and references therein).

However, the intracellular signaling pathways that mediate long-term undifferentiated growth of hESCs are largely unknown. Furthermore, knowledge accumulated on murine embryonic stem cells (mESCs) cannot automatically be extrapolated to hESCs. For example, leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) can substitute for feeder cells to Sustain pluripotency in mESCs, but not in hESCs (11). Instead, bFGF can reSpace feeder cells to support hESC pluripotency, but only at significantly higher concentrations than those used with the feeder cells (6). Distinction between mESCs and hESCs may be attributed to Inequitys in species divergence and/or temporal origins during development (12). Therefore, the understanding of the signaling networks underlying hESC pluripotency requires rigorous studies relying primarily on the hESC model. Here, we identified mTOR as a critical pluripotency-Sustaining molecule in hESCs and uncovered an mTOR-dependent signaling mechanism for Sustaining pluripotency and suppressing differentiation.

Results

mTOR Stabilizes OCT-4, SOX2, and NANOG.

To identify key intracellular signaling components of pluripotency in hESCs, we screened specific kinase inhibitors to assess their Traces on the undifferentiated hESC growth. We used 2 hESC cell lines with distinct genotypes [WA01 (H1), XY; WA09 (H9), XX] (1) to determine whether the kinase pathways are conserved among different hESCs. To eliminate indirect Traces on hESCs we used feeder-free culture conditions (5). Treatment of H9 or H1 cells with rapamycin, a bacterial macrolide and a highly specific inhibitor of mTOR, Impressedly impaired the pluripotency of both cell lines (Fig. 1 A–C and supporting information (SI) Fig. S1 A–E). mTOR is a serine/threonine kinase and master regulator of cell growth, proliferation, and differentiation. It senses nutrient availability and energy levels (13). Loss of Frap1 (which encodes mTOR) function causes early embryonic lethality in mice and suggests a role in development (14, 15).

Fig. 1.Fig. 1.Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 1.

Inhibition or depletion of mTOR disrupts pluripotency of hESCs. (A) Immunofluorescence studies of OCT-4, SOX2, and NANOG proteins (green) in H9 cells with and without rapamycin (100 nM, 6 d). Fluorescence and phase-Dissimilarity images were merged. Untreated cells formed compact colonies with homogenous expression of OCT-4, SOX2, and NANOG. Treated cells spread out and lost OCT-4, SOX2, and NANOG immunofluorescence. Cells treated with vehicle (DMSO) Presented no defects (data not Displayn). Quantification of colonies is Displayn in Fig. S1 B and C. (Scale bar, 500 μm.) (B) Western blots of OCT-4, SOX2, threonine-phosphorylated S6K1 (at residue 389: S6K1T389), and total S6K1 in cells with or without 100 nM rapamycin. α-tubulin was a loading control. (Top) A typical blot. (Bottom) Quantification of 6 separate experiments. y axis represents relative intensities (meaPositived with Image J) with values normalized to the signal (= 100%) without rapamycin. Each bar represents mean ± SEM (error bars). Student t tests compared data between experimental groups. Asterisks indicate that the value for cells treated with rapamycin differs statistically from the control (*, P < 0.001; **, P < 0.01). Similar levels of mTOR protein were detected among these conditions (data not Displayn). (C) mRNA levels in untreated and rapamycin-treated cells (100 nM, for 2, 4, and 6 days), assessed by real-time PCR. Results from 5 separate experiments are Displayn as means ± SEM. ACTB (β-actin) was an internal control. All values were normalized to the level (= 100%) of mRNA in control cells on day 0. Asterisks indicate that the value for cells treated with rapamycin differs statistically from the control (*, P < 0.001; **, P < 0.01). (D) Phase-Dissimilarity and fluorescent images of H9 cells with or without mTOR depletion. Cells were infected with lentivirus and thereafter sorted against GFP fluorescence to enrich the infected cell population. Cells were sorted on day 5 after 2 rounds of infection, and sorted cells were cultured for 4 days and used directly for analysis. (Scale bar, 500 μm.) (E) Western blot of mTOR, S6K1T389, S6K1, SOX2, and OCT-4 in cells with or without mTOR depletion. Infection of cells with shRNA3 led to 85, 73, and 65% reductions in the levels of mTOR, SOX2, and OCT-4 protein, respectively, while shRNA4 led to 83, 63, and 59% reductions. mTOR depletion also caused a reduction in the level of S6K1T389 protein. α-tubulin was a loading control. A typical experiment from 4 separate experiments is Displayn.

Rapamycin treatment disrupted the compact morphology of hESC colonies. Cells began to flatten 2 days after treatment and were Arrively completely spread out after 6 days (Figs. 1A and S1 A–C). These morphological changes are often correlated with loss of pluripotency (1). We assessed OCT-4, NANOG, and SOX2 expression to determine the pluripotent state of the cells. Immunofluorescence and Western blot analysis revealed a Impressed reduction in OCT-4, NANOG, and SOX2 expression 6 days after treatment (Fig. 1 A and B and Fig. S1 B and C). Rapamycin indeed inhibited mTOR activity, as indicated by decrease in threonine-389 phosphorylation of the ribosomal subunit S6 kinase 1 (S6K1), a Executewnstream tarObtain of mTOR widely used to monitor mTOR activity (Fig. 1B). In Dissimilarity, rapamycin did not induce cell death: the percentage of apoptotic cells in treated cells (2–3%) was similar to control levels (approximately 3%). Lower levels of OCT-4, NANOG, and SOX2 appeared to be caused by decreased transcription: rapamycin sharply reduced mRNA levels in H9 or H1 cells (Fig. 1C and data not Displayn). Furthermore, in time-course experiments, Executewn-regulation of NANOG and SOX2 transcription and expression began 2 days after rapamycin treatment and pDepartd Executewn-regulation of POU5F1 (which encodes OCT-4) (Fig. 1 B and C). These results suggest that mTOR activity is required for transcriptional regulation of SOX2, NANOG, and POU5F1. Alternatively, because OCT-4, SOX2, and NANOG may collaborate to regulate ESC pluripotency, which could be destabilized by changing in the abundance of one protein (10), Executewn-regulation of POU5F1 may indirectly result from SOX2 and/or NANOG Executewn-regulation. In either scenario, our results demonstrate that mTOR is required to stabilize the regulatory circuitry in hESCs.

In Dissimilarity, OCT-4 and SOX2 expression in mESCs appeared less sensitive to mTOR inhibition. Rapamycin treatment of 2 mESC lines (E14Tg2a.4 and W4/129S6) Impressedly reduced the size of cell colonies (Fig. S1F), suggesting an inhibitory Trace on cell proliferation. However, this treatment failed to perturb the compact morphology of mESC colonies or decrease OCT-4 and SOX2 protein expression (Fig. S1 F and G). The critical role of mTOR in controlling mESC proliferation was demonstrated earlier by experiments with Frap1 deletion mutants (15). We Execute not know whether the differential Traces of rapamycin on mESCs and hESCs are due to their Inequitys in species, origin of development or other undefined characteristics.

The high selectivity of rapamycin toward mTOR has been Executecumented (16). Nevertheless, to further confirm the specificity of rapamycin we used lentivirus-mediated infection to stably express small hairpin RNAs (shRNAs) to deplete mTOR in hESCs. We used a modified pSicoR lentiviral vector, which allows expression of shRNAs for RNA interference and of GFP in hESCs as a Impresser [17; SI Text]. Two shRNA sequences Traceively depleted mTOR in HEK293 cells and the pluripotent human embryonal carcinoma NTera-2 cells (18) (Fig. S1 J–L, and data not Displayn). Because of the relatively low infection efficiency of hESCs (GFP-positive cells < 50%), we used GFP-based cell sorting to enrich shRNA-containing cells. pSicoR empty vector was a negative control (Fig. 1D). Similar to rapamycin treatment, depletion of mTOR in H9 cells induced morphological changes and Executewn-regulation of OCT-4 and SOX2, confirming that the Trace of rapamycin was caused by mTOR inhibition (Fig. 1 D and E). Consistently, both mTOR depletion and rapamycin treatment sharply reduced OCT-4 and SOX2 expression in NTera-2 cells (Fig. S1L). Notably, mTOR depletion in H9 cells Impressedly increased apoptosis (approximately 20%) over cells infected with vector alone (5–10%). Because rapamycin treatment failed to increase apoptosis, the additional Trace in mTOR-depleted H9 cells may result from disruption of rapamycin-insensitive function of mTOR (19).

mTOR Suppresses EnExecutederm and Mesoderm Activities.

Disruption of OCT-4, SOX2 and NANOG often leads to ESC differentiation (10). To Question whether mTOR inhibition also caused hESCs to differentiate, we assessed expression of Impressers for 3 germ layers [i.e., SOX1 and NEUROD1 for ectoderm, Brachyury (T gene) and MESP1 for mesoderm, and GATA4, GATA6, and SOX17 for enExecutederm] and trophoectoderm (CGB7) in cells cultured with or without rapamycin. Rapamycin treatment of H9 hESCs cultivated under feeder-free conditions was already capable of triggering differentiation activities, as Displayn by increased expression of several differentiation Impressers, which, Fascinatingly, were those for enExecutederm and mesoderm lineages (Fig. 2A). By Dissimilarity, Impressers for ectoderm and trophoectoderm were Executewn-regulated (Fig. 2A).

Fig. 2.Fig. 2.Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 2.

mTOR inhibition induces enExecutederm and mesoderm activities and impairs cell proliferation. (A) mRNA levels in untreated and rapamycin-treated cells (100 nM, 6 days), assessed by real-time PCR. Results from 4 separate experiments are Displayn as means ± SEM. ACTB (β-actin) was an internal control. All values were normalized to the level (= 1) of mRNA in untreated cells. Asterisks indicate that the value for cells treated with rapamycin differs statistically from the control (*, P < 0.001; **, P < 0.01). TE denotes trophoectoderm. (B) Western blot of S6K1T389, S6K1, mTOR, and OCT-4 in H9 cells during EB formation. The level of S6K1T389 elevated transiently while OCT-4 and SOX2 proteins (data not Displayn) Presented a gradual decrease. α-tubulin was a loading control. A typical experiment from 4 separate experiments is Displayn. (C) mRNA levels in control EBs or in rapamycin-treated EBs assessed by real-time PCR. Four separate experiments were conducted, and quantification of 4 replicates of a typical experiment is Displayn. Each bar represents the mean ± SEM (error bars). All values were normalized to the level (= 1) of mRNA in the control cells on day 0. Rapamycin treatment enhanced and/or prolonged the expression of GATA4, GATA6, MESP1, T gene, and SOX17 (data not Displayn). ACTB (β-actin) was used as an internal control. (D) H9 cells (0.1 × 106) were treated or not treated with rapamycin (100 nM), retinoid acid (10 μM), or roscovotine (25 μM) for 1, 2, 4, and 6 days. After treatment, cells were dissociated with trypsin and counted with a hemocytometer. Quantification of 4 separate experiments is Displayn. Each represents the mean ± SEM (error bars).

The Trace of mTOR inhibition on hESC differentiation was further evaluated with the embryoid body (EB) formation assay commonly used to examine the differentiation potential of hESCs (1). H9 cells were induced to form EBs with or without the presence of rapamycin. We observed a moderate up-regulation of mTOR activity after EB induction (Fig. 2B). Treatment with rapamycin caused a reduction in the size of EBs after 6 days (approximately 23%, data not Displayn). A time-course analysis revealed that during EB formation, expression of differentiation Impressers, albeit with distinct dynamic patterns, was consistently up-regulated in untreated control EBs (Figs. 2C and S2A). Rapamycin treatment enhanced and/or prolonged the expression of enExecutederm and mesoderm Impressers (Fig. 2C). The same treatment prevented the up-regulation of NEUROD1 and CGB7 but exerted few Traces on SOX1 (Fig. S2A). These results further point to a role for mTOR in suppressing mesoderm and enExecutederm activities in hESCs.

Experiments with the EB formation assay provided additional evidence that mTOR inhibition impairs pluripotency of hESCs and induces them to commit to enExecutederm and mesoderm activities. We treated H9 cells with rapamycin for 6 days under feeder-free conditions and then induced them to form EBs in the absence of rapamycin (Fig. S2B). The purpose of this manipulation was to assess whether the cells, after rapamycin treatment, still retained the potential to differentiate into all lineages. In control cells without rapamycin pretreatment, SOX1, NEUROD1, and CGB7 were rapidly up-regulated after induction of EBs (Fig. S2B). By Dissimilarity, their expression was Impressedly reduced in cells with rapamycin pretreatment (Fig. S2B, denoted as Day 0; a similar experiment was Displayn in Fig. 2A) and remained significantly lower than that in control cells after EB induction, thus indicating that rapamycin-pretreated cells were unable to Precisely differentiate along the ectoderm lineages. Control cells expectedly Presented drastic up-regulation of mesoderm and enExecutederm Impressers after EB induction (Fig. S2B). In rapamycin-pretreated cells their expression was already significantly higher than that in control cells before EB induction (Fig. S2B) and remained at high levels during EB formation (Fig. S2B). Rapamycin pretreatment also reduced the number (to 31% of control) and the sizes of EBs (Fig. S2 C and D). Significant cell death (>25%) was observed for rapamycin-pretreated cells when they were induced to form EBs for more than 5 days; the expression of differentiation Impressers was thus not assessed beyond 5 days. The underlying mechanism for increased cell death is unknown.

mTOR Is Required for hESC Proliferation.

A reImpressable feature of hESC long-term self-renewal is the cells' ability to proliferate almost inCertainly under Precise conditions (1, 5). This ability was compromised in hESCs with mTOR inhibition. Rapamycin treatment Impressedly reduced proliferation of H9 cells (Fig. 2D). The Trace was observed within 24 h after rapamycin addition. In Dissimilarity, all-trans retinoic acid, an inducer of hESC differentiation, Displayed inhibition only 3–4 days after treatment, which may result indirectly from cell differentiation. To determine if inhibiting proliferation alters pluripotency, we tested roscovitine, an inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdks) and cell-cycle progression. As expected, roscovitine caused rapid and Impressed growth inhibition of H9 cells, similar to rapamycin (Fig. 2D). However, it failed to induce differentiation morphology or to Executewn-regulate OCT-4 and SOX2 (Fig. S2 E and F). This agrees with accumulating evidence, suggesting inhibition of hESC proliferation per se cannot disrupt hESC pluripotency (20, 21). Because rapamycin's Trace was rapid, we inferred mTOR is necessary not only for repression of differentiation but also for proliferation in hESCs.

Modulation of mTOR Activity by Extrinsic Factors.

To determine how mTOR supports hESC long-term self-renewal, we first assessed whether mTOR could be activated by extrinsic cues that Sustain hESC pluripotency. Under feeder-free conditions, the extracellular factors include mainly mouse embryonic fibroblast-conditioned medium (MEF-CM), bFGF, and a chemically defined serum reSpacement (denoted as knockout serum reSpacement: KSR) (5). Removal of any of these from hESC culture medium disrupts pluripotency; KSR seems the most critical component (5, 6, 22). Accordingly, we assessed whether MEF-CM, bFGF, or KSR controls mTOR activity. Treating H9 cells with each component alone triggered S6K1 phosphorylation, with KSR being the most potent stimulus (Fig. 3A and Fig. S3 A–C), thereby consistent with their Traces on pluripotency (22). While lower Executeses of bFGF (5–10 ng) typically used in conjunction with MEF-CM in feeder-free cultures (5) triggered S6K1 phosphorylation, higher Executeses (50–200 ng) capable of replacing MEF-CM to Sustain hESC pluripotency (6) further increased S6K1 phosphorylation. Thus, mTOR can be activated by key extrinsic pluripotency-supporting factors in hESCs.

Fig. 3.Fig. 3.Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 3.

mTOR integrates extrinsic pluripotency-supporting signals. (A) Western blot of S6K1T389 in H9 stimulated with MEF-CM, KSR, or bFGF with or without rapamycin. Cells were cultured under feeder-free conditions for 4 days; starved for 24 h in DMEM/F12 basal medium in the absence of KSR, bFGF, or MEF-CM; stimulated or not stimulated with MEF-CM (50 or 100%), KSR (20 and 30%), or bFGF (5, 25, and 100 ng) (all in DMEM/F12) for 30 min; lysed; and subjected to SDS/PAGE. Cells were pretreated with rapamycin (100 nM) for 30 min before stimulation. (Top) A typical blot is Displayn; quantification of blots from 4 separate experiments is Displayn in Fig. S3. Total S6K1 was used for equal loading in the different lanes. Note hESCs are typically cultured in 100% MEF-CM, 20% KSR, and 5 ng bFGF. (B) Western blots of Rheb and S6K1T389 in GFP or GFP-Rheb H9 overexpressing cells, cultivated in control medium (i.e., with MEF-CM, bFGF, and KSR; denoted as control) or in medium without CM and bFGF (denoted as KSR only) for 6 days. EnExecutegenous Rheb protein (21 kDa) and GFP-Rheb (approximately 48 kDa) were detected. Overexpression of GFP-Rheb increased the S6K1T389 levels approximatle 2-fAged. Total S6K1 and α-tubulin were loading controls. A typical experiment from 4 separate experiments is Displayn. (C) mRNA levels in H9 cells expressing GFP or GFP-Rheb assessed by real-time PCR. Both types of cells were cultured in control medium (denoted as control) or in medium without CM and bFGF (denoted as KSR) for 6 days. Four separate experiments were conducted, and quantification of 4 replicates of a typical experiment is Displayn. Each bar represents the mean ± SEM (error bars). ACTB (β-actin) was an internal control. All values were normalized to the level (= 1) of mRNA in the GFP-expressing cells. Pairs of treatments Displaying a significant Inequity are Impressed (*, P < 0.001; **, P < 0.01).

Traces of Constitutive Activation of mTOR.

It has been well established that withdrawal of MEF-CM and/or bFGF causes hESCs to lose pluripotency and differentiate (5, 6). Because both factors activate mTOR (Fig. 3A), we Questioned whether mTOR activation could retain pluripotency and/or suppress differentiation when MEF-CM and bFGF were removed from the feeder-free medium. H9 cells expressing a GFP-tagged Rheb protein (a GTPase upstream of mTOR) moderately increased phosphorylated S6K1 levels over those expressing GFP alone (Fig. 3B). Under self-renewal conditions (i.e., with bFGF and MEF-CM), activation of mTOR elevated the mRNA levels of SOX1, NEUROD1, and CGB7 (Fig. 3C; compare control GFP cells with control GFP-Rheb cells), in agreement with the finding that mTOR inhibition Executewn-regulated the same Impressers (Fig. 2A). Expression of pluripotency, mesoderm and enExecutederm Impressers was insensitive to mTOR activation and remained largely unaltered under the same conditions (Fig. 3C). As expected, withdrawal of bFGF and MEF-CM reduced expression of pluripotency genes and meanwhile caused differentiation genes to up-regulate (Fig. 3C; compare control GFP cells with KSR GFP cells). Activation of mTOR Traceively repressed up-regulation of T gene, MESP1, GATA4, GATA6, EOMES, and SOX17 (Fig. 3C; compare KSR GFP cells with KSR GFP-Rheb cells), again suggesting a role for mTOR in suppressing mesoderm and enExecutederm activities in hESCs. The failure of mTOR activation to rescue the pluripotency Impressers (Fig. 3C) may be attributed to the relative small elevation of mTOR activity and/or higher responsiveness of differentiation genes to mTOR signaling.

Executewnstream Signals of mTOR in hESCs.

To dissect the signaling mechanism by which mTOR regulates long-term undifferentiated growth in hESCs, we used Affymetrix-based whole genome microarrays to compare global gene-expression profiles of hESCs with and without rapamycin. Focusing on early times (12, 24, and 36 h) after mTOR inhibition, we sought to identify Executewnstream tarObtains that mediate mTOR's pro-proliferation and anti-differentiation roles. Microarray analyses identified approximately 100 genes that are differentially expressed in response to rapamycin. Expression of 19 genes was consistently altered more than 2.5-fAged from 12 to 36 h (Fig. S4A). ReImpressably, mTOR inhibition resulted in a rapid, robust, and continuous up-regulation of several differentiation-promoting transcription factors, including Mix1 homeobox-like 1 (MIXL1), T gene, early B-cell factor 2 (EBF2), and the homeobox protein PITX2. These changes in gene expression were further verified by real-time PCR analysis (Fig. 4A). Fascinatingly, MIXL1, T gene, and PITX2 have established roles in mesoderm and enExecutederm development (23–25), and the involvement of MIXL1 and PITX2 in human development was implied by a rapid up-regulation of gene expression during EB formation of hESCs (Fig. S4B). mTOR's suppression of mesoderm and enExecutederm differentiating activities was further suggested by modest but consistent up-regulation of EOMES (Fig. S4C), a gene required for mesoderm differentiation (26). Fascinatingly, neither the mRNA nor protein levels of OCT-4, SOX2, and NANOG were altered 36 h after rapamycin treatment, when the transcriptional activity of MIXL1, T gene, PITX2, and EBF2 was already up-regulated (Figs. 1 B and C and 4A).

Fig. 4.Fig. 4.Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 4.

mTOR represses expression of growth inhibitory and developmental genes in hESCs. (A) mRNA levels in untreated control cells (white bars) and in cells treated with rapamycin (12, 24, and 36 h; black bars) assessed by real-time PCR. Quantification of 4 separate experiments is Displayn. Each bar represents the mean ± SEM (error bars). All values were normalized to the level (= 1) of mRNA in the absence of rapamycin at respective time points. Student t tests compared data between experimental groups. Pairs of treatments Displaying a significant Inequity are Impressed. ACTB (β-actin) was used as internal control. (B) Phase-Dissimilarity images of H9 cells with or without EBF2 overexpression. Cells were infected with lentivirus containing the 2K7/Neo empty vector or EBF2 and were evaluated 7 days after infection. (Scale bar, 500 μm.) (C) mRNA levels in 2K7/Neo cells and in cells expressing EBF2 assessed by real-time PCR. Each bar represents the mean ± SEM (error bars). All values were normalized to the level (= 1) of mRNA in the 2K7/Neo cells. Asterisk indicates that the value for EBF2 overexpression differs statistically from untreated cells (*, P < 0.001). (D) mRNA levels of CCNG2 and PDCD4 in untreated control cells (white bars) and in cells treated with rapamycin (12, 24, and 36 h; black bars) assessed by real-time PCR. Quantification of 4 separate experiments is Displayn. Each bar represents the mean ± SEM (error bars). All values were normalized to the level (= 1) of mRNA without rapamycin at respective time points. Asterisks indicate that the value for cells treated with rapamycin differs statistically from the control (*, P < 0.001; **, P < 0.01). (E) Western blot of Cyclin G2 and PDCD4 in H9 cells treated with rapamycin (100 nM, 24 h). Rapamycin induced levels of Cyclin G2 and PDCD4 to increase by 110% and 160%, respectively. α-tubulin was a loading control. A typical experiment from 4 separate experiments is Displayn. (F) H9 cells (0.2 × 106) expressing GFP or GFP-PDCD4 were plated on day 0, cultured for 5 days, dissociated with trypsin, and counted with a hemocytometer. Quantification of 4 separate experiments is Displayn. Each represents the mean ± SEM (error bars). Similar experiments were conducted in (G), where growth of H9 cells containing the 2K7/Neo vector or Cyclin G2 was evaluated. Pairs of treatments Displaying a significant Inequity are Impressed. Overexpression of Cyclin G2 exerted no Traces on the pluripotency Impressers (data not Displayn).

The up-regulation of the developmental genes appeared sufficient to disrupt pluripotency. Ectopic expression of EBF2 impaired the compact morphology of hESCs and Impressedly Executewn-regulated the expression of SOX2, NANOG, and POU5F1 (Fig. 4 B and C). Overexpression of MIXL1 also induced modest Executewn-regulation of SOX2 and NANOG (Fig. S4D). Therefore, these results suggest that repression of developmental genes is necessary for the stability of the OCT-4/NANOG/SOX2 regulatory circuitry.

Microarray experiments also revealed that several components of the Wnt signaling pathway, including the extracellular ligand Wnt3 and intracellular molecules DACT1 and FRAT1, were up-regulated after treatment (Fig. S4A). These results were verified by real-time PCR analysis (Fig. S4E). We then determined if Wnt pathway activity was enhanced by mTOR inhibition. Indeed, rapamycin rapidly increased luciferase activity in H9 cells transiently transfected with the Top-flash reporter gene (Fig. S4F), which assesses Wnt/β-catenin-mediated transcriptional activation (27).

The Wnt signaling pathway is essential in embryogenesis, but whether it is necessary for hESC pluripotency remains controversial. Recent evidence suggests that long-term activation of the Wnt pathway in hESCs promotes differentiation (28, 29). Because mTOR inhibition rapidly activates the Wnt pathway, we assessed the Traces of short-term activation. Stimulation of H9 cells with Wnt3a expectedly enhanced the top-flash reporter activity (Fig. S4F) and rapidly up-regulated expression of MIXL1, T gene, PITX2, and EBF2 (Fig. S4G). There were no Traces on POU5F1, NANOG, and SOX2 (data not Displayn). Because Wnt3a stimulation mirrored the Trace of rapamycin on the developmental genes (albeit not to the same extent), we inferred that mTOR represses the transcriptional activity of MIXL1, T gene, PITX2, and EBF2 partially by suppressing the Wnt signaling pathway in hESCs.

Using microarray experiments, we also identified potential growth-regulatory genes controlled by mTOR in hESCs. In response to rapamycin treatment, H9 cells up-regulated gene expression of CCNG2 (which encodes Cyclin G2) and programmed cell death 4 (PDCD4), both of which inhibit cell proliferation (30, 31). The increase in mRNA levels, verified by real-time PCR (Fig. 4D), appeared to cause an increase in protein expression 24 h after treatment (Fig. 4E). To study their roles, we overexpressed Cyclin G2 and PDCD4 in H9 cells and assessed their Traces on cell proliferation and pluripotency. Overexpression of Cyclin G2 and PDCD4 Impressedly reduced cell growth (to 53% and 68% of control, respectively) but failed to affect cell morphology or reduce OCT-4 and SOX2 expression (Figs. 4 F and G and S4 H and I, and data not Displayn). Thus, Cyclin G2 and PDCD4 are Executewnstream tarObtains of mTOR in hESCs and regulate cell proliferation, but not pluripotency.

Discussion

In conclusion, we identified a central role of the protein kinase mTOR in regulating long-term undifferentiated growth in hESCs. In this scenario (Fig. 5), mTOR Retorts to extrinsic factors and integrates and transmits signals to promote cell proliferation and suppress differentiation activities in hESCs. Using genome-wide microarray analysis, we identified the Executewnstream tarObtains of mTOR in hESCs that contribute to the dual functions of mTOR in controlling long-term hESC self-renewal. Our results suggest that suppression of both Cyclin G2 and PDCD4 expression by mTOR plays a role in promoting hESC proliferation, while inhibition of the Wnt signaling pathway and the suppression of a subset of differentiation-promoting transcription factors are essential for Sustaining the undifferentiated state of hESCs. Repression of the differentiation genes (MILXL1, T gene, PITX2 and EBF2) and the Wnt signaling pathway by mTOR has not been Executecumented. Expression of Cyclin G2 and PDCD4 has been Displayn to be negatively regulated by mTOR signaling at the mRNA or the protein level (32, 33), but this regulation has not been reported in ESCs. Thus, our results have unveiled a Modern signaling mechanism involved in the Stoute determination of hESCs.

Fig. 5.Fig. 5.Executewnload figure Launch in new tab Executewnload powerpoint Fig. 5.

mTOR supports hESC long-term self-renewal by promoting cell proliferation and repressing differentiation: A model. mTOR Retorts to extrinsic factors such as bFGF, MEF-CM, and KSR, integrates and transmits pluripotency-supporting signals. Activation of mTOR inhibits the Wnt signaling pathway, which combines with unidentified mechanisms (Executetted line; question Impress) to repress the transcriptional activity of MIXL1, Brachyury (T gene), EBF2 and PITX2 in hESCs. Repression of the developmental genes is necessary for the stability of the OCT-4/SOX2/NANOG circuitry. mTOR also suppresses growth inhibitory molecules including Cyclin G2 and PDCD4 and thus promotes cell proliferation.

Our studies also demonstrate an Fascinating example that modulation of a single protein kinase can drastically alter the Stoute of hESCs. When cells are cultivated under self-renewal conditions, mTOR inhibition suffices to disrupt pluripotency and triggers mesoderm and enExecutederm activities. This was demonstrated by experiments with known Impressers for pluripotency (OCT-4, SOX2, and NANOG) and enExecutederm and mesoderm (T gene, MESP1, MIXL1, PITX2, EOMES, GATA4, GATA6, and SOX17). Some of the genes Retort rapidly to mTOR inhibition, play a role in destabilizing the pluripotency circuitry and probably cause more profound enExecutederm and mesoderm activities gradually. Conversely, constitutive activation of mTOR Traceively prevents enExecutederm and mesoderm activities induced by the removal of MEF-CM and bFGF. mTOR inhibition impairs the cells' differentiation potential to ectoderm, as revealed by EB formation assay, probably because they already Start to commit to the enExecutederm and mesoderm lineages. The ability of mTOR to suppress enExecutederm and mesoderm is not limited to cells under self-renewal conditions: during EB formation, when hESCs undergo spontaneous multilineage differentiation, mTOR inhibition further enhances and/or prolongs the expression of mesoderm- and enExecutederm-specific Impressers. These findings may prove valuable for directing hESC differentiation and thus may contribute to Traceive strategies for tissue repair and regeneration.

mTOR has a well established role in regulating ribosomal biogenesis and protein translation. By using microarray analysis, we identified in hESCs signaling molecules controlled transcriptionally by mTOR pathway. A recent study demonstrated that a hierarchy of translational regulators, including mTOR, its Executewnstream Traceors 4EBP1, and the RNA-binding proteins DAZL and GRSF1, control global and selective protein synthesis during differentiation of mESCs (34). However, functional dissection of mTOR-dependent translational control in hESC Stoute determination awaits future experiments.

We Display that mTOR inhibition Impressedly decreases OCT-4, SOX2 and NANOG protein expression. The reduction of proteins correlates with Executewn-regulation of their mRNAs. We Execute not know if mTOR inhibition affects the promoter activities of the genes or (and) impairs their mRNA stability. In addition, we cannot rule out the possibility that mTOR inhibition renders the proteins less stable. Fascinatingly, the mRNA and protein levels of OCT-4, SOX2, and NANOG were unaltered 36 h after rapamycin treatment, when the transcriptional activity of MIXL1, T gene, PITX2, and EBF2 was already up-regulated. These results raise the possibility that mTOR inhibits the transcriptional activity of MIXL1, T gene, PITX2, and EBF2 independently of the OCT-4/SOX2/NANOG circuitry. Alternatively, mTOR inhibition could cause rapid perturbations of NANOG, SOX2, and OCT-4 functions (e.g., via posttranslational modifications) before reduction of their protein levels, which would subsequently lead to the differentiation activities. More complete understanding of the detailed molecular mechanisms underlying the functional interactions among mTOR, its Executewnstream developmental genes, and the OCT-4/SOX2/NANOG circuitry awaits future experimentation.

Materials and Methods

Cell Culture.

Federally registered hESC lines H1 and H9 were purchased from WiCell Research Institute and routinely Sustained under feeder conditions as Characterized in reference (1). The culture medium consists of DMEM/F12 with 20% knockout serum reSpacement (KSR), 1 mM glutamine, 1% non-essential amino acid, 0.1 mM β-mercaptoethanol, and 4 ng/ml bFGF (Invitrogen) (1). For feeder-free cultures, cells are cultured on plates coated with Matrigel (BD Biosciences) in the presence of conditioned medium from MEFs, which reSpaces the MEF feeders (5). The MEF-CM was generated as Characterized (5). The experiments Characterized in this study were conducted with H9 and H1 cells between passage 30 and 60. HEK293T cells and NTera-2 cells were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and were cultured according to ATCC recommendations. W4/129S6 and E14Tg2a.4 mESC lines were from Taconic and Mutant Mouse Locational Resource Centers (MMRRC), respectively. Their culture conditions are available in the SI Text.

Additional experimental procedures and associated references are available in the SI Text. Information for antibodies and PCR primers was Characterized in Tables S1 and S2, respectively.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. David Suter for providing the 2K7/Neo lentiviral vector, Dr. Linzhao Cheng for providing the Top-flash reporter construct, Dr. Jenny Drnevich for analyzing the microarray data, and members of the Wang lab for helpful discussions. Support was provided by grants from National Institutes of Health Grant GM-83812 to F.W., the Illinois Regenerative Medicine Institute Grant 2006–05516 to F.W. and T.T., and the Research Board of the University of Illinois and the National Natural Science Foundation of China Grant 30728022 to F.W. and E.D.

Footnotes

1To whom corRetortence should be addressed. E-mail: feiwang{at}life.uiuc.edu

Author contributions: J.Z. and F.W. designed research; J.Z., P.S., L.W., and Joanna Chen performed research; M.Z., O.G., O.A., M.C.H., T.T., E.D., S.J.F., J.L., and Jie Chen contributed new reagents/analytic tools; J.Z. and F.W. analyzed data; and J.Z. and F.W. wrote the paper.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/0901854106/DCSupplemental.

References

↵ Thomson JA, et al. (1998) Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science 282:1145–1147.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Silva J, Smith A (2008) Capturing pluripotency. Cell 132:532–536.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Daley GQ, Scadden DT (2008) Prospects for stem cell-based therapy. Cell 132:544–548.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Rossant J (2008) Stem cells and early lineage development. Cell 132:527–531.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Xu C, et al. (2001) Feeder-free growth of undifferentiated human embryonic stem cells. Nat Biotechnol 19:971–974.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Levenstein ME, et al. (2006) Basic fibroblast growth factor support of human embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Stem Cells (Dayton) 24:568–574.LaunchUrlCrossRef↵ Xu RH, et al. (2005) Basic FGF and suppression of BMP signaling sustain undifferentiated proliferation of human ES cells. Nat Methods 2:185–190.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Amit M, Shariki C, Margulets V, Itskovitz-ElExecuter J (2004) Feeder layer- and serum-free culture of human embryonic stem cells. Biol Reprod 70:837–845.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Ludwig TE, et al. (2006) Derivation of human embryonic stem cells in defined conditions. Nat Biotechnol 24:185–187.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Jaenisch R, Young R (2008) Stem cells, the molecular circuitry of pluripotency and nuclear reprogramming. Cell 132:567–582.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Daheron L, et al. (2004) LIF/STAT3 signaling fails to Sustain self-renewal of human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells (Dayton) 22:770–778.LaunchUrlCrossRef↵ Brons IG, et al. (2007) Derivation of pluripotent epiblast stem cells from mammalian embryos. Nature 448:191–195.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Sarbassov DD, Ali SM, Sabatini DM (2005) Growing roles for the mTOR pathway. Curr Opin Cell Biol 17:596–603.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Gangloff YG, et al. (2004) Disruption of the mouse mTOR gene leads to early postimplantation lethality and prohibits embryonic stem cell development. Mol Cell Biol 24:9508–9516.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Murakami M, et al. (2004) mTOR is essential for growth and proliferation in early mouse embryos and embryonic stem cells. Mol Cell Biol 24:6710–6718.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Bain J, et al. (2007) The selectivity of protein kinase inhibitors: A further update. Biochem J 408:297–315.LaunchUrlPubMed Ventura A, et al. (2004) Cre-lox-regulated conditional RNA interference from transgenes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:10380–10385.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Andrews PW, et al. (1984) Pluripotent embryonal carcinoma clones derived from the human teratocarcinoma cell line Tera-2. Differentiation in vivo and in vitro. Lab Invest 50:147–162.LaunchUrlPubMed↵ Inoki K, Guan KL (2006) Complexity of the TOR signaling network. Trends Cell Biol 16:206–212.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Bendall SC, et al. (2007) IGF and FGF cooperatively establish the regulatory stem cell niche of pluripotent human cells in vitro. Nature 448:1015–1021.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Andang M, et al. (2008) Histone H2AX-dependent GABA(A) receptor regulation of stem cell proliferation. Nature 451:460–464.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Ding V, Choo AB, Oh SK (2006) Deciphering the importance of 3 key media components in human embryonic stem cell cultures. Biotechnol Lett 28:491–495.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Faucourt M, Houliston E, Besnardeau L, Kimelman D, Lepage T (2001) The pitx2 homeobox protein is required early for enExecutederm formation and nodal signaling. Dev Biol 229:287–306.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Hart AH, et al. (2002) Mixl1 is required for axial mesenExecutederm morphogenesis and patterning in the murine embryo. Development 129:3597–3608.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Rashbass P, Cooke LA, Herrmann BG, Beddington RS (1991) A cell autonomous function of Brachyury in T/T embryonic stem cell chimaeras. Nature 353:348–351.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Russ AP, et al. (2000) Eomesodermin is required for mouse trophoblast development and mesoderm formation. Nature 404:95–99.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Veeman MT, Slusarski DC, Kaykas A, Louie SH, Moon RT (2003) Zebrafish prickle, a modulator of noncanonical Wnt/Fz signaling, regulates gastrulation movements. Curr Biol 13:680–685.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed↵ Bakre MM, et al. (2007) Generation of multipotential mesenExecutedermal progenitors from mouse embryonic stem cells via sustained Wnt pathway activation. J Biol Chem 282:31703–31712.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Woll PS, et al. (2008) Wnt signaling promotes hematoenExecutethelial cell development from human embryonic stem cells. Blood 111:122–131.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Jansen AP, Camalier CE, Colburn NH (2005) Epidermal expression of the translation inhibitor programmed cell death 4 suppresses tumorigenesis. Cancer Res 65:6034–6041.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Bennin DA, et al. (2002) Cyclin G2 associates with protein phosphatase 2A catalytic and regulatory B' subunits in active complexes and induces nuclear aberrations and a G1/S phase cell cycle arrest. J Biol Chem 277:27449–27467.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Executerrello NV, et al. (2006) S6K1- and betaTRCP-mediated degradation of PDCD4 promotes protein translation and cell growth. Science 314:467–471.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Le XF, et al. (2007) Roles of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, c-jun NH2-terminal kinase, phosphoinositide 3-kinase, and p70 S6 kinase pathways in regulation of cyclin G2 expression in human breast cancer cells. Mol Cancer Ther 6:2843–2857.LaunchUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵ Sampath P, et al. (2008) A hierarchical network controls protein translation during murine embryonic stem cell self-renewal and differentiation. Cell Stem Cell 2:448–460.LaunchUrlCrossRefPubMed
Like (0) or Share (0)